Page 456 of 631

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2023 11:39 pm
by a fan
LandM wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 4:50 pm Marcus blew the cover off the top - point at his direction. I will say, about damn time. You gonna send young and highly trained folks into battle - own it. How about MD; aFan; Far; Pizza - go do it man. I responded to your request.
No clue why you lumped me in here. I'm the guy who was made fun of for cheering when Obama did nothing militarily about Crimea...while right wing America was calling him weak. Also cheered Trump for not getting involved during the Sea of Azov mess in 18.

You're talking to a card carrying peacenik, my man. If Biden did nothing but levy punitive economic sanctions on Putin after the Ukraine invasion, I would have slept just fine.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 4:45 am
by Farfromgeneva
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 10:05 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 9:10 pm
LandM wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 4:50 pm Lift 9 just got upgraded = let me know if you want pics

Marcus blew the cover off the top - point at his direction. I will say, about damn time. You gonna send young and highly trained folks into battle - own it. How about MD; aFan; Far; Pizza - go do it man. I responded to your request.

My fire is directed at Pizza - he has been under another name and he is a BS artist. He was never in SF. Call him out MD, You like calling others out, put him on the carpet.

MD, IMHO you grew up a kid in privileges'. Prep school and Dartmouth - did you make it on your own in your opinion?



'
I have no idea what you're talking about re Pizza, nor "Marcus" so I'll pass on those.

I'd heard that they opened up the backside of the mountain as well, areas previously only accessible to hikers and tree skiers...beyond my skill set.

Re "privilege", absolutely correct that I have and have had way, way above average "privilege", both economic advantages based on my parent's work and own education, and educational made possible by those resources and some of my own genetic talents and efforts of course. Big advantages out of the chute, and that's not including born a white male in our society, which has it's own "privileges". Perhaps somewhat less pronounced advantages than when I was growing up and initially competing in the world, but still some inherent structural advantages, IMO.

So, 'make it on my own'? Of course not...I don't think almost anyone actually makes it entirely on their own. Nearly every story has someone who lent a helping hand, an inspiring word, a hand up the ladder, along the way...indeed, it's a 'tell' to me when someone claims otherwise.

My wife comes from a more modest financial background, her dad never finished HS, went to war, then back on the boats like many generations before him commercial fishing. Her mom made it to nursing school, was a school nurse in the local public system. Both of her parents lost their mothers before the age of 10, both had absent fathers due to work, essentially raised themselves and their siblings. Self reliant. My wife went to public school, sewed her own clothes, worked from the age of ten, valedictorian, athlete, musician... never took a dime from her family for Dartmouth or Harvard Business School. Self reliant.

But she would never claim they she "made it on her own" as she had an intact, loving family, teachers who encouraged her, etc, etc.

That said, I haven't inherited any money (yet), have worked hard, married well, very lucky that way, and continue to believe that 'every day is a new day to close that deal' with my wife.

My dad's family had some money way back, his grandfather had been a doctor, including taking the family to Japan working in the consulate at the turn of the century...but died there. My grandfather at age 9 was put on a boat by himself back to the States with his dead father's body...he'd been supposed to go to Gilman school, but no insurance back then meant he went to public instead. He ended up working in insurance years later, but was a bad alcoholic and never managed to save anything. My dad's mom's family had some money and social privilege, but she passed away before he left HS and that family considered our side the black sheep...but he did have a good early education and due to lacrosse had the opportunity to go to UVA, where he ended up making the most of that opportunity, 3X AA, NC, captain, lived on the Lawn, etc. ROTC, went into the Army, served on the DEW line in Alaska. Got a job in banking and was quite successful, though most of his serious dough came from entrepreneurial side hustles, primarily in real estate development.

He wouldn't have claimed he "made it on his own" either.

My mom's family had some social 'privilege' but not much money, she went to Garrison Forest on scholarship, was captain of 2 sports, President of the school, went a year and a half to Wheaton, but left to get married to my dad, had me 9 and a half months later,...became a math teacher, then ran the middle school at Garrison Forest...very bright, she eventually went back to get her degree at Hopkins.

Both sides of my family have multiple ancestors who owned slaves, my mom's side, from Louisiana had KKK members too...

Everyone's background is interesting to me.
My old boss pulled me along with him. He said he grew up dirt poor in Queens and someone pulled him up. We started a leveraged finance group and he brought me in with him. A lot of people get help along the way and some of it is an invisible hand.
Everyone needs a rabbi. I had bosses throw chairs across the aisle at a analyst in my group and stuff like that. My only regret was not having one for the first 10-15yrs of my career. Think it was because I was getting into front office gigs of bigger shops from lesser perceived institutions (bulge brackets and similar aren’t recruiting Hobart or American University’s B school you have to hustle to get noticed by places like (formerly) CSFB but then I think they put you in the groups run by the aholes who have chips on their shoulders and also had to produce with minimal assistance. I ran the other way and now am too nice and my professional executive function needs a lot of work still.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 4:46 am
by Farfromgeneva
a fan wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 11:39 pm
LandM wrote: Wed Feb 22, 2023 4:50 pm Marcus blew the cover off the top - point at his direction. I will say, about damn time. You gonna send young and highly trained folks into battle - own it. How about MD; aFan; Far; Pizza - go do it man. I responded to your request.
No clue why you lumped me in here. I'm the guy who was made fun of for cheering when Obama did nothing militarily about Crimea...while right wing America was calling him weak. Also cheered Trump for not getting involved during the Sea of Azov mess in 18.

You're talking to a card carrying peacenik, my man. If Biden did nothing but levy punitive economic sanctions on Putin after the Ukraine invasion, I would have slept just fine.
He’s just spraying bullets everywhere. I don’t see how I’m included either unless the reading isn’t very close or critical but I’ll take the publicity!

