Page 465 of 848

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:23 pm
by a fan
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 12:56 pm Well, the 9th Circuit ruled, recently, proving you , and me, correct.
Yes! So relax, and stop looking for a fight that isn't there, my man.

The Patriot Act is still law. And the FISA courts are still running, out of the sight of the citizens that the courts are "supposed" to protect.

And if you look? You'll notice that I can't stand Biden....for many of the same reasons you don't like him either.


And to answer your question----no, I didn't comment on the ruling. Because it's not a surprise, and FISA and the Patriot Act..the actual problems...are still there, and no one is shutting them down.

So the abuses will continue.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
by MDlaxfan76
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, one the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:18 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, on the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
Yes. As if I don’t know what being recruited meant, particularly back then. I still have a media guide from the state tournament in which he was profiled and it mentions him being name top Sophomore in the State and who was recruiting him. I also used to go to the school office with him as he picked up his recruiting mail. Back then, then letters went to the coaches C/O.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:23 pm
by MDlaxfan76
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:18 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, on the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
Yes. As if I don’t know what being recruited meant, particularly back then. I still have a media guide from the state tournament in which he was profiled and it mentions him being name top Sophomore in the State and who was recruiting him. I also used to go to the school office with him as he picked up his recruiting mail. Back then, then letters went to the coaches C/O.
But you probably are "exaggerating"... ;)

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:27 pm
by runrussellrun
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, one the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
do you have files where you cutNpaste this stuff, or do you free hand the exact same stories, several times a week, telliing us all about you.

geezbus....and than, at the end, you conclude that you might understand my point....that PARENTS, mostly, and many, many players...exerrate. That you agree with my statement.

I live in Eastern Mass. TLD Fairfield Cty/CONN. You live somewhere near the Beltway of Baltimore. You know what you know, we all know that about you. You have declared as much. You refuse new ideas, reading material and input. From anyone. Even wgsdr. Guessing your musical taste remains with multiple plays of "brandy, ur a fine girl", Paul Anka's "having my baby" and think the Talking Heads are Anderson Cooper and Chris Matthews.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm
by seacoaster
Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:47 pm
by MDlaxfan76
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:27 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, one the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
do you have files where you cutNpaste this stuff, or do you free hand the exact same stories, several times a week, telliing us all about you.

geezbus....and than, at the end, you conclude that you might understand my point....that PARENTS, mostly, and many, many players...exerrate. That you agree with my statement.

I live in Eastern Mass. TLD Fairfield Cty/CONN. You live somewhere near the Beltway of Baltimore. You know what you know, we all know that about you. You have declared as much. You refuse new ideas, reading material and input. From anyone. Even wgsdr. Guessing your musical taste remains with multiple plays of "brandy, ur a fine girl", Paul Anka's "having my baby" and think the Talking Heads are Anderson Cooper and Chris Matthews.
My Spotify set-up answers were Nina Simone, Marvin Gaye, and Van Morrison but I'm not any music expert. I'd bet that you know a ton more than me in that arena. About various controlled substances too, for that matter, we can't all be experts...

But no, if you'd bothered to read what I wrote, you'd know that I said the opposite.

Seriously recruited players don't exaggerate and TLD certainly would know the difference.

Maybe you can't tell the difference? I don't know why being from Eastern Mass would handicap you into thinking that TLD would exaggerate or lie about his HS team mate's recruitment, but that's what you were suggesting.

But sure, there are undoubtedly some very naive or insecure folks out there...on that we can agree.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:48 pm
by Peter Brown
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.


What Democrats are scared of, such as evidenced by seacoaster's post above, is previously unsupervised poll precincts where Democrats voted at 100%+ of registered names, will finally be supervised.

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/ ... /95363314/

Just one example of a Democratic city: the problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn’t recount votes in 392 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. And two-thirds of those precincts had too many votes.

How about this one?

