Page 35 of 60

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:12 am
by jhu72
Peter Brown wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:51 am
tech37 wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 8:04 am
a fan wrote: Wed Feb 23, 2022 1:49 am And how about Tech? Last year, he was demanding on this very thread Facebook and Twitter get F'ed by the government simply because they have the gall to publish what THEY want to publish. Those bastards! They should publish what Tech wants them to publish, obviously. And if they don't? Well, Congress should FORCE them to publish what Tech wants.
Not sure what your motivation is here but I'll play along (briefly)...you may have me confused with someone else.

What I remember is, I cited work by Matt Stoller, someone who IMO, seems very smart in the antitrust area. I think I specifically mentioned the idea of repealing Section 230. Just to clarify, here is a piece he wrote back in 2021. I'm not sure this is the piece I cited at the time but it's a good example:

How To Prevent the Next Social Media-Driven Attack On Democracy—and Avoid a Big Tech Censorship Regime

https://www.economicliberties.us/our-wo ... en-attack/#

I also recall going back and forth with mdlax over this issue and we both came to the same conclusion (a rare occasion) that the issue was incredibly complicated and there were no easy answers. Don't believe I've commented since then.

I have never taken a "what TECH wants" position on anything, especially when it comes to this issue. I do disagree with people who, IMO, outright lie and/or are hypocritical.



When any business fails to deliver value to its customers, the customers seek out other providers. This is what’s occurring today with Twitter and Meta. Look at the stock prices for TWTR and FB….

They caved to the loud woke leftists, suspending and terminating whole swaths of conservatives and independent thinkers. So new entities sprung up to fill demand: Spotify, Substack, Parler, Truth Social, TikTok, Rumble, Snapchat….individually they aren’t scary (maybe TikTok) but collectively and as even more appear, they are massively denting the user statistics of the legacy social media and financial platforms, hurting their bottom lines.

It’s been equally interesting to see the defiance of certain CEO’s who refuse (so far) to cave to the woke left, especially Spotify’s Ek and Coinbase’s Armstrong. They defy the left mob’s demands even as their own stock prices have suffered. It would be a easy to cave (CEO’s generally don’t love negative comments, not to mention left activists showing up at the CEO homes) but they have defiantly issued statements saying their platforms are a political firewall and they won’t change, which of course makes the dingbat lefties go weapons-grade insane.

I’m looking for a good book to explain why the left seeks to suppress speech. I can explain it in my head, but I want a good historical book to round out the history and data.
... what bullsh*t. Kellyanne doesn't get it that those make believe leftists living in his small brain, for free apparently, don't like Facebook, Twitter, etc. either. :roll: :roll:

Coinbase is not remotely a social media company. :roll: Truth Social is barely a company. :lol: :lol: Yeah, Facebook and Twitter are on the run from Truth Social. :lol: :lol:

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:19 am
by MDlaxfan76
Anyone checked to see who DWAC stock has done since Truth Social launched?

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:54 am
by Farfromgeneva
Like one of the developments where he sells his name for a piece of the equity such as the projects in Stamford, Yorktown Heights and White Plains.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 12:13 pm
by NattyBohChamps04
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Tue Mar 08, 2022 10:19 am Anyone checked to see who DWAC stock has done since Truth Social launched?
That company with shady Chinese backing?

Read an interesting piece a few weeks ago.

Trump Fans Are Making DWAC the Best-Performing SPAC of Its Kind
“This is a bigger calling — this is my man Trump about to roll out a company,” Morales, a 40-year-old military veteran from New York City, remembers thinking when he first heard about Digital World Acquisition Corp. He bought almost $100,000 worth at about $109 a share on Oct. 22, two days after the company announced a deal to merge with Trump Media & Technology Group.
I could only think "a fool and his money are soon parted."

Looks like stock reality is catching up to the sputtering start. Now...