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:26 am
by LandM
DocB - hopefully the kernels in the popcorn does not damage a tooth or you choke on it

aFan I agree on the statues. They were created and put up, like the names of military bases to "heal" a nation. That is it. I am going to guess that 90% of those that were on a base had no clue why they were named what they were named. I am across the beach to NAS Pensacola, I spent my high school years living near NAS Fallon, where Top Gun is now located. Working in the salt mine next to Sand Mountain, used to see allot of Navy jet jockeys.

I have to apologize if I was rude. Swimming two days in the ocean at roughly I think 60 degrees with no wet-suit and riptides was not a great idea. Age sucks. I appreciate what you said. I apologize for lumping you in with others. I am trying to pry my wife away and hoping to be in the tin can by this Sunday.

MD,
Thanks for your background. I assumed and we all know what the first three letters of that word means - mea culpa.
The back bowl has been open for about 10 years - Revelation bowl. It is beautiful there. Funny story, I am not good skier. My wife is excellent and a bumps call her. Me, I am lucky to get down the hill in one piece. She, in the middle of a blizzard when I was learning how to ski gets me on Bushwacker bumps - way out of my league but I have my powder cords and feeling good. On about turn 2 I fall; the next few turns, I fall. After about the 5th fall. I take my skies off and heave them down the hill. It was a very long walk home. We ski the groomed part as I can ski that every year and laugh all the way down.

Marcus is Marcus Latteral (spelling) - he wrote a book called Lone Survivor. First 100 pages are a pretty decent read, the rest is a rant IMHO. He was really the first SEAL that came out of the closet :lol: Then you had the Bid Laden raid crew, now you have TV shows, movies, and books and help ads for how you too can become a SEAL. FTR, my wife, my kid, and all of my friends have no clue what I did. All they know is I graduated from the Academy and did my time.

Speaking of Academy, if I had a nickel for all the folks I met who could have gone to WP, USNA, and USAFA I would not have required a job. There are allot of them out there. I can go into my local Canandaigua WalMart and meet more SEAL team 6 members then have probably served in that group- amazing. Here in Pensacola everyone has Navy Aviation. It is interesting.

Pizza was in reference to PizzaSnake. I was friends with S&O and he thought S&O was force recon even though S&O said he was never a marine. Anybody coming out here calling people the "p" or "t" word and saying his daddy was a flag officer but he was smart enough not to go to USNA. I am calling BS. Now he is a Navy diver before he was a SEAL. YOU call it all the time. Call it man. Call both sides and if you have and I missed it, my apologizes.

My total point on jumping onto this thread. Research Vietnam. Kennedy said we did not have troops on the ground :x My first commanding officer would beg to differ with you if he was still alive. IMHO you have boots on the ground in Ukraine. All it takes is one body bag with an American flag and I am not thinking the Ukrainians mean that much anymore. My second point is those who call for military action, go do it yourself. You all were critical of Cadet Bone Spurs how about Cadet Asthma? Neither one should be a disqualifier. BUT if you send young folks over, let them do their job.
IMHO we are getting into dangerous waters with Ukraine. If China jumps in you are in unchartered waters.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 12:35 pm
by PizzaSnake
LandM wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:26 am DocB - hopefully the kernels in the popcorn does not damage a tooth or you choke on it

aFan I agree on the statues. They were created and put up, like the names of military bases to "heal" a nation. That is it. I am going to guess that 90% of those that were on a base had no clue why they were named what they were named. I am across the beach to NAS Pensacola, I spent my high school years living near NAS Fallon, where Top Gun is now located. Working in the salt mine next to Sand Mountain, used to see allot of Navy jet jockeys.

I have to apologize if I was rude. Swimming two days in the ocean at roughly I think 60 degrees with no wet-suit and riptides was not a great idea. Age sucks. I appreciate what you said. I apologize for lumping you in with others. I am trying to pry my wife away and hoping to be in the tin can by this Sunday.

MD,
Thanks for your background. I assumed and we all know what the first three letters of that word means - mea culpa.
The back bowl has been open for about 10 years - Revelation bowl. It is beautiful there. Funny story, I am not good skier. My wife is excellent and a bumps call her. Me, I am lucky to get down the hill in one piece. She, in the middle of a blizzard when I was learning how to ski gets me on Bushwacker bumps - way out of my league but I have my powder cords and feeling good. On about turn 2 I fall; the next few turns, I fall. After about the 5th fall. I take my skies off and heave them down the hill. It was a very long walk home. We ski the groomed part as I can ski that every year and laugh all the way down.

Marcus is Marcus Latteral (spelling) - he wrote a book called Lone Survivor. First 100 pages are a pretty decent read, the rest is a rant IMHO. He was really the first SEAL that came out of the closet :lol: Then you had the Bid Laden raid crew, now you have TV shows, movies, and books and help ads for how you too can become a SEAL. FTR, my wife, my kid, and all of my friends have no clue what I did. All they know is I graduated from the Academy and did my time.

Speaking of Academy, if I had a nickel for all the folks I met who could have gone to WP, USNA, and USAFA I would not have required a job. There are allot of them out there. I can go into my local Canandaigua WalMart and meet more SEAL team 6 members then have probably served in that group- amazing. Here in Pensacola everyone has Navy Aviation. It is interesting.

Pizza was in reference to PizzaSnake. I was friends with S&O and he thought S&O was force recon even though S&O said he was never a marine. Anybody coming out here calling people the "p" or "t" word and saying his daddy was a flag officer but he was smart enough not to go to USNA. I am calling BS. Now he is a Navy diver before he was a SEAL. YOU call it all the time. Call it man. Call both sides and if you have and I missed it, my apologizes.

My total point on jumping onto this thread. Research Vietnam. Kennedy said we did not have troops on the ground :x My first commanding officer would beg to differ with you if he was still alive. IMHO you have boots on the ground in Ukraine. All it takes is one body bag with an American flag and I am not thinking the Ukrainians mean that much anymore. My second point is those who call for military action, go do it yourself. You all were critical of Cadet Bone Spurs how about Cadet Asthma? Neither one should be a disqualifier. BUT if you send young folks over, let them do their job.
IMHO we are getting into dangerous waters with Ukraine. If China jumps in you are in unchartered waters.
"Ring-knocker" touched a nerve, did it? I was going to let your umbrage pass without further comment, but you persist. Your reading comprehension scuks.

