He also said this :youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:45 amI do not disagree afan. The 140 character of less quotes are the way most communicate now, because its about all the attention span most have who live and breath their news, via social media.a fan wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 8:59 pmIt turns my stomach to watch was a once decent man (before he arrived in DC) flush himself down the "I'm going to treat my voters like drooling morons" toilet.youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Nov 14, 2021 7:14 pm Is it like this one? https://www.instagram.com/p/CWRORpcLkHx ... =copy_link
Click to see the panels burying the mountain.
The next panel on his instagram, YA?
"Stuck in traffic? Blame the Dems: here's why"
More and more people are becoming rightfully skeptical of the radical obsession with wind and solar as the only clean energy solution. More are coming to the logical conclusion that we should be focusing efforts on reliable sources of clean energy that take up far less space, like nuclear and natural gas with carbon capture. Wind and solar get about 250x more subsidies than nuclear. Does that make any sense?
And by the way, China built 3x more coal capacity than the rest of the world combined in 2020, so let’s not pretend they’re going green.