You really think Trump is going to avoid criminal liability in NY?Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:43 amnjbill wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:38 amVance can’t introduce the NYT into evidence at Trump’s criminal trial. That’s why he needs the actual tax returns.Peter Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:31 amDid you guys miss that the NY Times already posted Trump's tax returns? If Cyrus is interested, I think The Times costs $1.50 at a newsstand.jhu72 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:29 amYup. I suspect the Supremes may decide not to take this case. This farce has gone on long enough.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 07, 2020 10:23 am Mr. Vance is being rather gentle and non-political in his repeated agreements to not enforce his subpoenas while Trump's lawyers respond, allowing Trump to delay beyond the election, but he's dogged in his pursuit of justice in this case.
2021 is going to rough for the Trump family and business.
The press has given much attention to the tax returns, themselves, but the real meat is going to be in the communications between Trump and his accountants which are also covered by the subpoena. Thar’s gold in them thar hills.
You do know that Trump has been a resident of NY State for his entire life, agitating some serious powers there, all of whom called in favors to the NY AG to 'get him'? And that he has a battalion of lawyers and accountants sign off on his returns? And that he has in all likelihood been under permanent audit by tax bureaucrats who would have loved nothing more than to catch him in a criminal act of tax non-compliance?
Are you guys even aware of how insane you sound?
Don’t bet on it.
BTW, the communications with the accountant may be where the real proof of guilt lies. The accountant requires the client to confirm that such and such are accurate statements. The client then confirms. The confirmations then become a noose.
What do you think Michael Cohen‘s testimony will be?