Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

D1 Womens Lacrosse
Relax77
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:02 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Relax77 »

DMac wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2024 5:10 pm
Relax77 wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2024 4:02 pm
Fischer wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2024 3:51 pm
DMac wrote: Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:55 am It now seems obvious to me that some of you had the inside scoop on this sickening mess, so my bad and apologies for questioning your reliability. I now know the scoop from a dependable and reliable source and must say I could not be more disappointed and disgusted with Kayla. The damage you and your assistant have done to Cuse wlax is immeasurable and will be felt for many years to come. The two of you need to go find a dark little corner to hide in and hang your heads in shame. Can't even express how thoroughly disgusted and disappointed I am in you.
No, I won't lay out the details but I can't imagine it being too long before they're out. NFW the KTrainwreck is the Cuse HC next year and doesn't deserve to be.
Sorry dmac I know you’re love of the orange But sometimes we do actually know what we’re talking about!
Funny how written words can be taken. At first, I thought Dmac was being facetious there.
Would make sense but not this time.
Funny indeed how written words can
be taken. Author means one thing, reader
interprets it completely differently. Can
cause big problems, completely change the
meaning. Not in the Bible though, everything
in there has been understood as intended and
the many translations have never missed the mark.
8-)
So true. Never had that problem growing up. Conversations were had face to face. People were less likely to be out of line and much less inappropriate to a degree back then as well.
Essexfenwick
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2021 7:23 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Essexfenwick »

What’s all this cryptic stuff?

The original link doesn’t say anything. What is the accusation ?
LaxEveryDay
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2024 6:29 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by LaxEveryDay »

She had an affair with her assistant coach. She married her husband in December but started the secret relationship with her new assistant in October. She went through with her marriage and got caught by her husband with her assistant at Final Four. KT is going to get fired because she violated Syracuse policy of having a workplace relationship with her subordinate
wgdsr
Posts: 9991
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by wgdsr »

LaxEveryDay wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 7:05 pm She had an affair with her assistant coach. She married her husband in December but started the secret relationship with her new assistant in October. She went through with her marriage and got caught by her husband with her assistant at Final Four. KT is going to get fired because she violated Syracuse policy of having a workplace relationship with her subordinate
if these are all supposed to be fact based, you forgot to mention why cuse told you she was going to be fired but neglected to tell treanor.
DMac
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by DMac »

Kayla was handed the Golden Egg and threw it against the wall and shattered it all to hell.
Geezuz H, unbelievable. Ya just had to not phukk it up and you did.
Bmk2222
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2022 11:34 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Bmk2222 »

Really hard to imagine in a world of complete moral decay that the University would terminate her for that.
WLaxdad
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2023 8:20 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by WLaxdad »

For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
Brownlax
Posts: 1148
Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 10:43 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Brownlax »

WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
Syracuse silence is deafening
DMac
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by DMac »

WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
I don't know about shouldn't matter as it speaks volumes about one's character, values, trustworthiness, loyalty, integrity, and more. This employer is putting her in a position to mentor young girls, I don't want a person with the flawed values she's exhibited mentoring my daughter. Yes, it does matter in this case, maybe not so much if she were a car salesman. I have no patience or tolerance for cheaters/infidelity (however rampant it might be).
TNLAX
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 11:46 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by TNLAX »

DMac wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 11:26 am
WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
I don't know about shouldn't matter as it speaks volumes about one's character, values, trustworthiness, loyalty, integrity, and more. This employer is putting her in a position to mentor young girls, I don't want a person with the flawed values she's exhibited mentoring my daughter. Yes, it does matter in this case, maybe not so much if she were a car salesman. I have no patience or tolerance for cheaters/infidelity (however rampant it might be).
+1
wgdsr
Posts: 9991
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by wgdsr »

Brownlax wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:52 am
WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
Syracuse silence is deafening
not seeing any press releases from the other acc schools, either. so we wait.
Brownlax
Posts: 1148
Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 10:43 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Brownlax »

wgdsr wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:09 pm
Brownlax wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:52 am
WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
Syracuse silence is deafening
not seeing any press releases from the other acc schools, either. so we wait.
Why would other teams issue press releases?
wgdsr
Posts: 9991
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:00 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by wgdsr »

Brownlax wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 1:57 pm
wgdsr wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 12:09 pm
Brownlax wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 10:52 am
WLaxdad wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:40 am For me the only issue here is the relationship with a direct report. The affair, the husband etc.. are all personal life choices that shouldn't matter for your employment.

