NESCAC

D3 Mens Lacrosse
callaxdad
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:05 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by callaxdad »

ah23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 12:04 am Please stop treating this person as if they matter.

Their entire goal is to be as toxic as possible and derail the forum; responding accomplishes that goal. Just look at the last few pages - it's the week of the quarters and semis, people (ergit, jumpman23, TaborAlum97, shorelax12, NNELax, etc.) started posting about the upcoming games, and it was immediately drowned out by a flood of troll garbage. This place has been too good of a resource for D3 discussion over the years to suddenly turn into this.

If you do block someone (aka "add them as a foe" :roll:), all their posts look like this.

Image

It's not perfect - you still know when there is garbage in the forum, and you still see that garbage if other people quote it. However, it is minimized and no longer takes up half the page, which means it doesn't drown out everyone else's comments.

At a bare minimum, as BackLax said last week: just stop responding to them. If someone is here to make the site worse on purpose, don't help them do it.
OK, took your advice and blocked. While it is always fun to mess with (choochoo)D!cks, I can see your point how it detracts from the purpose of the Forum. Going forward I will (try to!) avoid the nuisance.
SouthieLax
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2023 10:34 am

Re: NESCAC

Post by SouthieLax »

Chipzhoo wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 8:05 am
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am
Anyone see both Midd-Bowdoin games? What changed that Bowdoin had so much trouble second time around? Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them. But a 8 hour bus ride from Maine is brutal. Let’s just hope Tufts gets by Salisbury and it is somehow an all Nescac final. That will shut up the haters
Among other things, Midd's loss of Simpson and Zink preseason made them unavailable for the first matchup.
Agreed, let’s ignore the nonsense and talk about 3 teams in the Elite 8, something most conferences have never and will never accomplish.

This is a great point on Zink/Simpson, arguably their two best players right now and they’ve only played in the same game 7 times this year. Within those 7 games are wins over Dickinson, Bowdoin, Amherst, Geneseo. The Panthers are a different team right now than when they struggled early season.
The12lov3
Posts: 286
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:21 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by The12lov3 »

Lets talk Lax - how does Tufts match up with SJF.

What about Bowdoin - Midd round 3. Who do we like? I have to say that I think that game will depend on Hobbs. The performance against RPI was outstanding and if he has another game like that, I have a hard time seeing Bowdoin losing. That being said, Middlebury is an outstanding team when they play up to their capability so depending on which team we see, could dictate who will win. I will take Midd -2 on this one.
choochooCharlie
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:11 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by choochooCharlie »

callaxdad wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 10:59 am
ah23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 12:04 am Please stop treating this person as if they matter.

Their entire goal is to be as toxic as possible and derail the forum; responding accomplishes that goal. Just look at the last few pages - it's the week of the quarters and semis, people (ergit, jumpman23, TaborAlum97, shorelax12, NNELax, etc.) started posting about the upcoming games, and it was immediately drowned out by a flood of troll garbage. This place has been too good of a resource for D3 discussion over the years to suddenly turn into this.

If you do block someone (aka "add them as a foe" :roll:), all their posts look like this.

Image

It's not perfect - you still know when there is garbage in the forum, and you still see that garbage if other people quote it. However, it is minimized and no longer takes up half the page, which means it doesn't drown out everyone else's comments.

