All things CoronaVirus

[tech37]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

[MDlaxfan76]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Sure looks like a fraudulent study to me.
Darn students actually analyzing...

AND I just don't buy that there would be resistance to recommending something that could actually be proven effective and safe. But gotta prove it.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Sure looks like a fraudulent study to me.
Darn students actually analyzing...

AND I just don't buy that there would be resistance to recommending something that could actually be proven effective and safe. But gotta prove it.

It’s just typos and stuff. No big deal.

[jhu72]

White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates. The 7 states are Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama.

Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.

[Typical Lax Dad]

White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates.

Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.

He’s just virtue signaling.

[youthathletics]

White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates.

Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.

.....he's a physician! and does not know to slow down and rest his mind and body.

[Typical Lax Dad]

https://www.sciencealert.com/ivermectin ... 19-science

Maybe proper clinical trials will determine that Ivermectin is an effective therapeutic. We need all the help we can get….In the meantime the hurdle is higher than hope and a prayer, fortunately.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06 ... unraveling

[wgdsr]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

[jhu72]

https://www.sciencealert.com/ivermectin ... 19-science

Maybe proper clinical trials will determine that Ivermectin is an effective therapeutic. We need all the help we can get….In the meantime the hurdle is higher than hope and a prayer, fortunately.


https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06 ... unraveling
Not exactly surprising

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

[SCLaxAttack]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

And I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.

Freedom!

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

And I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.

Freedom!

No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!

What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.

[wgdsr]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

i was in? really? love to see that post.

the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

i was in? really? love to see that post.

the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.

I may have recalled incorrectly then.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:

https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide

[jhu72]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

And I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.

Freedom!

No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!

What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.

... that's because the ground was softer then.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

And I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.

Freedom!

No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!

What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.

... that's because the ground was softer then.

[wgdsr]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

i was in? really? love to see that post.

the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.

I may have recalled incorrectly then.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:

https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide

thanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.

the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?

but of course you knew that already.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

i was in? really? love to see that post.

the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.

I may have recalled incorrectly then.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:

https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide

thanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.

the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?

but of course you knew that already.

Wait you believed the WHO when they said masks are not helpful but now you don't believe them?

[wgdsr]

Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.

That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.

kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.

Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1

like with masks.

Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.

https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/

i was in? really? love to see that post.

the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.

I may have recalled incorrectly then.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:

https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide

thanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.

the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?

but of course you knew that already.

Wait you believed the WHO when they said masks are not helpful but now you don't believe them?

where did i say i believe anything they say? i'm not a scientist.
and where did i say they said they weren't helpful? maybe use my words?
and you should read up on their guidance if you want to walk down this road.