The Biden - Harris Era.

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5220
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:29 pm
yup, don't worry...but look at that thread below...people :? :roll:
Yes, noticed that. Ugh.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by cradleandshoot »

youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
Be nice now. You know Joe Biden is MD lax fans boy. I even learned via MD that all of the stupid chit that emanates from Bidens mouth is due to his stuttering problem. I was always under the impression it was because Biden is just a dumbass. Now I know the actual truth. :D
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
jhu72
Posts: 14456
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by jhu72 »

youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
... has Washington's reputable paper reported it??
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

jhu72 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
... has Washington's reputable paper reported it??
No, but the White House did: https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/17150 ... 05637?s=20

NEW: The White House admits they accidentally doxxed US Special Forces by posting an uncensored photo of them w/ Biden in Israel.

WH: “As soon as this was brought to our attention, we immediately deleted the photo. We regret the error and any issues this may have caused.”


Probably still not good enough for you. ;)
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
NattyBohChamps04
Posts: 2796
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by NattyBohChamps04 »

youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:50 pm
jhu72 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
... has Washington's reputable paper reported it??
No, but the White House did: https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/17150 ... 05637?s=20

NEW: The White House admits they accidentally doxxed US Special Forces by posting an uncensored photo of them w/ Biden in Israel.

WH: “As soon as this was brought to our attention, we immediately deleted the photo. We regret the error and any issues this may have caused.”


Probably still not good enough for you. ;)
2022 saw the first time in 20 years that we had 0 hostile action military deaths.

Last time it happened was under another Democratic president.

Sure an uncensored photo ain't great.

Unfortunately Biden's likely orange tinted opponent has been a disaster in compromising our own troops, making fun of them and their families, getting bone spurs, and as of today we're learning he compromised more allies lives because of his incompetence. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... court-told
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by cradleandshoot »

NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 10:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:50 pm
jhu72 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
... has Washington's reputable paper reported it??
No, but the White House did: https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/17150 ... 05637?s=20

NEW: The White House admits they accidentally doxxed US Special Forces by posting an uncensored photo of them w/ Biden in Israel.

WH: “As soon as this was brought to our attention, we immediately deleted the photo. We regret the error and any issues this may have caused.”


Probably still not good enough for you. ;)
2022 saw the first time in 20 years that we had 0 hostile action military deaths.

Last time it happened was under another Democratic president.

Sure an uncensored photo ain't great.

Unfortunately Biden's likely orange tinted opponent has been a disaster in compromising our own troops, making fun of them and their families, getting bone spurs, and as of today we're learning he compromised more allies lives because of his incompetence. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... court-told
So the way FLP liberals try and back their way out of it is classic... Trump was worse. He probably was but that isn't the point. You FLP libs have been telling us how brilliant Joe Biden and his team are. They sure as hell are not any smarter than the trumpeters people. To quote foul mouth Joe... It's a big f***ing deal.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 10:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:50 pm
jhu72 wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 7:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Thu Oct 19, 2023 5:17 pm Effing idiots running the WH Social Media: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... ons-forces
... has Washington's reputable paper reported it??
No, but the White House did: https://x.com/BillMelugin_/status/17150 ... 05637?s=20

NEW: The White House admits they accidentally doxxed US Special Forces by posting an uncensored photo of them w/ Biden in Israel.

WH: “As soon as this was brought to our attention, we immediately deleted the photo. We regret the error and any issues this may have caused.”


Probably still not good enough for you. ;)
2022 saw the first time in 20 years that we had 0 hostile action military deaths.

Last time it happened was under another Democratic president.

Sure an uncensored photo ain't great.

Unfortunately Biden's likely orange tinted opponent has been a disaster in compromising our own troops, making fun of them and their families, getting bone spurs, and as of today we're learning he compromised more allies lives because of his incompetence. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... court-told
Your scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
NattyBohChamps04
Posts: 2796
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by NattyBohChamps04 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
Seacoaster(1)
Posts: 5220
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:49 am

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by Seacoaster(1) »

Very good speech last night. Over the course of three days he flew to Israel, met with major leaders, given several speeches, negotiated humanitarian help through Egypt, flew home, briefed his team, and delivered an excellent speech.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
NattyBohChamps04
Posts: 2796
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by NattyBohChamps04 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
LOL wander around Virginia Beach & Norfolk off Shore Drive. You'll make friends with a few of them within a day or two. The ones I knew don't advertise it, but they're not exactly secretive about it.

