Page 305 of 308
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:28 pm
by Seacoaster(1)
Just a special kind of stupid. Gotta sit back and kind of appreciate it.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:32 pm
by youthathletics
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:28 pm
Just a special kind of stupid. Gotta sit back and kind of appreciate it.
Why go there?
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:32 pm
by youthathletics
Why do we continue to send 'condolence payments' to Afghani and the like.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:37 pm
by OCanada
youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:32 pm
Why do we continue to send 'condolence payments' to Afghani and the like.
Yeah, Trump pulled us out do why send any more $$$
https://civiliansinconflict.org/wp-cont ... r_2010.pdf
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:53 pm
by youthathletics
Not following you with the typos
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:00 pm
by Essexfenwick
Deranged Jack Smith getting complain slapped. Might want to arrange for leaving the country soon. Payback and balancing the scales won’t be pretty.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:25 pm
by NattyBohChamps04
"We're not encouraging violence"... riiight. ^
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:34 pm
by cradleandshoot
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:25 pm
"We're not encouraging violence"... riiight. ^
Nobody on this form seems interested in discouraging it either.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
by njbill
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:23 pm
by Seacoaster(1)
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
Agreed. Some of us here have been warning against the rhetoric employed by Trump and right for years.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:33 pm
by MDlaxfan76
youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:32 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:28 pm
Just a special kind of stupid. Gotta sit back and kind of appreciate it.
Why go there?
why not? It's quintessentially stupid trolling.
Seacoaster is just finding a little levity in the stupidity.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:46 pm
by cradleandshoot
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
There is one forum member who stated his displeasure that the shooter missed. I certainly don't interpret that statement as discouraging violence.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:52 pm
by cradleandshoot
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:23 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
Agreed. Some of us here have been warning against the rhetoric employed by Trump and right for years.
So the rhetoric employed by trump and the far right caused someone to try and assassinate their guy on the right? Makes perfectly good sense of you don't think about it for long.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:52 pm
by ggait
old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 1:47 pm
ggait wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 1:29 pm
Remember the complaints of Salty (and his muse Andy McCarthy) about how Weiss (but not Jack Smith) was a bad SC appointee (under the special counsel regs) because he was a current DOJ insider (i.e. Deep Stater in the tank for Sleepy Joe).
Because he was not confirmed by the Senate. Garland should have gone with a serving US Atty, who had been confirmed by the Senate.
You and McCarthy literally said the opposite.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:57 pm
by old salt
ggait wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:52 pm
old salt wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 1:47 pm
ggait wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 1:29 pm
Remember the complaints of Salty (and his muse Andy McCarthy) about how Weiss (but not Jack Smith) was a bad SC appointee (under the special counsel regs) because he was a current DOJ insider (i.e. Deep Stater in the tank for Sleepy Joe).
Because he was not confirmed by the Senate. Garland should have gone with a serving US Atty, who had been confirmed by the Senate.
You and McCarthy literally said the opposite.
No. We pointed out that there was no Constitutional problem with appointing Weiss or Durham because they had both been confirmed by the Senate. We criticized what Weiss failed to do as a US Atty.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:13 pm
by OCanada
youthathletics wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:53 pm
Not following you with the typos
I imagine it is very difficult go mentally correct do to so. Very difficult
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:15 pm
by njbill
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:46 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
There is one forum member who stated his displeasure that the shooter missed. I certainly don't interpret that statement as discouraging violence.
I’m glad the shooter missed. The last thing I want is to drive around this country seeing Trump statues, Trump Boulevard, Trump high school, Trump-ville, etc.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:24 pm
by NattyBohChamps04
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:52 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:23 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
Agreed. Some of us here have been warning against the rhetoric employed by Trump and right for years.
So the rhetoric employed by trump and the far right caused someone to try and assassinate their guy on the right? Makes perfectly good sense of you don't think about it for long.
Guy was a Republican. So it may indeed be right-wing caused violence against Trump. There are a lot of far-righties and moderate righties who are not happy with Trump for various reasons. With a lot of hate-filled, violent messages for their peers.
But we don't know yet. We'll hopefully find out what the motives are sooner than later.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:30 pm
by Kismet
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:15 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:46 pm
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence. The problem is Trump encourages it. Hillary, Pence, Cheney, J6, and on and on.
There is one forum member who stated his displeasure that the shooter missed. I certainly don't interpret that statement as discouraging violence.
I’m glad the shooter missed. The last thing I want is to drive around this country seeing Trump statues, Trump Boulevard, Trump high school, Trump-ville, etc.
You may get it anyway, Bill if former DOPUS is re-elected and has congressional majorities.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 5:34 pm
by old salt
njbill wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 4:22 pm
Actually, I think everyone or virtually everyone on this forum would discourage violence.
Except for BLM &/or Antifa riots.