All things Chinese CoronaVirus

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.

How many of your friends and family members have died of the Chinese Corona Virus?

0 people
44
64%
1 person.
10
14%
2 people.
3
4%
3 people.
5
7%
More.
7
10%
 
Total votes: 69

User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:39 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:34 am
Trinity wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:18 am Hey, guess which family stands to gain financially from sales of Plaqueril?

Another reason why real presidents divest.
really?
Is there evidence of this?

EDIT: ok, yup. Good lord.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/us/p ... e=Homepage



OMG, even MDLaxfan76 falls for the imbecility. :lol:

Trinity must be a Morning Joe disciple, since I just posted about this Dem/media windup idiocy on 'Media Matters'.

Man, I feel for Libs. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life. My brain hurts from just having watched that clown show. Quick summary:

If you invest in a mutual fund or any fund, you're now responsible for the mutual fund managers' equity, bond, commodity, and cash decisions and allocations. In fact, you must now participate in all investment decisions!

("Dumb" is way too kind a word here)

:lol:
No, mutual funds are transparent to their investors about their investments.

There's zero wrong about this investment, per se.

It's the conflict of interest in touting an unproven drug, knowing that you have a financial interest in its success.
Putting people's lives in danger.

Now, if your assets are in a totally blind trust, you have no idea as to whether there's a connection to your personal interest.

Yes, "dumb" is too kind a word for it.
Last edited by MDlaxfan76 on Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

Back on Planet Earth, where mutual fund managers make their own decisions and don't simply do what their investors tell them (clearly MDLax and Trinity have never attended a mutual fund investor's annual meeting :lol: ), it appears as if the infamous drug hydroxychloroquine appears to be wildly receptive to patients, if not medical orgs.

Now it's true, most Dem partisans and media hope for no cure before the Fall, but people with their lives on the line tend to ignore the partisans among us in their quest to live. Some Dems even take the drug:

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/loc ... -covid-19/
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:43 am Back on Planet Earth, where mutual fund managers make their own decisions and don't simply do what their investors tell them (clearly MDLax and Trinity have never attended a mutual fund investor's annual meeting :lol: ), it appears as if the infamous drug hydroxychloroquine appears to be wildly receptive to patients, if not medical orgs.

Now it's true, most Dem partisans and media hope for no cure before the Fall, but people with their lives on the line tend to ignore the partisans among us in their quest to live. Some Dems even take the drug:

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/loc ... -covid-19/
One of your grossest statements to date PB. Truly gross.

Now, on the mutual fund manager making decisions, absolutely correct. But it remains a conflict of interest to know that you stand to benefit financially from touting, against the advice of the medical experts, the benefits of taking this drug, indeed prophylactically, without regard to efficacy or danger to one's health.

This is not "blind". You are simply wrong PB.
It's why any President's assets should be in a blind trust.
I think that would properly apply to Congress and top Admin officials as well, but it's true of a POTUS as the most essential such.
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:39 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:34 am
Trinity wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:18 am Hey, guess which family stands to gain financially from sales of Plaqueril?

Another reason why real presidents divest.
really?
Is there evidence of this?

EDIT: ok, yup. Good lord.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/us/p ... e=Homepage



OMG, even MDLaxfan76 falls for the imbecility. :lol:

Trinity must be a Morning Joe disciple, since I just posted about this Dem/media windup idiocy on 'Media Matters'.

Man, I feel for Libs. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life. My brain hurts from just having watched that clown show. Quick summary:

If you invest in a mutual fund or any fund, you're now responsible for the mutual fund managers' equity, bond, commodity, and cash decisions and allocations. In fact, you must now participate in all investment decisions!

("Dumb" is way too kind a word here)

:lol:
No, mutual funds are transparent to their investors about their investments.

There's zero wrong about this investment, per se.

It's the conflict of interest in touting an unproven drug, knowing that you have a financial interest in its success.
Putting people's lives in danger.

Now, if your assets are in a totally blind trust, you have no idea as to whether there's a connection to your personal interest.

Yes, "dumb" is too kind a word for it.


You mean a fund investor gets a quarterly summary of the fund's investments with a 60-day lag?!

Thanks, Captain Obvious! :lol:

Let me know the next time you call a mutual fund manager or any manager and give them a tip about non-public information! I want to know how it goes.