Re-read what I said, then we can discuss. Or continue to rant and expose yourself. Your choice, friend.

"Pizza was in reference to PizzaSnake. I was friends with S&O and he thought S&O was force recon even though S&O said he was never a marine. Anybody coming out here calling people the "p" or "t" word and saying his daddy was a flag officer but he was smart enough not to go to USNA. I am calling BS. Now he is a Navy diver before he was a SEAL. YOU call it all the time. Call it man. Call both sides and if you have and I missed it, my apologizes."

Not what I wrote. Sorry if I don't genuflect to the "annointed". Maybe if you demonstrated some bravery and selflessness through actions like Jimmy Carter and his work on the Canadian reactor or his visit to Three Mile Island while he was CIC I would afford you some respect and deference for your "service".

As a general rule, the vets I meet who call for the loudest for respect deserve the least. Bet you sit in the first pew and sing the loudest too, eh? Fan your plumage elsewhere, peacock. Oh, and remedial reading instruction is probably available at your nearest public library.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 12:41 pm
by Farfromgeneva
PizzaSnake wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 12:35 pm
LandM wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 10:26 am DocB - hopefully the kernels in the popcorn does not damage a tooth or you choke on it

aFan I agree on the statues. They were created and put up, like the names of military bases to "heal" a nation. That is it. I am going to guess that 90% of those that were on a base had no clue why they were named what they were named. I am across the beach to NAS Pensacola, I spent my high school years living near NAS Fallon, where Top Gun is now located. Working in the salt mine next to Sand Mountain, used to see allot of Navy jet jockeys.

I have to apologize if I was rude. Swimming two days in the ocean at roughly I think 60 degrees with no wet-suit and riptides was not a great idea. Age sucks. I appreciate what you said. I apologize for lumping you in with others. I am trying to pry my wife away and hoping to be in the tin can by this Sunday.

MD,
Thanks for your background. I assumed and we all know what the first three letters of that word means - mea culpa.
The back bowl has been open for about 10 years - Revelation bowl. It is beautiful there. Funny story, I am not good skier. My wife is excellent and a bumps call her. Me, I am lucky to get down the hill in one piece. She, in the middle of a blizzard when I was learning how to ski gets me on Bushwacker bumps - way out of my league but I have my powder cords and feeling good. On about turn 2 I fall; the next few turns, I fall. After about the 5th fall. I take my skies off and heave them down the hill. It was a very long walk home. We ski the groomed part as I can ski that every year and laugh all the way down.

Marcus is Marcus Latteral (spelling) - he wrote a book called Lone Survivor. First 100 pages are a pretty decent read, the rest is a rant IMHO. He was really the first SEAL that came out of the closet :lol: Then you had the Bid Laden raid crew, now you have TV shows, movies, and books and help ads for how you too can become a SEAL. FTR, my wife, my kid, and all of my friends have no clue what I did. All they know is I graduated from the Academy and did my time.

Speaking of Academy, if I had a nickel for all the folks I met who could have gone to WP, USNA, and USAFA I would not have required a job. There are allot of them out there. I can go into my local Canandaigua WalMart and meet more SEAL team 6 members then have probably served in that group- amazing. Here in Pensacola everyone has Navy Aviation. It is interesting.

Pizza was in reference to PizzaSnake. I was friends with S&O and he thought S&O was force recon even though S&O said he was never a marine. Anybody coming out here calling people the "p" or "t" word and saying his daddy was a flag officer but he was smart enough not to go to USNA. I am calling BS. Now he is a Navy diver before he was a SEAL. YOU call it all the time. Call it man. Call both sides and if you have and I missed it, my apologizes.

My total point on jumping onto this thread. Research Vietnam. Kennedy said we did not have troops on the ground :x My first commanding officer would beg to differ with you if he was still alive. IMHO you have boots on the ground in Ukraine. All it takes is one body bag with an American flag and I am not thinking the Ukrainians mean that much anymore. My second point is those who call for military action, go do it yourself. You all were critical of Cadet Bone Spurs how about Cadet Asthma? Neither one should be a disqualifier. BUT if you send young folks over, let them do their job.
IMHO we are getting into dangerous waters with Ukraine. If China jumps in you are in unchartered waters.
"Ring-knocker" touched a nerve, did it? I was going to let your umbrage pass without further comment, but you persist. Your reading comprehension scuks.

Re-read what I said, then we can discuss. Or continue to rant and expose yourself. Your choice, friend.

"Pizza was in reference to PizzaSnake. I was friends with S&O and he thought S&O was force recon even though S&O said he was never a marine. Anybody coming out here calling people the "p" or "t" word and saying his daddy was a flag officer but he was smart enough not to go to USNA. I am calling BS. Now he is a Navy diver before he was a SEAL. YOU call it all the time. Call it man. Call both sides and if you have and I missed it, my apologizes."

Not what I wrote. Sorry if I don't genuflect to the "annointed". Maybe if you demonstrated some bravery and selflessness through actions like Jimmy Carter and his work on the Canadian reactor or his visit to Three Mile Island while he was CIC I would afford you some respect and deference for your "service".

As a general rule, the vets I meet who call for the loudest for respect deserve the least. Bet you sit in the first pew and sing the loudest too, eh? Fan your plumage elsewhere, peacock. Oh, and remedial reading instruction is probably available at your nearest public library.
“You wasted $150,000 on an education you coulda got for $1.50 in late fees at the public library.”

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 12:48 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/23/europe/r ... index.html

This is all our fault. Putin is rightfully entitled to this territory. Zelenksy is just being a pain in the @ss.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:29 pm
by Farfromgeneva
I so badly want to be a warlord. Even if one of these guys, or a combination of the two:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Warlord_(wrestler)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_War

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm
by old salt
F-16's for Ukraine, update :

https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html

Administration officials, speaking on background, have warned that trying to transition Ukraine to a new fighter system in the middle of an active war would be extremely difficult, at best, especially because its air force has no experience with similarly designed aircraft.
...A similar dynamic [to the provision of tanks ] seems to be playing out now, with a number of U.S. allies in Europe saying they are open to providing advanced fighters, though none have yet committed to taking that step.

