Page 279 of 346

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:10 pm
by MDlaxfan76
What are the odds that the same rigor has been applied to the question of collateral damage in the Trump Admin as the Obama Admin?

(For you military folks, that's not a criticism of our military).

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:36 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:10 pm
What are the odds that the same rigor has been applied to the question of collateral damage in the Trump Admin as the Obama Admin?

(For you military folks, that's not a criticism of our military).
Anybody seen Cradleandshoot?

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:42 pm
by cradleandshoot
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:46 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:24 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:11 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:57 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:40 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:43 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:05 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 5:31 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
I have no problem with BHOs drones strikes. The fact he seems to underplay the collateral damage issue surprises me. If the bad guys are hiding out under the protection of people friendly to them... the rules of engagement make you fair game. The sad fact is that includes children, women and old folks. If you folks are going to pizz your pants about kids in cages on our southern border but just yawn about kids being blown up as collateral damage... well then something is out of whack here. :roll: BHO approved every single drone strike that took out the bad guys. BHO was also ultimately responsible for every single death from his actions due to collateral damage. Every child, every woman, every old person were all killed on BHOs watch. It is funny how we never saw the pictures of those collateral damage victims on our evening news. What was up with that ABC, CBS and NBC and all the other cable outlets? You all had no problems showing us the victims at Mai Lai? That does not play very well anymore on the 6:30 news does it?
🥱
Your soooooo cute when your bored. :D
You were blabbering....
I forget, you were just a gleam in your dad's eye when these historic events were happening. Do you remember the Mai Lai massacre? Do you remember what a big deal it was? Do you remember all those pictures that all of us Americans saw back in the day. I'm sorry, you were not even born yet when that was a big deal. :roll: Your bored because you speak out of the blissful ignorance of someone who never lived through the events when they were happening. Got it...😁
Why would I expect you to ever be able to think outside of that little box you live in. You didn't grow up and experience what was happening then. To a young un like you it is just babble.

Have you ever seen the photos of all of those victims of collateral damage from those drone strikes that BHO approved? I'm just asking for a friend.
Barry was talking about ‘nam? You were/are babbling.
You understand that these drone strikes occured in a nation that was not involved in the conflict at hand. You remember that in Nam our military was strictly forbidden from any action in neighboring countries. Laos, Cambodia were all off limits. There is some guy named John Kerry that served in those areas and had to cross those borders in hot persiut. What is our justification for launching drone strikes in Pakistan? It was a war crime when done during the Vietnam era. When did the rules of engagement change?
You have more of an interest than I do. You tell me.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/obamas-final-drone-strike-data

“Where you been at” the past 4 years?

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/22/ob ... ngs-count/

Nope....I don’t care what Joe does because you don’t either

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-47480207

There have been 2,243 drone strikes in the first two years of the Trump presidency, compared with 1,878 in Mr Obama's eight years in office, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a UK-based think tank.
During the course of the conflict in Vietnam our forces were not allowed to conduct any operations in Cambodia and Laos. It did not matter if you were an infantry company in "hot pursuit" of NVA forces. The moment the NVA forces crossed into Cambodia they were free and clear. That was not always the case, but our forces that violated the border did so at great risk. You don't seem to grasp where I come from regarding our drone attacks that now cover 3 administrations. I have no problem with the drone attacks or the collateral damage that occurs. I don't like it when non combatants are killed. I am wondering when the rules of engagement changed and who changed them. What our forces could not do in Vietnam they can now do and nobody asks any questions about it. If the rules have been that the US military does not conduct operations in neutral countries, why have we been doing so for almost 20 years? My secondary question is why the MM folks don't pay all that much attention to the collateral damage when it comes to innocent people that are killed in the process?

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:44 pm
by cradleandshoot
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:36 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:10 pm
What are the odds that the same rigor has been applied to the question of collateral damage in the Trump Admin as the Obama Admin?

(For you military folks, that's not a criticism of our military).
Anybody seen Cradleandshoot?
I'm here my brother, I had to take my wife to the hospital yesterday. Everything is fine with her.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:52 pm
by cradleandshoot
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:10 pm
What are the odds that the same rigor has been applied to the question of collateral damage in the Trump Admin as the Obama Admin?