Digital World Acquisition Is Shaping Up as a Disaster

The tea party / trumpers didn't realize just how much support Twitter and Facebook gave them, and how far past the line they went before they were finally forced off (not before making those sites tons of money). They really did bite the hand that fed them.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 7:05 pm
by youthathletics
:lol: :lol: Ring doorbell monitor to catch thieves steeling gas.

Image

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:22 pm
by youthathletics
This thread is hilarious....list of all the NCAA tournament hoops coaches and what they’d do if not a coach.

https://twitter.com/pregameempire/statu ... 62915?s=21

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:48 pm
by seacoaster
youthathletics wrote: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:22 pm This thread is hilarious....list of all the NCAA tournament hoops coaches and what they’d do if not a coach.

https://twitter.com/pregameempire/statu ... 62915?s=21
Genius: Tom Izzo, funeral home director.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 9:06 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
seacoaster wrote: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:48 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:22 pm This thread is hilarious....list of all the NCAA tournament hoops coaches and what they’d do if not a coach.

https://twitter.com/pregameempire/statu ... 62915?s=21
Genius: Tom Izzo, funeral home director.
I thought that before I saw the profession!

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:38 pm
by youthathletics

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2022 1:32 pm
by Seacoaster(1)
A cancer on society:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... d-victory/

"Facebook parent company Meta is paying one of the biggest Republican consulting firms in the country to orchestrate a nationwide campaign seeking to turn the public against TikTok.

The campaign includes placing op-eds and letters to the editor in major regional news outlets, promoting dubious stories about alleged TikTok trends that actually originated on Facebook, and pushing to draw political reporters and local politicians into helping take down its biggest competitor. These bare-knuckle tactics, long commonplace in the world of politics, have become increasingly noticeable within a tech industry where companies vie for cultural relevance and come at a time when Facebook is under pressure to win back young users.

Employees with the firm, Targeted Victory, worked to undermine TikTok through a nationwide media and lobbying campaign portraying the fast-growing app, owned by the Beijing-based company ByteDance, as a danger to American children and society, according to internal emails shared with The Washington Post.

Targeted Victory needs to “get the message out that while Meta is the current punching bag, TikTok is the real threat especially as a foreign owned app that is #1 in sharing data that young teens are using,” a director for the firm wrote in a February email.

Campaign operatives were also encouraged to use TikTok’s prominence as a way to deflect from Meta’s own privacy and antitrust concerns.

“Bonus point if we can fit this into a broader message that the current bills/proposals aren’t where [state attorneys general] or members of Congress should be focused,” a Targeted Victory staffer wrote.

The emails, which have not been previously reported, show the extent to which Meta and its partners will use opposition-research tactics on the Chinese-owned, multibillion-dollar rival that has become one of the most downloaded apps in the world, often outranking even Meta’s popular Facebook and Instagram apps. In an internal report last year leaked by the whistleblower Frances Haugen, Facebook researchers said teens were spending “2-3X more time” on TikTok than Instagram, and that Facebook’s popularity among young people had plummeted.

Targeted Victory declined to respond to questions about the campaign, saying only that it has represented Meta for several years and is “proud of the work we have done.”

In one email, a Targeted Victory director asked for ideas on local political reporters who could serve as a “back channel” for anti-TikTok messages, saying the firm “would definitely want it to be hands off.”

In other emails, Targeted Victory urged partners to push stories to local media tying TikTok to dangerous teen trends in an effort to show the app’s purported harms. “Any local examples of bad TikTok trends/stories in your markets?” a Targeted Victory staffer asked.

“Dream would be to get stories with headlines like ‘From dances to danger: how TikTok has become the most harmful social media space for kids,’ ” the staffer wrote.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone defended the campaign by saying, “We believe all platforms, including TikTok, should face a level of scrutiny consistent with their growing success.”

A TikTok spokesperson said the company is “deeply concerned” about “the stoking of local media reports on alleged trends that have not been found on the platform.”