Trump surely called the boys at Dodge and Cox in late January and told them to switch their holdings to Sanofi! ("delusional" is too kind here, as well)

:lol:
calourie
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 5:52 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by calourie »

What is it about Trump being a constant self promoting shill that Trump apologists don't see? Let's wait for the studies being done on the drug here in NYC and elsewhere before we sstart bashing the media and the people who are skeptical of Trump's constant putting of his own self interests before everything. Trump has fought hard for every bit of media scrutiny he deserves. If the drug is truly effective then fine, and I wiil eat crow for my own septicism regarding this matter. If ineffective, it isn't a matter of not being hopeful, it is a matter of Trump' s recommendation being utterly irresponsibly self absorbed to the point of wreckless. Which side has greater TDS will be revealed.
Last edited by calourie on Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:48 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:43 am Back on Planet Earth, where mutual fund managers make their own decisions and don't simply do what their investors tell them (clearly MDLax and Trinity have never attended a mutual fund investor's annual meeting :lol: ), it appears as if the infamous drug hydroxychloroquine appears to be wildly receptive to patients, if not medical orgs.

Now it's true, most Dem partisans and media hope for no cure before the Fall, but people with their lives on the line tend to ignore the partisans among us in their quest to live. Some Dems even take the drug:

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/loc ... -covid-19/
One of your grossest statements to date PB. Truly gross.

Now, on the mutual fund manager making decisions, absolutely correct. But it remains a conflict of interest to know that you stand to benefit financially from touting, against the advice of the medical experts, the benefits of taking this drug, indeed prophylactically, without regard to efficacy or danger to one's health.

This is not "blind". You are simply wrong PB.
It's why any President's assets should be in a blind trust.
I think that would properly apply to Congress and top Admin officials as well, but it's true of a POTUS as the most essential such.


Trump 'knew'. :lol:

I thought Drumpf was an "idiot", the "dumbest president in the history of the United States"? For such a 'dumb' guy, he sure has his fingers on the pulse of every investment he's every made, including even the indirect ones, such as mutual funds he doesn't even know about.

Pure fascist! Man the barricades boys, Trump is looting your bank!

TDS, no other way to describe today's fatuity.

:lol:
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

calourie wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:53 am What is it about Trump being a constant self promoting shill that Trump apologists don't see? Let's wait for the studies being done on the drug here in NYC and elsewhere before we sstart bashing the media and the people who are skeptical of Trump's constant putting of his own self interests before everything. Trump has fought hard for every bit of media scrutiny he deserves.


Or, maybe when you can't breathe, you can take the drug and possibly recover? Or, should we just deny people all hope? Let me know the rules.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/detroi ... e-her-life
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:49 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:43 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:39 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:34 am
Trinity wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:18 am Hey, guess which family stands to gain financially from sales of Plaqueril?

Another reason why real presidents divest.
really?
Is there evidence of this?

EDIT: ok, yup. Good lord.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/us/p ... e=Homepage



OMG, even MDLaxfan76 falls for the imbecility. :lol:

Trinity must be a Morning Joe disciple, since I just posted about this Dem/media windup idiocy on 'Media Matters'.

Man, I feel for Libs. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life. My brain hurts from just having watched that clown show. Quick summary:

If you invest in a mutual fund or any fund, you're now responsible for the mutual fund managers' equity, bond, commodity, and cash decisions and allocations. In fact, you must now participate in all investment decisions!

("Dumb" is way too kind a word here)

:lol:
No, mutual funds are transparent to their investors about their investments.

There's zero wrong about this investment, per se.

It's the conflict of interest in touting an unproven drug, knowing that you have a financial interest in its success.
Putting people's lives in danger.

Now, if your assets are in a totally blind trust, you have no idea as to whether there's a connection to your personal interest.

Yes, "dumb" is too kind a word for it.


You mean a fund investor gets a quarterly summary of the fund's investments with a 60-day lag?!

Thanks, Captain Obvious! :lol:

Let me know the next time you call a mutual fund manager or any manager and give them a tip about non-public information! I want to know how it goes.

Trump surely called the boys at Dodge and Cox in late January and told them to switch their holdings to Sanofi! ("delusional" is too kind here, as well)

:lol:
Nope, such a 'tip' would be illegal. Mutual fund manager goes to jail.

The conflict of interest is yes, "obvious".

It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:55 am
calourie wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:53 am What is it about Trump being a constant self promoting shill that Trump apologists don't see? Let's wait for the studies being done on the drug here in NYC and elsewhere before we sstart bashing the media and the people who are skeptical of Trump's constant putting of his own self interests before everything. Trump has fought hard for every bit of media scrutiny he deserves.