(For you military folks, that's not a criticism of our military).
MD collateral damage is always a horrible consequence of any military action. There is no way around it, it is going to happen. I will repeat what I posted to TLD, our forces in Vietnam were strictly forbidden from any and all operations in Cambodia and Laos. At what point in time did our government authorize the drone strikes in Pakistan and surrounding countries? It is like all of a sudden it was okay to strike the bad guys hiding out in other countries. I don't have a problem with our leaders doing it. i just don't know where the controlling legal authority is that allows our leaders to do it. This has always been since the conflict in Vietnam, not our governments policy to do this. When did this change and who authorized it?

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:57 pm
by cradleandshoot
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:28 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:27 am
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:23 am ok, I'll bite.
Yes, we've seen pictures of the dead from drone strikes gone bad.
ABC, CBS and NBC? Were they broadcast over all of the MM? I don't think so...
I'm not sure where we saw these pictures, but certainly mainstream media has covered.

But you keep ignoring the differences in intent, thus the public's different reaction to them.
I went off on too much of a tangent here. The collateral damage from our drone strikes have never been sensationalized like the massacre at My Lai. When some of these pictures start making the regular rounds on the cover of Time and on our local newspapers then I will know it actually matters to some people.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 2:27 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
cradleandshoot wrote: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:44 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:36 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:10 pm
What are the odds that the same rigor has been applied to the question of collateral damage in the Trump Admin as the Obama Admin?

(For you military folks, that's not a criticism of our military).
Anybody seen Cradleandshoot?
I'm here my brother, I had to take my wife to the hospital yesterday. Everything is fine with her.
That’s good to hear. All the best. Got a call from my sister about my uncle having to be revived this morning. He should be fine. More important things in life than stupid politics.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2020 2:31 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
cradleandshoot wrote: Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:42 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:46 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:24 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:11 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:57 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:40 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:43 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 6:05 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 5:31 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
I have no problem with BHOs drones strikes. The fact he seems to underplay the collateral damage issue surprises me. If the bad guys are hiding out under the protection of people friendly to them... the rules of engagement make you fair game. The sad fact is that includes children, women and old folks. If you folks are going to pizz your pants about kids in cages on our southern border but just yawn about kids being blown up as collateral damage... well then something is out of whack here. :roll: BHO approved every single drone strike that took out the bad guys. BHO was also ultimately responsible for every single death from his actions due to collateral damage. Every child, every woman, every old person were all killed on BHOs watch. It is funny how we never saw the pictures of those collateral damage victims on our evening news. What was up with that ABC, CBS and NBC and all the other cable outlets? You all had no problems showing us the victims at Mai Lai? That does not play very well anymore on the 6:30 news does it?
🥱
Your soooooo cute when your bored. :D
You were blabbering....
I forget, you were just a gleam in your dad's eye when these historic events were happening. Do you remember the Mai Lai massacre? Do you remember what a big deal it was? Do you remember all those pictures that all of us Americans saw back in the day. I'm sorry, you were not even born yet when that was a big deal. :roll: Your bored because you speak out of the blissful ignorance of someone who never lived through the events when they were happening. Got it...😁
Why would I expect you to ever be able to think outside of that little box you live in. You didn't grow up and experience what was happening then. To a young un like you it is just babble.

Have you ever seen the photos of all of those victims of collateral damage from those drone strikes that BHO approved? I'm just asking for a friend.
Barry was talking about ‘nam? You were/are babbling.
You understand that these drone strikes occured in a nation that was not involved in the conflict at hand. You remember that in Nam our military was strictly forbidden from any action in neighboring countries. Laos, Cambodia were all off limits. There is some guy named John Kerry that served in those areas and had to cross those borders in hot persiut. What is our justification for launching drone strikes in Pakistan? It was a war crime when done during the Vietnam era. When did the rules of engagement change?
You have more of an interest than I do. You tell me.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/obamas-final-drone-strike-data

“Where you been at” the past 4 years?

