JUST the Stolen Documents/Mar-A-Lago/"Judge" Cannon Trial

[Typical Lax Dad]

Hey — what do y’all think about that new secret nuke that Bone Spurs told Woodward about.

Sounds pretty cool, doesn’t it?

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodward

So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

Or was he just lying and bull shirting about our nukes?

Not if he didn't disclose any specifics. It's no secret that we always have advanced weapons under development.
There's also been a lot of public discussion about the need to update & modernize our nuc arsenal, particularly with Congress.
Expiring arms control treaties & new weapons from China & Russia also fed the discussion.

You don’t know what he disclosed.

What did Woodward say he told him ?

Who cares. You don’t know what he disclosed.

However...there are tapes...

Yes. Until then, Old Admiral doesn’t know what Trump did or didn’t say. Even the publications he cited used “likely”and “probable” as operative words. But Old Admiral is all in.

I read what is in the quotes from Woodward's book that are being reported.
What's in them that you think is specific enough to be classified ?

Where did mention anything about classification? I don’t care. You don’t know what Trump said.

Before you & your TDS wingman butted in, I was replying to this specific question to me from ggait :
So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

You don’t know what he did or did not disclose. All you know is what has been printed.

This was the beginning of my response : Not if he didn't disclose any specifics.

So I was right. You don’t know what he did or did not say, hence the word if.

This was your original pithy post:

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodw

[old salt]

Hey — what do y’all think about that new secret nuke that Bone Spurs told Woodward about.

Sounds pretty cool, doesn’t it?

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodward

So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

Or was he just lying and bull shirting about our nukes?

Not if he didn't disclose any specifics. It's no secret that we always have advanced weapons under development.
There's also been a lot of public discussion about the need to update & modernize our nuc arsenal, particularly with Congress.
Expiring arms control treaties & new weapons from China & Russia also fed the discussion.

You don’t know what he disclosed.

What did Woodward say he told him ?

Who cares. You don’t know what he disclosed.

However...there are tapes...

Yes. Until then, Old Admiral doesn’t know what Trump did or didn’t say. Even the publications he cited used “likely”and “probable” as operative words. But Old Admiral is all in.

I read what is in the quotes from Woodward's book that are being reported.
What's in them that you think is specific enough to be classified ?

Where did mention anything about classification? I don’t care. You don’t know what Trump said.

Before you & your TDS wingman butted in, I was replying to this specific question to me from ggait :
So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

You don’t know what he did or did not disclose. All you know is what has been printed.

This was the beginning of my response : Not if he didn't disclose any specifics.

So I was right. You don’t know what he did or did not say, hence the word if.

This was your original pithy post:

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodw

So what ? I never indicated I knew what was said beyond what Woodward wrote, which I conveyed to ggait in answering his follow up question.

My initial post, in reply to ggait's initial question, linked to informed speculation by others about what weapon Trump may have been referring to, or not.

I was responding to ggait's question about the specific subject matter.
Apparently your TDS prevents you from processing anything that is not political.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Hey — what do y’all think about that new secret nuke that Bone Spurs told Woodward about.

Sounds pretty cool, doesn’t it?

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodward

So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

Or was he just lying and bull shirting about our nukes?

Not if he didn't disclose any specifics. It's no secret that we always have advanced weapons under development.
There's also been a lot of public discussion about the need to update & modernize our nuc arsenal, particularly with Congress.
Expiring arms control treaties & new weapons from China & Russia also fed the discussion.

You don’t know what he disclosed.

What did Woodward say he told him ?

Who cares. You don’t know what he disclosed.

However...there are tapes...

Yes. Until then, Old Admiral doesn’t know what Trump did or didn’t say. Even the publications he cited used “likely”and “probable” as operative words. But Old Admiral is all in.

I read what is in the quotes from Woodward's book that are being reported.
What's in them that you think is specific enough to be classified ?

Where did mention anything about classification? I don’t care. You don’t know what Trump said.

Before you & your TDS wingman butted in, I was replying to this specific question to me from ggait :
So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

You don’t know what he did or did not disclose. All you know is what has been printed.

This was the beginning of my response : Not if he didn't disclose any specifics.

So I was right. You don’t know what he did or did not say, hence the word if.

This was your original pithy post:

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodw

So what ? I never indicated I knew what was said beyond what Woodward wrote, which I conveyed to ggait in answering his follow up question.

My initial post, in reply to ggait's initial question, linked to informed speculation by others about what weapon Trump may have been referring to, or not.

I was responding to ggait's question about the specific subject matter.
Apparently your TDS prevents you from processing anything that is not political.