Effectiveness questioned
Experts said that it would be a mistake to believe that the provision of F-16s or similar jets to Ukraine would make a significant difference in the near term.
While Ukraine has a long-established and effective air force, the country's stock of planes and maintenance equipment is all older, Soviet-era gear, primarily MiG-29s and SU-27s, all of it completely incompatible with the more advanced planes being considered. That means that in addition to new planes, Ukraine would have to utterly overhaul its logistics and retrain its maintenance crews, monumental tasks even in peacetime.

Mike Pietrucha, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel and a veteran of more than 150 combat missions, told VOA it would take years for Ukrainian pilots to develop the expertise needed to operate the F-16 in a combat environment.
"The Ukrainians already have fighter pilots that are both talented and experienced with their form of fighter aviation, and some of that transfers," Pietrucha told VOA. "But not as much as you would hope."
"The fact that you can do air-to-air [combat] in a MiG-29 means you've got the principles right, but in an F-16, it's a different ballgame," he said. "You have different sensors, you have different weapons, and you've got a differently capable aircraft."
Training, logistics challenges
When the U.S. began the transition to jets like the F-16 from older models, it took years of training to bring the first combat-ready units online. This was because of the complexity of the planes and the inherent danger in operating a supersonic aircraft.
Pietrucha said that rushing Ukrainian pilots through training would almost certainly result in pilots dying unnecessarily.
"One of the worst things you could possibly do is to take your experienced group of fighter aviators out of Ukraine, stick them in a new airplane, throw them back into combat and expect them to do well," Pietrucha said. "Because you will overestimate their capabilities, and you will give them inappropriate taskings, and you will waste the guys that could otherwise have been your initial instructor cadre if you had just gone at a reasonable speed."
"This is a big undertaking, because the F-16 is not designed to be a particularly undemanding aircraft," Mueller said. "It is designed to operate from major bases with big maintenance infrastructures and personnel footprints."

Advanced weapons system
The F-16, though not the most advanced plane in the U.S. arsenal, is still a formidable weapon.
Originally designed by General Dynamics in the 1970s and considerably upgraded since, the F-16 is what defense experts call a "multirole" fighter jet. Over the years, it has evolved from a daytime fighter meant to engage targets within visual range into a much more sophisticated aircraft. The F-16 is now capable of operation at night, engaging targets that are beyond the horizon, and playing multiple roles in a combat situation.

More than 4,600 of the planes have been made since production began nearly 50 years ago, and new models are still being built for some foreign markets. Notably, the F-16 is in service in a number of European allies of the U.S., including NATO members Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and others.

Ukraine has formally requested that the Netherlands, which is in the process of transitioning away from the F-16 to the more advanced F-35, provide some of the planes it will be decommissioning to the Ukrainian armed forces. Dutch authorities said they are seriously considering the request.


https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/1 ... a-00083572

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who met with Cavoli and Ukrainian leaders in Munich, said he supports identifying Ukrainian pilots and maintenance crews and bringing them to the United States for training.
“It is the right thing to do to come up with a plan to identify personnel to be trained, along with the maintainers and develop a syllabus” on how to operate and repair the complex fourth-generation fighter plane.
Kelly, a retired Navy pilot with combat experience, added that Ukrainians are interested in using the warplane to hit Russian air defense systems * from far away, which would then allow other aircraft and drones to operate more freely across the country, particularly in the east and south where the fighting is concentrated.

Both American and British officials continue to say that nothing is off the table.
Slovakia, meanwhile, is in talks with Ukraine about sending MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine. “The Ukrainian president asked me to deliver the MiGs. Now, because this official request has come, the process of negotiations can be started,” Slovakian Prime Minister Eduard Heger said last week. “Our MiGs can save innocent lives in Ukraine.”


* F-16 Wild Weasel mission :
https://www.military.com/defensetech/20 ... es-destroy

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:02 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
Farfromgeneva wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:29 pm I so badly want to be a warlord. Even if one of these guys, or a combination of the two:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Warlord_(wrestler)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_War
Image

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:52 pm
by Kismet
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :

https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html

Administration officials, speaking on background, have warned that trying to transition Ukraine to a new fighter system in the middle of an active war would be extremely difficult, at best, especially because its air force has no experience with similarly designed aircraft.
...A similar dynamic [to the provision of tanks ] seems to be playing out now, with a number of U.S. allies in Europe saying they are open to providing advanced fighters, though none have yet committed to taking that step.

Effectiveness questioned
Experts said that it would be a mistake to believe that the provision of F-16s or similar jets to Ukraine would make a significant difference in the near term.
While Ukraine has a long-established and effective air force, the country's stock of planes and maintenance equipment is all older, Soviet-era gear, primarily MiG-29s and SU-27s, all of it completely incompatible with the more advanced planes being considered. That means that in addition to new planes, Ukraine would have to utterly overhaul its logistics and retrain its maintenance crews, monumental tasks even in peacetime.

Mike Pietrucha, a retired U.S. Air Force colonel and a veteran of more than 150 combat missions, told VOA it would take years for Ukrainian pilots to develop the expertise needed to operate the F-16 in a combat environment.
"The Ukrainians already have fighter pilots that are both talented and experienced with their form of fighter aviation, and some of that transfers," Pietrucha told VOA. "But not as much as you would hope."
"The fact that you can do air-to-air [combat] in a MiG-29 means you've got the principles right, but in an F-16, it's a different ballgame," he said. "You have different sensors, you have different weapons, and you've got a differently capable aircraft."
Training, logistics challenges
When the U.S. began the transition to jets like the F-16 from older models, it took years of training to bring the first combat-ready units online. This was because of the complexity of the planes and the inherent danger in operating a supersonic aircraft.
Pietrucha said that rushing Ukrainian pilots through training would almost certainly result in pilots dying unnecessarily.
"One of the worst things you could possibly do is to take your experienced group of fighter aviators out of Ukraine, stick them in a new airplane, throw them back into combat and expect them to do well," Pietrucha said. "Because you will overestimate their capabilities, and you will give them inappropriate taskings, and you will waste the guys that could otherwise have been your initial instructor cadre if you had just gone at a reasonable speed."
"This is a big undertaking, because the F-16 is not designed to be a particularly undemanding aircraft," Mueller said. "It is designed to operate from major bases with big maintenance infrastructures and personnel footprints."