I'm sure it's similar around other places they're based.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27083
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27083
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:46 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

or

https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-cent ... -is-doxing
Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"two websites that were previously blocked for doxing made a brief reappearance online"

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:50 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:46 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

or

https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-cent ... -is-doxing
Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"two websites that were previously blocked for doxing made a brief reappearance online"

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
Exactly. The first 16 words of the wiki page is exactly what happened. Peoples faces are identifiable….no?
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by cradleandshoot »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
A very feeble attempt to soft peddle an embarrassing foul up. I'm tickled pink that you believe everything that Joe Biden tells you. ;) So how is damage control being handled on this? Were these special ops folks plastered on the Internet long enough for their faces to be identified by the bad guys? So if the bad guys know who you are, where you live, who your family is, that individual and his family are now in danger. Simple question for you MD, would you feel comfortable knowing all of your personal information was out there for all to see? This was more than just a run of the mill foul ups. This foul up puts highly specialized members of our military in grave danger. Bidens handlers should have known better. They were just more interested in a really groovy photo op.
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by cradleandshoot »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:11 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:50 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:46 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

or

https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-cent ... -is-doxing
Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"two websites that were previously blocked for doxing made a brief reappearance online"

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
Exactly. The first 16 words of the wiki page is exactly what happened. Peoples faces are identifiable….no?
That depends on what people good or bad have access to facial recognition technology. It seems like a trivial thing but compromising the identity of these people in any way can't be allowed . So who gets fired? Is there a sacrificial lamb?
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 27083
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:11 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:50 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:46 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

or

https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-cent ... -is-doxing
Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"two websites that were previously blocked for doxing made a brief reappearance online"

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
Exactly. The first 16 words of the wiki page is exactly what happened. Peoples faces are identifiable….no?
The first 16 words? Remind me to never ask you to represent me in any negotiation or court or other conflict requiring good faith. 😉

The wiki is a long piece saying a heck of a lot more than those 16 words, as would be the case for any long explanation.

The definition, however, only takes Oxford 23 words.

Seriously, you think Biden had any malicious intent?

Now, any thoughts to my other questions?
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15809
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: The Biden - Harris Era.

Post by youthathletics »

MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:20 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:11 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:50 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:46 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 5:22 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 4:17 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 7:33 am
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 6:28 amYour scoreboard argument is just stupid, they doxxed Special Forces, for the world to see. Its okay to admit they effed up, without the scoreboard BS, Karen.
LMAO sure they effed up. But it's not like it's hard to find who these guys are.

And the alternative is still way worse. Not a lot of chatter about all the screw ups when it was your guy. I really enjoy the false outrage from you two.
You are full of crap. If ya it’s so easy tell me who is in DEVGRU and you can pick the color.
"doxxing" is being used inappropriately...that is, unless you think someone provided names, address, embarrassing details, etc about someone in order to put them in harm's way or to embarrass them on purpose.

That's probably what is garnering you the response. It's exaggerating pejoratively something that, while having repercussions, wasn't an intentional act to cause harm.

or

https://usa.kaspersky.com/resource-cent ... -is-doxing
Obviously mistakes get made. Everyone is capable of making them.
In most cases, they didn't mean for the error to occur, they regret the error.

On the other hand, some people don't care, are negligent without remorse...or worse.

Now, which do you think describes this situation?

Can you think of any situations that would be better described the second way committed by Biden?

And yeah, now here's another test: can you think of any situations committed by Trump in which the latter description better fits?

Last test, did you raise any such on these threads?
Nope, you are incorrect. Doxing is posting private or identifying info about someone, you added another layer to it that also applies.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
doxing
/ˈdäksiNG/
noun
the action or process of searching for and publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"two websites that were previously blocked for doxing made a brief reappearance online"

AND

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
Exactly. The first 16 words of the wiki page is exactly what happened. Peoples faces are identifiable….no?
The first 16 words? Remind me to never ask you to represent me in any negotiation or court or other conflict requiring good faith. 😉

The wiki is a long piece saying a heck of a lot more than those 16 words, as would be the case for any long explanation.

The definition, however, only takes Oxford 23 words.

Seriously, you think Biden had any malicious intent?

Now, any thoughts to my other questions?
I’d have you acquitted pre-trial, unless you were in one of those moods. 😉

No, not malicious at all, just plain stupidity.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”