Johns Hopkins 2023

D1 Mens Lacrosse
nyjay
Posts: 1150
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:12 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by nyjay »

10stone5 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:51 pm Collison again making clutch plays.
I love how confident he is with the ball in his stick. Who was the last guy we had like that?
Hoponboard
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by Hoponboard »

It wasn’t pretty, but 6-3 feels good.
DMac
Posts: 9059
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by DMac »

Well, embarrassed and pitiful (not my words) but Hop sails away from Navy with the W.
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by HopFan16 »

Burn the tape. Get out of Annapolis as fast as possible. Don't have to come back till 2025. We're onto the Hens.
10stone5
Posts: 7624
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:29 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by 10stone5 »

nyjay wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:55 pm
10stone5 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:51 pm Collison again making clutch plays.
I love how confident he is with the ball in his stick. Who was the last guy we had like that?
He’s on the right team, that much I know.
faircornell
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:23 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by faircornell »

Congratulations to JHU! Navy looked like it had a slight advantage in conditioning and speed. Hopkins had the skill advantage and closed the game very well.
Hoponboard
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by Hoponboard »

Just like vs. Cuse, Collison comes up big in crunch time.
Hoponboard
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by Hoponboard »

faircornell wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:59 pm Congratulations to JHU! Navy looked like it had a slight advantage in conditioning and speed. Hopkins had the skill advantage and closed the game very well.
That’s the difference between this year and last, we’re closing out games well.
DocBarrister
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by DocBarrister »

Blue Jays with 20 turnovers and some embarrassing play.

Still, they kept grinding it out and earned the win. Have to give some credit for that.

The Midshipmen, as always, were tough on their turf.

Hopkins won this must-win game. Another must-win game on Sunday.

DocBarrister
@DocBarrister
DocBarrister
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by DocBarrister »

Hoponboard wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:02 pm
faircornell wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:59 pm Congratulations to JHU! Navy looked like it had a slight advantage in conditioning and speed. Hopkins had the skill advantage and closed the game very well.
That’s the difference between this year and last, we’re closing out games well.
Yep. I’m also likin’ how the Blue Jays win games even when they lose the faceoff battle. Marcille is a big factor there.

DocBarrister
@DocBarrister
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by HopFan16 »

Hoponboard wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:02 pm
faircornell wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:59 pm Congratulations to JHU! Navy looked like it had a slight advantage in conditioning and speed. Hopkins had the skill advantage and closed the game very well.
That’s the difference between this year and last, we’re closing out games well.
100%. Well, except the UNC game. Doesn't excuse the very rough performance overall but that's two straight games on the road they've shut the door when it mattered most.

Another good effort from Marcille. 7 GBs for Mazzone. Carson Brown another precocious showing.

Goes without saying that if they play like that again on Sunday, they'll lose. Possibly by a lot.
DocBarrister
Posts: 6658
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Ok … Hopkins didn’t play THAT badly.

Post by DocBarrister »

Just read that no. 1 seed Purdue lost to no. 16 Fairleigh Dickinson in the NCAA basketball tournament.

The average height of FDU players is only 6ft 1in. I suspect even the Johns Hopkins men’s basketball team is taller than that.

Arguably the greatest upset in college basketball history. Sadly, the Purdue players will never live this down.

So … the Blue Jays played ok tonight, relatively speaking.

DocBarrister :)
@DocBarrister
Hoponboard
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by Hoponboard »

Purdue was the most overrated #1 seed. They couldn’t shoot from outside.

Good contributions from Grimes 1,2 and Peshko 2.
Hoponboard
Posts: 528
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:45 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by Hoponboard »

HopFan16 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:08 pm
Hoponboard wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:02 pm
faircornell wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:59 pm Congratulations to JHU! Navy looked like it had a slight advantage in conditioning and speed. Hopkins had the skill advantage and closed the game very well.
That’s the difference between this year and last, we’re closing out games well.
100%. Well, except the UNC game. Doesn't excuse the very rough performance overall but that's two straight games on the road they've shut the door when it mattered most.

Another good effort from Marcille. 7 GBs for Mazzone. Carson Brown another precocious showing.

Goes without saying that if they play like that again on Sunday, they'll lose. Possibly by a lot.
Four of Jays’ six wins have featured 4th quarter close outs.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23267
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: Ok … Hopkins didn’t play THAT badly.

Post by Farfromgeneva »

DocBarrister wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:23 pm Just read that no. 1 seed Purdue lost to no. 16 Fairleigh Dickinson in the NCAA basketball tournament.

The average height of FDU players is only 6ft 1in. I suspect even the Johns Hopkins men’s basketball team is taller than that.

Arguably the greatest upset in college basketball history. Sadly, the Purdue players will never live this down.

So … the Blue Jays played ok tonight, relatively speaking.

DocBarrister :)
UMBC-UVA?
Now I love those cowboys, I love their gold
Love my uncle, God rest his soul
Taught me good, Lord, taught me all I know
Taught me so well, that I grabbed that gold
I left his dead ass there by the side of the road, yeah
JoeMauer89
Posts: 2004
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 10:39 pm

Re: Ok … Hopkins didn’t play THAT badly.

Post by JoeMauer89 »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:52 pm
DocBarrister wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 9:23 pm Just read that no. 1 seed Purdue lost to no. 16 Fairleigh Dickinson in the NCAA basketball tournament.