Advanced weapons system
The F-16, though not the most advanced plane in the U.S. arsenal, is still a formidable weapon.
Originally designed by General Dynamics in the 1970s and considerably upgraded since, the F-16 is what defense experts call a "multirole" fighter jet. Over the years, it has evolved from a daytime fighter meant to engage targets within visual range into a much more sophisticated aircraft. The F-16 is now capable of operation at night, engaging targets that are beyond the horizon, and playing multiple roles in a combat situation.

More than 4,600 of the planes have been made since production began nearly 50 years ago, and new models are still being built for some foreign markets. Notably, the F-16 is in service in a number of European allies of the U.S., including NATO members Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and others.

Ukraine has formally requested that the Netherlands, which is in the process of transitioning away from the F-16 to the more advanced F-35, provide some of the planes it will be decommissioning to the Ukrainian armed forces. Dutch authorities said they are seriously considering the request.


https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/1 ... a-00083572

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who met with Cavoli and Ukrainian leaders in Munich, said he supports identifying Ukrainian pilots and maintenance crews and bringing them to the United States for training.
“It is the right thing to do to come up with a plan to identify personnel to be trained, along with the maintainers and develop a syllabus” on how to operate and repair the complex fourth-generation fighter plane.
Kelly, a retired Navy pilot with combat experience, added that Ukrainians are interested in using the warplane to hit Russian air defense systems * from far away, which would then allow other aircraft and drones to operate more freely across the country, particularly in the east and south where the fighting is concentrated.

Both American and British officials continue to say that nothing is off the table.
Slovakia, meanwhile, is in talks with Ukraine about sending MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine. “The Ukrainian president asked me to deliver the MiGs. Now, because this official request has come, the process of negotiations can be started,” Slovakian Prime Minister Eduard Heger said last week. “Our MiGs can save innocent lives in Ukraine.”


* F-16 Wild Weasel mission :
https://www.military.com/defensetech/20 ... es-destroy
For someone whose allegedly worried about starting WWIII what's up with seemingly advocating for sending F-16s into Ukraine :?: :?: :?: :?:
Of course, if Biden was for it, you'd hate the idea. :oops:

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:54 pm
by old salt
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :

https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html

Administration officials, speaking on background, have warned that trying to transition Ukraine to a new fighter system in the middle of an active war would be extremely difficult, at best, especially because its air force has no experience with similarly designed aircraft.
...A similar dynamic [to the provision of tanks ] seems to be playing out now, with a number of U.S. allies in Europe saying they are open to providing advanced fighters, though none have yet committed to taking that step.

More than 4,600 of the planes have been made since production began nearly 50 years ago, and new models are still being built for some foreign markets. Notably, the F-16 is in service in a number of European allies of the U.S., including NATO members Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and others.

Ukraine has formally requested that the Netherlands, which is in the process of transitioning away from the F-16 to the more advanced F-35, provide some of the planes it will be decommissioning to the Ukrainian armed forces. Dutch authorities said they are seriously considering the request.


https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/1 ... a-00083572

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who met with Cavoli and Ukrainian leaders in Munich, said he supports identifying Ukrainian pilots and maintenance crews and bringing them to the United States for training.
“It is the right thing to do to come up with a plan to identify personnel to be trained, along with the maintainers and develop a syllabus” on how to operate and repair the complex fourth-generation fighter plane.
Kelly, a retired Navy pilot with combat experience, added that Ukrainians are interested in using the warplane to hit Russian air defense systems * from far away, which would then allow other aircraft and drones to operate more freely across the country, particularly in the east and south where the fighting is concentrated.

Both American and British officials continue to say that nothing is off the table.
Slovakia, meanwhile, is in talks with Ukraine about sending MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine. “The Ukrainian president asked me to deliver the MiGs. Now, because this official request has come, the process of negotiations can be started,” Slovakian Prime Minister Eduard Heger said last week. “Our MiGs can save innocent lives in Ukraine.”


* F-16 Wild Weasel mission :
https://www.military.com/defensetech/20 ... es-destroy
I don't know if MDLF76 or Kismet consider this Indian publication to be a Russian propaganda organ, but they do provide useful reporting on military hardware details that are hard to find in "western" media.

https://eurasiantimes.com/lockheed-plan ... n-of-f-16/
There are also refitting maintenance and training issues. Long accustomed to Russian machines, Ukraine’s soldiers need proper training to operate the Western platforms and weapons. That explains why the Abrams tanks, which the US has agreed to send, will take several months to reach the battlefields in Ukraine. And this will be true for the F-16 planes, though Ukraine says it needs them the most for its “spring offensive” against Russia.

It should be noted that Ukraine has asked for dozens of F-16s, the single-engine fighter jet capable of air-to-air and air-to-ground operations, developed in the 1970s by General Dynamics. It says that F-16s are needed to provide air support for troops as they seek to reclaim cities and towns in the east and the south where Russian troops have dug in and protect Ukrainian cities and towns from Moscow’s attack planes.

Incidentally, these planes may not come to Ukraine directly from the United States but from NATO countries flying them. Ukraine understands that Poland will supply them with the F-16 once the US government approves sales or transfers of F-16s from partner nations to third-party countries (required under US laws), but other experts say that it is more likely that such transfers would come from Denmark or the Netherlands[.
As the Netherlands has around 40 F-16s and is transitioning to the more advanced F-35 fighter (also made by General Dynamics/ Lockheed Martin), sending some of its F-16s to Ukraine is said to be making better sense.


