Speaking for myself....all you have to do is look at ordinary students. Can the NCAA or some other entity prevent, for example, UVa from cutting a check to an honors kid for $10K? No, right? Apply that to students who plays sports. The Engineering Dept. at UMich can hand out all the scholarshiops they want, right?Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 7:44 pmThat is what I am waiting for. Something rational will come out of it unless Football, Baseball, Basketball, Hockey etc collectively bargains their own deal. If so, I can see non revenue/olympic sports following a D3 model. Are we also saying D3 schools will have to pay all their athletes also?wgdsr wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 7:10 pmdepends on hoo is at the negotiating table. nil is/has been a placeholder. things are moving even faster than i was expecting. when we get to collective bargaining (there will be leaks), we'll have some more defined possible outcomes.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 7:02 pmSo every participant for every sport will be on scholarship?a fan wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 6:36 pmPretty obvious to me that the NCAA can't limit scholarships post NCAA v. Alston.jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2024 4:15 pm From what I have seen the immediate impact for lacrosse could be
-roster limits
-unlimited scholarships
I have a hard time seeing schools adding lacrosse scholarships but the roster limits I think could benefit the competitiveness of d1. Instead of Hopkins and Syracuse hoarding players those last guys are available for other schools.
The question is: when do the athletes and/or smart Athletic Directors figure this out?
It's not about forcing schools to do something. The SCOTUS is telling the NCAA that THEY can't tell students (Americans) what they can and can't earn.
The rest of the stuff? Unions, collective bargaining, revenue v. non-revenue sports? I've got nothing. No clue what will happen.