Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
You, too?
Trump had his foundation buy a couple portraits at charity auctions, then hung them in his golf clubs.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
Did you think Clinton was a good President ? ...his posse never threatened anyone .a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:19 pm This is the mistake that you and FoxNation keep making, old salt. You were promised BY THE LEFT that Trump was compromised.
The rest of us moderates....most of the freaking nation.... are horrified to hear what a sitting President thinks is normal business behavior. And believe it or not, there are Republican voters who can think for themselves, and their morals and values aren't depending on party affiliation. They're disgusted by the Cohen show.
Does your personal lawyer call and threaten people, old salt? Trump's did. And not just once. Or pay off hookers so you can betray your wife?
Who cares, right? Because Russia.
This is the bar of behavior you're setting for our next POTUS. That should bother you.
. I have lost track, didn’t he have an NDA signed by Ms. Clifford? (Legitimate question)frmanfan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:11 pm I was deposed for 3-1/2 straight days once. Lots of threats, these were business lawyers. That is what they do. I nicknamed one of them "the bulldog", he just would grab hold of something and not let it go. My lawyer beat those fancy city lawyers to a pulp, although it took almost 10 years to resolve it (in my favor I might add).
As for the rest of his testimony, didn't really listen or pay attention. From what I have read and heard, there really isn't any new information.
Now if he had the invoices for Stormy, or the checks actually stated what they were for, he would have a stronger case, but those checks could have been for anything. If he has a campaign violation, he isn't the first, they know how to fine pols for those.
Remember Melania is wife #3, and she was an affair on wife #2. She knows what she has.
He is slimy, I'll say that. Makes me appreciate my lawyer all the more.
Hold onto what the TRUTH.LOLMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amKeep holding onto that 6ft. SAD.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:09 amAny corroborating proof? A check made out to his lawyer? You KNOW what it was for or do you only have the liar Cohens assertions.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:45 pmReally? Did you actually watch the testimony?
It was very much about the pattern of deceit and cover-up of Trump in all aspects of his life, including into the Presidency.
Both as he was campaigning for the Presidency and then the cover-up of what he'd done, as President, including obstruction of justice and witness intimidation...while President.
Yes, some of his deceit and potentially alleged crimes like tax evasion, bank fraud, etc were as a 'businessman'. True, but then the same pattern continued into the campaign, and then into the Oval Office.
So what you have today after the big splash—NO COLLUSION. NO obstruction of justice. You got maybe sone alleged bad behavior. After two years.
Exactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
Just in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
The guy who decided this was just about some "collusion" between Trump and Putin.....6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
Bullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
IMO, 72-inch kindling is losing it. Wonder if 72"K believes Mueller is pursuing "Russian Collusion" by Trump or either his 2 legitimate spawn that can read and write. Nothing could be further from the truth. He doesn't have to do so.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:43 pmHold onto what the TRUTH.LOLMDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amKeep holding onto that 6ft. SAD.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:09 amAny corroborating proof? A check made out to his lawyer? You KNOW what it was for or do you only have the liar Cohens assertions.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 10:45 pmReally? Did you actually watch the testimony?
It was very much about the pattern of deceit and cover-up of Trump in all aspects of his life, including into the Presidency.
Both as he was campaigning for the Presidency and then the cover-up of what he'd done, as President, including obstruction of justice and witness intimidation...while President.
Yes, some of his deceit and potentially alleged crimes like tax evasion, bank fraud, etc were as a 'businessman'. True, but then the same pattern continued into the campaign, and then into the Oval Office.
So what you have today after the big splash—NO COLLUSION. NO obstruction of justice. You got maybe sone alleged bad behavior. After two years.
they can't imagine Trump could possibly lie, cheat and steal.So the Cohen case is not being handled by the SDNY? This is the basic genesis:6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:15 pmBullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
This is Mueller's scopeFederal law enforcement agents Monday raided the office and hotel room of Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer. The raid was overseen by the US Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York after a referral from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:24 pmafter a referral from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:15 pmBullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
Like I said, the case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry..... I am sure you didn't bother reading:6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:30 pmTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:24 pmafter a referral from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:15 pmBullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
This is the first public indication that Cohen is involved in a federal investigation that’s unrelated to Mueller’s inquiry into Russian election meddling. The Washington Post reported last month that Mueller had requested documents and other materials related to Russian interference, but added that there was “no indication” that Cohen is a subject or target of the special counsel’s investigation.
Like I said there wouldn't be a case without Mueller's fishing expedition. All of this anti trump derangement stems from the collusion hoax.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:37 pmLike I said, the case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:30 pmTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:24 pmafter a referral from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:15 pmBullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
Like I said, his case is not part of the Russian inquiry.... see above then see above again.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:40 pmLike I said there wouldn't be a case without Mueller's fishing expedition. All of this anti trump derangement stems from the collusion hoax.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:37 pmLike I said, the case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:30 pmTypical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:24 pmafter a referral from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:15 pmBullsh*t It originated with the Mueller fishing expedition.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:57 pmJust in case you are interested, the Cohen case is not part of the Russian conspiracy inquiry.6ftstick wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 1:45 pmExactly ALLL OF THIS was supposed to be about "collusion". REMEMBER. Not hearsay and uncorroborated innuendo about Trump from years before he became President. Who moved the freakin bar?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 11:35 amYou, too?
So that's what you got from seeing a sitting President's personal lawyer yesterday? Cohen "didn't prove collusion", therefore, you didn't bother listening to any of the other things he said? Therefore, all this behavior from a sitting President was ok?
My, how the bar has moved. Is this where the bar goes for you for the next President?
