LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Didn’t see your post and basically said the same thing. Brilliant minds…

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 am

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 am

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am

sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 am

A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.

Ha! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?

"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.

Crawley isn't going to High Point

A quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.

Since you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?

Norcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.

06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.

Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?

DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:39 am

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 am

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 am

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am

sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 am

A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.

Ha! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?

"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.

Crawley isn't going to High Point

A quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.

Since you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?

Norcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.

06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.

Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?

I have never called for Crawley’s dismissal. Have never called for PM’s dismissal either.

Crawley is a fine young coach, but he is still developing in that role. PM is a very good coach.

Tulip Ball is a legitimate thing to critique, but that doesn’t mean the coaches should go. Hardly the case.

DocBarrister

steel_hop wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:16 am

DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:39 am

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 am

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 am

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am

sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 am

A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.

Ha! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?

"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.

Crawley isn't going to High Point

A quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.

Since you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?

Norcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.

06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.

Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?

I have never called for Crawley’s dismissal. Have never called for PM’s dismissal either.

Crawley is a fine young coach, but he is still developing in that role. PM is a very good coach.

Tulip Ball is a legitimate thing to critique, but that doesn’t mean the coaches should go. Hardly the case.

DocBarrister

Wasn't me either. I wanted them to push more on the pace of play because the offense was struggling and it made sense to try to get a cheap goal or two if they could. They also desperately tried to get a freshman to step up (most of the offensive players tailed off the 2nd half of the season) and it just didn't happen. It it what it is.

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 3:27 pm May have been wrong about Crawley. Sounds like he is in the mix for High Point along with several others.

stevemc wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:26 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 3:27 pm May have been wrong about Crawley. Sounds like he is in the mix for High Point along with several others.

Please expand if you can. Other names you've heard floated?

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:32 pm

stevemc wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:26 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 3:27 pm May have been wrong about Crawley. Sounds like he is in the mix for High Point along with several others.

Please expand if you can. Other names you've heard floated?

Fiefs, Bernhardt, and Richards

getitdone wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 2:53 pm No way is Crawley the problem. Bar set way too low. Need to look higher. Some HC's have trouble delegating. PM is one of them.

Slim wrote: ↑Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:50 am Didn't Richards get the Marquette job?

LaxPundit07 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 7:36 pm

BigTom5 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:32 pm

stevemc wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 4:26 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 3:27 pm May have been wrong about Crawley. Sounds like he is in the mix for High Point along with several others.

Please expand if you can. Other names you've heard floated?

Fiefs, Bernhardt, and Richards

Paul Richards would be a home run for HPU.

sguy9 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:25 am

Didn’t see your post and basically said the same thing. Brilliant minds…

I've been call many things, brilliant aint one of them..

But, I do agree. This is a really good fit, no idea how much he loves the north though.

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 2:13 pm Wow Unterstein from UNC to Duke

AreaLax wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 2:47 pm

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2024 2:13 pm Wow Unterstein from UNC to Duke

Is it? Didn’t he get demoted when Preto came on board at UNC.