At a bare minimum, as BackLax said last week: just stop responding to them. If someone is here to make the site worse on purpose, don't help them do it.
OK, took your advice and blocked. While it is always fun to mess with (choochoo)D!cks, I can see your point how it detracts from the purpose of the Forum. Going forward I will (try to!) avoid the nuisance.
Yes. Such sage advice. :roll:
ah23 wrote: Mon May 06, 2024 5:12 pm
ah23 wrote: Sun May 05, 2024 11:33 pm Looking forward to the excuses + doubling/tripling/quadrupling down.
As predictable as the sunrise.
ah23 wrote: Sun May 12, 2024 5:10 pm
ah23 wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:37 am
The Liberty League is the top conference in DIII lacrosse now, and for the foreseeable future.
The first part is obviously true; the second part isn’t worth engaging with.
Hey, when you’re wrong, you’re wrong.
ah23 wrote: Sun May 05, 2024 11:33 pm
SouthieLax wrote: Sun May 05, 2024 10:32 pm For four months you chirped Middlebury. But they made the conference final. Then they made the NCAAs with a 10-8 record…because of their strong schedule, which you bashed.
pcowlax wrote: Sun May 05, 2024 10:41 pm Choochoo crying himself to sleep tonight. Why did the dead baby cross the road, Blaine? I would have put in Amherst over Bowdoin but that was a toss up, Midd was clearly going to be in once they made the finals. 4 CAC, 4 LL, the dominant leagues dominating the bids. As it should be.
Oh come on, how bad could one troll be?
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:33 pm Been discussed on here for weeks. Middlebury avoids tough OOC competition.
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 06, 2024 8:33 pm They never were. Just a bunch of hype and avoiding tough OOC. When they can’t duck tough OOC they fold like a cheap suit.
choochooCharlie wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2024 6:47 am
Unknown Participant wrote: Wed Mar 06, 2024 10:15 pm CNU up there, but Lynchburg and York also in the running for overrated.
Middlebury takes the cake. Count Bowdoin among that group too.
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:07 pm Bowdoin was outplayed in all aspects. Not top 10, not top 20. Middlebury has shown their stripes. They’re out too.
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 10:07 pm 1. Tufts
2. (Maybe) Wesleyan
3+. Hodgepodge

When’s the last time the NESCAC got 1 bid?
choochooCharlie wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 8:00 am Get past the whole, “but that’s John Carroll, and this is Middlebury” schtick. At the end of the year, one will likely be regionally ranked, and one likely won’t.
choochooCharlie wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:14 am If even some of that plays out you’re looking at 1 bid remaining.
It ain’t as sure a shot as you hope.
choochooCharlie wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:32 pm :idea: Don’t say something snarky about what I called preseason, Don’t say something snarky about what I called preseason:idea:

Please note, I’m resisting the urge everyone.
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 4:23 pm Is there something that guarantees 3 bids to the NESCAC?
choochooCharlie wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 5:36 pm Why not just respectfully disagree with my assessments?
Middlebury was highly overrated.
Bowdoin was highly overrated.
The NESCAC is down relatively big this year.

Williams, of all teams, is actually looking pretty sharp through 3 vs CNU.
choochooCharlie wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 6:09 am #downyear #callaxfraud #1bid?
choochooCharlie wrote: Sun May 05, 2024 2:17 pm Middlebury is out.
Ah.

Looking forward to the excuses + doubling/tripling/quadrupling down.
Etc etc.
RetroChode
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 10, 2024 11:01 am

Re: NESCAC

Post by RetroChode »

Saturday predictions:

RIT 17 - CNU 8
Bowdoin 9 - Midd 11
Salisbury 16 - W&L 8
Tufts 18 - SJF 9

No team to hit o20 goals +105
choochooCharlie
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:11 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by choochooCharlie »

RetroChode wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:15 am Saturday predictions:

RIT 17 - CNU 8
Bowdoin 9 - Midd 11
Salisbury 16 - W&L 8
Tufts 18 - SJF 9

No team to hit o20 goals +105
RIT by 9?
If CNU shows like they did vs tufts, maybe. If thy come ready and legit, it’s a lot closer.
ah23
Posts: 767
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:25 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by ah23 »

jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them.
2022 was just their third NCAA bid ever and first time making it past the Second Round; their only NCAA wins before then were two First Round wins over Mt. Ida. Now they've making their second quarterfinal appearance in three years.

