Page 1 of 1

Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 1:18 pm
by gymman1031
Any predictions? Have any programs that don't have them yet been talking about them?

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:15 pm
by JPAtlantic
I have to think the Terps and Rutgers must be looking for one since Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State all have them now.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:42 pm
by Essexfenwick
Terps should be “Old Bay” stadium

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 5:21 pm
by Wheels
JPAtlantic wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:15 pm I have to think the Terps and Rutgers must be looking for one since Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State all have them now.
Tills actually talked about this at an event this past week. I wouldn't count on a lacrosse-only stadium any time soon. He said the only way it could work would be to have a dual soccer-lacrosse field. MD's soccer program needs grass. Tills prefers turf. He also said that a joint soccer-lacrosse facility would mean that his program couldn't use the field for 3 months (during soccer season), so what's the point. With the Gossett renovations, they're content to stay where they are.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:58 pm
by gymman1031
Wheels wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 5:21 pm
JPAtlantic wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:15 pm I have to think the Terps and Rutgers must be looking for one since Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State all have them now.
Tills actually talked about this at an event this past week. I wouldn't count on a lacrosse-only stadium any time soon. He said the only way it could work would be to have a dual soccer-lacrosse field. MD's soccer program needs grass. Tills prefers turf. He also said that a joint soccer-lacrosse facility would mean that his program couldn't use the field for 3 months (during soccer season), so what's the point. With the Gossett renovations, they're content to stay where they are.
Thanks so much for the info, Wheels! And, not saying this is, or ever will be a factor. But due to Maryland having played in that stadium for so long, and since it is such a historic lacrosse venue, maybe leaving it would be breaking too much of a tradition.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 5:37 pm
by 1766
Rutgers. Soon.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:21 pm
by Laxfan#1969
1766 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 5:37 pmRutgers. Soon.
To go along with the fantastic combo lacrosse and soccer facility they just built (Rodkin)….I’d put that new facility up with any other lacrosse locker room / training facilities in the country…not saying it’s the best but it is as good as most. Great addition and selling point at RU.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 12:27 pm
by gymman1031
Laxfan#1969 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:21 pm
1766 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 5:37 pmRutgers. Soon.
To go along with the fantastic combo lacrosse and soccer facility they just built (Rodkin)….I’d put that new facility up with any other lacrosse locker room / training facilities in the country…not saying it’s the best but it is as good as most. Great addition and selling point at RU.
Wow! Due to Rutgers' Final Four appearance last year and the above, I don't think it would be a mistake to add Rutgers to the "next programs to win the national title for the first time" discussions.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:09 pm
by 1766
Laxfan#1969 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:21 pm
1766 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 5:37 pmRutgers. Soon.
To go along with the fantastic combo lacrosse and soccer facility they just built (Rodkin)….I’d put that new facility up with any other lacrosse locker room / training facilities in the country…not saying it’s the best but it is as good as most. Great addition and selling point at RU.
I personally haven't seen one better for lacrosse. That's been reiterated by the transfers that have brought in. The best? I can't say for certain but I'd be surprised if there were any better. Once the stadium is built, lacrosse will have all it needs for the foreseeable future. SHI isn't bad until that happens. The program's record there over the last 8 years is quite strong.

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2022 7:51 pm
by hooligan88
Saw pics of the proposed Ohio State stadium. Thats raising the bar!!! https://ohiostatebuckeyes.com/board-of- ... e-stadium/

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 11:16 am
by Gorilla Fan

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2022 11:37 am
by socalref
Not quite at the same level, but St John’s is moving to make Belson Stadium the primary lacrosse field going forward. Very nice change. It will be shared with soccer, but there isn’t much they can do on campus. There does seem to be renewed energy and support along with the new coach.

https://redstormsports.com/news/2022/12 ... 0ISN2YXCZw

Re: Programs Who Will Have Lacrosse-Only Stadiums In The Future?

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2023 4:32 pm
by JPAtlantic
gymman1031 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:58 pm
Wheels wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 5:21 pm
JPAtlantic wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 2:15 pm I have to think the Terps and Rutgers must be looking for one since Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State all have them now.
Tills actually talked about this at an event this past week. I wouldn't count on a lacrosse-only stadium any time soon. He said the only way it could work would be to have a dual soccer-lacrosse field. MD's soccer program needs grass. Tills prefers turf. He also said that a joint soccer-lacrosse facility would mean that his program couldn't use the field for 3 months (during soccer season), so what's the point. With the Gossett renovations, they're content to stay where they are.
Thanks so much for the info, Wheels! And, not saying this is, or ever will be a factor. But due to Maryland having played in that stadium for so long, and since it is such a historic lacrosse venue, maybe leaving it would be breaking too much of a tradition.
The current lacrosse facility is also right in the stadium, so why would they leave it? unless a whole lacrosse-onlly facility is built.

Natural turf does not hold up to lacrosse - even if you limit it to only games, it still turns into a mess. Look at those southern teams' natural fields every year.

MD could expand the womens lacrosse/field hockey complex to include mens lacrosse if they wanted to.