Yep, and bottom line for them, the alternative is worse.
Agreed.
The more I sit back and observe what is going on, the more I believe that Trump is either getting played by the left, or is in on it; and so are his supporters. Trump is an opportunist, and the left has provided him and his family a silver(er) spoon for a very long time.....and in return, the US, as we knew it slips further progressive.
The Biden Harris ticket has sealed it for me, it is a win-win for the left. If Trump wins...he'll continue to give them just enough of what they want, they'll start filling more and more seats as people get sick and tired of Trump, and their donor base will grow exponentially. I believe, as I've stated awhile ago.....they have their eyes set on the majority, which is only a handful of seats in the Senate to turn it blue. The r's have to flip close to 20 in the house I believe.
What a brilliant post YA. Ever since that picture of the queen of evil and her former POTUS hubby at Trump's wedding I have asked the same question...when did the Democrats especially in NYS decide to hate the guy who gave them so much money? For crying out loud the look on the queen of evils face. She looked like she wanted to give don the con a Lewinsky right there.
Re: 2020 Elections - Desperate Don is Panicking
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 6:07 am
by seacoaster
Concerning the President’s quip about sending troops and sheriffs to the polling places on November 3:
So is this racist, mysogynistic, homophobic or truthful.
no, just stupid.
Bet you chuckled.
How are you gonna win with a guy who never got over 3% of the vote in prior runs for President and a woman who was the first to quit the primary for lack of interest and lack of money.
So is this racist, mysogynistic, homophobic or truthful.
no, just stupid.
Bet you chuckled.
How are you gonna win with a guy who never got over 3% of the vote in prior runs for President and a woman who was the first to quit the primary for lack of interest and lack of money.
… Trump.
Re: 2020 Elections - Desperate Don is Panicking
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 5:11 pm
by Peter Brown
BLM protesters terrorize the suburbs of Portland and shut down the streets as they chant & scream "Wake up, mother f—ker wake up!" 2 am.
Babies. Old people. Suburban moms. Doesn’t matter.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 6:13 pm
Looks like Joe plagiarized his acceptance speech. Read the comparisons to this deceased canadien politician.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 6:13 pm
Looks like Joe plagiarized his acceptance speech. Read the comparisons to this deceased canadien politician.
Actually not plagiarized. Same logic structure, sure, different words though.
Such whiners, left wingers from Canada! Sure
Say what you will of the Donald, but the guy does his own speeches. This plagiarism charge is picking up steam. You can’t run interference for the guy forever.
Why the insecurity to take others’ words? What’s the deal?
Re: 2020 Elections - Desperate Don is Panicking
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:06 pm
by njbill
Picking up steam? In the N.Y. Post?
What’s next? Fox? Rush?
These expressions are as old as the hills. I’ve heard them, or similar concepts, going back decades.
Next.
Re: 2020 Elections - Desperate Don is Panicking
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:09 pm
by njbill
By the way Pete, the guy who originated the word “covfefe” sued Trump for plagiarism. Trump settled out of court, paid him $130,000, and made him sign an NDA.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 6:13 pm
Looks like Joe plagiarized his acceptance speech. Read the comparisons to this deceased canadien politician.
Actually not plagiarized. Same logic structure, sure, different words though.
Such whiners, left wingers from Canada! Sure
Say what you will of the Donald, but the guy does his own speeches. This plagiarism charge is picking up steam. You can’t run interference for the guy forever.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 7:59 pm
Say what you will of the Donald, but the guy does his own speeches. This plagiarism charge is picking up steam. You can’t run interference for Trump forever.
Fixed it for ya.
Dude. You can put a houseplant up against Trump when it comes to making nonsensical speeches, and the houseplant would win.
The Lincoln project has endless ammo to use on this point for the next several months. Please, by all means, make "speeches" a campaign issue.
Trump is better off making this race about just about anything other than "making sense when talking".
No one cares about plagiarism, or pretty much anything Biden says or does. Wake up. The votes are already decided. All that matters is how many people are driven to vote....and that, my friend is about hatred.
It's a heckuva lot easier to hate Trump than vanilla wafers Biden.
Peter Brown wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 7:59 pm
Say what you will of the Donald, but the guy does his own speeches. This plagiarism charge is picking up steam. You can’t run interference for Trump forever.
Fixed it for ya.
Dude. You can put a houseplant up against Trump when it comes to making nonsensical speeches, and the houseplant would win.
The Lincoln project has endless ammo to use on this point for the next several months. Please, by all means, make "speeches" a campaign issue.
Trump is better off making this race about just about anything other than "making sense when talking".
No one cares about plagiarism, or pretty much anything Biden says or does. Wake up. The votes are already decided. All that matters is how many people are driven to vote....and that, my friend is about hatred.
It's a heckuva lot easier to hate Trump than vanilla wafers Biden.
You mean like this?
Obama took unemployment down from 10% to 4.6%...Trump knocked it down another point and a half and he walks on water!!
EgDcCtZXkAAwZoi.jpg (123.85 KiB) Viewed 1095 times
Re: 2020 Elections - Desperate Don is Panicking
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2020 11:10 pm
by RedFromMI
njbill wrote: ↑Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:06 pm
Picking up steam? In the N.Y. Post?
What’s next? Fox? Rush?
These expressions are as old as the hills. I’ve heard them, or similar concepts, going back decades.
Next.
Even in the article, it points out that a specific anti-plagiarism program _passed_ his speech... (the "plagiarism" is basically one line of his speech!)
PB is grasping at straws, and the NY Post article is trying to sensationalize something quite routine/mundane about political speech.
There are sometimes just a few ways to get across the same idea.
I used to teach a Science and Religion class at my university, and made them do a term paper. If they chose something like cloning for their topic - their plagiarism score often was a bit elevated, as some of the scientific descriptions of stem cell types can only be said certain ways.