Mason deserves a ton of credit for how fast Bowdoin's rise has been, especially given the uncertainty in the program when Archbell left. Mason took over a team that hadn't made the conference tournament since 2017, hadn't finished above .500 since 2018, and didn't play at all in 2021...and has a 42-13 record so far with two NCAA QF appearances. Really, really impressive stuff.
LongPoleGuy
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2024 1:53 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by LongPoleGuy »

SouthieLax wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am
Chipzhoo wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 8:05 am
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am
Anyone see both Midd-Bowdoin games? What changed that Bowdoin had so much trouble second time around? Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them. But a 8 hour bus ride from Maine is brutal. Let’s just hope Tufts gets by Salisbury and it is somehow an all Nescac final. That will shut up the haters
Among other things, Midd's loss of Simpson and Zink preseason made them unavailable for the first matchup.
Agreed, let’s ignore the nonsense and talk about 3 teams in the Elite 8, something most conferences have never and will never accomplish.

This is a great point on Zink/Simpson, arguably their two best players right now and they’ve only played in the same game 7 times this year. Within those 7 games are wins over Dickinson, Bowdoin, Amherst, Geneseo. The Panthers are a different team right now than when they struggled early season.
Zink, Simpson, Dummer and Hickey all out for the first Bowdoin game...in other words Zink and half the defense. Simpson was 3rd in NESCAC last year in caused turnovers. Curran, Tarr, and Dummer are all top 20 this year. A healthy Midd defense has been pretty formidable down the stretch, and having Zink back adds a new element on offense. It's not the same Midd team that Bowdoin faced in Week 3.
jumpman23
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 1:55 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by jumpman23 »

ah23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 12:04 pm
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them.
2022 was just their third NCAA bid ever and first time making it past the Second Round; their only NCAA wins before then were two First Round wins over Mt. Ida. Now they've making their second quarterfinal appearance in three years.

Mason deserves a ton of credit for how fast Bowdoin's rise has been, especially given the uncertainty in the program when Archbell left. Mason took over a team that hadn't made the conference tournament since 2017, hadn't finished above .500 since 2018, and didn't play at all in 2021...and has a 42-13 record so far with two NCAA QF appearances. Really, really impressive stuff.
He deserves credit for on field performance, but sounds like Archbell may deserve the credit for recruiting the players on the field. But yes, Mason has raised this school to a whole new level so kudos to him.
jumpman23
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2023 1:55 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by jumpman23 »

LongPoleGuy wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 1:47 pm
SouthieLax wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am
Chipzhoo wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 8:05 am
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am
Anyone see both Midd-Bowdoin games? What changed that Bowdoin had so much trouble second time around? Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them. But a 8 hour bus ride from Maine is brutal. Let’s just hope Tufts gets by Salisbury and it is somehow an all Nescac final. That will shut up the haters
Among other things, Midd's loss of Simpson and Zink preseason made them unavailable for the first matchup.
Agreed, let’s ignore the nonsense and talk about 3 teams in the Elite 8, something most conferences have never and will never accomplish.

This is a great point on Zink/Simpson, arguably their two best players right now and they’ve only played in the same game 7 times this year. Within those 7 games are wins over Dickinson, Bowdoin, Amherst, Geneseo. The Panthers are a different team right now than when they struggled early season.
Zink, Simpson, Dummer and Hickey all out for the first Bowdoin game...in other words Zink and half the defense. Simpson was 3rd in NESCAC last year in caused turnovers. Curran, Tarr, and Dummer are all top 20 this year. A healthy Midd defense has been pretty formidable down the stretch, and having Zink back adds a new element on offense. It's not the same Midd team that Bowdoin faced in Week 3.
great info on those players not in first game. explains a lot. thanks and enjoy the games this weekend.
callaxdad
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 12:05 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by callaxdad »

The12lov3 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am Lets talk Lax - how does Tufts match up with SJF.

What about Bowdoin - Midd round 3. Who do we like? I have to say that I think that game will depend on Hobbs. The performance against RPI was outstanding and if he has another game like that, I have a hard time seeing Bowdoin losing. That being said, Middlebury is an outstanding team when they play up to their capability so depending on which team we see, could dictate who will win. I will take Midd -2 on this one.
I feel that if both teams played to the best of their ability and both coaching staffs put together their best game plan and executed to their best ability on game day that I’d give Midd a slight advantage. Slight!! However, as Yogi Berra once said, in theory, theory and reality are the same, in reality, they’re different. Midd has been to Jeckyl and Hyde and, nothing against Campbell but, I’ve been hugely impressed with Mason. Based on that, I am giving Bowden the slight advantage on Saturday. That said, getting healthy is a big plus for Midd. Should be fun!