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/22/ob ... ngs-count/

Nope....I don’t care what Joe does because you don’t either

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-us-canada-47480207

There have been 2,243 drone strikes in the first two years of the Trump presidency, compared with 1,878 in Mr Obama's eight years in office, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a UK-based think tank.
During the course of the conflict in Vietnam our forces were not allowed to conduct any operations in Cambodia and Laos. It did not matter if you were an infantry company in "hot pursuit" of NVA forces. The moment the NVA forces crossed into Cambodia they were free and clear. That was not always the case, but our forces that violated the border did so at great risk. You don't seem to grasp where I come from regarding our drone attacks that now cover 3 administrations. I have no problem with the drone attacks or the collateral damage that occurs. I don't like it when non combatants are killed. I am wondering when the rules of engagement changed and who changed them. What our forces could not do in Vietnam they can now do and nobody asks any questions about it. If the rules have been that the US military does not conduct operations in neutral countries, why have we been doing so for almost 20 years? My secondary question is why the MM folks don't pay all that much attention to the collateral damage when it comes to innocent people that are killed in the process?
Why are you asking me? I thought your issue was with Obama. I wasn’t defending the guy. Just pointing out how different a rational discussion can be given the current guy in office....you raise good points. I don’t have an answer. The people we pay should be answering those questions.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:32 am
by old salt

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:22 am
by cradleandshoot
old salt wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:32 am France's new aircraft carrier (in 2038). Tres chic !

https://news.usni.org/2020/12/08/presid ... er-program

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... t-carrier/
2038??? It sure looks like they are not in a hurry to build it. The construction must be a union job if it is going to take 18 years to build it? :lol:

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:03 pm
by dislaxxic
Republicans plot their first and last Trump rebellion

The House has passed the Defense Authorization Bill over Don the Con's veto threat (he wants to keep Confederate Generals around) and now the Senate seems poised to do so as well, even in the face of Dear Leader's veto threats...

..

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:25 am
by old salt
US sanctions Turkey for purchasing & employing Russian S-400 air defense system.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/u-s ... le-system/

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle urged the administration to sanction Ankara, though President Trump had previously refused. U.S. officials had previously said that sanctions could be avoided if Turkey did not employ the system, but Turkish officials test fired it in October.

Congress last week passed its annual defense policy bill that forced the White House to implement sanctions within 30 days.

Officials have said the mobile surface-to-air missile system poses a risk to the NATO alliance and the F-35, the U.S.’s most expensive weapons platform.

The acquisition violated the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which was passed in summer 2017 and targeted Iran, North Korea and Russia, requiring sanctions on any country that made a “significant purchase” of defense equipment from Russia.

The Trump administration has only used the sanctions once before, against China’s defense procurement agency for its purchase of a S400 as well as a Russian Sukhoi Su-35 combat aircraft.
If Erdogan kicks us (& NATO) out of Incirlik, Crete would be a great alternatine.
https://www.defenseworld.net/news/28184 ... 9hYRdHYrrc

Greece could receive six F-35 stealth jets originally built for Turkey before its ouster from the program, days after the latter conducted tests of the S-400 missile systems it bought from Russia.

...Additionally, the U.S. is mulling over relocating Incirlik Air Base in Turkey to Greece’s Crete island, reports said. NATO allies rely on the base as a staging point for access to the Middle East.

However, a month earlier, Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas Campbell told Anadolu Agency: “The U.S. has operated at Incirlik Air Base for decades at the invitation of the Turkish government, and our continued presence there demonstrates the ongoing and strong relationship between the United States and our NATO Ally Turkey.”

The Greek Air Force also plans to acquire 18 Rafale combat jets from France besides other major military equipment as friction with Turkey mounts. Modernization of 10 Mirage jets, buying two Type 214 submarines and four frigates from Germany, Spike missiles and drones from Israel, is also on the cards.

The United States and Greece agreed upon the sale of 20 F-35s during U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s visit to Athens earlier this month. Of this, six will be purchased in 2022, Greek newspaper Estia reported on October 19.