Mitt didn't score one vote in 59 Philly precincts. I mean, by accident, he should have gotten one.

https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/po ... votes.html

The big fraud is in your face. It comes from one direction only.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
by MDlaxfan76
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
by youthathletics
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:55 pm
by Kismet
youthathletics wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)
or his supplier sold him some really BAAAAD STUFF :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
by cradleandshoot
youthathletics wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)
Wouldn't that be a really small problem? :)

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
by cradleandshoot
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)
Wouldn't that be a really small problem? :)
Once you lick it the problem is solved. :shock:

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:00 pm
by MDlaxfan76
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)
Wouldn't that be a really small problem? :)
Once you lick it the problem is solved. :shock:
:lol: you're on a roll...

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:06 pm
by runrussellrun
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:18 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, on the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
Yes. As if I don’t know what being recruited meant, particularly back then. I still have a media guide from the state tournament in which he was profiled and it mentions him being name top Sophomore in the State and who was recruiting him. I also used to go to the school office with him as he picked up his recruiting mail. Back then, then letters went to the coaches C/O.
off the rails. I asked because YOU knew what it meant. (recruiting) Your failure to understand the obvious in on you. I asked what proof you had that he was a top recruit. I have zero idea what that means in basketball world. 50 years ago, or today. All I know of basketball is that we lost in the Maryland U's intrammural championship game........won't go into details, but it included the way its' pronounced, band that sang, We're only making plans for nigel. Or, of course, my all time favorite, "dear god".

Lacrosse? I know what recruiting was like than, and now. More accutely, what the parents know about recruiting. Than, and now. TLD, you stated that you didn't play lacrosse in HIGH school, correct? If you look at someone looking for a fight , all the time, that is on you. I was just curious what being a "top" recruit meant, in the 1970's, in Ohio. Publications certainly existed, ranking hoops players. I do not know. Again ,why I asked. mcdonalds AA didn't happen, yet, right? Were blacks even allowed to be recruited at some top schools. again, don't know. But, I will always watch the latest movie/show about the most corrupt sport in all of college sports. It's past, fascinates me. Blame it on "goodfellas"

. I bet most posters, that played lacrosse, at a top level, can tell similar stories about HS friends being top recruits, only throwing it to the drug prowling wolf. I actually know one. Being totally serious. He was a sex addict, along with beer. ...but it was the nympho that got him. He would say "trump like " things in bars. had the most beautiful girlfriends. Several marriages. etc. Crazy good lacrosse player.

In short, not my problem if you feel confronted when asked to provide further details of your life experience. Willing to bet the vast majority of posters, D1 Players included, could give details as to what really constituted serious recruiting efforts in the basketball world of the 1970's, turtle boy excluded.

and the " I know an athlete when I see one" comment IS good for a chuckle. That IS coming from your basketball, perspective, so I will cut you some slack. You can succeed in lacrosse without being a superior "athlete". Hoops, almost to the point were it IS impossible. And than there are the dads that only look at size......you're not one of those, are you?

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:13 pm
by runrussellrun
a fan wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:23 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 12:56 pm Well, the 9th Circuit ruled, recently, proving you , and me, correct.
Yes! So relax, and stop looking for a fight that isn't there, my man.

The Patriot Act is still law. And the FISA courts are still running, out of the sight of the citizens that the courts are "supposed" to protect.

And if you look? You'll notice that I can't stand Biden....for many of the same reasons you don't like him either.


And to answer your question----no, I didn't comment on the ruling. Because it's not a surprise, and FISA and the Patriot Act..the actual problems...are still there, and no one is shutting them down.

So the abuses will continue.
Not looking for a fight. Just wondering your choices of when, and where, you do. Lots and lots of comments. Just not about this. Curios as to why? Like event 201, no one cares ;)

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:30 pm
by cradleandshoot
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:00 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:59 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:52 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:50 pm
seacoaster wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:41 pm Big lies to recruit poll and ballot intimidation?

https://mobile.twitter.com/atrupar/stat ... 5818737664

The Trump problem is different than ordinary partisan rancor.
Yikes, definitely agree with many of the responses.
Don Jr has a serious drug problem.

