cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:26 pm
I might try and stay up to watch some of it but not likely.
Don’t worry. We all will give you an unbiased accounting of how poorly Trump did.
Thank you, I'm counting on you, don't let me down.
I am sitting it out tonight. Will catch up tomorrow after I check in with njbill's perspective and someone neutral, like MDLax, who will give us a fair and balanced response.
It's 5am, I've had a good nights sleep, I'm ready for the debacle post mortem.
I've been waiting patiently for any of the MAGA/MAGA adjacent/Trump apologist, or simply anti-Dem, folks on here to tell us what they saw. So, far, I haven't seen any even admit they watched...
Salty made a snide comment about Taylor Swift's endorsement, but hasn't shared any actual impressions of the performances by either candidate. I'm expecting something akin to "she didn't answer all the questions directly, she didn't explain why some of her positions have changed over time...and he's right about Ukraine and Israel and China etc"... maybe some complaining that moderators fact checked him more than her, (I haven't yet herd that they gave him too much air time...he spoke for 5 minutes more than her),
But nothing really about what a disaster this was for Trump, how obviously incompetent he is, the mess he created for himself at each turn, goaded along by Harris. Absolutely played him like a fiddle. And most damning, she pointed out that this is what foreign leaders tell her, how easy he is to manipulate, how his own top defense and security people believe he is a disgrace" and "dangerous".
The contrast was stark and obvious.
But over 40% of Americans will ignore his incompetence, his ignorance and his serious mental decline.
That's inevitable and it's really indeed "quite troubling".
I thought she took him apart masterfully.
But he hasn't said...nor has anyone else in adjacent/apologist land.
I have been scrolling through social media....still have not watched it.
1. CNN post panel clip: Woman states, I am not listening to what they say, but what they each have done while in office and at which point I was better off.
2. Dr. Phil had a behavioral scientists who interviewed people for the FBI and body language expert who was a grammy award winner: they both shared how lopsided the questions were posed and in the manner in which they were asked.
3. Zero facts checks for one, but many for another...when it was clear they both fibbed.
I could on, but it seems the narrative will be the media set up Trump in a 3v1 debate by just lobbing grenades at him and put him on the defensive...and at the end of the day, the media were the ones that looked more foolish, which made many voters empathize more for Trump by being attacked, while they ignored how poorly he responded.
Youth...come on man. Stop buying what the morons are selling and watch the debate if it's important to you. You know better.
Surprised you didn't parrot the TinFoilHat "earring" nonsense. As if talking about issues is SO hard, Kamala needs help.
Naturally, they don't care that you can't see Trump's ears to see if he's also "cheating". I'm so sick of how stupid these Americans have become.
That’s how he rolls. Have you not noticed? Just putting it out there. He has no position on the issue….but it is always one sided. That’s rain on your leg.
youthathletics wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 10:59 am
I was merely sharing the pulse of what Social media is absorbing and pushing out...how it was interpreted that "I" believed this was an assumption on the reader.
You mean the pulse of your very narrow sliver of Social Media spoon feeds certain things to you.
And I guess that CNN panel lady also forgot the entire last year of Trump's presidency?
Some social media posts are describing the debate as Kamal committing "elder abuse" with Trump's flailing and her smackdown.
Trump builds things so he gets a pass.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 11:18 am
by ggait
Props to Harris' team for designing such a highly effective rope-a-dope on Trump.
She turned a question on immigration (an obvious KH weak spot) into a riff on how lame his rallies (Hannibal Lechter, windmill cancer) and crowd sizes are.
Totally set Trump off. Next thing he's rambling about eating pets, USA is Venezuela on steroids, Harris is a communist (because her father is a lefty economics professor), etc. etc.
I'm sure they were high five-ing back in the KH war room.
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:26 pm
I might try and stay up to watch some of it but not likely.
Don’t worry. We all will give you an unbiased accounting of how poorly Trump did.
Thank you, I'm counting on you, don't let me down.
I am sitting it out tonight. Will catch up tomorrow after I check in with njbill's perspective and someone neutral, like MDLax, who will give us a fair and balanced response.
It's 5am, I've had a good nights sleep, I'm ready for the debacle post mortem.
I've been waiting patiently for any of the MAGA/MAGA adjacent/Trump apologist, or simply anti-Dem, folks on here to tell us what they saw. So, far, I haven't seen any even admit they watched...