Targeted Victory worked to amplify negative TikTok coverage through a Google document titled “Bad TikTok Clips,” which was shared internally and included links to dubious local news stories citing TikTok as the origin of dangerous teen trends. Local operatives working with the firm were encouraged to promote these alleged TikTok trends in their own markets to put pressure on lawmakers to act.

One trend Targeted Victory sought to enhance through its work was the “devious licks'' challenge, which showed students vandalizing school property. Through the “Bad TikTok Clips” document, the firm pushed stories about the “devious licks” challenge in local media across Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Rhode Island and Washington, D.C.

That trend led Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) to write a letter in September calling on TikTok executives to testify in front of a Senate subcommittee, saying the app had been “repeatedly misused and abused to promote behavior and actions that encourage harmful and destructive acts.” But according to an investigation by Anna Foley at the podcast network Gimlet, rumors of the “devious licks” challenge initially spread on Facebook, not TikTok.

In October, Targeted Victory worked to spread rumors of the “Slap a Teacher TikTok challenge” in local news, touting a local news report on the alleged challenge in Hawaii. In reality, no such challenge existed on TikTok. Again, the rumor started on Facebook, according to a series of Facebook posts first documented by Insider.

Coalition of state attorneys general launches probe into whether TikTok harms children and teens

The firm worked to use both genuine concerns and unfounded anxieties to cast doubt about the popular app. One email outlining recent negative TikTok stories mixed reasonable questions, largely about TikTok’s corporate ownership and practices, with more exaggerated stories about young users recording themselves behaving badly — the kinds of social media panics that have long bedeviled big social networks, including Facebook.

The agency was working at the same time to get “proactive coverage” about Facebook into local newspapers, radio segments and TV broadcasts, including submitting letters and opinion pieces speaking glowingly of Facebook’s role in, for instance, supporting Black-owned businesses. Those letters did not mention the Meta-funded firm’s involvement.

Targeted Victory has contracted with dozens of public relations firms across the United States to help sway public opinion against TikTok. In addition to planting local news stories, the firm has helped place op-eds targeting TikTok around the country, especially in key congressional districts.

On March 12, a letter to the editor that Targeted Victory officials helped orchestrate ran in the Denver Post. The letter, from a “concerned” “new parent,” claimed that TikTok was harmful to children’s mental health, raised concerns over its data privacy practices and said that “many people even suspect China is deliberately collecting behavioral data on our kids.” The letter also issued support for Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser’s choice to join a coalition of state attorneys general investigating TikTok’s impact on American youths, putting political pressure on the company.

A very similar letter to the editor, drafted by Targeted Victory, ran that same day in the Des Moines Register. The piece linked to negative stories about TikTok that Targeted Victory had previously sought to amplify. The letter was signed by Mary McAdams, chair of the Ankeny Area Democrats. Targeted Victory touted McAdams’ credentials in an email on March 7.

“[McAdams’s] name on this [letter to the editor] will carry a lot of weight with legislators and stakeholders,” a Targeted Victory director wrote. The email then encouraged partners across other states to look for opportunities to add to the campaign, “especially if your state AG suddenly joins on.”

The authors of the two letters did not respond to calls or emails requesting comment.

In an email sent last week to local contractors, Targeted Victory asked each team to “be prepared to share the op-ed they’re working on right now.” “Colorado and Iowa — Can you talk about the TikTok Op-eds you both got?” a Targeted Victory representative asked.

The emails show how the firm has effectively promoted its anti-TikTok messaging without revealing that it came from a firm working on Meta’s behalf. None of the op-eds or letters to the editor were published with any indication that the Meta-funded group had been involved.

Launched as a Republican digital consulting firm by Zac Moffatt, a digital director for Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, Targeted Victory has routinely advised Facebook officials over the years, including during a high-profile congressional hearing after the 2016 election.

The Arlington, Va.-based firm advertises on its website that it brings “a right-of-center perspective to solve marketing challenges” and can deploy field teams “anywhere in the country within 48 hours.”

