any idea if they ever explained why masks are mandatory and what they said?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:22 pm https://twitter.com/meidastouch/status/ ... 58688?s=21
All things CoronaVirus
Re: All things CoronaVirus
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
No. A tenor saxophone player that I follow on Twitter had this in his feed. I don’t look for this crap on social media….(other than when I am looking for something funny on YouTube).wgdsr wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:25 pmany idea if they ever explained why masks are mandatory and what they said?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 10:22 pm https://twitter.com/meidastouch/status/ ... 58688?s=21
He’s excellent.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Maybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Nature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly (so far, wrongly, IMO), the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Last edited by tech37 on Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Is it Weinstein again?tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly, the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
So, are you saying the potentially flawed data should just be ignored and fulll steam ahead?tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly, the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Why would the medical establishment be motivated to not not endorse a potential effective treatment?
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:01 amSo, are you saying the potentially flawed data should just be ignored and fulll steam ahead?tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly (so far, wrongly IMO), the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
The podcast explains this. You can either listen or not.
Why would the medical establishment be motivated to not not endorse a potential effective treatment?
I have posted my opinions on here weeks/months ago in regards. Sorry you missed it. Watch out for Delta kismet...
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Because Weinstein says so?Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:01 amSo, are you saying the potentially flawed data should just be ignored and fulll steam ahead?tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly, the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Why would the medical establishment be motivated to not not endorse a potential effective treatment?
“I wish you would!”
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27187
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
It's circular.
If you buy the notion that all researchers who are in the vast majority mainstream of peer-reviewed science are corrupted by Big Pharma and Big Health, then of course they, as the peer-reviewers, will reject studies that don't conform with what makes the most money for Big Pharma and Big Health, and the only honest researchers are those who submit studies that flout 'orthodoxy' regardless of whether the studies are 'flawed' or not repeatable by others...
It's all corrupt...
If you buy the notion that all researchers who are in the vast majority mainstream of peer-reviewed science are corrupted by Big Pharma and Big Health, then of course they, as the peer-reviewers, will reject studies that don't conform with what makes the most money for Big Pharma and Big Health, and the only honest researchers are those who submit studies that flout 'orthodoxy' regardless of whether the studies are 'flawed' or not repeatable by others...
It's all corrupt...
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Just clicked on podcast. As I predicted Brett Weinstein.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:42 am It's circular.
If you buy the notion that all researchers who are in the vast majority mainstream of peer-reviewed science are corrupted by Big Pharma and Big Health, then of course they, as the peer-reviewers, will reject studies that don't conform with what makes the most money for Big Pharma and Big Health, and the only honest researchers are those who submit studies that flout 'orthodoxy' regardless of whether the studies are 'flawed' or not repeatable by others...
It's all corrupt...
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
OK. I listened. It appears to me that these are HIS opinions (and some research on him indicates he has lots of opinions that are also not backed up by reviewed studies and facts). Starting to look a lot like another hydroxychloroquine fantasy IMHO.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly (so far, wrongly, IMO), the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Why should anyone believe him as opposed to anyone else with a contrary view that are supported by data?
Lastly, he makes no credible case why we should all ignore the medical establishment view many of which are supported with data. I could not find any specific data that supports his hypothesis.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
You just don’t get it. Why listen to the “so called experts” when you can listen to Weinstein. People that don’t work in your field are just as qualified to do your job as you are.Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:54 amOK. I listened. It appears to me that these are HIS opinions (and some research on him indicates he has lots of opinions that are also not backed up by reviewed studies and facts). Starting to look a lot like another hydroxychloroquine fantasy IMHO.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly (so far, wrongly, IMO), the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Why should anyone believe him as opposed to anyone else with a contrary view that are supported by data?
Lastly, he makes no credible case why we should all ignore the medical establishment view many of which are supported with data. I could not find any specific data that supports his hypothesis.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:54 amOK. I listened. It appears to me that these are HIS opinions (and some research on him indicates he has lots of opinions that are also not backed up by reviewed studies and facts). Starting to look a lot like another hydroxychloroquine fantasy IMHO.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:53 amNature is a good source, no doubt...Kismet wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:27 amMaybe check the data again firsttech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:32 am Fauci stating the obvious...
https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectious ... definition
Asked whether a $3.2 billion program will be enough to incentivize drugmakers, Fauci hinted that he anticipates more funding down the line.
"Nothing convinces the source of resources to give more resources than success," he said. "If we come up with success, I think we'll get more."
That's great but before you spend all that time and money... in the meantime, how about approving Ivermectin off-label?
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/is ... day-675612
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermec ... vermectin/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w
"Flawed Invermectin preprint highlights challenges of COVID drug studies
The study’s withdrawal from a preprint platform deals a blow to the anti-parasite drug’s chances as a COVID treatment, researchers say."
If you're open to it, have the time, patience, and interest, listen to this podcast that gives a different perspective specifically dealing with this "flawed" study:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/d ... 0529189232
Rightly or wrongly (so far, wrongly, IMO), the medical establishment is hell bent on blocking the use of Ivermectin regarding Covid. Any claims in the media should be considered in that context.
Fine, and that's your humble opinion. That's a standard reaction...not surprised.
Why should anyone believe him as opposed to anyone else with a contrary view that are supported by data?
You shouldn't of course (based on this small sample) unless you've been following him and the people he has interviewed/debated over the past 18 months. You would have a lot of catching up to do if interested in order to gain a more informed opinion.
Lastly, he makes no credible case why we should all ignore the medical establishment view many of which are supported with data. I could not find any specific data that supports his hypothesis.
Not sure what you consider "data." Who's data, what data? If you casually believe Fauci and the medical bureaucracy without considering other POVs, go for it... that's your prerogative of course.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27187
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
All "opinions" are equal...
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... l-concerns
But Weinstein and Joe Rogan are all over it. Get a good study and hopefully it is an effective therapeutic.
Last edited by Typical Lax Dad on Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
“I wish you would!”
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Try to follow dude.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:49 amhttps://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... l-concerns
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
You “following” Weinstein is enough following for all of us, Dude.tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:55 amTry to follow dude.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:49 amhttps://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... l-concerns
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/2 ... lisher?amp
The U.S. FDA has received reports of COVID-19 patients who have required medical support and been hospitalized after self-medicating with Ivermectin.
“I wish you would!”
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 27187
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
-
- Posts: 34257
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: All things CoronaVirus
That’s meaningless. Just their opinion. You have to go back and follow all of the Bret Weinstein podcasts to follow it. Drug approval protocols are rigged.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 11:03 am Yikes, looks like outright fraud.
The Guardian's description of the specific "ethical" issues is very revealing...ouch.
“I wish you would!”