Or, maybe when you can't breathe, you can take the drug and possibly recover? Or, should we just deny people all hope? Let me know the rules.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/detroi ... e-her-life
Hope all you want.
Don't take the drug if you have diabetes or heart disease...certainly not unless it becomes proven as a miracle drug whose benefit outweighs the medical cost.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:54 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:48 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:43 am Back on Planet Earth, where mutual fund managers make their own decisions and don't simply do what their investors tell them (clearly MDLax and Trinity have never attended a mutual fund investor's annual meeting :lol: ), it appears as if the infamous drug hydroxychloroquine appears to be wildly receptive to patients, if not medical orgs.

Now it's true, most Dem partisans and media hope for no cure before the Fall, but people with their lives on the line tend to ignore the partisans among us in their quest to live. Some Dems even take the drug:

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/loc ... -covid-19/
One of your grossest statements to date PB. Truly gross.

Now, on the mutual fund manager making decisions, absolutely correct. But it remains a conflict of interest to know that you stand to benefit financially from touting, against the advice of the medical experts, the benefits of taking this drug, indeed prophylactically, without regard to efficacy or danger to one's health.

This is not "blind". You are simply wrong PB.
It's why any President's assets should be in a blind trust.
I think that would properly apply to Congress and top Admin officials as well, but it's true of a POTUS as the most essential such.


Trump 'knew'. :lol:

I thought Drumpf was an "idiot", the "dumbest president in the history of the United States"? For such a 'dumb' guy, he sure has his fingers on the pulse of every investment he's every made, including even the indirect ones, such as mutual funds he doesn't even know about.

Pure fascist! Man the barricades boys, Trump is looting your bank!

TDS, no other way to describe today's fatuity.

:lol:
Does Trump not know his investments?
Yes he's an idiot, but no one has suggested that he doesn't pay very close attention to his personal self interest.
Financial self interest, absolutely.

Blind trust.
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:20 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?



Re-read my last post: your posts "are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago". Your post was, 'Trump is a crook, here look at the NYT'.

You fired a rearguard sniper hit and run repost of Trinity's obtuse post, 'Trump is a crook, look, he's standing to benefit from Sanofi and hydroxychloroquine' (Howard Dena scream yeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaah).

Your post wasn't about the conflict of interest; c'mon, man, be honest at least. I called you out. No one likes getting called out, I get that. But this is an internet board, so do the board a favor and explain Trump's crookedness here as he stands to benefit from his words.

I'm asking you: defend the thesis of, 'did Trump benefit from extolling hydroxychloroquine?' Don't run away from your transparent claim. C'mon. Did he?
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27086
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:28 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:20 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?



Re-read my last post: your posts "are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago". Your post was, 'Trump is a crook, here look at the NYT'.

You fired a rearguard sniper hit and run repost of Trinity's obtuse post, 'Trump is a crook, look, he's standing to benefit from Sanofi and hydroxychloroquine' (Howard Dena scream yeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaah).

Your post wasn't about the conflict of interest; c'mon, man, be honest at least. I called you out. No one likes getting called out, I get that. But this is an internet board, so do the board a favor and explain Trump's crookedness here as he stands to benefit from his words.

I'm asking you: defend the thesis of, 'did Trump benefit from extolling hydroxychloroquine?' Don't run away from your transparent claim. C'mon. Did he?
Another whiff, PB.

You can't just make up quotes and attribute them to me, nor to anyone.

I took Trinity's post to be about conflict of interest. "Another reason why real Presidents divest"

Sounded like an internet rumor to me, asked for evidence, but then swiftly found it on my own.

Conflict of interest is definitely the issue.
Blind Trust.

What, we're supposed to no longer care???

stop flailing PB.
6ftstick
Posts: 3194
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 5:19 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by 6ftstick »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:28 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:20 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?



Re-read my last post: your posts "are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago". Your post was, 'Trump is a crook, here look at the NYT'.

You fired a rearguard sniper hit and run repost of Trinity's obtuse post, 'Trump is a crook, look, he's standing to benefit from Sanofi and hydroxychloroquine' (Howard Dena scream yeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaah).

Your post wasn't about the conflict of interest; c'mon, man, be honest at least. I called you out. No one likes getting called out, I get that. But this is an internet board, so do the board a favor and explain Trump's crookedness here as he stands to benefit from his words.