Salty made a snide comment about Taylor Swift's endorsement, but hasn't shared any actual impressions of the performances by either candidate. I'm expecting something akin to "she didn't answer all the questions directly, she didn't explain why some of her positions have changed over time...and he's right about Ukraine and Israel and China etc"... maybe some complaining that moderators fact checked him more than her, (I haven't yet herd that they gave him too much air time...he spoke for 5 minutes more than her),
But nothing really about what a disaster this was for Trump, how obviously incompetent he is, the mess he created for himself at each turn, goaded along by Harris. Absolutely played him like a fiddle. And most damning, she pointed out that this is what foreign leaders tell her, how easy he is to manipulate, how his own top defense and security people believe he is a disgrace" and "dangerous".
The contrast was stark and obvious.
But over 40% of Americans will ignore his incompetence, his ignorance and his serious mental decline.
That's inevitable and it's really indeed "quite troubling".
I thought she took him apart masterfully.
But he hasn't said...nor has anyone else in adjacent/apologist land.
I have been scrolling through social media....still have not watched it.
1. CNN post panel clip: Woman states, I am not listening to what they say, but what they each have done while in office and at which point I was better off.
2. Dr. Phil had a behavioral scientists who interviewed people for the FBI and body language expert who was a grammy award winner: they both shared how lopsided the questions were posed and in the manner in which they were asked.
3. Zero facts checks for one, but many for another...when it was clear they both fibbed.
I could on, but it seems the narrative will be the media set up Trump in a 3v1 debate by just lobbing grenades at him and put him on the defensive...and at the end of the day, the media were the ones that looked more foolish, which made many voters empathize more for Trump by being attacked, while they ignored how poorly he responded.
Youth...come on man. Stop buying what the morons are selling and watch the debate if it's important to you. You know better.
Surprised you didn't parrot the TinFoilHat "earring" nonsense. As if talking about issues is SO hard, Kamala needs help.
Naturally, they don't care that you can't see Trump's ears to see if he's also "cheating". I'm so sick of how stupid these Americans have become.
That’s how he rolls. Have you not noticed? Just putting it out there. He has no position on the issue….but it is always one sided. That’s rain on your leg.
Master of the obvious. That was the entire point....there are only a few around here that present the 'otherside', otherwise it would be an echo chamber. Once you share with us that your political posts are not one-sided, then you have standing. I cant emphasize how many times I've made it clear I am no longer a Trump fan. Yet, YOU continue to troll me while posting to others with innuendo, only after coming unglued stating you were no longer engaging with me....seems your word is much like Trumps....just talk.
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 12:08 pm
by OCanada
You are what you support. On the one hand you disavow Trump while endorsing positions he would or has favored.
You seem to view the world as binary, left or right. Most would i think prefer the concept of true or false with some notable exceptions
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 12:11 pm
by NattyBohChamps04
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 12:15 pm
by NattyBohChamps04
ggait wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:28 pm
She signed it “childless cat lady” Taylor Swift.
She better watch our for those pesky immigrants or she'll soon be a childless catless lady.
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:26 pm
I might try and stay up to watch some of it but not likely.
Don’t worry. We all will give you an unbiased accounting of how poorly Trump did.
Thank you, I'm counting on you, don't let me down.
I am sitting it out tonight. Will catch up tomorrow after I check in with njbill's perspective and someone neutral, like MDLax, who will give us a fair and balanced response.
It's 5am, I've had a good nights sleep, I'm ready for the debacle post mortem.
I've been waiting patiently for any of the MAGA/MAGA adjacent/Trump apologist, or simply anti-Dem, folks on here to tell us what they saw. So, far, I haven't seen any even admit they watched...
Salty made a snide comment about Taylor Swift's endorsement, but hasn't shared any actual impressions of the performances by either candidate. I'm expecting something akin to "she didn't answer all the questions directly, she didn't explain why some of her positions have changed over time...and he's right about Ukraine and Israel and China etc"... maybe some complaining that moderators fact checked him more than her, (I haven't yet herd that they gave him too much air time...he spoke for 5 minutes more than her),
But nothing really about what a disaster this was for Trump, how obviously incompetent he is, the mess he created for himself at each turn, goaded along by Harris. Absolutely played him like a fiddle. And most damning, she pointed out that this is what foreign leaders tell her, how easy he is to manipulate, how his own top defense and security people believe he is a disgrace" and "dangerous".
The contrast was stark and obvious.
But over 40% of Americans will ignore his incompetence, his ignorance and his serious mental decline.
That's inevitable and it's really indeed "quite troubling".
I thought she took him apart masterfully.
