Re: Bracketology 2023
Posted: Sun May 21, 2023 11:43 am
Allegations and unfounded speculation about a decision and a coach then demanding they answer you. Let her throw up public comments about how you are doing your job and please don’t claim she’s a public figure and fair game that would be a joke.
Look Laxfan22 its better to keep quiet and let people think you're an idiot than speak up and confirm it. WS has everything to do with it!laxfan22 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:08 pm What does WS have to do with certain teams getting bids? Did anyone suggest WS shouldn’t have been in the tourney?
Let me ask you, do you think depauw and mount union deserved at large bids? That’s the question. She doesn’t need to respond or answer or anything else but if she wants to explain the decision process, I think there are people that would like to know. I know there are kids who didn’t make the tourney that would like answers.
13-2 at end of 3….The four goals and 18 shots were a season-low for the Jumbos.RocLaxFan wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:54 pmLook Laxfan22 its better to keep quiet and let people think you're an idiot than speak up and confirm it. WS has everything to do with it!laxfan22 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:08 pm What does WS have to do with certain teams getting bids? Did anyone suggest WS shouldn’t have been in the tourney?
Let me ask you, do you think depauw and mount union deserved at large bids? That’s the question. She doesn’t need to respond or answer or anything else but if she wants to explain the decision process, I think there are people that would like to know. I know there are kids who didn’t make the tourney that would like answers.
All the so called experts have been saying how great the teams in the Nescac are and how unfair it was that they had to play each other so early in the tourney. Disrespecting other teams strength of schedule is NOW turned back in you and the rest of your trolls faces. Looks like your so called power conference is overrated! Today's WS/Tufts game confirmed it. I'm sure there will be others that will say it was just one game. But what I watched (until I got bored and stop watching) was a butt kicking,
So yes, you believe that mount union and DePauw should have gotten AL bids? But not because they deserved it but based on geography? I’ll ignore your 12 year old churlish comments I’m the hope that you can act like an adult and discuss things in such a manner.RocLaxFan wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:54 pmLook Laxfan22 its better to keep quiet and let people think you're an idiot than speak up and confirm it. WS has everything to do with it!laxfan22 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:08 pm What does WS have to do with certain teams getting bids? Did anyone suggest WS shouldn’t have been in the tourney?
Let me ask you, do you think depauw and mount union deserved at large bids? That’s the question. She doesn’t need to respond or answer or anything else but if she wants to explain the decision process, I think there are people that would like to know. I know there are kids who didn’t make the tourney that would like answers.
All the so called experts have been saying how great the teams in the Nescac are and how unfair it was that they had to play each other so early in the tourney. Disrespecting other teams strength of schedule is NOW turned back in you and the rest of your trolls faces. Looks like your so called power conference is overrated! Today's WS/Tufts game confirmed it. A 5-5 conference record doesn't deserve a at large bid no matter what your ranking is,
The NCAA is trying to grow Lacrosse nationally, This has been going on for years so please just go way, delete your account and come back next year,
Believed? That is a term that does not apply here. Deserved? Yes based on the criteria of regional ranking set up by the NCAA they deserved to be in the field. It is very difficult for teams ranked 6 or 7 in a regional ranking to get an at large bid. It has been laid our how this came to be. This system is far from perfect and yes, stronger leagues/regions are somewhat penalized but that being said a team still has win games.laxfan22 wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 6:51 amSo yes, you believe that mount union and DePauw should have gotten AL bids? But not because they deserved it but based on geography? I’ll ignore your 12 year old churlish comments I’m the hope that you can act like an adult and discuss things in such a manner.RocLaxFan wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:54 pmLook Laxfan22 its better to keep quiet and let people think you're an idiot than speak up and confirm it. WS has everything to do with it!laxfan22 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:08 pm What does WS have to do with certain teams getting bids? Did anyone suggest WS shouldn’t have been in the tourney?
Let me ask you, do you think depauw and mount union deserved at large bids? That’s the question. She doesn’t need to respond or answer or anything else but if she wants to explain the decision process, I think there are people that would like to know. I know there are kids who didn’t make the tourney that would like answers.
All the so called experts have been saying how great the teams in the Nescac are and how unfair it was that they had to play each other so early in the tourney. Disrespecting other teams strength of schedule is NOW turned back in you and the rest of your trolls faces. Looks like your so called power conference is overrated! Today's WS/Tufts game confirmed it. A 5-5 conference record doesn't deserve a at large bid no matter what your ranking is,
The NCAA is trying to grow Lacrosse nationally, This has been going on for years so please just go way, delete your account and come back next year,
And the Depauw coach said (as I know to be the case from D3 football as well) she was removed from the discussion. So what was said in the room isn’t hers or for her to share and she wasn’t part of it yet the demand for more information came after she said that.Bart wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 7:44 amBelieved? That is a term that does not apply here. Deserved? Yes based on the criteria of regional ranking set up by the NCAA they deserved to be in the field. It is very difficult for teams ranked 6 or 7 in a regional ranking to get an at large bid. It has been laid our how this came to be. This system is far from perfect and yes, stronger leagues/regions are somewhat penalized but that being said a team still has win games.laxfan22 wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 6:51 amSo yes, you believe that mount union and DePauw should have gotten AL bids? But not because they deserved it but based on geography? I’ll ignore your 12 year old churlish comments I’m the hope that you can act like an adult and discuss things in such a manner.RocLaxFan wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:54 pmLook Laxfan22 its better to keep quiet and let people think you're an idiot than speak up and confirm it. WS has everything to do with it!laxfan22 wrote: ↑Sun May 21, 2023 8:08 pm What does WS have to do with certain teams getting bids? Did anyone suggest WS shouldn’t have been in the tourney?
Let me ask you, do you think depauw and mount union deserved at large bids? That’s the question. She doesn’t need to respond or answer or anything else but if she wants to explain the decision process, I think there are people that would like to know. I know there are kids who didn’t make the tourney that would like answers.
All the so called experts have been saying how great the teams in the Nescac are and how unfair it was that they had to play each other so early in the tourney. Disrespecting other teams strength of schedule is NOW turned back in you and the rest of your trolls faces. Looks like your so called power conference is overrated! Today's WS/Tufts game confirmed it. A 5-5 conference record doesn't deserve a at large bid no matter what your ranking is,
The NCAA is trying to grow Lacrosse nationally, This has been going on for years so please just go way, delete your account and come back next year,
You do not like the regional rankings, that is fine. What is your alternative? Spell it out completely and we can discuss the pro's and con's.
I’m not sure what your point is. Yea it’s a little difficult to compare regions but there are enough data points to make pretty informed decisions.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 8:41 am Regions are arbitrarily defined. There’s nothing magical about them. It’s about grouping based on division 3 student athletes not being able to play a statistically significant amount of games OOC. It’s just speculation. Nothing more across regions and whenone interjects otherwise it’s a signal they think they know better.
Nope it’s just one exerting their claimed expertise over another. You are insisting you know better, that’s your entire argument.laxfan22 wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 9:13 amI’m not sure what your point is. Yea it’s a little difficult to compare regions but there are enough data points to make pretty informed decisions.Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 8:41 am Regions are arbitrarily defined. There’s nothing magical about them. It’s about grouping based on division 3 student athletes not being able to play a statistically significant amount of games OOC. It’s just speculation. Nothing more across regions and whenone interjects otherwise it’s a signal they think they know better.