The average height of FDU players is only 6ft 1in. I suspect even the Johns Hopkins men’s basketball team is taller than that.

Arguably the greatest upset in college basketball history. Sadly, the Purdue players will never live this down.

So … the Blue Jays played ok tonight, relatively speaking.

DocBarrister :)
UMBC-UVA?
It's close, but UMBC was much more talented than a 16 seed that year. FDU was the last team on the S-Curve. Wouldn't have even gotten in if not for Merrimack still being in an transitional period per the NCAA's archaic transition rule.

Joe
jhu06
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:43 am

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by jhu06 »

HopFan16 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:52 pm YIKES of a first half.

jhu06's favorite punching bags — Peshko, Grimes, Bauer, Evans — have our only goals
-The star of the game was the Navy grounds crew. How hard is it to make Homewood look like that?
-12-9 was the consensus score I think most people anticipated. This game was closer because Hopkins in year 1 of crawley continues to not have the cohesiveness and consistency that JK has developed at the other end.
-Navy broadcasters did a nice job. They said early Hopkins depth would be the difference.
-Stuart Phillips was back for his fan club on here.
-The broadcast production was awful. How many faceoffs did we miss because they were still on the last shots.
-51 has talked a lot here about the offensive talent issues. At attack, midfield, and we see that in a lot of these games.
-6-3 was the very optimistic scenario coming into the season at this point. There's been a lot of progress this season.
jhu06
Posts: 2741
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 7:43 am

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by jhu06 »

why do they not sell these jerseys in the bookstore?
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 6059
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by HopFan16 »

jhu06 wrote: Sat Mar 18, 2023 12:15 am
HopFan16 wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 7:52 pm YIKES of a first half.

jhu06's favorite punching bags — Peshko, Grimes, Bauer, Evans — have our only goals
-The star of the game was the Navy grounds crew. How hard is it to make Homewood look like that?
-12-9 was the consensus score I think most people anticipated. This game was closer because Hopkins in year 1 of crawley continues to not have the cohesiveness and consistency that JK has developed at the other end.
-Navy broadcasters did a nice job. They said early Hopkins depth would be the difference.
-Stuart Phillips was back for his fan club on here.
-The broadcast production was awful. How many faceoffs did we miss because they were still on the last shots.
-51 has talked a lot here about the offensive talent issues. At attack, midfield, and we see that in a lot of these games.
-6-3 was the very optimistic scenario coming into the season at this point. There's been a lot of progress this season.
It is probably true that the defense is ahead of the offense in terms of cohesion/chemistry at this point. But a couple things: As much as Navy has struggled this year, they've still largely played good D. They have a player in Bonitz who'd be starting on any team in the country. To put up 12 on them on the road is not a bad number. And if you look closer — we only had 1 EMO goal and zero in transition, meaning 11 of 12 goals were in half-field 6v6 sets. The clearing woes and uncharacteristic Benny Hill moments leave a sour taste but when the offense had the ball (losing faceoffs didn't help), they were fine, especially in the second half.

Production was indeed terrible. Think they had a baby operating the camera. That was our final janky broadcast of the season — Sunday's game is ESPN+ again but it's an actual ESPN production, and then everything after that is either ESPNU or BTN.
51percentcorn
Posts: 1565
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2018 6:54 am

Re: Johns Hopkins 2023

Post by 51percentcorn »

Well we are not sending that game to the Hall of Fame to be looped on a monitor in the "Offense" wing. If it's a good sign to beat a team when you are not playing your "A" game then Hopkins fans got a very good sign. The stretch from the 2nd quarter to the just before the Degnon man-up goal was as unfocused and flat as you can get. Navy's effort obviously had something to do with it but at one point JHU couldn't execute a pass from one player to another. There are not many mysteries to this game - the defense played fairly well and Tim played great again (except for one or two outlet passes) but the mental lapses that led to the turnovers helped on many Navy goals. Once again Hopkins shot pretty well - even in the horror show of a third quarter they shot 67% (4 of 6). Hopkins shot 31% Navy shot 24% - there's the glaring difference in the game. Other thoughts:
- I know Hopkins can justifiably feel no team gets any sympathy about injuries bur no Skalniak and Swanson helped a fair bit - if they play - oh boy
- Milliman's response on Peshko was mildly interesting - when asked to evaluate him because good things always seemed to happen when he was on the field - ball coach said "Well it doesn't always seem that way" He then went on to offer some compliments but clearly coaches want more consistency.
- Hopkins surely must think shot clock operators are overworked and underpaid as it feels like you could go get a cup of coffee for 70 seconds when Hop has the ball and the only thing you have to worry about is a turnover. It's a contributing factor I am sure why they shoot fairly well but at some point the numbers just may not work. Rutgers and Penn State are pretty close to 50 shots per game - Maryland 45 - Michigan 40. On the goalie side Fraycon is at 57% Rupple 59% Mullin 54% So you are about to embark on a very tough road and if you generate only 35ish shots per game you might not score 12 and then you are asking something heroic from Marcille and the defense.
- Angelus must run a marathon during a game - they ask alot of that kid and he will be one tired puppy by 9 pm Sunday.
- If Hopkins has a strength on offense it is that they have some variety in scoring - 8 guys with at least 6 goals and Evans has 7 point in 5 games and Chauvette has 5 goals - the shot at the end of the 3rd period last night was huge. Of course not many other teams have played 9 games.
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”