We will see what shows up in Popular Mechanics.

[old salt]

Hey — what do y’all think about that new secret nuke that Bone Spurs told Woodward about.

Sounds pretty cool, doesn’t it?

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodward

So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

Or was he just lying and bull shirting about our nukes?

Not if he didn't disclose any specifics. It's no secret that we always have advanced weapons under development.
There's also been a lot of public discussion about the need to update & modernize our nuc arsenal, particularly with Congress.
Expiring arms control treaties & new weapons from China & Russia also fed the discussion.

You don’t know what he disclosed.

What did Woodward say he told him ?

Who cares. You don’t know what he disclosed.

However...there are tapes...

Yes. Until then, Old Admiral doesn’t know what Trump did or didn’t say. Even the publications he cited used “likely”and “probable” as operative words. But Old Admiral is all in.

I read what is in the quotes from Woodward's book that are being reported.
What's in them that you think is specific enough to be classified ?

Where did mention anything about classification? I don’t care. You don’t know what Trump said.

Before you & your TDS wingman butted in, I was replying to this specific question to me from ggait :
So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

You don’t know what he did or did not disclose. All you know is what has been printed.

This was the beginning of my response : Not if he didn't disclose any specifics.

So I was right. You don’t know what he did or did not say, hence the word if.

This was your original pithy post:

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodw

So what ? I never indicated I knew what was said beyond what Woodward wrote, which I conveyed to ggait in answering his follow up question.

My initial post, in reply to ggait's initial question, linked to informed speculation by others about what weapon Trump may have been referring to, or not.

I was responding to ggait's question about the specific subject matter.
Apparently your TDS prevents you from processing anything that is not political.

We will see what shows up in Popular Mechanics.

Popular Mechanics has had 16 articles on hypersonic weapons in the past 2 years.
This is the most relevant :
https://www.popularmechanics.com/milita ... on-system/

[Typical Lax Dad]

Hey — what do y’all think about that new secret nuke that Bone Spurs told Woodward about.

Sounds pretty cool, doesn’t it?

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodward

So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

Or was he just lying and bull shirting about our nukes?

Not if he didn't disclose any specifics. It's no secret that we always have advanced weapons under development.
There's also been a lot of public discussion about the need to update & modernize our nuc arsenal, particularly with Congress.
Expiring arms control treaties & new weapons from China & Russia also fed the discussion.

You don’t know what he disclosed.

What did Woodward say he told him ?

Who cares. You don’t know what he disclosed.

However...there are tapes...

Yes. Until then, Old Admiral doesn’t know what Trump did or didn’t say. Even the publications he cited used “likely”and “probable” as operative words. But Old Admiral is all in.

I read what is in the quotes from Woodward's book that are being reported.
What's in them that you think is specific enough to be classified ?

Where did mention anything about classification? I don’t care. You don’t know what Trump said.

Before you & your TDS wingman butted in, I was replying to this specific question to me from ggait :
So was Trump actually disclosing nuclear bomb secrets, Salty?

You don’t know what he did or did not disclose. All you know is what has been printed.

This was the beginning of my response : Not if he didn't disclose any specifics.

So I was right. You don’t know what he did or did not say, hence the word if.

This was your original pithy post:

I'm waiting for Popular Mechanics to confirm which one he's talking about.

https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tec ... yield-nuke

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3 ... b-woodw

So what ? I never indicated I knew what was said beyond what Woodward wrote, which I conveyed to ggait in answering his follow up question.

My initial post, in reply to ggait's initial question, linked to informed speculation by others about what weapon Trump may have been referring to, or not.

I was responding to ggait's question about the specific subject matter.
Apparently your TDS prevents you from processing anything that is not political.

We will see what shows up in Popular Mechanics.

Popular Mechanics has had 16 articles on hypersonic weapons in the past 2 years.
This is the most relevant :
https://www.popularmechanics.com/milita ... on-system/

un huh. my subscription lapsed.

[DocBarrister]

From a former aide to President George W. Bush:

This year, on Sept. 11, 2020, our nation faces multiple crises simultaneously. But behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, we have a man incapable of resolve, incapable of focus, incapable of strength, incapable of reassurance.

In Lafayette Square, the same place we were evacuated to 19 years ago, armed agents were sent to attack American civilians with gas and rubber bullets. With that gas still hanging in the air, President Donald Trump emerged from the White House to march through the park to another national church — not for prayer or to urge national unity but for a photo op.

Around the time I walked to the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building on this fateful day in 2001, Donald Trump bragged in a live interview that with the Twin Towers in smoldering ruins, he was now the owner of the tallest building in lower Manhattan. He lamented the loss of the skyline but spared little sympathy for the loss of human life.