Our country has a much bigger problem.
Maybe Guilfoyle is under the desk. 8-)
Wouldn't that be a really small problem? :)
Once you lick it the problem is solved. :shock:
:lol: you're on a roll...
I have been out of work too long. This is part of my problem when I have too much time on my hands.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:52 pm
by seacoaster
Another:

https://www.denverpost.com/2020/09/25/d ... ssion=true

Excerpt:

“In the summer of 1976, I was 14 years old and new to Colorado, my father took command of the Western Region’s National Guard. I enrolled in the brand-new Smoky Hill High School on what was then the far eastern boundary of Aurora. As a military brat, I was accustomed to moving around and not putting down roots — but as readers will know well, Colorado has a way of pulling on your heart and it became home. It remains so as my family spends as much time as possible in our Dillon residence.

Upon graduating from Cornell University, I joined the intelligence community as an analyst during President Ronald Reagan’s increasing investments in defense — a buildup that culminated in the collapse of the Soviet Union by the end of the decade. In my nearly four decades of service, I had the privilege of serving under six presidents — four Republican and two Democrat. The constant across all of those administrations was the oath I took to “protect and defend” the Constitution against “all enemies — foreign and domestic.”

I know what it takes to succeed at the highest levels of our government — intellectual curiosity, the strength of moral purpose and a commitment to selfless service. Broadly speaking, I can personally attest that Americans were very well served by those they elected to fill critical national security positions.

There is one important exception to that statement — our current president.

I have briefed him up close — and I have seen and felt the effect of his faults on our nation’s security. Out of respect for the confidential nature of Oval Office conversations, I will not provide details. Suffice to say that the person you see presiding over COVID-19 press conferences is the same one in the privacy of his office. He has little patience for facts or data that do not comport with his personal world view. Thus, the conversations are erratic and less than fully thoughtful.”

Sound like a guy you’d want to support?

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 4:06 pm
by runrussellrun
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:47 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:27 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 2:13 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:37 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:31 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 10:24 am Ok, that crossed a line, RRR.

TLD's son had a tremendous college lacrosse experience, top player, and a great education.

You're out of line.
I don't think he meant it that way. I assumed that he knows that I know how folks exaggerate.
This little exchange kind of sums up exactly what I am talking about. Arrogant , contextless baffoons chiming in when they think little.

I am talking about people embellisioning their athletic status, saying they are being recruited by this, or that, "top" college. Back when we played, it happened. It happens today. And TLD, thru his son's experience, knows exactly of what I am talking about. Think, before you spew your arrogance.
You did so in the context of saying "possibly" to TLD's asking, politely, whether you thought he was lying? "possibly"???

But, ok, you were simply suggesting that TLD would know, through watching his son's recruiting experience (and thus others?), that some people, not TLD or his son, exaggerate the level of recruitment they received...but, hey, you weren't suggesting anything more than that, nothing about his son in specific. TLD apparently understood you that way, so all good.

Except for questioning his veracity.

"back when we played". When was that, RRR?

I don't recall any of my HS buddies (1976) exaggerating the recruiting they received, which, frankly, was minimal compared to the onslaught of attention comparable players receive today. 5 of my classmates and I were D1 AA in college, most multiple years, with a whole bunch of the younger players on the team eventually doing the same, including two first teamers. 12 of my classmates started on their college teams, most D1, a few DIII. Most of the 'recruiting' was actually the athletes expressing an interest in the school, maybe an alum suggesting to a coach that he pay attention, a few college trips, and a decision made in due course. None of the showcase tournament stuff of today, none of the social media stuff. And we rarely talked about it at all. Coaches may have seen us play, but we were largely oblivious to it. Summer ball was a weeknight or two, for fun and to improve, not to "show". In season we were focused on winning games as a team.