I'm asking you: defend the thesis of, 'did Trump benefit from extolling hydroxychloroquine?' Don't run away from your transparent claim. C'mon. Did he?
Astonishing our friends on the left would prefer people die than use the "SNAKE OIL" Trump says is hopeful. True TDS

Dr. Oz this morning said his staff has been running big data from hospitals health insurance companies and other sources. 100 million people. They identified 11,000 rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients on a regular regimen of Hydroxychloroquine. Not one had tested positive for Coravid-19. Hes interviewing another physician (Mt.Sinai I think) today thats been prescribing the drug for decades. NOT A SINGLE side effect.
jhu72
Posts: 14456
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by jhu72 »

Peanut Butters, what ever happened to the lame ass story of yours about the Arizona lady who took chloroquine phosphate, being a democratic donor?? :lol: :lol: Not a single reputable source is reporting it. NOT EVEN FOX NEWS!!

How's the swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool?? :lol:
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
jhu72
Posts: 14456
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by jhu72 »

6ftstick wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:44 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:28 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:20 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?



Re-read my last post: your posts "are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago". Your post was, 'Trump is a crook, here look at the NYT'.

You fired a rearguard sniper hit and run repost of Trinity's obtuse post, 'Trump is a crook, look, he's standing to benefit from Sanofi and hydroxychloroquine' (Howard Dena scream yeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaah).

Your post wasn't about the conflict of interest; c'mon, man, be honest at least. I called you out. No one likes getting called out, I get that. But this is an internet board, so do the board a favor and explain Trump's crookedness here as he stands to benefit from his words.

I'm asking you: defend the thesis of, 'did Trump benefit from extolling hydroxychloroquine?' Don't run away from your transparent claim. C'mon. Did he?
Astonishing our friends on the left would prefer people die than use the "SNAKE OIL" Trump says is hopeful. True TDS

Dr. Oz this morning said his staff has been running big data from hospitals health insurance companies and other sources. 100 million people. They identified 11,000 rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients on a regular regimen of Hydroxychloroquine. Not one had tested positive for Coravid-19. Hes interviewing another physician (Mt.Sinai I think) today thats been prescribing the drug for decades. NOT A SINGLE side effect.

Another it never happened story. QUACK QUACK QUACK!

He ran BIG DATA. Really? And exactly how did he get access to this BIG DATA?? What you are claiming he did is a violation of federal privacy laws.

NEVER HAPPENED!
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
6ftstick
Posts: 3194
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 5:19 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by 6ftstick »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:55 am
6ftstick wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:44 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:28 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:20 am
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:15 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:02 am It's not the mutual fund manager's investment that is the problem, it's the actions of an elected official, in this case the most powerful such, to benefit oneself financially. There should never be even a shred of question about motivation.

Blind trust.

You're flailing PB.


Implicit in your posts, particularly the first one where you gas-lit the idiocy, is that Trump knew he would benefit financially from a drug which costs less than $1/pill and is decades off-patent. He was, how did you say, 'motivated'?!?!? Please defend that rather bold assumption!!! :lol:

Who did Trump tip off? What is his absolute dollar stake in Sanofi? Sanofi is down almost 8% over 12 months. When did his mutual fund managers invest? Do they speak with Trump? Any family members? Advisors? What is the incremental profit per pill that Sanofi can make over an off-patent pill over the next 12 months? What does that do to Trump's mutual fund? What % of the fund is Sanofi?

C'mon, you can do this. Anyone making accusations like yours (and no, they are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago), needs to come back and defend their stance. Let's hear you out!
jiminy PB, you do understand "conflict of interest", right?

Maybe not.

You at least bolded the most relevant aspect.
There should be zero question as to motivation. Ever.

But somehow you're confusing insider trading with conflict of interest. They can overlap, but they definitely aren't the same thing.

do you really not know that or are you just continuing to flail?



Re-read my last post: your posts "are not about some hypothetical discussion of conflicts of interest; that Trump ship long ago". Your post was, 'Trump is a crook, here look at the NYT'.

You fired a rearguard sniper hit and run repost of Trinity's obtuse post, 'Trump is a crook, look, he's standing to benefit from Sanofi and hydroxychloroquine' (Howard Dena scream yeeeeeeeeee-aaaaaaah).

Your post wasn't about the conflict of interest; c'mon, man, be honest at least. I called you out. No one likes getting called out, I get that. But this is an internet board, so do the board a favor and explain Trump's crookedness here as he stands to benefit from his words.

