I've been call many things, brilliant aint one of them..Didn’t see your post and basically said the same thing. Brilliant minds…
But, I do agree. This is a really good fit, no idea how much he loves the north though.
I've been call many things, brilliant aint one of them..Didn’t see your post and basically said the same thing. Brilliant minds…
I have never called for Crawley’s dismissal. Have never called for PM’s dismissal either.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pmNorcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 amSince you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 amA quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 amHa! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.
Crawley isn't going to High Point
Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?
Wasn't me either. I wanted them to push more on the pace of play because the offense was struggling and it made sense to try to get a cheap goal or two if they could. They also desperately tried to get a freshman to step up (most of the offensive players tailed off the 2nd half of the season) and it just didn't happen. It it what it is.DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:39 amI have never called for Crawley’s dismissal. Have never called for PM’s dismissal either.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pmNorcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 amSince you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 amA quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 amHa! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.
Crawley isn't going to High Point
Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?
Crawley is a fine young coach, but he is still developing in that role. PM is a very good coach.
Tulip Ball is a legitimate thing to critique, but that doesn’t mean the coaches should go. Hardly the case.
DocBarrister
Maybe it was docs comment here --> more than likely a frustrating comment in the qf's: viewtopic.php?p=554172&hilit=milliman#p554172steel_hop wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 9:16 amWasn't me either. I wanted them to push more on the pace of play because the offense was struggling and it made sense to try to get a cheap goal or two if they could. They also desperately tried to get a freshman to step up (most of the offensive players tailed off the 2nd half of the season) and it just didn't happen. It it what it is.DocBarrister wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 8:39 amI have never called for Crawley’s dismissal. Have never called for PM’s dismissal either.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:26 pm06 and Doc are the two I was referring to. Norcal did not call to fire Crawley. "HopDonk" is a troll who joined the forum immediately after the quarterfinals, posted three times, and hasn't been seen since. Who knows if he's actually a real fan or not.BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 12:21 pmNorcalhop, HopDonk, and your boy jhu06 voice it the loudest, but a lot more than that are clearly unhappy with the “tulip” offense.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:57 amSince you've done the research already, who specifically was saying they need to get rid of him, besides the two resident failsons?BigTom5 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 11:48 amA quick scroll through the Johns Hopkins thread shows plenty of Hop centric posters expressing this sentiment. Might not be the majority’s opinion but a healthy bunch.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:50 am"A decent amount of Hopkins fans" = two guys on an anonymous lacrosse forum. It's not a popular opinion.sguy9 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:46 amHa! But seriously, how can this be true? He was a great player there, and the team showed ridiculous improvement this year. Is Crowley the reason? Or would they really be better off without him?A decent amount of Hopkins fans would be willing to drive Crawley down to High Point, so the AD could save some money on relocation costs if he goes that route.
Crawley isn't going to High Point
Are the "healthy bunch" of Hopkins fans who want to personally drive Crawley to another job in the room with us?
Crawley is a fine young coach, but he is still developing in that role. PM is a very good coach.
Tulip Ball is a legitimate thing to critique, but that doesn’t mean the coaches should go. Hardly the case.
DocBarrister
That was Jake Richard. Paul Richards is a Richmond assistant. I had the same thought at first though.
I agree. I'm encouraged by all the names but what Richards has done at Richmond seems most translatable to HPU.LaxPundit07 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 12, 2024 7:36 pmPaul Richards would be a home run for HPU.
Do you drink much or did you in college? Maybe that's the connection!
He did.