My son went through this more recently and was lightly recruited as he didn't start on his high school team until his senior year, just as I had done, but different recruiting era. All the intensity of showcases, all-star tournaments, club, etc. Nuts, but he enjoyed the playing and was self-driven to improve. And he paid for his own extra training, etc by working. His team had 6 D1 in his class who started in college, two of whom were college AA's, three of whom, like my son made all-conference teams in college. Some others who started in DIII. Lots of team captains in the bunch. His HS junior year's team had a bunch more, including a first team AA. The top 3 players in his class, who started as sophomores, received lots of attention, well deserved, but I never heard anyone exaggerating such, not the boys, not their parents. Same for the boys in the class above him. One of those three started at Denver as a freshman, but concussions ended his career, the other two were AA's, one the Big 10 Defenseman of the Year, the other a co-captain of a national championship team. None of these families exaggerated.

That said, I do know what you may be referring to of those who do exaggerate (confusing letters of outreach with actual recruitment or just insecure braggarts), but I'm not so sure that's the case for any, or sure not many, of those who are actually seriously recruited.

and that's what you were negatively dismissing with TLD's team mate.
do you have files where you cutNpaste this stuff, or do you free hand the exact same stories, several times a week, telliing us all about you.

geezbus....and than, at the end, you conclude that you might understand my point....that PARENTS, mostly, and many, many players...exerrate. That you agree with my statement.

I live in Eastern Mass. TLD Fairfield Cty/CONN. You live somewhere near the Beltway of Baltimore. You know what you know, we all know that about you. You have declared as much. You refuse new ideas, reading material and input. From anyone. Even wgsdr. Guessing your musical taste remains with multiple plays of "brandy, ur a fine girl", Paul Anka's "having my baby" and think the Talking Heads are Anderson Cooper and Chris Matthews.
My Spotify set-up answers were Nina Simone, Marvin Gaye, and Van Morrison but I'm not any music expert. I'd bet that you know a ton more than me in that arena. About various controlled substances too, for that matter, we can't all be experts...

But no, if you'd bothered to read what I wrote, you'd know that I said the opposite.

Seriously recruited players don't exaggerate and TLD certainly would know the difference.

Maybe you can't tell the difference? I don't know why being from Eastern Mass would handicap you into thinking that TLD would exaggerate or lie about his HS team mate's recruitment, but that's what you were suggesting.

But sure, there are undoubtedly some very naive or insecure folks out there...on that we can agree.
what are you talking about. go away. When, did I evah say that TLD was "exaggerating"....or even implied as much? If I asked a question regarding golf, and how you go about getting recruited ,would you know the answer? the process in 2020? Versus the 1970's. I certainly don't. Same for college hoops. than and now. just like TLD, that IS on you, if you think everything I write is antagonistic. ON YOU.

and, thank you for understanding the "possible" differences in our regions. catching on that a backyard bbq, with Boys Latin freshman lacrosse parents only, no one is going to grab another drink while saying "...yes, UNC just verballed Richard....so excited" Why is no one going to say that at an MIAA back yard bbq? Because the likelyhood of someone knowing......blah blah, you know the rest. It's reality.

Fairfield county? You can pick your spots. But, again, for top athletes, and people for that matter, there never a need to embellish. To tell accolades.

Emass? Even at ISL and "top" club team backyard bbq's, the embellishment tree is ripe. After all, can't tell you how many times.........

So, I could be like you, and disparrage that you caught on. Instead, hats off to finally reading and understand. And look, no insults about it, aimed at you. I like who I am. I think you like who you were.

And, it's not about you, knowing a lot about music; it's about the music knowing a lot about you.

Re: 2020 Elections - Dems vs Trumpublicons

Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2020 4:18 pm
by runrussellrun
It IS interesting that MDLAXFAN does not seek out new comforts for the soul, when it comes to the arts. This mite help:

Performance of one of you named musicians

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQjCQ9IIa0k

He has played multiple times. You can find each episode and the artist. How I learned about Grimes, she appeared on this show. Well before she met Elon, while attending McGill in hip Montreal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_L ... d_episodes

This was the line up that got me hooked all those years ago..

18 June 1993 The Kinks / Belly / The Auteurs / Neneh Cherry / La Polla Records / Aimee Mann / Maldita Vecindad Y Los Hijos Del Quinto Patio

all one show. Enjoy watching fear porn all nite