All things CoronaVirus

[tech37]

You reap what you sow - the measles vaccine has been in use for decades and almost eradicated the disease - but now lumped in with the current mRNA vaccine mania and this is what we're in for sadly.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/measles ... 37190.html

Tech, Kramer, YA and that Russell dude have been helping to lead the charge in this relapse.

Why do you lie to make your point? You're a liar. I was vaccinated against Covid.

Find one post of mine that shows I'm anti-vaxx or against any vaccine outside of the Moderna or Pfizer mNRA Covid vaccines.

Stop lying.

He doesn't lie.....he told us that.

I don’t lie. It doesn’t mean I can’t be mistaken. You have told us you are a man of faith. You don’t act like most folks of faith that I know. I don’t equate you to a false prophet though.

So are you mistaken in your recent comment?

No. My comment is that his posts contributes to the Anti-vaxx sentiment….Jesus Boy.

Jesus knows you are trying bs us right now....you can take it up with him.....little devil.

Anyway, the volume of the one sided posts eventually reflects a position. This is how the “anti-vaxx” sentiment is disseminated. Again, you, Kram, Russell Dude and Tech, for instance contribute to it by spreading these skeptical articles all the time. You were on “Ethical Skeptics” Jock before Endwokeness.

"One sided"? What the F are you talking about... no sh!t. The science and issues surrounding it wasn't and still isn't settled... it's slowly getting there. Your side believes it's settled but you're personally afraid of the truth

[Typical Lax Dad]

You reap what you sow - the measles vaccine has been in use for decades and almost eradicated the disease - but now lumped in with the current mRNA vaccine mania and this is what we're in for sadly.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/measles ... 37190.html

Tech, Kramer, YA and that Russell dude have been helping to lead the charge in this relapse.

Why do you lie to make your point? You're a liar. I was vaccinated against Covid.

Find one post of mine that shows I'm anti-vaxx or against any vaccine outside of the Moderna or Pfizer mNRA Covid vaccines.

Stop lying.

He doesn't lie.....he told us that.

I don’t lie. It doesn’t mean I can’t be mistaken. You have told us you are a man of faith. You don’t act like most folks of faith that I know. I don’t equate you to a false prophet though.

So are you mistaken in your recent comment?

No. My comment is that his posts contributes to the Anti-vaxx sentiment….Jesus Boy.

Jesus knows you are trying bs us right now....you can take it up with him.....little devil.

Anyway, the volume of the one sided posts eventually reflects a position. This is how the “anti-vaxx” sentiment is disseminated. Again, you, Kram, Russell Dude and Tech, for instance contribute to it by spreading these skeptical articles all the time. You were on “Ethical Skeptics” Jock before Endwokeness.

"One sided"? What the F are you talking about... no sh!t. The science wasn't and still isn't settled... it's slowly getting there. Your side believes it's settled but you're personally afraid of the truth

Un huh. You do you. That’s what I am talking about.

[tech37]

You reap what you sow - the measles vaccine has been in use for decades and almost eradicated the disease - but now lumped in with the current mRNA vaccine mania and this is what we're in for sadly.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/measles ... 37190.html

Tech, Kramer, YA and that Russell dude have been helping to lead the charge in this relapse.

Why do you lie to make your point? You're a liar. I was vaccinated against Covid.

Find one post of mine that shows I'm anti-vaxx or against any vaccine outside of the Moderna or Pfizer mNRA Covid vaccines.

Stop lying.

He doesn't lie.....he told us that.

I don’t lie. It doesn’t mean I can’t be mistaken. You have told us you are a man of faith. You don’t act like most folks of faith that I know. I don’t equate you to a false prophet though.

So are you mistaken in your recent comment?

No. My comment is that his posts contributes to the Anti-vaxx sentiment….Jesus Boy.

Jesus knows you are trying bs us right now....you can take it up with him.....little devil.

Anyway, the volume of the one sided posts eventually reflects a position. This is how the “anti-vaxx” sentiment is disseminated. Again, you, Kram, Russell Dude and Tech, for instance contribute to it by spreading these skeptical articles all the time. You were on “Ethical Skeptics” Jock before Endwokeness.

"One sided"? What the F are you talking about... no sh!t. The science wasn't and still isn't settled... it's slowly getting there. Your side believes it's settled but you're personally afraid of the truth

Un huh. You do you. That’s what I am talking about.