Incidentally, Lockheed Martin’s COO, Frank St. John, has said that while the company does not participate directly in negotiations on the potential supply of jets to Ukraine, it was involved in numerous discussions with third parties who are considering making their stock of F-16s available to Kyiv.
According to him, Lockheed Martin plans to “ramp up production of F-16s in Greenville (South Carolina) to get to where we can backfill pretty capably any countries that choose to do third-party transfers to help with the current conflict.”

However, the fact remains that any European country looking to supply Ukraine with its F-16s would need to get a re-export permit from Washington first. And here, there seem to be three main factors that the Biden Administration is confronted with before giving the green signal.

First, there are logistical issues. Besides the training that the Ukrainian pilots must undertake before flying the F–16s (a minimum period of six months is supposed to be needed for Ukraine’s pilots to become proficient enough for combat), the multipurpose jet also requires relatively pristine runways for takeoff and landing.

Here, F-16s are unlike the Soviet-built planes, which were designed to operate from “austere bases”; these can be damaged by objects sucked into their engines and therefore need to be inspected and maintained almost daily. But Ukraine is said to have few “pristine airfields,” Russia could bomb those repeatedly, forcing endless rounds of repair.

Secondly, there is the question of whether F-16s are needed by Ukraine when Russia has the powerful S-400 surface-to-air missile deployed in Russian-occupied Crimea and Belarus to neutralize them. To preserve the F-16s, Ukrainian pilots must fly low to avoid detection.

But then it will be a very challenging job to fly F-16s at a very low level within tens of kilometers from the front line. And if they remain low, that would significantly constrain their weapons employment and sensor picture options. So it is unclear how much these advantages F-16s would offer in the war in Ukraine.

It is pointed out that, all told, there hasn’t been much of an air war in Ukraine lately. Neither Russia nor Ukraine has flown combat planes far forward of their front lines because they know that the other side could shoot the aircraft down with its dense layers of air-defense weapons (in many cases, they have been shot down).

Instead, both sides have aimed to destroy enemy troop concentrations or other targets by firing rockets, missiles, and long-range artillery from launch pads on the ground—cheaper, more reliable, and less vulnerable than fighter planes. And that explains why the Biden administration has prioritized sending Ukraine thousands of missiles and rockets, millions of ammunition, and quality air defense systems.

Of course, Chris Gordon, a senior editor at “Air & Space Forces Magazine,” has written how the Biden Administration is constantly underestimating the importance of the Air Force as its “top US military advisors, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley are experienced ground officers (Austin is a retired Army General and Milley is the Army’s former Chief of Staff) and their collective experience is skewed toward land warfare.”

The point is that Defense Department leadership advising President Biden are products of the Army and that “they have no comprehension of the effective use of air power in a concerted conventional campaign.”

Thirdly, the mother of all the factors is the concern whether sending F-16s to Ukraine would cross a line that Russian President Vladimir Putin might regard as a provocation, to which he might respond by escalating the fight involving the tactical nuclear weapons.

It is argued that “a fully armed F-16 has a range of 500 miles, putting the plane—if it takes off from some of Ukraine’s airbases—within striking distance of targets well inside Russian territory. (ATACMs, an advanced ground-launched tactical missile that Zelensky wants but Biden doesn’t want to give him, have this same feature.)

This is not the case with any other weapon the West has given Ukraine. Biden could make Zelensky promise that his pilots would not fly the planes across the Russian border. Zelensky could be trusted to abide by the pledge; cheating would severely alienate his leading arms supplier and intelligence. But Putin’s mindset is the primary concern here; would he believe the pledge?”

In other words, will Putin regard Ukraine with F-16s as an existential threat? And, if so, will not supplying F-16s to Ukraine start World War III, involving nuclear weapons?

However, supporters of F-16s in Ukraine counter-argue that Ukraine has already struck targets inside Russia (and inside Ukrainian districts, including Crimea, that Putin claims are parts of Russia), with no escalatory consequences, though the incidents may have spurred Putin to order more intense Russian bombings of Ukrainian cities.

But then there is still a difference. So far, Ukraine has hit Russian targets with its missiles (or, in some cases, it seems, with on-the-ground saboteurs). But will not hitting Russia with F-16 be a qualitatively different situation?

In sum, all the above factors remain relevant, even though President Biden created history by visiting Ukraine on Monday. So, it remains to be seen if the typical US pattern of “first saying no, then defending that decision fiercely, only to say yes in the end” will be repeated when sending F-16s to Ukraine.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:11 pm
by old salt
Kismet wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:52 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html
For someone whose allegedly worried about starting WWIII what's up with seemingly advocating for sending F-16s into Ukraine :?: :?: :?: :?:
Of course, if Biden was for it, you'd hate the idea. :oops:
Because if it's going to happen any way, I'd like to see it done via EU NATO contributions.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm posting my research on how (imho) it's most likely to happen.

Even if they don't deploy to Ukraine in time to make a difference in the near term, making the commitment & starting the process could be part of follow-on post war defensive assistance. It also signals to Putin a NATO commitment to Ukraine's long term defense.

It is a way for a couple of our more capable & steadfast EU NATO allies (the Dutch & Danes) to make a meaningful contribution & put their retiring (but still capable & up to date) F-16's to good use, as they replace them with F-35's in their own Air Forces.
It's a way to get western fighters to Ukraine (eventually) without taking from current US & NATO inventory.
It would also provide political cover for Slovokia & Poland to donate their Mig-29's which would help immediately.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:37 pm
by Farfromgeneva
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:02 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:29 pm I so badly want to be a warlord. Even if one of these guys, or a combination of the two:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Warlord_(wrestler)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_of_War
Image
Like the jacket but a lot of brown, needs some purple and orange.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 5:45 pm
by MDlaxfan76
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:11 pm
Kismet wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:52 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html
For someone whose allegedly worried about starting WWIII what's up with seemingly advocating for sending F-16s into Ukraine :?: :?: :?: :?:
Of course, if Biden was for it, you'd hate the idea. :oops:
Because if it's going to happen any way, I'd like to see it done via EU NATO contributions.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm posting my research on how (imho) it's most likely to happen.

