kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 8:32 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2023 6:21 am
kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 11:55 pm
PizzaSnake wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:39 pm
He needed the money back. Took the opportunity. Gifts with conditions are BS.
All large gifts have conditions. And the schools make them with eyes wide open.
Sure but they are still BS. Like not even a gift in reality it it comes restricted or conditional. But the colleges are equally culpable for accepting them as then alums (who were molded into the men and women that would give conditional gifts by these same institutions that are so compromised as to eagerly accept the conditional gifts.
But its a reality. I cannot think of any that are made with no strings attached. Even if it's ultimately - "better be nice to me and my family, because I have money."
Heard of another just recently. A $10M gift was given to renovate fields, build an indoor athletic bubble etc. But the expectation was for the school to purchase the donor's proprietary software (that the school doesn't really need) in return ...
The president who agreed to it is now learning that he was so excited to land the intial donation that he didn't read the fine print. And the school community is figuring out that he's a moron. So how does the school afford a useless enterprise software solution AND finish the capital project? "Thanks for your donation."
Well if we’re using self gratification as a exchange of value then all concepts of philanthropy, magnanimity and even religion believing in a higher future benefit for doing something today falls into that category and you are subject to the Just Judges.
I don’t care if the President is out, and she’s already dead she just doesn’t have her separation agreement buttoned up yet and all this is just piling on and noise for other agendas around higher ed if we’re speaking plainly and talking reality.
I’m quite familiar, not just my FIL who gives with no strings and makes the top 100 Athletics donor ranking for Ga Tech compared with a former colleague who stopped giving to Penn also having a named scholarship from prior Giving when his acceptable by every metric and admissions criterion didnt get accepted a few years back (told this story kid is at Wash U in St Louis in full academic ride so buddy is saving $300k plus donations to penn thanks to their rejection of his boy who is a good kid but wildly coddled). Know some of the folks in the news lately as big givers as well personally. But to say no donations are made without statins means you don’t believe in even the Bible’s teachings which I know isn’t the case. And certainly don’t need ducking passage quotes from the Bible like it’s drunk post college idiots at a piano bar slapping money down for Country Road or their Alma mater right song. (You can do that down in the inner harbor power plant at Howl at the Moon if you want)
The wrist is when they direct endowment investment management to their firm. That’s awful. A good investment by the donor but awful.
No defending the vast weak higher ed admin but your lying all the “guilt” and “fault” at the hands of the receiver, a non profit who’s been conditioned to be life they can’t exist if they had to run a neutral to profitable budget every year. They just don’t function that way and have no earthly idea how to and that’s why St Rose and another college just failed and more are coming where the kids aren’t located.
Just like banks were there’s over 4,000 in the country and naturally there aren’t that many “A students” to run them all theres thousands of 4yr colleges. They can’t all have great Mgt and leadership and there’s little correlation between USNWR and admin quality that I can observe.