Today, after millions of Americans have fallen ill and almost 200,000 people have died, Trump again seems more focused on damage control and his personal finances than helping regular people. We now know that Trump knew the danger we faced with COVID-19 but intentionally played it down. More than 55 million Americans have sought unemployment benefits, and countless small businesses are failing, yet Trump spent valuable time trying to push through $1.75 billion in relief funds for a gleaming new FBI building across the street from his Trump International Hotel.

Americans don't expect our presidents to be perfect; we know they will make mistakes. But they do expect our leaders to work to ease tensions and calm fears and to be honest about the challenges we face. Instead of bringing us together, addressing racial injustice and presenting a national strategy to stop the spread of the virus, Trump has intentionally sowed division, encouraged white nationalists and vigilantes while downplaying the threats they pose to society, stoked fear and spread misinformation with dangerous consequences.

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/9 ... cna1239795

DocBarrister

[old salt]

CinC Biden's defense platfowm :
Sweet talk the EUroburghers, but no real increase in support to NATO, just tough talk to Russia.
All rhetoric, no action. Tell Putin the Cornpop story.

https://www.stripes.com/news/us/biden-s ... s-1.644631

Biden says US must maintain small force in Middle East, has no plans for major Defense cuts

Former Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he supports drawing down troops in the Middle East but if elected president would keep a small force there to prevent extremists from posing a threat to the United States and its allies.

“These ‘forever wars’ have to end. I support drawing down the troops. But here’s the problem, we still have to worry about terrorism and [the Islamic State],” Biden told Stars and Stripes in a telephone interview.

He also said he does not foresee major reductions in the U.S. defense budget as the military refocuses its attention to potential threats from “near-peer” powers such as China and Russia.

Biden spoke a day after Gen. Frank McKenzie, commander of U.S. Central Command, said that the U.S. plans to cut the troop level in Iraq from 5,200 to 3,000 by the end of the month.

He said the force in Afghanistan will drop from about 8,600 to 4,500 by November, as President Trump seeks to fulfill a key campaign promise to end “endless wars.”

Biden said conditions in Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq are so complicated that he cannot promise full withdrawal of troops in the near future.

However, he supports a small U.S. military footprint whose primary mission would be to facilitate special operations against the Islamic State, or ISIS, and other terror organizations.

“I think we need special ops capacity to coordinate with our allies,” Biden said, adding there should be a maximum of “1,500 to 2,000” on the ground, a smaller force that what he would likely inherit from Trump.

However, Biden said the military should not meddle in the political dynamics of the countries where they operate. He said U.S. forces must be able to coordinate with allies to train and lead to “take out terrorist groups who are going to continue to emerge.”

President Barack Obama, whom Biden served as vice president, abandoned efforts to maintain a military presence in Iraq after the end of major fighting. Obama removed all U.S. troops in 2011, a move critics said contributed to the rise of the Islamic State.

Despite the ongoing operations abroad, the pandemic at home, and increased government spending, Biden does not foresee major cuts to the Pentagon budget.

In fact, he said defense spending could increase in a Biden Administration.

“I don’t think [budget cuts] are inevitable, but we need priorities in the budget,” Biden said.

Republicans have long accused the Democrats of hollowing out the military through Obama era spending cuts, due in part to a bipartisan system of mandatory budget cuts known as “sequestration.”

“Rebuilding the military” through spending increases has been hailed by the Republicans as a major achievement of the Trump Administration.

Biden said, however, that the Defense Department desperately needs to innovate in emerging technology such as beefing up its cyberwarfare capabilities and unmanned aircraft.

“We have to focus more on unmanned capacity, cyber and IT, in a very modern world that is changing rapidly,” Biden said. “I’ve met with a number of my advisors and some have suggested in certain areas the budget is going to have to be increased.”

Should he become commander in chief, Biden said he would press for an inclusive military able to maintain its dominant position as the world’s most powerful force.

He has vowed to better equip the National Guard, which often trains and deploys with outdated equipment and has said transgender people should be able to openly serve in the military.

The former vice president said the largest readiness issue facing the military is America’s strained relationship with NATO. “They’re worried as hell about our failure to confront Russia diplomatically or other ways, and worried about ‘America First’ meaning ‘America Alone,’” he said.

“First thing I’m going to have to do, and I’m not joking: if elected I’m going to have to get on the phone with the heads of state and say America’s back, you can count on us.”

[Peter Brown]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work. Stunning revelation about something that actually happened, as opposed to debunked claim from anonymous sources. Note disparity in media coverage.

mh

[a fan]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work.