"Un huh." Exceptional reply...

Fine. When I do me, don't lie about it. Capisce?

[Farfromgeneva]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

[Typical Lax Dad]

You reap what you sow - the measles vaccine has been in use for decades and almost eradicated the disease - but now lumped in with the current mRNA vaccine mania and this is what we're in for sadly.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/measles ... 37190.html

Tech, Kramer, YA and that Russell dude have been helping to lead the charge in this relapse.

Why do you lie to make your point? You're a liar. I was vaccinated against Covid.

Find one post of mine that shows I'm anti-vaxx or against any vaccine outside of the Moderna or Pfizer mNRA Covid vaccines.

Stop lying.

He doesn't lie.....he told us that.

I don’t lie. It doesn’t mean I can’t be mistaken. You have told us you are a man of faith. You don’t act like most folks of faith that I know. I don’t equate you to a false prophet though.

So are you mistaken in your recent comment?

No. My comment is that his posts contributes to the Anti-vaxx sentiment….Jesus Boy.

Jesus knows you are trying bs us right now....you can take it up with him.....little devil.

Anyway, the volume of the one sided posts eventually reflects a position. This is how the “anti-vaxx” sentiment is disseminated. Again, you, Kram, Russell Dude and Tech, for instance contribute to it by spreading these skeptical articles all the time. You were on “Ethical Skeptics” Jock before Endwokeness.

"One sided"? What the F are you talking about... no sh!t. The science wasn't and still isn't settled... it's slowly getting there. Your side believes it's settled but you're personally afraid of the truth

Un huh. You do you. That’s what I am talking about.

"Un huh." Exceptional reply...

Fine. When I do me, don't lie about it. Capisce?

You are contributing to the anti vaxx problem….capisce? It could be useful idiot stuff or it could be intentional. Only you would really know.

[Typical Lax Dad]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

[tech37]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

[Typical Lax Dad]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

This article was well after my post BTW.

[tech37]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

[Typical Lax Dad]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

You didn’t answer my question. You and the crew contribute to the anti-vaxx problem. Was that your only post on the topic over these past few years, BTW?
ICYMI:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

[tech37]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

You didn’t answer my question. You and the crew contribute to the anti-vaxx problem. Was that your only post on the topic over these past few years, BTW?
ICYMI:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

Why dodge? Watch the link I posted to the podcast yesterday, it's easy to find. I'd really be interested in what you think. Scientist is a Princeton guy too. What are you afraid of?

[Typical Lax Dad]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

You didn’t answer my question. You and the crew contribute to the anti-vaxx problem. Was that your only post on the topic over these past few years, BTW?
ICYMI:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

Why dodge? Watch the link I posted to the podcast yesterday, it's easy to find. I'd really be interested in what you think. Scientist is a Princeton guy too. What are you afraid of?

I asked you a question to figure out what it was. If it was the guy talking about gain of function I watched maybe 15 minutes of it. Are you talking about that or something else? I saw it was part of a longer interview?

Obviously you are not wearing your thinking cap so before answering this question, I suggest you put it on…..here is the question. From this day forward, whenever someone from Princeton says something, you won’t question it and will be inclined to believe it? Think hard…..capisce? Meanwhile in the real world…

https://apple.news/A0anZReX5QSWKtVNW7UgQAw

[tech37]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

You didn’t answer my question. You and the crew contribute to the anti-vaxx problem. Was that your only post on the topic over these past few years, BTW?
ICYMI:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

Why dodge? Watch the link I posted to the podcast yesterday, it's easy to find. I'd really be interested in what you think. Scientist is a Princeton guy too. What are you afraid of?

I asked you a question to figure out what it was. If it was the guy talking about gain of function I watched maybe 15 minutes of it. Are you talking about that or something else? I saw it was part of a longer interview?

Obviously you are not wearing your thinking cap so before answering this question, I suggest you put it on…..here is the question. From this day forward, whenever someone from Princeton says something, you won’t question it and will be inclined to believe it? Think hard…..capisce? Meanwhile in the real world…

https://apple.news/A0anZReX5QSWKtVNW7UgQAw

Okay keep playing dumb...you're afraid to watch it and comment honestly.

As to mRNA tech in general, it has incredible potential. I hope it works for any number of diseases, especially cancer. But there needs to be time for proper testing to reduce vaccine damage and the trials need to be conducted by independent, unbiased groups and not Big Pharma itself.

