Trump's Russian Collusion

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
ggait
Posts: 4167
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by ggait »

Hey Judge Howell -- tell us what your really think:

"Even in cases of presidential impeachment, a House resolution has never, in fact, been required to begin an impeachment inquiry."

"The Speaker of the House of Representatives has announced an official impeachment inquiry, and the House Judiciary Committee(“HJC”), in exercising Congress’s “sole Power of Impeachment,”U.S.CONST.art. I, § 2, cl.5, is reviewing the evidence set out in the Mueller Report."

"The reasoning for the purported "House must vote rule" is fatally flawed. The precedential support cited [by DOJ] for the “House resolution” test is cherry-picked and incomplete, and more significantly, this test has no textual support in the U.S. Constitution, the governing rules of the House, or Rule 6(e), as interpreted in binding decisions."

"[DOJ's] arguments smack of farce. The reality is that DOJ and the White House have been openly stonewalling the House’s efforts to get information by subpoena and by agreement, and the White House has flatly stated that the Administration will not cooperate with congressional requests for information. See Letter from Pat A. Cipollone, Counsel to the President, to Representative Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, et al. (Oct. 8, 2019)."

"The White House’s stated policy of non-cooperation with the impeachment inquiry weighs heavily in favor of disclosure. Congress’s need to access grand jury material relevant to potential impeachable conduct by a President is heightened when the Executive Branch willfully obstructs channels for accessing other relevant evidence."
Boycott stupid. If you ignore the gator troll, eventually he'll just go back under his bridge.
foreverlax
Posts: 3219
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:21 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by foreverlax »

ggait wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 3:54 pm Snippet from Howell's opinion:

"Even in cases of presidential impeachment, a House resolution has never, in fact, been required to begin an impeachment inquiry."
Freakin Obama appointee using those pesky facts again. :lol:
wahoomurf
Posts: 1844
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2018 8:51 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Gather evidence steadily, go to trial in the Senate.

Post by wahoomurf »

CU88 wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:56 am
Peter Brown wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:11 am
CU88 wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:46 am
Peter Brown wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:14 am
old salt wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 11:28 pm
In your non-judicial impeachment proceedings, are documents with cell phone shadows admissible, or is that the equivalent of a notary stamp ?
The newest old standard was sentence first, trial second. Now it's sentence first, no trial at all. Salem witch trials back in vogue! If you hate the defendant enough, isn't that all that's needed? :lol: (John Jay, Eral Warren or Charles Evan Hughes? I remember that brilliant quote but forget who said it).
Rules be Rules, unless?

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-judge ... ed-1467485

If something has to be stated as a rule, it's something that's not absolutely necessary but rather preferable, like if you limit bathroom breaks, employees work harder... :lol:
Posted twice because it was so meaningful??

This is disgraceful political theater. 47 Republicans sit on those Committees and attend the investigative hearings. A number of them were part of " storming" the hearing that they had free access to.

Thug move
I heard an unfounded rumor that because of IMMENSE, VERY BIG, the ENORMOUS success of the Staircase Brother's Civil Disobedience, they're taking their act on the road. They plan on assembling en masse at Congressman Elijah Cummings's Funeral, GOD REST HIS SOUl, and pee on the hearse that will carry Mr.Cummings to his rest. Wonder if they'll bring Pizza and their cell phones?

Gaetz, Scalise, Jordan-Hastert and Mighty Mac want to send a warning to any uppity Republican Congressperson to THINK TWICE about following the precedent set that turncoat Mark Meadows.

URINE OR YOUR OUT!
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by CU88 »

Friends of Rudy Colludy getting the door of their personal safe blown off by the Feds!

Feds blow door off safe, issue subpoenas as probe into Giuliani associates escalates

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/25/politics ... index.html
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
njbill
Posts: 7166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:35 am

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by njbill »

Never a good sign when the feds blow the door off your safe.
tech37
Posts: 4364
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by tech37 »

seacoaster wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:15 pm
a fan wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 2:00 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 1:49 pm 5. America is unequaled in the history of the world and shall stay that way provided we keep tax rates low (long theory to write up here)

6. Global warming is a mixed bag of well-meaning folks concerned with the environment, and not-well-meaning socialists
So what you're saying here is:

1. You want taxpayers to continue to pay for your expensive socialized industry (Government owns and operates airports, security, safety protocols)

2. You want to keep taxes low so that we have to borrow the money to keep your business literally in the air.


That about square it? I'd agree with you personal points here. That's a sweet deal for you. For businesses like mine, not so much.

Enjoy my money, I guess. ;)
Can we go back and talk about impeachment on this thread, and use other threads for discussions that are relevant there? I understand the way we post often slides sideways, but this PB-specific discussion has gone on a while here.
seacoaster is still nervous :D
tech37
Posts: 4364
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:02 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Gather evidence steadily, go to trial in the Senate.