So you wanted to investigate the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump? And these are, of course, all Republicans.

Who are you going to ask to do that investigation, Petey? Isn't everyone "in on it"?

Let's just cut the nonsense, and make Jared Kushner our new Emperor. Then maybe TeamDeepState would finally shut up with this stupidity.

Naaaaaah. Kush is probably behind the whole thing, right, Pete?

I demand that we open an immediate investigation to investigate the investigation that investigated the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump!

[Peter Brown]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work.

So you wanted to investigate the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump? And these are, of course, all Republicans.

Who are you going to ask to do that investigation, Petey? Isn't everyone "in on it"?

Let's just cut the nonsense, and make Jared Kushner our new Emperor. Then maybe TeamDeepState would finally shut up with this stupidity.

Naaaaaah. Kush is probably behind the whole thing, right, Pete?

I demand that we open an immediate investigation to investigate the investigation that investigated the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump!

I thought investigators were beyond reproach? What did they have to hide?

[Typical Lax Dad]

More turnover in Noriega’s administration

[Peter Brown]

Trump needs to issue blanket pardons for Snowden and Assange.

Watch libs/neocon heads explode.

Do it!

[Typical Lax Dad]

Trump needs to issue blanket pardons for Snowden and Assange.

Watch libs/neocon heads explode.

Do it!

[youthathletics]

@PeteThamel
·
1h
Source: The fire at The Swamp, University of Florida’s venerable football stadium, has been put out. It was caused by a golf cart that caught on fire and is not believed to be structural.

[Typical Lax Dad]

@PeteThamel
·
1h
Source: The fire at The Swamp, University of Florida’s venerable football stadium, has been put out. It was caused by a golf cart that caught on fire and is not believed to be structural.

Peter Brown looking for his drive off a par 5.

[a fan]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work.

So you wanted to investigate the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump? And these are, of course, all Republicans.

Who are you going to ask to do that investigation, Petey? Isn't everyone "in on it"?

Let's just cut the nonsense, and make Jared Kushner our new Emperor. Then maybe TeamDeepState would finally shut up with this stupidity.

Naaaaaah. Kush is probably behind the whole thing, right, Pete?

I demand that we open an immediate investigation to investigate the investigation that investigated the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump!

I thought investigators were beyond reproach? What did they have to hide?

So then why does DeepStateNation keep assigning more investigations, Pete?

When are you gonna go after Durham? He's obviously in on it, too, right Pete?

[Peter Brown]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work.

So you wanted to investigate the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump? And these are, of course, all Republicans.

Who are you going to ask to do that investigation, Petey? Isn't everyone "in on it"?

Let's just cut the nonsense, and make Jared Kushner our new Emperor. Then maybe TeamDeepState would finally shut up with this stupidity.

Naaaaaah. Kush is probably behind the whole thing, right, Pete?

I demand that we open an immediate investigation to investigate the investigation that investigated the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump!

I thought investigators were beyond reproach? What did they have to hide?

So then why does DeepStateNation keep assigning more investigations, Pete?

When are you gonna go after Durham? He's obviously in on it, too, right Pete?

3B5AEF4E-D833-4A54-9FA9-CBF30A42F0E1.jpeg (53.8 KiB) Viewed 382 times

[a fan]

The Mueller team intentionally wiped their phones to thwart an investigation into their work.

So you wanted to investigate the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump? And these are, of course, all Republicans.

Who are you going to ask to do that investigation, Petey? Isn't everyone "in on it"?

Let's just cut the nonsense, and make Jared Kushner our new Emperor. Then maybe TeamDeepState would finally shut up with this stupidity.

Naaaaaah. Kush is probably behind the whole thing, right, Pete?

I demand that we open an immediate investigation to investigate the investigation that investigated the investigators who investigated the investigators who investigated TeamTrump!

I thought investigators were beyond reproach? What did they have to hide?

So then why does DeepStateNation keep assigning more investigations, Pete?

When are you gonna go after Durham? He's obviously in on it, too, right Pete?

3B5AEF4E-D833-4A54-9FA9-CBF30A42F0E1.jpeg

And Pete brings out the squirrels again.

[Peter Brown]

Bubba Wallace: "There's a noose in my garage!"

FBI: "We'll scramble 15 agents to investigate today!"

Tom Fitton: "The Mueller team destroyed 31 work phones to hide their tracks in 2018!"

FBI: "Sorry, we're busy at an Intersectionality training class."




(Emerald R)

[njbill]

Who is in charge of the FBI?

Billy. Boy. Barr.

Talk to him.

Or replace him with someone who can get the job done.