Even if they don't deploy to Ukraine in time to make a difference in the near term, making the commitment & starting the process could be part of follow-on post war defensive assistance. It also signals to Putin a NATO commitment to Ukraine's long term defense.

It is a way for a couple of our more capable & steadfast EU NATO allies (the Dutch & Danes) to make a meaningful contribution & put their retiring (but still capable & up to date) F-16's to good use, as they replace them with F-35's in their own Air Forces.
It's a way to get western fighters to Ukraine (eventually) without taking from current US & NATO inventory.
It would also provide political cover for Slovokia & Poland to donate their Mig-29's which would help immediately.
If I recall our conversation of a day or two ago, you argued against F-16's as unable to be flown from Ukraine's airfields due to runway length and condition? Made your head explode?

Has that changed?

You did, if I recall, suggest that in a long term situation, with enough time and preparation to build the right runways and hardened hangars, they could be a useful deterrent to future Russian aggression...do I have that right?

For purposes of that discussion, I took that position as reasonable and informed, but argued that in the meantime long range precision missiles and artillery, and drones, would be more useful without the need for the runway improvement effort, etc...could do it sooner, immediately for that matter, with devastating impact on longer reach, taking out command and control, armor, artillery, ammunition stores, and striking fear into any Russian soldier or commander thinking they had a safe haven anywhere within Ukraine's territory or in proximity of Ukraine. Morale buster as well as cutting off command and control and supply lines.

Of course, if runways can be used by F-16s and other modern air resources from allies, all the better to get moving on that right away IMO.

The Russians are using all of these sorts of weapons already.
And against civilians.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 8:22 pm
by old salt
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 5:45 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:11 pm
Kismet wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:52 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html
For someone whose allegedly worried about starting WWIII what's up with seemingly advocating for sending F-16s into Ukraine :?: :?: :?: :?:
Of course, if Biden was for it, you'd hate the idea. :oops:
Because if it's going to happen any way, I'd like to see it done via EU NATO contributions.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm posting my research on how (imho) it's most likely to happen.

Even if they don't deploy to Ukraine in time to make a difference in the near term, making the commitment & starting the process could be part of follow-on post war defensive assistance. It also signals to Putin a NATO commitment to Ukraine's long term defense.

It is a way for a couple of our more capable & steadfast EU NATO allies (the Dutch & Danes) to make a meaningful contribution & put their retiring (but still capable & up to date) F-16's to good use, as they replace them with F-35's in their own Air Forces.
It's a way to get western fighters to Ukraine (eventually) without taking from current US & NATO inventory.
It would also provide political cover for Slovokia & Poland to donate their Mig-29's which would help immediately.
If I recall our conversation of a day or two ago, you argued against F-16's as unable to be flown from Ukraine's airfields due to runway length and condition? Made your head explode?

Has that changed? No, but I think it's going to happen anyway, so I outlined my opinion on how it could best happen.
I still think Gripens & Mig-29's are the better short term option. I'd like to see Sweden's ticket to NATO admission be a lend lease of Gripens to Ukraine.


You did, if I recall, suggest that in a long term situation, with enough time and preparation to build the right runways and hardened hangars, they could be a useful deterrent to future Russian aggression...do I have that right? Yes, long term, but due to their proximity to Russia, Ukraine's runways will always be at greater risk than those of allies further away.

For purposes of that discussion, I took that position as reasonable and informed, but argued that in the meantime long range precision missiles and artillery, and drones, would be more useful without the need for the runway improvement effort, etc...could do it sooner, immediately for that matter, with devastating impact on longer reach, taking out command and control, armor, artillery, ammunition stores, and striking fear into any Russian soldier or commander thinking they had a safe haven anywhere within Ukraine's territory or in proximity of Ukraine. Morale buster as well as cutting off command and control and supply lines.DoD probably agrees with your assessment, but I sense they don't want to provide weapons with sufficient range to reach targets within Crimea or Russia.

Of course, if runways can be used by F-16s and other modern air resources from allies, all the better to get moving on that right away IMO.
It could be like the M1A1 Abrams "yes, but" gambit. Promise F-16's but not soon enough to matter in the near term, just to shut up Lindsey Graham & Zelensky. Start training F-16 pilots & mechs.

The Russians are using all of these sorts of weapons already.
And against civilians. Neither side is using their Air Force due to the effectiveness of air defenses.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 8:39 pm
by old salt

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 9:02 pm
by MDlaxfan76
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 8:22 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 5:45 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 3:11 pm
Kismet wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 2:52 pm
old salt wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 1:56 pm F-16's for Ukraine, update :https://www.voanews.com/a/political-mom ... 73498.html
For someone whose allegedly worried about starting WWIII what's up with seemingly advocating for sending F-16s into Ukraine :?: :?: :?: :?:
Of course, if Biden was for it, you'd hate the idea. :oops:
Because if it's going to happen any way, I'd like to see it done via EU NATO contributions.
I'm not advocating anything. I'm posting my research on how (imho) it's most likely to happen.

Even if they don't deploy to Ukraine in time to make a difference in the near term, making the commitment & starting the process could be part of follow-on post war defensive assistance. It also signals to Putin a NATO commitment to Ukraine's long term defense.

It is a way for a couple of our more capable & steadfast EU NATO allies (the Dutch & Danes) to make a meaningful contribution & put their retiring (but still capable & up to date) F-16's to good use, as they replace them with F-35's in their own Air Forces.
It's a way to get western fighters to Ukraine (eventually) without taking from current US & NATO inventory.
It would also provide political cover for Slovokia & Poland to donate their Mig-29's which would help immediately.
If I recall our conversation of a day or two ago, you argued against F-16's as unable to be flown from Ukraine's airfields due to runway length and condition? Made your head explode?