The firm is one of the biggest recipients of Republican campaign spending, earning more than $237 million in 2020, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets. Its biggest payments came from national GOP congressional committees and America First Action, a pro-Trump super PAC.

In 2020, the firm said it was expanding its “crisis practice and corporate affairs offerings” because of its clients’ growing need for “issues management and executive positioning,” adding that it would focus its efforts toward “authentic storytelling” with a “hyper-local approach.”

Some of the emails targeting TikTok were sent in February, shortly after Meta announced that Facebook had lost users for the first time in its 18-year history. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg told investors then that TikTok was a major obstacle, saying, “People have a lot of choices for how they want to spend their time, and apps like TikTok are growing very quickly.” The company has unveiled a TikTok clone, a short-video feature called Reels, and promotes it heavily in its Instagram app.

In a 2019 speech at Georgetown University, during which he invoked the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and championed Facebook’s role in promoting free speech, Zuckerberg criticized TikTok for reports it had banned discussion of topics deemed subversive by the Chinese government, saying, “Is that the Internet that we want?” (The Washington Post and the Guardian had previously highlighted those content-moderation rules. TikTok has said those guidelines were outdated and that its U.S. business now operates under different rules than its Chinese counterpart.)

But Zuckerberg has also pointed at TikTok to counter concerns that Facebook holds a monopoly on social media. TikTok is the “fastest-growing app,” he said in his opening remarks at a hearing of the House antitrust subcommittee in 2020.

The anti-TikTok campaign follows in a long line of Facebook-funded advocacy groups working to boost its standing in the public eye.

In 2018, Facebook worked with Definers Public Affairs, another Washington consulting firm founded by Republican political veterans, to lash out at critics and other tech companies, including Apple and Google, during the Cambridge Analytica scandal that sparked global outrage over Facebook’s privacy rules. (The company said it stopped working with Definers shortly after a New York Times report on the arrangement.)

And in 2019, as the company faced antitrust scrutiny over its gargantuan impact, Facebook drove the creation of a political advocacy group, American Edge, designed to persuade Washington lawmakers that Silicon Valley was critical to the U.S. economy — and that overt regulation could weaken the country’s competitiveness in a technology race against China.

Meta outspends all but six of the nation’s biggest companies and industry groups in federal lobbying, paying more than $20 million last year, according to data compiled by OpenSecrets."

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:25 pm
by Peter Brown
Surprised the Fanlax FLP haven’t melted down over Elon Musk buying 10% of Twitter.

A return to the traditional value of free speech.

Why the quiet?

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:34 pm
by a fan
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:25 pm Surprised the Fanlax FLP haven’t melted down over Elon Musk buying 10% of Twitter.

A return to the traditional value of free speech.

Why the quiet?
:lol: Still don't know what Free Speech is, eh? Boy, there sure are a lot things Pete doesn't understand.

You're such a freaking Liberal, it's hilarious. In what world would an American Conservative want to tell an American company what it can and can't publish?

If Twitter has to publish everything you want, Pete, does that apply to Tesla, too?

Do I get to tell Tesla what to do, too, Pete?

Do I get to tell your airplane company how to market and what it can and can't communicate to the world, Pete?

How about FoxNews, Pete? Am I in charge of online content now, and they have to publish what I want them to publish?

Government control of what American Businesses can and can't publish. Neat. What's next, my commie friend?

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:21 pm
by Peter Brown
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:34 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 2:25 pm Surprised the Fanlax FLP haven’t melted down over Elon Musk buying 10% of Twitter.

A return to the traditional value of free speech.

Why the quiet?
:lol: Still don't know what Free Speech is, eh? Boy, there sure are a lot things Pete doesn't understand.

You're such a freaking Liberal, it's hilarious. In what world would an American Conservative want to tell an American company what it can and can't publish?

If Twitter has to publish everything you want, Pete, does that apply to Tesla, too?

Do I get to tell Tesla what to do, too, Pete?

Do I get to tell your airplane company how to market and what it can and can't communicate to the world, Pete?

