FORUM: Discussion
2018 FanLax D Performance (vs. 2017)
This is a list, in order, of how the FanLax Ds performed in 2018. Hofstra is top of the pile with 28 points followed by Denver, Army, etc. The next number (e.g. 18 for Hofstra) is how many points, positive or negative, the team improved or worsened from 2017 to 2018. Hofstra improved by 18 points. Denver and Georgetown improved the most with 29 points. Princeton worsened the most with -37.
2018 | 18 | 18-17 |
Hofstra D | 28 | 18 |
Denver D | 19 | 29 |
Army D | 18 | 1 |
UMBC D | 17 | -6 |
Navy D | 15 | 6 |
Notre Dame D | 13 | 2 |
Yale D | 12 | 11 |
Georgetown D | 10 | 29 |
Towson D | 9 | -8 |
Duke D | 9 | -7 |
Maryland D | 8 | 7 |
Loyola D | 7 | -6 |
PSU D | 5 | 10 |
OSU D | 3 | -13 |
Rutgers D | -2 | -13 |
Umass D | -2 | 0 |
Upenn D | -3 | 15 |
Cornell D | -4 | 20 |
JHU D | -6 | 5 |
Syracuse D | -9 | -4 |
UNC D | -12 | -2 |
Fairfield D | -12 | -2 |
UVA D | -25 | 9 |
Princeton D | -33 | -37 |
2018 FanLax Ds in Draft Order (with 2018-2017 Performance)
A list of when each D was picked in draft order followed by the 2018-2017 Performance Numbers from above. (A 2 after a FanLax team’s name means this was the relevant FanLax team’s 2nd D pick.)
Pick | Rnd | FanLax Team | NCAA D | 18 | 18-17 |
19 | 2.1 | Greenielax | DENVER D | 19 | 29 |
21 | 2.3 | FCALax | HOFSTRA D | 28 | 18 |
22 | 2.4 | Ohmilax34 | TOWSON D | 9 | -8 |
24 | 2.6 | CalLaxDad | MARYLAND D | 8 | 7 |
25 | 2.7 | Genghiskhanbluejay | ARMY D | 18 | 1 |
26 | 2.8 | Matnum PI | UMBC D | 17 | -6 |
30 | 2.12 | HipandKneeDoc | LOYOLA D | 7 | -6 |
32 | 2.14 | GCCLax | DUKE D | 9 | -7 |
34 | 2.16 | Stegmakk | OSU D | 3 | -13 |
36 | 2.18 | Maddog | RUTGERS D | -2 | -13 |
37 | 3.1 | Maddog 2 | PSU D | 5 | 10 |
43 | 3.7 | Ocanada | YALE D | 12 | 11 |
45 | 3.9 | EZE | NOTRE DAME D | 13 | 2 |
47 | 3.11 | PA Talk | NAVY D | 15 | 6 |
51 | 3.15 | UK Lax | PRINCETON D | -33 | -37 |
56 | 4.1 | Greenielax 2 | SYRACUSE D | -9 | -4 |
65 | 4,10 | NJLaxx11 | UMASS D | -2 | 0 |
77 | 5.4 | Wholly Metro | CORNELL D | -4 | 20 |
88 | 5.15 | FCALax 2 | UVA D | -25 | 9 |
89 | 5.16 | NC Lax | JHU D | -6 | 5 |
99 | 6.9 | GCCLax 2 | GEORGETOWN D | 10 | 29 |
103 | 7.1 | TartanLax | UNC D | -12 | -2 |
107 | 7.5 | Genghiskhanbluejay 2 | FAIRFIELD D | -12 | -2 |
115 | 8.5 | HipandKneeDoc 2 | Upenn D | -3 | 15 |
2018 FanLax D Draft Efficiency
A list of the FanLax Ds in order of Draft Efficiency. Draft Efficiency is calculated by comparing when a D was drafted vs. how that D performed. i.e. If a D is drafted #1, it should be the #1 performing D. The disparity between when a D was drafted and how they performed dictates the D Draft Efficiency. (A 2 after a FanLax team’s name means this was the relevant FanLax team’s 2nd D pick.)
Pick | Rnd | FanLax Team | NCAA D | Pick | Rank | Eff |
99 | 6.9 | GCCLax 2 | GEORGETOWN D | 21 | 8 | 13 |
47 | 3.11 | PA Talk | NAVY D | 14 | 5 | 9 |
115 | 8.5 | HipandKneeDoc | Upenn D | 24 | 17 | 7 |
45 | 3.9 | EZE | NOTRE DAME D | 13 | 6 | 7 |
43 | 3.7 | Ocanada | YALE D | 12 | 7 | 5 |
26 | 2.8 | Matnum PI | UMBC D | 6 | 4 | 2 |
25 | 2.7 | Genghiskhanbluejay | ARMY D | 5 | 3 | 2 |
103 | 7.1 | TartanLax1822 | UNC D | 22 | 21 | 1 |
65 | 4,10 | NJLaxx11 | UMASS D | 17 | 16 | 1 |
89 | 5.16 | NC Lax | JHU D | 20 | 19 | 1 |
107 | 7.5 | Genghiskhanbluejay 2 | FAIRFIELD D | 23 | 22 | 1 |
21 | 2.3 | FCALax | HOFSTRA D | 2 | 1 | 1 |
77 | 5.4 | Wholly Metro | CORNELL D | 18 | 18 | 0 |
19 | 2.1 | Greenielax | DENVER D | 1 | 2 | -1 |
37 | 3.1 | Maddog | PSU D | 11 | 13 | -2 |
32 | 2.14 | GCCLax | DUKE D | 8 | 10 | -2 |
56 | 4.1 | Greenielax 2 | SYRACUSE D | 16 | 20 | -4 |
88 | 5.15 | FCALax 2 | UVA D | 19 | 23 | -4 |
34 | 2.16 | Stegmakk | OSU D | 9 | 14 | -5 |
36 | 2.18 | Maddog 2 | RUTGERS D | 10 | 15 | -5 |
30 | 2.12 | HipandKneeDoc 2 | LOYOLA D | 7 | 12 | -5 |
22 | 2.4 | Ohmilax34 | TOWSON D | 3 | 9 | -6 |
24 | 2.6 | CalLaxDad | MARYLAND D | 4 | 11 | -7 |
51 | 3.15 | UK Lax | PRINCETON D | 15 | 24 | -9 |
FORUM: Discussion