tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 9:55 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 9:41 am
tech37 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 8:56 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2023 9:56 pm
Again, call Rettig in...while you're at it, call Wray...and hey, call Barr...nope, you guys don't want to hear
they've got nuthin on Joe.
Just Hunter.
This is clearly the
same impaired, arrogant, sort of thinking/narrative the Dems rode in 2016... "Hillary will never lose."
Oh Joe can lose. The smear job, totally unsubstantiated, could work.
Not surprisingly you missed the point.
It has nothing to do with Joe winning or losing but everything to do with, in the face of mounting evidence, the blind belief by the Dems and you that there is nothing to Biden corruption, which most certainly includes Ol Joe.
Hey, it's exactly the point of what you wrote. If you mean something different, make it clear.
Remember that I didn't vote for Hillary because I felt she represented a corrupt way of thinking and the 'arrogance' that she was entitled to the job. And it would have been my first vote ever for a Dem for President, requiring a high standard that even Obama didn't reach given the alternatives from the GOP. I knew my vote didn't matter to whether she'd win my state of MD, but I can fairly say that I'd have voted for her over the much, much worse corruption that was and is Trump if my state was contested.
I also don't believe that there was ever evidence that she committed a crime, much less a serious crime. I did think she was unethical in accepting exorbitant speaking fees when she was known to be in consideration as a candidate, but even the erasure of emails was not illegal far as I could tell. I thought she was sloppy in security in using a personal server, albeit I understand her paranoia, though that's not a sufficient excuse...but I don't see criminal. But not worthy of my support as a crossover voter for the first time. She didn't get my (now former Republican) wife's vote either, though she'd voted for Obama in 2008 (she knew Romney from her days together at Bain so he had her support).
I see Biden as at worse unwilling to reprimand or distance himself from his son during a time when he was obviously in very bad shape, I see absolutely nothing criminal by dad as VP or POTUS. No evidence that as VP Joe changed policy or took or sought bribes. And I see all sorts of ethical choices made as POTUS to not fire the prosecutor, not stop the prosecution, etc. No pardon. All within his power as POTUS....in huge contrast to Trump's behaviors. Not perfect, but not remotely in the same ballpark of corruption that has infested the GOP nearly entirely top to bottom. Disgustingly so to this anti-MAGA voter.
That said, if there actually was clear evidence of Joe's criminality that would stand up to scrutiny in court, I'll be the first to withdraw my support and actively call for an alternative (to be clear, that alternative ain't Trump). But it ain't there. there is no "mounting evidence" outside of right wing fever dreams designed to distract from Trump's 4 cases, 91 indictments, with tremendous granular detail presented, testimony, texts, recordings.
And I think Rettig, Wray, and Barr, all Republicans appointed by Trump would say they saw nothing criminal about Joe if under oath. And so will Weiss eventually, I think...but I'm entirely open to that being proven wrong.
apparently you
want to believe the fever dreams...
But hey, call for Rettig, Wray, and Barr to testify under oath if you think they won't explode those fever dreams...