But he hasn't said...nor has anyone else in adjacent/apologist land.
I have been scrolling through social media....still have not watched it.
1. CNN post panel clip: Woman states, I am not listening to what they say, but what they each have done while in office and at which point I was better off.
2. Dr. Phil had a behavioral scientists who interviewed people for the FBI and body language expert who was a grammy award winner: they both shared how lopsided the questions were posed and in the manner in which they were asked.
3. Zero facts checks for one, but many for another...when it was clear they both fibbed.
I could on, but it seems the narrative will be the media set up Trump in a 3v1 debate by just lobbing grenades at him and put him on the defensive...and at the end of the day, the media were the ones that looked more foolish, which made many voters empathize more for Trump by being attacked, while they ignored how poorly he responded.
Youth...come on man. Stop buying what the morons are selling and watch the debate if it's important to you. You know better.
Surprised you didn't parrot the TinFoilHat "earring" nonsense. As if talking about issues is SO hard, Kamala needs help.
Naturally, they don't care that you can't see Trump's ears to see if he's also "cheating". I'm so sick of how stupid these Americans have become.
I was merely sharing the pulse of what Social media is absorbing and pushing out...how it was interpreted that "I" believed this was an assumption on the reader.
It's not what "social media" is reporting, Youth. It's what YOUR FEED is reporting. And you're telling us you're not seeing the slant here?
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 12:47 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
What’s worse:
A) Shine a powerful light inside the body to kill COVID or
B) In Springfield they are eating the dogs?
What would have happened to Obama, Biden or Kamala had any of them said these words?
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:26 pm
I might try and stay up to watch some of it but not likely.
Don’t worry. We all will give you an unbiased accounting of how poorly Trump did.
Thank you, I'm counting on you, don't let me down.
I am sitting it out tonight. Will catch up tomorrow after I check in with njbill's perspective and someone neutral, like MDLax, who will give us a fair and balanced response.
It's 5am, I've had a good nights sleep, I'm ready for the debacle post mortem.
I've been waiting patiently for any of the MAGA/MAGA adjacent/Trump apologist, or simply anti-Dem, folks on here to tell us what they saw. So, far, I haven't seen any even admit they watched...
Salty made a snide comment about Taylor Swift's endorsement, but hasn't shared any actual impressions of the performances by either candidate. I'm expecting something akin to "she didn't answer all the questions directly, she didn't explain why some of her positions have changed over time...and he's right about Ukraine and Israel and China etc"... maybe some complaining that moderators fact checked him more than her, (I haven't yet herd that they gave him too much air time...he spoke for 5 minutes more than her),
But nothing really about what a disaster this was for Trump, how obviously incompetent he is, the mess he created for himself at each turn, goaded along by Harris. Absolutely played him like a fiddle. And most damning, she pointed out that this is what foreign leaders tell her, how easy he is to manipulate, how his own top defense and security people believe he is a disgrace" and "dangerous".
The contrast was stark and obvious.
But over 40% of Americans will ignore his incompetence, his ignorance and his serious mental decline.
That's inevitable and it's really indeed "quite troubling".
I thought she took him apart masterfully.
But he hasn't said...nor has anyone else in adjacent/apologist land.
I have been scrolling through social media....still have not watched it.
1. CNN post panel clip: Woman states, I am not listening to what they say, but what they each have done while in office and at which point I was better off.
2. Dr. Phil had a behavioral scientists who interviewed people for the FBI and body language expert who was a grammy award winner: they both shared how lopsided the questions were posed and in the manner in which they were asked.
3. Zero facts checks for one, but many for another...when it was clear they both fibbed.
I could on, but it seems the narrative will be the media set up Trump in a 3v1 debate by just lobbing grenades at him and put him on the defensive...and at the end of the day, the media were the ones that looked more foolish, which made many voters empathize more for Trump by being attacked, while they ignored how poorly he responded.
Youth...come on man. Stop buying what the morons are selling and watch the debate if it's important to you. You know better.
Surprised you didn't parrot the TinFoilHat "earring" nonsense. As if talking about issues is SO hard, Kamala needs help.
Naturally, they don't care that you can't see Trump's ears to see if he's also "cheating". I'm so sick of how stupid these Americans have become.
I was merely sharing the pulse of what Social media is absorbing and pushing out...how it was interpreted that "I" believed this was an assumption on the reader.
It's not what "social media" is reporting, Youth. It's what YOUR FEED is reporting. And you're telling us you're not seeing the slant here?