Has that changed? No, but I think it's going to happen anyway, so I outlined my opinion on how it could best happen.
I still think Gripens & Mig-29's are the better short term option. I'd like to see Sweden's ticket to NATO admission be a lend lease of Gripens to Ukraine.


You did, if I recall, suggest that in a long term situation, with enough time and preparation to build the right runways and hardened hangars, they could be a useful deterrent to future Russian aggression...do I have that right? Yes, long term, but due to their proximity to Russia, Ukraine's runways will always be at greater risk than those of allies further away.

For purposes of that discussion, I took that position as reasonable and informed, but argued that in the meantime long range precision missiles and artillery, and drones, would be more useful without the need for the runway improvement effort, etc...could do it sooner, immediately for that matter, with devastating impact on longer reach, taking out command and control, armor, artillery, ammunition stores, and striking fear into any Russian soldier or commander thinking they had a safe haven anywhere within Ukraine's territory or in proximity of Ukraine. Morale buster as well as cutting off command and control and supply lines.DoD probably agrees with your assessment, but I sense they don't want to provide weapons with sufficient range to reach targets within Crimea or Russia.

Of course, if runways can be used by F-16s and other modern air resources from allies, all the better to get moving on that right away IMO.
It could be like the M1A1 Abrams "yes, but" gambit. Promise F-16's but not soon enough to matter in the near term, just to shut up Lindsey Graham & Zelensky. Start training F-16 pilots & mechs.

The Russians are using all of these sorts of weapons already.
And against civilians. Neither side is using their Air Force due to the effectiveness of air defenses.
Thanks, that makes sense to me.

Other than any "ticket" being required of Sweden...we want them and Finland in, period, end of story. Turkey is the problem. They need to be persuaded, not us.

I think arrangements with Sweden to contribute will be a natural event without pressure. Same for Finland.

Yes, apparently the air defenses of Ukraine have discouraged the Russians from using more air power, having destroyed so much of it anytime they get close. I think the Ukrainian argument is that when they push forward, the precision weaponry we're providing will take out the Russian air defenses within Ukraine. Russia does not have that same capability. If that's accurate, then having the planes could well be very useful when they make their big push forward. They may lose some, but they could break the Russian's back.

But I think the longer range missiles and drones are a more straightforward, and swifter answer.

Re the 'gambit', I think less to shut people up, more to move the allies to contribute what they have that's more appropriate.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 12:58 am
by old salt
Tanks ? Yes, but.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/abrams-tan ... 5#cxrecs_s

OPINION/REVIEW & OUTLOOK

Abrams Tanks May Never Reach Ukraine
The war may be over by the time the U.S. fulfills its promise to Kyiv.

by The Editorial Board, Feb. 23, 2023

Friday marks the first anniversary of Vladimir Putin’s Ukraine invasion, and one lesson of the past year is that Western weapons can be crucial on the battlefield at manageable risk and cost to the U.S. But the Biden Administration still lacks the speed befitting the stakes, and missing-in-action Abrams tanks are the latest example.

The Administration said on Jan. 25 that the U.S. would furnish 31 Abrams tanks, the size of a Ukrainian tank battalion. Advanced Western equipment would help the Ukrainians narrow Russia’s tank advantage. Part of the U.S. calculus was to push Germany into providing its own Leopard tanks, which Berlin finally did after weeks of dithering. The hope is that some Leopards will be up and running on the country’s front lines this spring, which will be crucial to stopping new Russian advances.

Yet the U.S. Abrams tanks were announced under a procurement authority, and Administration officials said at the time they’d take “months as opposed to weeks.” Progress update a month later? Army Secretary Christine Wormuth told reporters Thursday that “none of the options that we’re exploring are weeks or two months.” The options for providing tanks feature “longer timelines,” but “I think there are options that are less than two years, less than a year-and-a-half,” she said.

Two years? That is an eternity in warfare, and the Abrams offer increasingly looks like it was an insincere promise intended to give Germany’s government political cover to provide the Leopards. That may have been necessary as diplomacy but it isn’t enough to help the Ukrainians evict Russia. A Pentagon spokesman insisted on Jan. 26 that U.S. stocks “just don’t have these tanks available in excess” for immediate transfer, even though the U.S. Marines are retiring their Abrams fleet.

The Biden Team has consistently refused to provide Ukraine some weapon or another, only to relent later. Another bad habit is announcing some purported bold step only to follow through at a glacial pace. Don’t be surprised if the same story plays out on fighter jets.

The Administration can get tanks, drones and long-range missiles into Kyiv’s hands if it summons the political will. President Biden promised this week in Poland that “Ukraine will never be a victory for Russia,” but ensuring that result will require tanks, not words.

Re: All Things Russia & Ukraine

Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2023 4:02 am
by LandM
Last reply - gotta hit the tin can and get ready for the mountains. I apologize to those trying to have an adult conversion. No body bags, tanks and planes are not gonna make that happen.

aFan, fun civil war fact, someone who saved the north's boodie and was awarded the MOH - AND SPOKE AND WROTE ABOUT HIS TIMES IN BATTLE - Joshua Chamberlain. Had he not done what he did, the famous "hook", you might be eating shrimp and grits. Tough guy, nope, lived experiences yep.

OK Pizza and FFG, reading comprehension I see is not a strong suit for either so here we go again:
1. PS last week you were a diver - I asked what depth and class - crickets;
2. PS your daddy was a flag officer and you could have gone to USNA - what class - crickets;
3. PS you have called folks posting the "p" word and the "t" word and been the macho man - I am supposedly the "tough" guy. I am telling folks my either "lived" experiences or answering a question. Call the ball
4. FFG if you have as much time on your hands to post as much as you do, raising billions of dollars, funding major deals, having a wife and kids - you sir are an amazing dude;
5. FFG, I am gonna cheap shot you back. I officiated HS football to give back - biggest jerk hole was Geneva NY - I think you are a proud graduate of that fine university.