Re: Maryland 2019
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 9:38 am
Jacob Snyder '19 OSUfcalax wrote:Really......who you got on Defense?
Parker Byrd '19 UNC
Ryan Kilcoyne '20 St. Joes
This accurate?
Jacob Snyder '19 OSUfcalax wrote:Really......who you got on Defense?
Green's particular problem was that he was a lefty attackman, and both Kellys were lefty attackmen. Next, Green wasn't real big while the Mitchells and Herbert are good-sized midfielders. This sort of worked in Jack Sawyer's favor, as he was a right-hander, and thus toward the end of the season got the start on attackMatnum PI wrote:I was looking at CHC's 2019 roster and they literally have a D1 player at every starting spot as well as on the 2nd Middy line. That's pretty ridiculous...Cooter wrote:Z.Green was one of those early recruits, who was well-thought of early on and looked like he might be a top guy as a sophomore, but then seemed to get stuck on the 2nd midfield as a senior behind some talented players at Calvert Hall.
I was discussing over on the Syracusefan forum, how if the Terps choose to put Fairman on attack it would probably give the Terps the top attack in D1.AreaLax wrote:According to MD Twitter
Logan Wisnauskas & Bubba Fairman had the most combined goals (61) by a freshman duo in Maryland history last season.
I wouldn't be surprised either.AreaLax wrote:Would not be surprised to see Fairman on the field the whole game like Kelly last year.
Green is not left handed ...Cooter wrote:along with Evan Malgier (NJ, LSM).Big Easy Lax wrote:Zach Green, a 2019 recruit from Calvert Hall also not on roster either
Z.Green was one of those early recruits, who was well-thought of early on and looked like he might be a top guy as a sophomore, but then seemed to get stuck on the 2nd midfield as a senior behind some talented players at Calvert Hall.
You are right. I looked at some old video on youtube, Green looks like a righty. Both Jacob and Daniel Kelly are lefties, so they shouldn't have kept Green off the field.Big Easy Lax wrote:Green is not left handed, his biggest problem was his last name wasn't Kelly!
Classic example of the risks of early recruiting / commitments ...
Must be #6 in all of those categories.Cooter wrote:There we go again. Maryland is ranked #3 overall, but isn't in Inside Lacrosse's top 5 attacks, midfields, speciallists or defenses. Does that figure? Uh, no.
I think one of Maryland's strengths has been how few weaknesses they have. But, you're right, this is not good content from IL. It's a list that they spent little time on and everyone loves crappy lists.Cooter wrote:There we go again. Maryland is ranked #3 overall, but isn't in Inside Lacrosse's top 5 attacks, midfields, speciallists or defenses. Does that figure? Uh, no.
The thing that gets me is IL always seems so negative towards the Terps. Making these lists involves optimism towards players improving or doing well.Like for example, (according to IL) Epstein will be an impact freshman attackman and give Hopkins the top attack group, while Makar will probably just sit on the bench for the Terps' defense. Bernhardt and Wisnauskus did as good as they possibly could last season, even though one was a sophomore and the other a freshman - no possible improvement there - and the Terps couldn't possibly find a talented 3rd guy even if the move Fairman to attack. Then there is Justin Shockey, who missed fall ball last season, but put up nice numbers at FOs and the Terps have Henningsen as a #2 punch.ohmilax34 wrote:I think one of Maryland's strengths has been how few weaknesses they have. But, you're right, this is not good content from IL. It's a list that they spent little time on and everyone loves crappy lists.Cooter wrote:There we go again. Maryland is ranked #3 overall, but isn't in Inside Lacrosse's top 5 attacks, midfields, speciallists or defenses. Does that figure? Uh, no.
I don't think it's because IL is "negative" toward the Terps. I think it's just because IL has no idea what it's doing in general. Not including Duke's midfield is a mindboggling oversight. Plenty other examples similar to that. Where's Towson on the best specialists list? (Is having the best SSDM in the country and a top 3 or 4 FOGO in Woodall not good enough? Also why are LSMs and SSDMs grouped with the specialists instead of with the defense?) Also, for what it's worth, the IL writer of all these unit ranking posts is a recent Maryland grad. So I don't think it's a case of bias.Cooter wrote:The thing that gets me is IL always seems so negative towards the Terps. Making these lists involves optimism towards players improving or doing well.Like for example, (according to IL) Epstein will be an impact freshman attackman and give Hopkins the top attack group, while Makar will probably just sit on the bench for the Terps' defense. Bernhardt and Wisnauskus did as good as they possibly could last season, even though one was a sophomore and the other a freshman - no possible improvement there - and the Terps couldn't possibly find a talented 3rd guy even if the move Fairman to attack. Then there is Justin Shockey, who missed fall ball last season, but put up nice numbers at FOs and the Terps have Henningsen as a #2 punch.ohmilax34 wrote:I think one of Maryland's strengths has been how few weaknesses they have. But, you're right, this is not good content from IL. It's a list that they spent little time on and everyone loves crappy lists.Cooter wrote:There we go again. Maryland is ranked #3 overall, but isn't in Inside Lacrosse's top 5 attacks, midfields, speciallists or defenses. Does that figure? Uh, no.
