a fan wrote: ↑Wed Feb 10, 2021 1:46 pm
runrussellrun wrote: ↑Wed Feb 10, 2021 1:30 pm
So, one last time, please explain why it is harmful to say what ever you want on a social media business
Already told you. You don't get to tell another business what to do, or how to run its business. That's it. That's as complicated as it gets.
But, THIS is precisely what "you" did. Amazon told another business, how to run its business. Why not just say you agree with that in the first place?
I don't care if YOU think it's bad. I have ZERO interest in someone else telling me how to run my business. And neither do you, for that matter. I don't even have to ask you the question "do you want someone else to tell you what to do".
forgive me if it appears I have offered an opinion, good or bad. If that is what I have inferred, I apologize for being my self agrandizing self, acting all intricate with response. like bad shakespeare.
What YOU, if I am understanding you correctly, will be completely happy when you can NO longer purchase grains from anyone, b/c you disregarded your theoretical associations "terms of Agreement" (which ALWAYS include arbitration, theirs, btw ) savvy. there are a few "platforms" where you can get your grains from, but one is in Vermont, per the King Arthur gang. No out of state shipping due to covid tho. so, there is one in brazil, but, on backorder. So, you CAN purchase grains.......just gonna make it hard for you.
You still haven't answered , as always the simple, specific answer. You claim you don't like govt. telling you what to do. Not buying it. Not for one moment. Rightfully so, you love the obviousness of pointing out the government funds, virtually everywhere. (the essence of TAATS, btw ) besides what they steal from you (taxes, fees, etc. ) is there nothing good the govt. does? Come on, we know your answer....right.
Are you inferring that you do NOT think that Parler should be shut down? Or that the , like theoritical grains example. the free market and "terms
rules.
Is it wrong to infer you approve of twitter, or in this case, amazon, in denying someone an opportunity to conduct business, IE editing, hence, you approve of their 230 exclusion & status?
or, we could just answer......