Page 12 of 12

Re: Semifinal No. 2 -- Maryland v. BC 5/27 -- 5:00 pm

Posted: Fri May 27, 2022 1:12 pm
by Baducchi
@inthe8m wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 10:33 am
Dr. Tact wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 6:10 pm
Baducchi wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 5:28 pm
Can Opener wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 5:22 pm ...Are any of you willing to just step up and admit that you are trying to bully ONW off the site?...
Can't agree more. Just Bullies...
Sounds like someone I know....maybe another alter ego?
Perfectly understandable thought given the well documented history of the many aliases.
What's perfectly understandable is that this guy is doing next to nothing and there's a gauntlet of paranoids piling on him. You people are freakin' crazy. That my post is an example of how terrible this guy is is EXACTLY what is going on here. you sheople are freakin' crazy.

Re: Semifinal No. 2 -- Maryland v. BC 5/27 -- 5:00 pm

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2022 8:03 pm
by OuttaNowhereWregget
Baducchi wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 1:12 pm
@inthe8m wrote: Fri May 27, 2022 10:33 am
Dr. Tact wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 6:10 pm
Baducchi wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 5:28 pm
Can Opener wrote: Thu May 26, 2022 5:22 pm ...Are any of you willing to just step up and admit that you are trying to bully ONW off the site?...
Can't agree more. Just Bullies...
Sounds like someone I know....maybe another alter ego?
Perfectly understandable thought given the well documented history of the many aliases.
What's perfectly understandable is that this guy is doing next to nothing and there's a gauntlet of paranoids piling on him. You people are freakin' crazy. That my post is an example of how terrible this guy is is EXACTLY what is going on here. you sheople are freakin' crazy.
Well put and well appreciated.

Image

Locked topics on WLAX forum

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 7:54 am
by Dr. Tact
I am curious why there were two topics locked today. I was going to respond to them indicating I didnt think we needed to see posts from over a year re-hashed, but it looks like that decision was made. Just interested in what the reason was. Admin?

Re: Locked topics on WLAX forum

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:41 am
by wlaxphan20
Dr. Tact wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 7:54 am I am curious why there were two topics locked today. I was going to respond to them indicating I didnt think we needed to see posts from over a year re-hashed, but it looks like that decision was made. Just interested in what the reason was. Admin?
I was curious about this as well

Re: Locked topics on WLAX forum

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:53 pm
by @inthe8m
wlaxphan20 wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:41 am
Dr. Tact wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 7:54 am I am curious why there were two topics locked today. I was going to respond to them indicating I didnt think we needed to see posts from over a year re-hashed, but it looks like that decision was made. Just interested in what the reason was. Admin?
I was curious about this as well
Yes, I imagine quite a few posters are curious about that.

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:46 pm
by admin
...and so was Admin. They were locked because a post-er locked them. I'm looking right now at how to remove post-er's abilities to lock topics. Like you, I don't like locked topics. If you want to discuss 2021 Boston College Women's Lacrosse, why not?...

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 9:32 pm
by @inthe8m
admin wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:46 pm ...and so was Admin. They were locked because a post-er locked them. I'm looking right now at how to remove post-er's abilities to lock topics. Like you, I don't like locked topics. If you want to discuss 2021 Boston College Women's Lacrosse, why not?...
Thanks.

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:56 pm
by njbill
Posters could lock threads? Dang, had we known that, it would have solved a lot of problems. Or maybe created a lot of them. Maybe it was a bot.

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2022 6:48 am
by wlaxphan20
njbill wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:56 pm Posters could lock threads? Dang, had we known that, it would have solved a lot of problems. Or maybe created a lot of them. Maybe it was a bot.
I think only the poster that created the thread could lock it. I only saw that permission for topic threads I had created when I checked for it

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:03 am
by @inthe8m
njbill wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 10:56 pm Posters could lock threads? Dang, had we known that, it would have solved a lot of problems. Or maybe created a lot of them. Maybe it was a bot.
I am a bot.

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:04 am
by 8meterPA
admin wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:46 pm ...and so was Admin. They were locked because a post-er locked them. I'm looking right now at how to remove post-er's abilities to lock topics. Like you, I don't like locked topics. If you want to discuss 2021 Boston College Women's Lacrosse, why not?...
you understand what was going on, right? It wasn't "discussing" 2021 BC lacrosse, it was trolling and the poster wanted to have the last troll in place before locking the thread. You get that, right?

Round of applause

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2022 7:59 am
by OuttaNowhereWregget
Hey! Just noticed the ads are gone! Let's hear it for Matnum!

Image

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:25 am
by DMac
8meterPA wrote: Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:04 am
admin wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 8:46 pm ...and so was Admin. They were locked because a post-er locked them. I'm looking right now at how to remove post-er's abilities to lock topics. Like you, I don't like locked topics. If you want to discuss 2021 Boston College Women's Lacrosse, why not?...
you understand what was going on, right? It wasn't "discussing" 2021 BC lacrosse, it was trolling and the poster wanted to have the last troll in place before locking the thread. You get that, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB52NEPJxUs

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:46 am
by OuttaNowhereWregget
I would like to request that a word that is currently auto changed be removed from the list.

Yesterday, I was describing the quality of planning that went into the so-called Crown Lacrosse Classic game on the WD1 boards between Johns Hopkins and Stony Brook which featured no audio, no on-screen scoreboard, no field mics, no nothing, except a wide angle video feed of the game as "pizz poor". (See, even here I have to change the letters in order to get it by the auto change feature.) I found after the fact that the word had automatically been changed to "tick". "Tick" poor planning makes no sense.

Now, I understand the seven words you can't say on television made famous by George Carlin, of which seven, this word is included. But I would suggest that most of the people interacting on these boards are adults. If an adult wants to say "pizz poor planning or performance" -- why is that unacceptable? I've read where people were called "dick" and "jerkoff" on these boards. How is pizz worse?

So, just a thought and request. Thanks for considering.

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:32 am
by Matnum PI
OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:46 am So, just a thought and request. Thanks for considering.
ammended

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:21 am
by OuttaNowhereWregget
Matnum PI wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 8:32 am
OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:46 am So, just a thought and request. Thanks for considering.
ammended
Thankee

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2024 6:35 am
by OuttaNowhereWregget
No biggie. The site was inaccessible for only about 10 minutes or so, but thought you might like to know this happened last night a little after 7 pm.

Image

Re: FanLax Feedback

Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2024 10:42 am
by Matnum PI
Thank you. Submitted this to our hosting service.