Goalkeepers

D3 Mens Lacrosse
Post Reply
Olderbarndog
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2022 9:45 am

Goalkeepers

Post by Olderbarndog »

As an old man I try to keep up with the boxscores, tracking players I had coached in the club ranks. Fortunate enough to see NESCAC, NEWMAC & CCC without too much travel. Interogative: When did (and why do) teams start rostering 4-5 keepers?
SixBySix
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by SixBySix »

Has been pretty common as long as I have been around the D3 game to recruit one goalie a year. If they all stick around, you end up with 4 at a time (plus the occasional walk-on).
Olderbarndog
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2022 9:45 am

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by Olderbarndog »

Can see it if your assistant is a goalie guru or your staff is large enough. Would be concerned about shooters getting quality reps in 6 v 6 if the talent level was substantially different. Glad to see even smaller schools with large rosters though.
BallHunt
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:46 pm
Location: DC

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by BallHunt »

Olderbarndog wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:54 pm Can see it if your assistant is a goalie guru or your staff is large enough. Would be concerned about shooters getting quality reps in 6 v 6 if the talent level was substantially different. Glad to see even smaller schools with large rosters though.
I think this is a big problem for both programs and players. Generally speaking, in D3 there is a staffing shortage to develop goalies, and talent in the other positions too. It's impossible to workout 4 goalies a day and coaches end up relying on shooting drills for reps. It ain't the same. D1 is another story, as they have the staff, and when they have mostly Saturday games there is time to workout.

In D3 you have to step on campus ready, and improve over the summer with relentless workouts.
poster formerly know as "wherestheslide"
ah23
Posts: 757
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:25 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by ah23 »

At least for some programs, goalies are coached kind of like the stereotypical kicker on a football team (“go over there and do whatever it is you do, if you screw up I’m putting the next guy in”). Obviously D3 budgets are usually limited and it’s easier to justify hiring assistants for the entire offense/defense than for one position, but man does that show up on gameday sometimes.
MVPiccoli
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:36 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by MVPiccoli »

BallHunt wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:44 pm
Olderbarndog wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:54 pm Can see it if your assistant is a goalie guru or your staff is large enough. Would be concerned about shooters getting quality reps in 6 v 6 if the talent level was substantially different. Glad to see even smaller schools with large rosters though.
I think this is a big problem for both programs and players. Generally speaking, in D3 there is a staffing shortage to develop goalies, and talent in the other positions too. It's impossible to workout 4 goalies a day and coaches end up relying on shooting drills for reps. It ain't the same. D1 is another story, as they have the staff, and when they have mostly Saturday games there is time to workout.

In D3 you have to step on campus ready, and improve over the summer with relentless workouts.
Agree with this. Very few capable coaches for that position at our level, even fewer with the bandwidth to address 4-5 of them. Same with FO. Gotta chase the development outside the lines of practice. Although, I'll say, the nuance of all positions largely go unaddressed in D3. No one leaned in to teach me the granular details of a dodge, read, or specific technique during my time in Radnor.
BallHunt
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:46 pm
Location: DC

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by BallHunt »

MVPiccoli wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 4:30 pm
BallHunt wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 7:44 pm
Olderbarndog wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 6:54 pm Can see it if your assistant is a goalie guru or your staff is large enough. Would be concerned about shooters getting quality reps in 6 v 6 if the talent level was substantially different. Glad to see even smaller schools with large rosters though.
I think this is a big problem for both programs and players. Generally speaking, in D3 there is a staffing shortage to develop goalies, and talent in the other positions too. It's impossible to workout 4 goalies a day and coaches end up relying on shooting drills for reps. It ain't the same. D1 is another story, as they have the staff, and when they have mostly Saturday games there is time to workout.