Post by tech37 »

tech37 wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 7:22 am
a fan wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 5:32 pm This is the silly game you play.

If I try and read into your posts, and infer meaning other than literal, you jump all over me, and say "Oh, I never said that, you're building a strawman".

And now here you are, urging me to do just that. You're asking me to understand you thought by reading things into your posts that aren't there.

So here's your chance to get what want. Do you want me to take your posts literally, or do you want me to read into them and guess at your thoughts?

Your choice, I don't care which. Pick one, and be done with it.

Or, better yet, stop complaining because I can't read your mind. ;)


And once you've made your choice, you don't get to shift between demanding I take your posts literally and not build strawmen, and demanding---as you just did----that I DON'T take you literally, and guess at what you are implying.
No game "dude"...here's a novel idea...if you care and if you're not sure what I mean by a post, try asking politely what is meant instead of replying with a snarky interpretation/misrepresentation or strawman argument? That's another option so it's actually your choice. ;)
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by seacoaster »

Judge’s Order releasing to Congress the unredacted Mueller Report:

https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper ... are#page=1
njbill
Posts: 7166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:35 am

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by njbill »

Interesting statement by the court on page 13: The OLC Opinion that a sitting president is not subject to indictment or criminal prosecution “has never been adopted, sanctioned, or in any way approved by a court.”
LandM
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:51 am

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by LandM »

Rumor on the street is there is an election. Get over it boys. Vote :shock: some of you guys are worse then a coffee klatch group :D
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 26407
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

LandM wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 6:46 pm Rumor on the street is there is an election. Get over it boys. Vote :shock: some of you guys are worse then a coffee klatch group :D
Buckle up, LandM.
It's gonna get a whole lot more painful for any Trump apologists.

And, hey, did you hear that there's an election coming up?
Get over it.
User avatar
MDlaxfan76
Posts: 26407
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by MDlaxfan76 »

njbill wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 6:18 pm Interesting statement by the court on page 13: The OLC Opinion that a sitting president is not subject to indictment or criminal prosecution “has never been adopted, sanctioned, or in any way approved by a court.”
geez, that branch of the "Deep State" keeps ruling against Trumpist authoritarian over reach.
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by youthathletics »

Where is John Brennan?
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32933
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:01 pm Where is John Brennan?

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/25/al ... n-brennan/
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by youthathletics »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:10 pm
youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:01 pm Where is John Brennan?

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/25/al ... n-brennan/
Thanks. I saw that, but figured any link posted would just be dispelled as partisan. That guy reminds me of the one parent on every lax team that has done it all and knows everything, just seems shady....kinda like Trump. ;)
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15228
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by youthathletics »

Latest....https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 37987?s=21

Democrats just announced that they no longer want the Whistleblower to testify. But everything was about the Whistleblower (they no longer want the second Whistleblower either), which they don’t want because the account of my call bore NO RELATIONSHIP to the call itself.....
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
jhu72
Posts: 14153
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by jhu72 »

youthathletics wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:28 pm Latest....https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 37987?s=21

Democrats just announced that they no longer want the Whistleblower to testify. But everything was about the Whistleblower (they no longer want the second Whistleblower either), which they don’t want because the account of my call bore NO RELATIONSHIP to the call itself.....
consider the source :roll:

The complaint was he only had second hand information. Now the dems are going to present witnesses with first hand information AND THIS IS THE PROBLEM. :lol:
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
a fan
Posts: 18552
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by a fan »

LandM wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 6:46 pm Rumor on the street is there is an election. Get over it boys. Vote :shock: some of you guys are worse then a coffee klatch group :D
I take it this means you were upset Nixon was impeached. DoI have that right?
LandM
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:51 am

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by LandM »

MD and Afan
Nope and Nope. Nixon got what he deserved. The Russians have been messing around for a long time, I am stunned that well educated people such as yourselves are still harping on this. Guess what the Russians are laughing at you guys. Ukraine is a pi$$ poor country that means nothing to me BUT some how instead of going west young man to find gold everyone seems to have gone there......

Unfortunately when he wins again who is to blame - grab a mirror because the bit$ching by the really smart people will get him re-elected - get out of your safe space and see the country.
a fan
Posts: 18552
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: IMPEACHMENT ... Constitutional method to vacate an election

Post by a fan »

a fan wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 11:58 pm
LandM wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2019 6:46 pm Rumor on the street is there is an election. Get over it boys. Vote :shock: some of you guys are worse then a coffee klatch group :D
I take it this means you were upset Nixon was impeached. DoI have that right?
You're not being consistent, then. All Americans had to do is let Nixon do his thing, and wait for the 76 election....just as you are counseling that we do here with Trump.
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”