The relationship with a direct report is a real problem though, imagine your the other assistant without the relationship and it's raise time. I wonder which of the 2 assistant's are going to get the larger raise :?:
Syracuse silence is deafening
not seeing any press releases from the other acc schools, either. so we wait.
Why would other teams issue press releases?
exactly. why would syracuse?
LaxPundit07
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2019 3:34 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by LaxPundit07 »

I know we are constantly sucked into a world where every discussion and answer to each question has to be binary. A or B. Yes or No. Left or Right. But there is some nuance here.

1. Did KT violate university employee conduct policy?
2. Did KT violate ethical standards according to reasonable observers?
3. Will Syracuse fire her?
4. Should Syracuse fire her?
5. (A) If her assistant was at the time, and currently is, a consenting adult who made the choice to enter the relationship on her own free will, is their relationship really that wrong? (besides the obvious of being a violation of university conduct policy). (B) If KT was a man, and the assistant coach was a female, this would certainly fall squarely into the #metoo movement and dynamic. Given they are both women, does that change anything here?
6. (A) Is what KT did worse than Calipari paying players through boosters for years? (B) Is it worse than Gary Williams hitting up the local college bars in College Parks and hitting on girls? (C) It is worse than Hugh Freez using his university phone to contact escort services...only to be hired at Auburn 4 years later?

In my humble opinion.

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. No.
4. Yes.
5. (A) Reasonable people could debate this. (B) Yes.
6. (A) No. (B) No. (C) No.
stephes2
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:28 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by stephes2 »

I'm not sure this analysis will help sell parents on the program.
Lax101
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 11:46 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Lax101 »

At this point does it really matter. She made a bad decision and I'm glad Syracuse is not firing her. She is one of the most liked and humble superstars in the history of womens lacrosse. Public humiliation is a strong enough sentence in my opinion. I suggest we all move on and stop feeding this thread.
Batman
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 10:43 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by Batman »

+1. Thank you for your post. Please everyone move on. And thank you to NJ Bill for your wisdom and seacoaster for your grace during a difficult time.
orangelax13
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2024 12:36 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by orangelax13 »

Lax101 wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 9:45 pm At this point does it really matter. She made a bad decision and I'm glad Syracuse is not firing her. She is one of the most liked and humble superstars in the history of womens lacrosse. Public humiliation is a strong enough sentence in my opinion. I suggest we all move on and stop feeding this thread.
I’m biased but I agree. She’s not a bad person she just made a bad mistake. She’ll learn a hard lesson from this, but it has nothing to do with her ability to go on and be a tremendous coach. If Cuse lets her go it’ll be another program’s gain
UpDownLax
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:09 pm

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by UpDownLax »

My only thought around keeping her is do you keep the coach that she had the alleged affair with too? If you keep her, how do the other coaches respond? The head coach and her “secret partner” have a stronger bond than anyone else on the staff. I would guess that if KT keeps her job, at least one assistant leaves…
DMac
Posts: 9303
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Kayla Treanor. Is this true?

Post by DMac »

LaxPundit07 wrote: Mon Jul 08, 2024 7:55 pm I know we are constantly sucked into a world where every discussion and answer to each question has to be binary. A or B. Yes or No. Left or Right. But there is some nuance here.

1. Did KT violate university employee conduct policy?
2. Did KT violate ethical standards according to reasonable observers?
3. Will Syracuse fire her?
4. Should Syracuse fire her?
5. (A) If her assistant was at the time, and currently is, a consenting adult who made the choice to enter the relationship on her own free will, is their relationship really that wrong? (besides the obvious of being a violation of university conduct policy).Would you think it was/is wrong if you were her husband? Doubt he's much thinking about university conduct policy. (B) If KT was a man, and the assistant coach was a female, this would certainly fall squarely into the #metoo movement and dynamic. Given they are both women, does that change anything here? Ya just knew this had to come up. No, that changes nothing about the deceit and all that goes along with secret (they're only secret because you know it's wrong) little affairs. Bring her home and have a threesome, I'm good with that.
6. (A) Is what KT did worse than Calipari paying players through boosters for years? (B) Is it worse than Gary Williams hitting up the local college bars in College Parks and hitting on girls? (C) It is worse than Hugh Freez using his university phone to contact escort services...only to be hired at Auburn 4 years later? All deflection. I think KT has done immeasurable damage to Cuse wlax (see transfers and decommits).
Am a big KT fan but could not be more disappointed and disgusted with the dark cloud she's hung over Cuse wlax and the position she's put everybody around her in.


In my humble opinion.

1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. No.
4. Yes.
5. (A) Reasonable people could debate this. (B) Yes.
6. (A) No. (B) No. (C) No.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 WOMENS LACROSSE”