![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
i think Beardsley is a great idea...no laughingLandM wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:42 am This is a total long-shot and I am sure many will laugh but there is a local guy, played pretty well at SU; taken the premier local academic high school and won a state championship; taught my kid the famous butt-end check; announces games pretty well as he is just as entertaining in person as on TV; and he has mellowed post kids, believe it or not. Not sure if a great fit based on ego's but he certainly could plug a hole.....no laughing![]()
![]()
Announcing a significant change this late is perplexing. SU will regroup but weird timing given the progress seen last season and good outlook heading into 2020. They better select an assistant wisely because this could really sting.Mr3Putt wrote: ↑Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:01 am RB bleeds Orange. Can he make a difference on the defensive end of the field? Let’s face it, D has been an issues for years. Carcatera was on LaxSportsNet & said he would choose Will Manny. Offense IMO will never be an issue w this team. They need to make more stops on D. Especially, the ACC is a grind & UVA has awoken.
because????dawn patrol wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:40 pm What is the average age of the current staff, mid to late 50's ? The unfortunate truth is the staff needs to get younger. It's about perception, not lacrosse knowledge or a succession plan. It's just the lacrosse world we live in today and Virginia's recent success doesn't help change the narrative.
Very good summationwgdsr wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 12:07 ambecause????dawn patrol wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 8:40 pm What is the average age of the current staff, mid to late 50's ? The unfortunate truth is the staff needs to get younger. It's about perception, not lacrosse knowledge or a succession plan. It's just the lacrosse world we live in today and Virginia's recent success doesn't help change the narrative.
they were scoring top 10, as they've done plenty of times.
supposedly while not getting any recruits.
if anything, they've missed recently with attackmen. and faceoff. they seem to have guys that can play at d, lsm, ssdm, middie, goalie. at least once they're in college.
good amount of energy by the players on the sidelines. if i had critiques, i'd say their roster is too big and they've participated in too much groupthink on value possession. finding and hiring a candidate that thinks differently on those is doubtful.
the rest is you're playing against a top 8 or 10 nowadays, not a top 4 then a dropoff.