As for Tufts, unless they dig themselves a 6-8 goal deficit, which they’ve done on a few occasions this year, I don’t see any way they don’t advance. Roll Bos!!
choochooCharlie
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:11 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by choochooCharlie »

ah23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 12:04 am
callaxdad wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 10:59 am
Image
ComaSlide
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2024 11:25 am

Re: NESCAC

Post by ComaSlide »

LongPoleGuy wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 1:47 pm
SouthieLax wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am
Chipzhoo wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 8:05 am
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am
Anyone see both Midd-Bowdoin games? What changed that Bowdoin had so much trouble second time around? Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them. But a 8 hour bus ride from Maine is brutal. Let’s just hope Tufts gets by Salisbury and it is somehow an all Nescac final. That will shut up the haters
Among other things, Midd's loss of Simpson and Zink preseason made them unavailable for the first matchup.
Agreed, let’s ignore the nonsense and talk about 3 teams in the Elite 8, something most conferences have never and will never accomplish.

This is a great point on Zink/Simpson, arguably their two best players right now and they’ve only played in the same game 7 times this year. Within those 7 games are wins over Dickinson, Bowdoin, Amherst, Geneseo. The Panthers are a different team right now than when they struggled early season.
Zink, Simpson, Dummer and Hickey all out for the first Bowdoin game...in other words Zink and half the defense. Simpson was 3rd in NESCAC last year in caused turnovers. Curran, Tarr, and Dummer are all top 20 this year. A healthy Midd defense has been pretty formidable down the stretch, and having Zink back adds a new element on offense. It's not the same Midd team that Bowdoin faced in Week 3.
I do worry about Simpson being off and on with injuries this season, anyone else think his fitness has been lacking? Maybe a few too many Magic Hat's up there in VT coming for his waistline, one heck of a stick though
Motorman
Posts: 89
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2024 12:59 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by Motorman »

ComaSlide wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 2:55 pm
LongPoleGuy wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 1:47 pm
SouthieLax wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am
Chipzhoo wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 8:05 am
jumpman23 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 7:40 am
Anyone see both Midd-Bowdoin games? What changed that Bowdoin had so much trouble second time around? Also doesn’t seem like Bowdoin has ever been to a final 4 in school history, so even more on line for them. But a 8 hour bus ride from Maine is brutal. Let’s just hope Tufts gets by Salisbury and it is somehow an all Nescac final. That will shut up the haters
Among other things, Midd's loss of Simpson and Zink preseason made them unavailable for the first matchup.
Agreed, let’s ignore the nonsense and talk about 3 teams in the Elite 8, something most conferences have never and will never accomplish.

This is a great point on Zink/Simpson, arguably their two best players right now and they’ve only played in the same game 7 times this year. Within those 7 games are wins over Dickinson, Bowdoin, Amherst, Geneseo. The Panthers are a different team right now than when they struggled early season.
Zink, Simpson, Dummer and Hickey all out for the first Bowdoin game...in other words Zink and half the defense. Simpson was 3rd in NESCAC last year in caused turnovers. Curran, Tarr, and Dummer are all top 20 this year. A healthy Midd defense has been pretty formidable down the stretch, and having Zink back adds a new element on offense. It's not the same Midd team that Bowdoin faced in Week 3.
I do worry about Simpson being off and on with injuries this season, anyone else think his fitness has been lacking? Maybe a few too many Magic Hat's up there in VT coming for his waistline, one heck of a stick though
Sadly Magic Hat is no longer brewed in VT near Middlebury as they brew out of state. I’m partial to Long Trail and Fiddle head anyways. Both tough on the waistline.
laxpert
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:30 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by laxpert »

The12lov3 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 11:05 am Lets talk Lax - how does Tufts match up with SJF.