Uh......my feed is part of Social Media as a hole. I stated rather clearly that "It seems the narrative will be". The entire paragraph is paraphrasing how the right wing media is responding today. I then reply again, "Sharing the pulse of what social media is pushing out" The latter further amplifying the former.
Unfortunately, you can no longer see who my followers are, but I have stated on many occasion, my timeline is not just R stuff. I follow and like plenty from the otherside, I often send them corrections when I see 'fake' posts....that has always helped keep the timeline balanced. But the narrative from the fanlax boomers is far more factual....
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 2:26 pm
I might try and stay up to watch some of it but not likely.
Don’t worry. We all will give you an unbiased accounting of how poorly Trump did.
Thank you, I'm counting on you, don't let me down.
I am sitting it out tonight. Will catch up tomorrow after I check in with njbill's perspective and someone neutral, like MDLax, who will give us a fair and balanced response.
It's 5am, I've had a good nights sleep, I'm ready for the debacle post mortem.
I've been waiting patiently for any of the MAGA/MAGA adjacent/Trump apologist, or simply anti-Dem, folks on here to tell us what they saw. So, far, I haven't seen any even admit they watched...
Salty made a snide comment about Taylor Swift's endorsement, but hasn't shared any actual impressions of the performances by either candidate. I'm expecting something akin to "she didn't answer all the questions directly, she didn't explain why some of her positions have changed over time...and he's right about Ukraine and Israel and China etc"... maybe some complaining that moderators fact checked him more than her, (I haven't yet herd that they gave him too much air time...he spoke for 5 minutes more than her),
But nothing really about what a disaster this was for Trump, how obviously incompetent he is, the mess he created for himself at each turn, goaded along by Harris. Absolutely played him like a fiddle. And most damning, she pointed out that this is what foreign leaders tell her, how easy he is to manipulate, how his own top defense and security people believe he is a disgrace" and "dangerous".
The contrast was stark and obvious.
But over 40% of Americans will ignore his incompetence, his ignorance and his serious mental decline.
That's inevitable and it's really indeed "quite troubling".
I thought she took him apart masterfully.
But he hasn't said...nor has anyone else in adjacent/apologist land.
I have been scrolling through social media....still have not watched it.
1. CNN post panel clip: Woman states, I am not listening to what they say, but what they each have done while in office and at which point I was better off.
2. Dr. Phil had a behavioral scientists who interviewed people for the FBI and body language expert who was a grammy award winner: they both shared how lopsided the questions were posed and in the manner in which they were asked.
3. Zero facts checks for one, but many for another...when it was clear they both fibbed.
I could on, but it seems the narrative will be the media set up Trump in a 3v1 debate by just lobbing grenades at him and put him on the defensive...and at the end of the day, the media were the ones that looked more foolish, which made many voters empathize more for Trump by being attacked, while they ignored how poorly he responded.
Youth...come on man. Stop buying what the morons are selling and watch the debate if it's important to you. You know better.
Surprised you didn't parrot the TinFoilHat "earring" nonsense. As if talking about issues is SO hard, Kamala needs help.
Naturally, they don't care that you can't see Trump's ears to see if he's also "cheating". I'm so sick of how stupid these Americans have become.
I was merely sharing the pulse of what Social media is absorbing and pushing out...how it was interpreted that "I" believed this was an assumption on the reader.
It's not what "social media" is reporting, Youth. It's what YOUR FEED is reporting. And you're telling us you're not seeing the slant here?
Uh......my feed is part of Social Media as a hole. I stated rather clearly that "It seems the narrative will be". The entire paragraph is paraphrasing how the right wing media is responding today. I then reply again, "Sharing the pulse of what social media is pushing out" The latter further amplifying the former.
Unfortunately, you can no longer see who my followers are, but I have stated on many occasion, my timeline is not just R stuff. I follow and like plenty from the otherside, I often send them corrections when I see 'fake' posts....that has always helped keep the timeline balanced. But the narrative from the fanlax boomers is far more factual....
Well...you're either fibbing, or you are "forgetting" to post the "not just the R stuff".
You NEVER post stuff hitting the R's or Trump. Or if you do, I've never seen it. You know that, right?
Re: 2024
Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2024 2:31 pm
by Seacoaster(1)
DMac wrote: ↑Wed Sep 11, 2024 2:22 pm
I saw it on tv....geezuz h, like everything is real and accurate there.
I saw Milli Vanilli singin' on tv too.
Thanks for this one. Made me chuckle for a few minutes.