It might just be bad lists as you say. I can't see leaving OSU off the specialists list with preseason AAs Inacio (FO) and Terefenko (ssdm). They also have Borges return as one of their LSMs.
Lots of people graduate from UMd. Some aren't big UMd fans, while others can be over critical of UMd's teams.HopFan16 wrote: Also, for what it's worth, the IL writer of all these unit ranking posts is a recent Maryland grad. So I don't think it's a case of bias.
Anybody who has followed Aburn's writing or social media over the years knows he is not overly critical of Maryland teams. He voted for Roman Puglise on his AA ballot: https://twitter.com/Dan_Aburn/status/10 ... 0088532992Cooter wrote:Lots of people graduate from UMd. Some aren't big UMd fans, while others can be over critical of UMd's teams.HopFan16 wrote: Also, for what it's worth, the IL writer of all these unit ranking posts is a recent Maryland grad. So I don't think it's a case of bias.
I remember there was a Hopkins' poster who was over critical of Hopkins back on the laxpower forum, who you didn't appreciate.
But he doesn't have Curtis Corley on the team on defense, so that sort of breaks even in my book. 3 Terps in 39 players. (Only one Hopkins guy, Foley - and he is giving Hopkins the top attack. confused2 )HopFan16 wrote:Anybody who has followed Aburn's writing or social media over the years knows he is not overly critical of Maryland teams. He voted for Roman Puglise on his AA ballot: https://twitter.com/Dan_Aburn/status/10 ... 0088532992Cooter wrote:Lots of people graduate from UMd. Some aren't big UMd fans, while others can be over critical of UMd's teams.HopFan16 wrote: Also, for what it's worth, the IL writer of all these unit ranking posts is a recent Maryland grad. So I don't think it's a case of bias.
I remember there was a Hopkins' poster who was over critical of Hopkins back on the laxpower forum, who you didn't appreciate.
Maryland has received plenty of fawning coverage at IL over the years. The issue is that they just aren't very consistent and frequently make head-scratching editorial decisions. If you ask me, being the only major lax media outlet in town has made them pretty lazy. Their stories are riddled with typos. I wouldn't take any rankings they make too seriously.
I think Quint goes out of his way to not appear biased towards Hopkins and that sometimes make it seem like he hates his alma mater. But if you have a conversation with him off camera it's clear that's not the case. He's not just any Hopkins grad, he played in college on the same defense as the head coach, so if he's overly nice toward Hop then people would never stop complaining about bias. Kind of an awkward situation to be in.Cooter wrote:But he doesn't have Curtis Corley on the team on defense, so that sort of breaks even in my book. 3 Terps in 39 players. (Only one Hopkins guy, Foley - and he is giving Hopkins the top attack. confused2 )HopFan16 wrote:Anybody who has followed Aburn's writing or social media over the years knows he is not overly critical of Maryland teams. He voted for Roman Puglise on his AA ballot: https://twitter.com/Dan_Aburn/status/10 ... 0088532992Cooter wrote:Lots of people graduate from UMd. Some aren't big UMd fans, while others can be over critical of UMd's teams.HopFan16 wrote: Also, for what it's worth, the IL writer of all these unit ranking posts is a recent Maryland grad. So I don't think it's a case of bias.
I remember there was a Hopkins' poster who was over critical of Hopkins back on the laxpower forum, who you didn't appreciate.
Maryland has received plenty of fawning coverage at IL over the years. The issue is that they just aren't very consistent and frequently make head-scratching editorial decisions. If you ask me, being the only major lax media outlet in town has made them pretty lazy. Their stories are riddled with typos. I wouldn't take any rankings they make too seriously.
Puglise does seem to be developing into one of the better ssdms. I was making up a preseason All-Big ten team, a few weeks back, and I had Puglise as the 2nd team ssdm.
What about QK?
Except against Maryland, he seems to try to be fair and not such a Hopkins homer. Also, having been a top goalie and on championship teams, he often displays sort of a condescending attitude towards Hopkins' current team.
Perhaps it would seem like "quite the stretch" to a Hopkins' fan.HopFan16 wrote: Puglise is a solid player who's likely to get better but I think making him 3rd team AA is quite the stretch.