What about Bowdoin - Midd round 3. Who do we like? I have to say that I think that game will depend on Hobbs. The performance against RPI was outstanding and if he has another game like that, I have a hard time seeing Bowdoin losing. That being said, Middlebury is an outstanding team when they play up to their capability so depending on which team we see, could dictate who will win. I will take Midd -2 on this one.
With just a cursory glance I don't think Fisher matches up well. Tufts has 2 First Team , 1 Third Team and 1 HM on the USA Lacrosse AA list and I
didn't see anyone from SJF. Of course Wesleyan and SLU were represented on the AA list and Fisher found a way to win those games. Might have a small craft advisory issued for Saturdays game which could factor.


Bowdoin-Midd Can't say it will be Polar Bear or Panther weather with a forecast of temps in the mid to high 70's. Will the winner have enough legs to take on the RIT CNU winner with less than 24 hours rest?
Last edited by laxpert on Thu May 16, 2024 9:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
Leonard Washington
Posts: 602
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:02 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by Leonard Washington »

laxpert wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 6:38 pm With a just a cursory glance I don't think Fisher matches up well. Tufts has 2 First Team , 1 Third Team and 1 HM on the USA Lacrosse AA list and I
didn't see anyone from SJF.
The USA All American list, and how they select it, is pretty bad, IMO.

Excited to see the USILA announcement and also who will play in the North/South game.

Tufts just has to much (everything) up and down the roster and should win comfortably.

Tufts 23
Fisher 10
First of all, ya better check your tone. I dont think you know who you're talking to. I'm Leonard Washington...I don't get butt naked for nobody!!
The12lov3
Posts: 286
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:21 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by The12lov3 »

[/quote]

With a just a cursory glance I don't think Fisher matches up well. Tufts has 2 First Team , 1 Third Team and 1 HM on the USA Lacrosse AA list and I
didn't see anyone from SJF. Of course Wesleyan and SLU were represented on the AA list and Fisher found a way to win those games. Might have a small craft advisory issued for Saturdays game which could factor.


Bowdoin-Midd Can't say it will be Polar Bear or Panther weather with a forecast of temps in the mid to high 70's. Will the winner have enough legs to take on the RIT CNU winner with less than 24 hours rest?
[/quote]

I think a lot of AA stuff is politics if you ask me. SJF has earned ALOT of respect from a lot of people. They have been historically a decent team but I would actually say they have to be pretty good to knock off not one but two teams in the top ten on consecutive days. That tells me that A) they must have some depth since you have to rely on the 2nd and 3rd midfield lines to keep people fresh B) They are peaking at the right time. Whether they can do it a third time remains to be seen but they should not be taken lightly.

Bowdoin - Midd - coin toss there. Hard to choose but I think Mid pulls this one out in a close game. The difference will be Hobbs if Bowdoin takes this one.
Chipzhoo
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2019 9:36 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by Chipzhoo »

[/quote]

I do worry about Simpson being off and on with injuries this season, anyone else think his fitness has been lacking? Maybe a few too many Magic Hat's up there in VT coming for his waistline, one heck of a stick though
[/quote]

He had the one injury that kept him out for much of the season. Once back, he hasn’t been out.
laxpert
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:30 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by laxpert »

Leonard Washington wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 6:53 pm

The USA All American list, and how they select it, is pretty bad, IMO.

Excited to see the USILA announcement and also who will play in the North/South game.

Tufts just has to much (everything) up and down the roster and should win comfortably.

Tufts 23
Fisher 10
Agree some of these lists are rough sandpaper at best. I was curious on how Fisher might contain Regnery, Hauser et al. and it appears they rely on team defense rather than one or two shut down defenders. I think Fisher will need a hot goalie and success at faceoffs to keep it close.
choochooCharlie
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:11 pm

Re: NESCAC

Post by choochooCharlie »

Tufts 23 SJF 12
Midd 11 Bowdoin 10
RIT 17 CNU 14
Sal 18 W&L 11
Post Reply

Return to “D3 MENS LACROSSE”