How about FoxNews, Pete? Am I in charge of online content now, and they have to publish what I want them to publish?

Government control of what American Businesses can and can't publish. Neat. What's next, my commie friend?



Learn something new every day! I never realized a car manufacturer and an aircraft hangar developer were ‘publishers’! Gonna take this up with the FAA! The whole time I shoulda been regulated by the FCC!!! :lol:

You sound a tad salty, a fan. All because the free market did its work: woke lunatic Oberlin Twitter-Safety speech-suppressing Marxist birdbrains predictably wrecked a successful business model, cheapening the public exchange of company stock, allowing a wealthy investor (who’s way more prone to the free exchange of ideas) to scoop up 10% and reassert that quaint notion of free speech to the ‘town square’.

Go git’em, Elon!!!! Fire the entire lunatic Safety staff and let them inhabit their natural world being Starbucks baristas!! 🤠!!!!

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:36 pm
by a fan
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:21 pm Learn something new every day! I never realized a car manufacturer and an aircraft hangar developer were ‘publishers’! Gonna take this up with the FAA! The whole time I shoulda been regulated by the FCC!!! :lol:
Uh oh, Petey doesn't think that businesses publish anything....unless they're in the newspaper game.

You don't send out documents to your customers, Pete? Brochures? Advertisements?

What YOU are asserting is that businesses don't get to choose what they put out that has THEIR name on the publication.



But if it make it easier for your toddler ideology to understand this, stick with the NYTImes and FoxNews.

Do you think that the public at-large gets to choose what the NYTimes and FoxNews publishes? Your'e telling me yes. And if FoxNews and the NYTimes doesn't publish what the public at large demands they publish? Oh, well they're suppressing speech.

This is the dumbest idea you have brought to us, Pete. And that's saying something. Let me know when my op-ed for FoxNews runs 24/7, Pete. I'm sure they'll be just thrilled by your idea that Fox HAS to publish what I want them to publish.
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:21 pm You sound a tad salty, a fan. All because the free market did its work: woke lunatic Oberlin Twitter-Safety speech-suppressing Marxist birdbrains predictably wrecked a successful business model, cheapening the public exchange of company stock, allowing a wealthy investor (who’s way more prone to the free exchange of ideas) to scoop up 10% and reassert that quaint notion of free speech to the ‘town square’.
:lol: It's like talking to a Toddler.

Elon Musk doesn't change a thing, Pete. As a part owner, I'm sure he gets a say in how twitter is run. Ten seconds ago, you told me that you don't like that the owners and managers at Twitter do whatever they like with their business.

Make up your mind. Do businesses get to publish anything they want, or not? Which is it, Pete?

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:43 pm
by Peter Brown
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:36 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:21 pm Learn something new every day! I never realized a car manufacturer and an aircraft hangar developer were ‘publishers’! Gonna take this up with the FAA! The whole time I shoulda been regulated by the FCC!!! :lol:
Uh oh, Petey doesn't think that businesses publish anything....unless they're in the newspaper game.

You don't send out documents to your customers, Pete? Brochures? Advertisements?

What YOU are asserting is that businesses don't get to choose what they put out that has THEIR name on the publication.



But if it make it easier for your toddler ideology to understand this, stick with the NYTImes and FoxNews.

Do you think that the public at-large gets to choose what the NYTimes and FoxNews publishes? Your'e telling me yes. And if FoxNews and the NYTimes doesn't publish what the public at large demands they publish? Oh, well they're suppressing speech.

This is the dumbest idea you have brought to us, Pete. And that's saying something. Let me know when my op-ed for FoxNews runs 24/7, Pete. I'm sure they'll be just thrilled by your idea that Fox HAS to publish what I want them to publish.
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:21 pm You sound a tad salty, a fan. All because the free market did its work: woke lunatic Oberlin Twitter-Safety speech-suppressing Marxist birdbrains predictably wrecked a successful business model, cheapening the public exchange of company stock, allowing a wealthy investor (who’s way more prone to the free exchange of ideas) to scoop up 10% and reassert that quaint notion of free speech to the ‘town square’.
:lol: It's like talking to a Toddler.