In D3 you have to step on campus ready, and improve over the summer with relentless workouts.
Agree with this. Very few capable coaches for that position at our level, even fewer with the bandwidth to address 4-5 of them. Same with FO. Gotta chase the development outside the lines of practice. Although, I'll say, the nuance of all positions largely go unaddressed in D3. No one leaned in to teach me the granular details of a dodge, read, or specific technique during my time in Radnor.
This is the big difference between D1 to D3. D1 coaching staffs can actually develop players, where D3 it's really up to the players to make strides in improving.
poster formerly know as "wherestheslide"
Laxaholic123
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2020 1:17 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by Laxaholic123 »

I'll play devil's advocate and say that I understand why teams have 4 goalies. it takes one to transfer and one to get hurt before you are sitting looking at one starter and one on the bench and hoping neither of the two get sick or break a thumb to where you can't run full field in practice. I think the pros of 4 goalies outweigh the cons of only having two on a roster. I do agree that anything more than 4 is too much and goalies won't be seeing the reps they want. I think it is up to the coaches to incorporate drills that have goalies seeing a lot of realistic shots if they are going to have that many goalies on the roster.
BallHunt
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:46 pm
Location: DC

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by BallHunt »

Laxaholic123 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:20 am I'll play devil's advocate and say that I understand why teams have 4 goalies. it takes one to transfer and one to get hurt before you are sitting looking at one starter and one on the bench and hoping neither of the two get sick or break a thumb to where you can't run full field in practice. I think the pros of 4 goalies outweigh the cons of only having two on a roster. I do agree that anything more than 4 is too much and goalies won't be seeing the reps they want. I think it is up to the coaches to incorporate drills that have goalies seeing a lot of realistic shots if they are going to have that many goalies on the roster.
If practices have a lot of 6v6 and full field, then, with 4 goalies you can get some decent realistic shots. Still doesn't replace the reps and hopefully technique of longer workouts. If you can work 4 goalies that's great!
poster formerly know as "wherestheslide"
Unknown Participant
Posts: 677
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:31 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by Unknown Participant »

BU Terriers heading to the frozen four have 4 gks on the roster. One of them has played every minute this year. If a college hockey team has 4 gks, then surely 4-5 is appropriate on a lacrosse roster (where gks serve penalties after all). When I coached HS lacrosse, a common concern was the gk getting pummeled with shots in practice. Having 4-5 certainly allows more shooters to shoot with a keeper in the cage without wearing 1-2 out.

As an aside, Tufts has 3 on the roster this year having graduated 3 last year. My sources tell me that the D coordinator knows 1-2 students on campus that played the position in HS who could be called up if 1-2 gks get hurt.
MVPiccoli
Posts: 411
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 1:36 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by MVPiccoli »

BallHunt wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:42 am
Laxaholic123 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:20 am I'll play devil's advocate and say that I understand why teams have 4 goalies. it takes one to transfer and one to get hurt before you are sitting looking at one starter and one on the bench and hoping neither of the two get sick or break a thumb to where you can't run full field in practice. I think the pros of 4 goalies outweigh the cons of only having two on a roster. I do agree that anything more than 4 is too much and goalies won't be seeing the reps they want. I think it is up to the coaches to incorporate drills that have goalies seeing a lot of realistic shots if they are going to have that many goalies on the roster.
If practices have a lot of 6v6 and full field, then, with 4 goalies you can get some decent realistic shots. Still doesn't replace the reps and hopefully technique of longer workouts. If you can work 4 goalies that's great!
That's 100% the approach. The "target practice" goalies at all levels seem to turnover a lot too. That label isn't fair, but it's accurate. Some know that will likely be their role, some are sold a bill of goods.
OC410
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:59 am

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by OC410 »

In my experience 3 is optimal 4 is too many. Coaches will "invite" as many as six to fall ball just to see who sticks around for spring. Tough position but even tougher to coach the right way. If coaches put a little extra time in with this position it can reap benefits but most don't.
NNELax
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2022 8:49 am

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by NNELax »

Keepers and FOGO's are two positions you NEED to invest in to be successful at any level...People also don't give enough credit to the SSDM...at the end of the year when the AA list comes out you'd be hard pressed to find a NC without guys from those positions listed....
OC410
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:59 am

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by OC410 »

Had a SSDM and coached a couple good ones. Face off gbs and good D helped both GK and FOGO. Dead on with NC comment
SixBySix
Posts: 292
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 12:42 pm

Re: Goalkeepers

Post by SixBySix »

NNELax wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 3:54 pm Keepers and FOGO's are two positions you NEED to invest in to be successful at any level...People also don't give enough credit to the SSDM...at the end of the year when the AA list comes out you'd be hard pressed to find a NC without guys from those positions listed....
I think you have the causality backwards on this relationship (but I would absolutely agree that SSDM is one of the most underrated positions in the sport).
Post Reply

Return to “D3 MENS LACROSSE”