I'm asking you: defend the thesis of, 'did Trump benefit from extolling hydroxychloroquine?' Don't run away from your transparent claim. C'mon. Did he?
Astonishing our friends on the left would prefer people die than use the "SNAKE OIL" Trump says is hopeful. True TDS

Dr. Oz this morning said his staff has been running big data from hospitals health insurance companies and other sources. 100 million people. They identified 11,000 rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients on a regular regimen of Hydroxychloroquine. Not one had tested positive for Coravid-19. Hes interviewing another physician (Mt.Sinai I think) today thats been prescribing the drug for decades. NOT A SINGLE side effect.

Another it never happened story. QUACK QUACK QUACK!

He ran BIG DATA. Really? And exactly how did he get access to this BIG DATA?? What you are claiming he did is a violation of federal privacy laws.

NEVER HAPPENED!
Of course hes a quack and a liar. Of course.
User avatar
RedFromMI
Posts: 5079
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:42 pm

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by RedFromMI »

6ftstick wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:44 am

Astonishing our friends on the left would prefer people die than use the "SNAKE OIL" Trump says is hopeful. True TDS

Dr. Oz this morning said his staff has been running big data from hospitals health insurance companies and other sources. 100 million people. They identified 11,000 rheumatoid arthritis and lupus patients on a regular regimen of Hydroxychloroquine. Not one had tested positive for Coravid-19. Hes interviewing another physician (Mt.Sinai I think) today thats been prescribing the drug for decades. NOT A SINGLE side effect.
I am not calling it snake oil, but it is only "proven" to work anecdotally - which means it fails basic scientific rigor (selection bias, controlled trials, etc).

From WebMD (for hydroxychloroquine):
Side Effects

Nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea, dizziness, or headache may occur. If any of these effects last or get worse, tell your doctor or pharmacist promptly.

Remember that your doctor has prescribed this medication because he or she has judged that the benefit to you is greater than the risk of side effects. Many people using this medication do not have serious side effects.

Tell your doctor right away if you have any serious side effects, including: slow heartbeat, symptoms of heart failure (such as shortness of breath, swelling ankles/feet, unusual tiredness, unusual/sudden weight gain), mental/mood changes (such as anxiety, depression, rare thoughts of suicide, hallucinations), hearing changes (such as ringing in the ears, hearing loss), easy bruising/bleeding, signs of infection (such as sore throat that doesn't go away, fever), signs of liver disease (such as severe stomach/abdominal pain, yellowing eyes/skin, dark urine), muscle weakness, unwanted/uncontrolled movements (including tongue/face twitching), hair loss, hair/skin color changes.

This medication may cause low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). Tell your doctor right away if you develop symptoms of low blood sugar, such as sudden sweating, shaking, hunger, blurred vision, dizziness, or tingling hands/feet. If you have diabetes, be sure to check your blood sugars regularly. Your doctor may need to adjust your diabetes medication.

Get medical help right away if you have any very serious side effects, including: severe dizziness, fainting, fast/irregular heartbeat, seizures.

This medication may cause serious eye/vision problems. The risk for these side effects is increased with long-term use of this medication and with taking this medication in high doses. Get medical help right away if you have any symptoms of serious eye problems, including: sensitivity to light, vision changes (such as light flashes/streaks, blurred vision, difficulty reading, missing areas of vision).

A very serious allergic reaction to this drug is rare. However, get medical help right away if you notice any symptoms of a serious allergic reaction, including: rash, itching/swelling (especially of the face/tongue/throat), dizziness, trouble breathing.

This is not a complete list of possible side effects. If you notice other effects not listed above, contact your doctor or pharmacist.
Just to give you one example about the "reports" that no one that this particular doctor knows has come down with CV - the fact that a patient has lupus means they are at severe risk should they get it. So they may be taking a whole lot of precautions to avoid it. Kind of messes up the data...you just don't know the real answer.

There is a reason the drug approval process is hard. A lot of people's lives depend on it. Now, granted this drug has already been approved. The question is whether it is effective. That requires real data, and anecdotes are actually not useful. And more importantly, there may be other drugs out there that are more or even much more effective in treatment (assuming this drug is found to be effective). The process to see that is just as important...
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: All things Chinese CoronaVirus

Post by Peter Brown »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2020 9:48 am Peanut Butters, what ever happened to the lame ass story of yours about the Arizona lady who took chloroquine phosphate, being a democratic donor?? :lol: :lol: Not a single reputable source is reporting it. NOT EVEN FOX NEWS!!

How's the swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool?? :lol:


It's lukewarm. Yours?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arizon ... p-democrat
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”