So, would it not make sense to allow this sort of action taken during a pandemic?6ftstick wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 4:13 pmDid South Korea Violate Civil Liberties?DocBarrister wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 4:03 pmSouth Koreans never stupidly relied on one source for test kits like the Trump administration did. The South Korean government gathered much of industry together at a train station and ordered them to come up with test kits, which they did in little over a week.youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Apr 19, 2020 9:45 am Anyone care to retract blaming Trump on the Test kit delay...and guess what it's not a fox news link, going to have to go to plan b or c this time?
Contamination at CDC lab delayed rollout of coronavirus tests
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/conta ... r-BB12Q90W
#OrangeManNotBad
That is the difference between intelligent leadership (South Korea) and the moronic denial of Donald Trump, his administration, and his vapid supporters.
DocBarrister
South Korea’s efficiency and effectiveness included surveillance and data gathering without court warrants, compulsory testing, and mandatory isolation, which American citizens might never be on board with, Heritage’s Klingner said.
The South Korean government began testing asymptomatic people, then isolated patients even if they had only mild symptoms. U.S. officials have discouraged those without symptoms from getting tested, in large part because of a shortage of testing equipment.
South Korea changed its law to allow the government to engage in more surveillance to determine who diagnosed citizens were in contact with. The government then could access citizens’ cellphones, credit card and other financial information, and GPS data to know where they had been and who they had been with.
In some cases, the government then could quarantine not only a patient who tests positive but those who came in contact with the patient.
As the new coronavirus spread, China’s communist government was far more restrictive than the South Korea government, enforcing severe bans on speech, forcing isolation, removing people from their residences, and quarantining health care workers.
These actions did slow the spread of the coronavirus, noted Dr. Lee Gross, president of Docs 4 Patient Care, a health care advocacy group.
“You can do that in some societies and they would look favorably upon it,” Gross told The Daily Signal. “I’m not sure people would do that in the U.S.”
Gross, who practices family medicine in North Port, Florida, said that after the New York City quarantine was imposed, New Yorkers began flying into Florida. He said Florida state officials are issuing self-quarantine orders to travelers from such high-risk areas.
“People don’t follow self-stay-at-home orders,” Gross said. “Americans don’t like being told what to do.”
Moffit, the Heritage health policy expert who is a former HHS official, said South Korea’s actions could not occur at a national level in the United States and would be ineffective if tried.
“From a public health perspective, South Korea was very aggressive in isolating people rather than putting them in crowded hospitals,” he said.
Would you vote against such action, limited to the application to combat a pandemic?
It's not as if we haven't already given up every aspect of this 'privacy' for commercial benefit, would we really be opposed to the government in these exigent circumstances?
Serious question.