And certainly the healthcare establishment needs to confirm they actually work before releasing it on the public, unlike the Covid vaccines.

[Farfromgeneva]

“Libel” (in this venue), “liar”, “afraid of the truth”. “What are you afraid of?”

And talks turd about others around here with the arrogance that could fill an army of hot air balloons. I love it.

[Typical Lax Dad]

You’re personally afraid of the truth.

Then “you’re a liar”. As if he know what’s in the other persons head. The hubris and nonsense but it’s what one should expect there.

Did you notice the “your side is afraid of the TRUTH” line?….what assumptions are imbedded in that statement?

That's not what I wrote but...whatever.

Did you watch the entire podcast sport? If so, you don't see any validity to what the Princeton PhD is explaining?

Was that the guy talking about Gain of Function or something else? There are so many links to guys on the internet I can’t remember them all. If it’s GoF, in case you don’t remember, which I am sure you don’t, I am pretty sure I was the first person to post about Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Lab. My brother is a chemist and a bit of a conspiracy guy so he told me about it. Well before people like you ran across it. Capisce?

Okay so you didn't watch and yet libel people over something you didn't even see. What a guy.

You didn’t answer my question. You and the crew contribute to the anti-vaxx problem. Was that your only post on the topic over these past few years, BTW?
ICYMI:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234839/

Why dodge? Watch the link I posted to the podcast yesterday, it's easy to find. I'd really be interested in what you think. Scientist is a Princeton guy too. What are you afraid of?

I asked you a question to figure out what it was. If it was the guy talking about gain of function I watched maybe 15 minutes of it. Are you talking about that or something else? I saw it was part of a longer interview?

Obviously you are not wearing your thinking cap so before answering this question, I suggest you put it on…..here is the question. From this day forward, whenever someone from Princeton says something, you won’t question it and will be inclined to believe it? Think hard…..capisce? Meanwhile in the real world…

https://apple.news/A0anZReX5QSWKtVNW7UgQAw

Okay keep playing dumb...you're afraid to watch it and comment honestly.

As to mRNA tech in general, it has incredible potential. I hope it works for any number of diseases, especially cancer. But there needs to be time for proper testing to reduce vaccine damage and the trials need to be conducted by independent, unbiased groups and not Big Pharma itself.

And certainly the healthcare establishment needs to confirm they actually work before releasing it on the public, unlike the Covid vaccines.

You didn’t answer my question…..again….. Are you this concerned with the boner pills?

[Typical Lax Dad]

Some guys on the internet... a couple real dummies spreading misinformation

https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/sta ... 7695900809

Thanks

I watched this yesterday. Not the 2 hours but this excerpt. Did I miss the part on vaccines or do I have to watch 2 hours? If it’s the latter, I will wait for more consensus that the mRNA vaccine for covid isn’t safe and effective.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Like I said, I will wait for a consensus…..and I am still not sure of his position on vaccines….


An alternative proposal is therefore that the sites evolved via natural recombination in the wild, and that their regular spacing really is just a matter of chance. Alex Crits-Christoph, who has just completed a postdoc in microbiology at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, says there are clues which support a natural origin for these sites. He says the regions on either side of the restriction sites show similarities to some in other viruses—something that points to the natural swapping of chunks of genetic data between viruses. These patterns are “inconsistent with engineering”, he says, and concludes that the preprint is “false”. Dr Washburne concedes that natural recombination “isn’t an implausible scenario”.


The scientific method continues…..you notice I didn’t say a Hopkins guy made a claim so he is right…..

Clown

[Typical Lax Dad]

Tech is hanging his hat on this as the reason the virus was engineered and came from a lab…..Fauci and team looked into it and moved on…..

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/19/cov ... ih-emails/

Obviously Fauci was covering for the chinks.

[NattyBohChamps04]

Tech is hanging his hat on this as the reason the virus was engineered and came from a lab…..Fauci and team looked into it and moved on…..

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/19/cov ... ih-emails/

Obviously Fauci was covering for the chinks.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Tech is hanging his hat on this as the reason the virus was engineered and came from a lab…..Fauci and team looked into it and moved on…..

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/19/cov ... ih-emails/

Obviously Fauci was covering for the chinks.

I was being purposely offensive……you know….how folks say they aren’t being offensive they are just not being politically correct.