kismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
All things CoronaVirus
Re: All things CoronaVirus
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27187
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Sure looks like a fraudulent study to me.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
Darn students actually analyzing...
AND I just don't buy that there would be resistance to recommending something that could actually be proven effective and safe. But gotta prove it.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Uh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
“I wish you would!”
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
It’s just typos and stuff. No big deal.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:39 amSure looks like a fraudulent study to me.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
Darn students actually analyzing...
AND I just don't buy that there would be resistance to recommending something that could actually be proven effective and safe. But gotta prove it.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates. The 7 states are Florida, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi and Alabama.
Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.
Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.
Last edited by jhu72 on Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
STAND AGAINST FASCISM
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
He’s just virtue signaling.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:05 pm White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates.
Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.
“I wish you would!”
- youthathletics
- Posts: 15965
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
.....he's a physician! and does not know to slow down and rest his mind and body.jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:05 pm White House presser noted Florida and Texas combined are now accounting for 1/3 of all new cases. 7 states account for over 50% of all new cases, all with low vaxx rates.
Just saw interview with a Texas doctor fighting COVID who had been on duty for over 450 straight days. Finally took 3 days off to marry off his daughter a few weeks ago. Even the US military in war time has a more liberal leave policy.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
~Livy
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
https://www.sciencealert.com/ivermectin ... 19-science
Maybe proper clinical trials will determine that Ivermectin is an effective therapeutic. We need all the help we can get….In the meantime the hurdle is higher than hope and a prayer, fortunately.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06 ... unraveling
Maybe proper clinical trials will determine that Ivermectin is an effective therapeutic. We need all the help we can get….In the meantime the hurdle is higher than hope and a prayer, fortunately.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06 ... unraveling
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
like with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 12:46 pm https://www.sciencealert.com/ivermectin ... 19-science
Maybe proper clinical trials will determine that Ivermectin is an effective therapeutic. We need all the help we can get….In the meantime the hurdle is higher than hope and a prayer, fortunately.
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06 ... unraveling
Not exactly surprising
STAND AGAINST FASCISM
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Yeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
“I wish you would!”
-
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
And I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
Freedom!
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:17 pmAnd I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
Freedom!
No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!
What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
i was in? really? love to see that post.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
I may have recalled incorrectly then.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:24 pmi was in? really? love to see that post.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:
https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide
Last edited by Typical Lax Dad on Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:38 pm, edited 3 times in total.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
... that's because the ground was softer then.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:19 pmSCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:17 pmAnd I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
Freedom!
No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!
What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.
STAND AGAINST FASCISM
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
jhu72 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:27 pm... that's because the ground was softer then.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:19 pmSCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:17 pmAnd I still can't figure out why governments allow stores to require me to wear a shirt and something on my feet when I enter their businesses.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
Freedom!
No way do I eat that steak if it’s not dry aged!
What’s wrong with dirty feet? Cavemen didn’t wear shoes and shirts.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
thanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:26 pmI may have recalled incorrectly then.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:24 pmi was in? really? love to see that post.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:
https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide
the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?
but of course you knew that already.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Wait you believed the WHO when they said masks are not helpful but now you don't believe them?wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:02 pmthanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:26 pmI may have recalled incorrectly then.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:24 pmi was in? really? love to see that post.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:
https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide
the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?
but of course you knew that already.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
where did i say i believe anything they say? i'm not a scientist.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:16 pmWait you believed the WHO when they said masks are not helpful but now you don't believe them?wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:02 pmthanks for the nature article again to reiterate my point. maybe i should start posting it.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:26 pmI may have recalled incorrectly then.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:24 pmi was in? really? love to see that post.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:10 pmYeah because nobody has ever wore a mask to cut down on disease spread and wearing a mask might be dangerous…. You have a lot to lose by wearing a mask. It keeps the germs in and makes COVID-19 worse….you a were in on HCL if I recall correctly.wgdsr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 1:04 pmlike with masks.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:46 amUh huh….but still promoting it. How about wait until a legitimate study has been conducted.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:28 amkismet's Nature link and the podcast I linked, both refer to the same "flawed" study the Guardian cited weeks ago, genius.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:05 amThat’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... 064397?p=1
https://www.eatthis.com/face-masks-side-effects/
the who went 5 months questioning the efficacy or prudence of masks in the community. then signed off with "what can it hurt?". what was their problem with all this evidence, i wonder? should we bring them up on charges or just malign them on social media?
ftr, i'd absolutely love for that tact to be proven with any real probability, given our leaning on it.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
Idiots at WHO don’t know if masks helps to reduce disease spread:
https://www.who.int/news/item/03-03-202 ... -worldwide
the who made their reasoning clear monthly. shortage of ppe was one and there were others. like they didn't have any idea if would be helpful in community. for a number of reasons. still don't?
but of course you knew that already.
and where did i say they said they weren't helpful? maybe use my words?
and you should read up on their guidance if you want to walk down this road.