Elon Musk doesn't change a thing, Pete. As a part owner, I'm sure he gets a say in how twitter is run. Ten seconds ago, you told me that you don't like that the owners and managers at Twitter do whatever they like with their business.

Make up your mind. Do businesses get to publish anything they want, or not? Which is it, Pete?



Owners absolutely have a say in how their businesses are run. You seem to be guilty of that ‘assuming’ thing you’re known for round these parts! :lol:

And if an owner of Twitter is cool with the Marxist lunatics shutting down discourse, I’m okay with that too, if not somewhat bemused.

Elon is gonna fire your stormtrooper speech-suppressing lefty lunatic Safety Standards team. Those pencil necked anti American Oberlin doofs can fire up the espresso machine at Starbucks, but not at Black Rifle Coffee!!! :lol: :lol:

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:01 pm
by a fan
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:43 pm Owners absolutely have a say in how their businesses are run. You seem to be guilty of that ‘assuming’ thing you’re known for round these parts! :lol:

And if an owner of Twitter is cool with the Marxist lunatics shutting down discourse, I’m okay with that too, if not somewhat bemused.
Then stop whining about it. Celebrate that in America, Twitter can do whatever the F they want with their business. I don't care, not even a little....what or who they shut down.

And if you don't like it? Don't give the company your business. You know: the free market. Another Petey-Fake-Problem solved.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:36 pm
by Peter Brown
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:01 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:43 pm Owners absolutely have a say in how their businesses are run. You seem to be guilty of that ‘assuming’ thing you’re known for round these parts! :lol:

And if an owner of Twitter is cool with the Marxist lunatics shutting down discourse, I’m okay with that too, if not somewhat bemused.
Then stop whining about it. Celebrate that in America, Twitter can do whatever the F they want with their business. I don't care, not even a little....what or who they shut down.

And if you don't like it? Don't give the company your business. You know: the free market. Another Petey-Fake-Problem solved.



Why can’t I care about it? I could be a shareholder.

I’m ecstatic my man Elon is going to cause these Marxist loons to quit, so Twitter can be the town square for all again, not just the left.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2022 7:35 pm
by a fan
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:36 pm
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:01 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:43 pm Owners absolutely have a say in how their businesses are run. You seem to be guilty of that ‘assuming’ thing you’re known for round these parts! :lol:

And if an owner of Twitter is cool with the Marxist lunatics shutting down discourse, I’m okay with that too, if not somewhat bemused.
Then stop whining about it. Celebrate that in America, Twitter can do whatever the F they want with their business. I don't care, not even a little....what or who they shut down.

And if you don't like it? Don't give the company your business. You know: the free market. Another Petey-Fake-Problem solved.
Why can’t I care about it? I could be a shareholder.
Fine. I'll be more specific. Stop claiming that a company is violating the 1st Amendment.

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:47 pm
by runrussellrun
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 7:35 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:36 pm
a fan wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 6:01 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Mon Apr 04, 2022 5:43 pm Owners absolutely have a say in how their businesses are run. You seem to be guilty of that ‘assuming’ thing you’re known for round these parts! :lol:

And if an owner of Twitter is cool with the Marxist lunatics shutting down discourse, I’m okay with that too, if not somewhat bemused.
Then stop whining about it. Celebrate that in America, Twitter can do whatever the F they want with their business. I don't care, not even a little....what or who they shut down.

And if you don't like it? Don't give the company your business. You know: the free market. Another Petey-Fake-Problem solved.
Why can’t I care about it? I could be a shareholder.
Fine. I'll be more specific. Stop claiming that a company is violating the 1st Amendment.
Hey, private companies don't have to follow laws, at all.

are twitter bans tied to your credit score?

Re: Facegram & Instabook

Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:14 am
by youthathletics
Elon Musk makes offer to purchase Twitter.

Image