Perhaps people should take an elementary Civics course before asking questions that would be addressed in such a course. (But thanks for joining the conversation!)get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Orange Duce
-
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: Orange Duce
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 26194
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: Orange Duce
I'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
-
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am
Re: Orange Duce
He is alluding to the right wing talking point that Smith's appointment is somehow constitutionally or legally ineffective.
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-just ... irst-place
https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-just ... irst-place
-
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Orange Duce
No. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
"I would never want to belong to a club that would have me as a member", Groucho Marx
-
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Nope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
"There is nothing more difficult and more dangerous to carry through than initiating changes. One makes enemies of those who prospered under the old order, and only lukewarm support from those who would prosper under the new."
-
- Posts: 32569
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm
Re: Orange Duce
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 14346
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: Orange Duce
What is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
Re: Orange Duce
tRump mental degeneration: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gYc-4i-4 ... ture=share
right wingers like to point to Biden's deficiencies but go silent when Dump's mental incapacity is pointed out
right wingers like to point to Biden's deficiencies but go silent when Dump's mental incapacity is pointed out
It has been proven a hundred times that the surest way to the heart of any man, black or white, honest or dishonest, is through justice and fairness.
Charles Francis "Socker" Coe, Esq
Charles Francis "Socker" Coe, Esq
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 26194
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: Orange Duce
So… you and get it to x don’t want to just admit that what he said simply has no basis in actual law?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pmWhat is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
And the relevant law is actually being followed to a t?
Just want to pretend and complain? Then change subject to more complaints?
MAGA logic compliant.
-
- Posts: 1325
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 11:58 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Actually, no. I admit when I make an error, which I did in this case. I was not on this board again until just now. Unlike some, this board is an occasional diversion for me.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:39 amSo… you and get it to x don’t want to just admit that what he said simply has no basis in actual law?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pmWhat is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
And the relevant law is actually being followed to a t?
Just want to pretend and complain? Then change subject to more complaints?
MAGA logic compliant.
"I would never want to belong to a club that would have me as a member", Groucho Marx
Re: Orange Duce
Tip of the hat, get it to x. See guys? It ain't all that hard to admit when you're wrong. And we're ALL wrong at times.get it to x wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 11:02 amActually, no. I admit when I make an error, which I did in this case.....(cut)MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:39 amSo… you and get it to x don’t want to just admit that what he said simply has no basis in actual law?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pmWhat is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
And the relevant law is actually being followed to a t?
Just want to pretend and complain? Then change subject to more complaints?
MAGA logic compliant.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 26194
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: Orange Duce
I stand corrected, happily.get it to x wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 11:02 amActually, no. I admit when I make an error, which I did in this case. I was not on this board again until just now. Unlike some, this board is an occasional diversion for me.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:39 amSo… you and get it to x don’t want to just admit that what he said simply has no basis in actual law?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pmWhat is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
And the relevant law is actually being followed to a t?
Just want to pretend and complain? Then change subject to more complaints?
MAGA logic compliant.
It just wasn't a correct understanding of the relevant law...no reason for cradle to try to divert from that.
Last edited by MDlaxfan76 on Sun Apr 07, 2024 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- MDlaxfan76
- Posts: 26194
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Indeed, all.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 11:24 amTip of the hat, get it to x. See guys? It ain't all that hard to admit when you're wrong. And we're ALL wrong at times.get it to x wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 11:02 amActually, no. I admit when I make an error, which I did in this case.....(cut)MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:39 amSo… you and get it to x don’t want to just admit that what he said simply has no basis in actual law?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pmWhat is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:41 amNope. Here is the relevant legislation regarding the position of Special Counsel. This is not the abandoned (1999) Independent Counsel.get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 11:31 pmNo. I'm trying to say the Special Counsel law was not followed. Special Counsel are subject to the legislative branch. No hearing was held. He just showed up. Not that I want a more competent prosecutor.. The SC overturned him 9-0 once already.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 9:43 pmI'll keep an open mind. What's your intended point?get it to x wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 5:38 pmPerhaps before we get too far into the case Mr. Smith can give us the date and vote count of his Senate confirmation.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:35 pmThat appears right, they want her to either fully back down or provide them basis to immediately appeal...and rightfully ask for her removal.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:20 pm"Give me an order I can appeal, and reverse your sorry ass a third time and maybe get rid of you."PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 4:18 pm“a correct formulation of the law”Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:41 pm This is just an astonishing pleading:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... 28.0_1.pdf
I read that as, I double-dog dare you, Judge Cannon…
Her proposed instructions are so far from the reality of the law that it's a bit flabbergasting that she thought she could get away with it. I've read where she keeps turning over staff because she's gone a little nutso with them, and thus isn't getting much help in doing the actual legal work and no one is pushing back...so maybe she just wants off the case somehow without looking like she turned on Trump...but that sure would be whacky, just ask to get off for personal reasons, right?
Are you trying to say that Cannon is neither incompetent nor in the bag for Trump, nor both?
Or that Smith is wrong on the law and Cannon is right?
And trying to divert from those straightforward arguments to something that's pretty nonsensical?
Or are you actually serious...and clueless?
Or is there something else to your point?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
Please point out the portion that describes the position being "subject to the legislative branch."
And the relevant law is actually being followed to a t?
Just want to pretend and complain? Then change subject to more complaints?
MAGA logic compliant.
And agreed on tip of hat.
-
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Donnie's lucky this is America. Vietnam doesn't mess around with fraudsters. https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/truo ... 48346.html
Re: Orange Duce
They do, if your last name is Biden.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pm What is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...
- cradleandshoot
- Posts: 14346
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm
Re: Orange Duce
old salt wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 5:00 pmThey do, if your last name is Biden.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 1:00 pm What is the point? Laws or regulations can only be effective as the willingness to enforce them. We have immigration laws on the books that are ignored every damn day and most DC types could care less. That is what happens when laws become subjective based on popular opinion. I wish the IRS had such lax standards when enforcing tax codes...
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
- NattyBohChamps04
- Posts: 2335
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Love that Trump's orgs have already been found guilty of tons of counts of tax fraud, and he has many more on the way.
While Biden has none that I'm aware of.
One Biden offspring seems to have IRS trouble, while multiple Trump offspring have like 10-100x the trouble.
Funny joke guys! A real knee slapper. Must get tons of laughs.
While Biden has none that I'm aware of.
One Biden offspring seems to have IRS trouble, while multiple Trump offspring have like 10-100x the trouble.
Funny joke guys! A real knee slapper. Must get tons of laughs.
-
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 10:24 pm
Re: Orange Duce
Come on Natty, you know that’s only because our criminal justice system has been weaponized against the Trumps.NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:08 am Love that Trump's orgs have already been found guilty of tons of counts of tax fraud, and he has many more on the way.
While Biden has none that I'm aware of.
One Biden offspring seems to have IRS trouble, while multiple Trump offspring have like 10-100x the trouble.
Funny joke guys! A real knee slapper. Must get tons of laughs.
Re: Orange Duce
+1SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 8:59 amCome on Natty, you know that’s only because our criminal justice system has been weaponized against the Trumps.NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:08 am Love that Trump's orgs have already been found guilty of tons of counts of tax fraud, and he has many more on the way.
While Biden has none that I'm aware of.
One Biden offspring seems to have IRS trouble, while multiple Trump offspring have like 10-100x the trouble.
Funny joke guys! A real knee slapper. Must get tons of laughs.
The usual jokers here who keep calling out Biden are too funny; Keystone Cops for Faux News MAGA idiots.
Re: Orange Duce
Wonder if The Donald has asked Weaselberg what Riker's is like. You know, asking for a friend.