On October 16, Turkey conducted first test of S-400 air defense system (ADS) from its missile test facility in Sinop province on the Black Sea, where it was delivered earlier this month with British-made Banshee drones for use as targets.

The U.S.-Turkey tensions skyrocketed after the latter bought the S-400 systems from Russia for $2.5 billion in 2017. Washington’s attempts to persuade Ankara to ditch the systems went in vain. Soon after Russia began shipping the S-400s to Turkey in July 2019, the U.S. struck off Turkey’s name from the list of F-35 program partners and refused to sell the jets, 100 of which Ankara had planned to buy.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:35 am
by Typical Lax Dad
old salt wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:25 am US sanctions Turkey for purchasing & employing Russian S-400 air defense system.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/u-s ... le-system/

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle urged the administration to sanction Ankara, though President Trump had previously refused. U.S. officials had previously said that sanctions could be avoided if Turkey did not employ the system, but Turkish officials test fired it in October.

Congress last week passed its annual defense policy bill that forced the White House to implement sanctions within 30 days.

Officials have said the mobile surface-to-air missile system poses a risk to the NATO alliance and the F-35, the U.S.’s most expensive weapons platform.

The acquisition violated the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), which was passed in summer 2017 and targeted Iran, North Korea and Russia, requiring sanctions on any country that made a “significant purchase” of defense equipment from Russia.

The Trump administration has only used the sanctions once before, against China’s defense procurement agency for its purchase of a S400 as well as a Russian Sukhoi Su-35 combat aircraft.
Trump’s guys....handling business


Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:36 am
by DocBarrister
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:22 am
old salt wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:32 am France's new aircraft carrier (in 2038). Tres chic !

https://news.usni.org/2020/12/08/presid ... er-program

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... t-carrier/
2038??? It sure looks like they are not in a hurry to build it. The construction must be a union job if it is going to take 18 years to build it? :lol:
More than a light carrier ... but not quite a true super carrier.

Typical middling French endeavor.

DocBarrister ;)

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:45 am
by old salt
DocBarrister wrote: Tue Dec 15, 2020 1:36 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:22 am
old salt wrote: Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:32 am France's new aircraft carrier (in 2038). Tres chic !

https://news.usni.org/2020/12/08/presid ... er-program

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... t-carrier/
2038??? It sure looks like they are not in a hurry to build it. The construction must be a union job if it is going to take 18 years to build it? :lol:
More than a light carrier ... but not quite a true super carrier.

Typical middling French endeavor.

DocBarrister ;)
The French will always be, ...well, French.
Credit them for sustaining their own organic defense industry,
even if it means they're always 1 generation behind, at a higher per unit cost.
...but their stuff always looks sexier & they're not afraid to use it.

The Brits, true to form, took our light carrier concept & made it slightly bigger & more capable, using our F-35B's
Just as we followed their lead in conventional carrier development, they designed the Harrier, thought of the ski jump bow & took it to sea first.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 9:50 am
by seacoaster
From Trump's former Homeland Security Advisor and Deputy Homeland Security Advisor to Bush II:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/opin ... e=Homepage

"At the worst possible time, when the United States is at its most vulnerable — during a presidential transition and a devastating public health crisis — the networks of the federal government and much of corporate America are compromised by a foreign nation. We need to understand the scale and significance of what is happening.

Last week, the cybersecurity firm FireEye said it had been hacked and that its clients, which include the United States government, had been placed at risk. This week, we learned that SolarWinds, a publicly traded company that provides software to tens of thousands of government and corporate customers, was also hacked.

The attackers gained access to SolarWinds software before updates of that software were made available to its customers. Unsuspecting customers then downloaded a corrupted version of the software, which included a hidden back door that gave hackers access to the victim’s network.

This is what is called a supply-chain attack, meaning the pathway into the target networks relies on access to a supplier. Supply-chain attacks require significant resources and sometimes years to execute. They are almost always the product of a nation-state. Evidence in the SolarWinds attack points to the Russian intelligence agency known as the S.V.R., whose tradecraft is among the most advanced in the world.

According to SolarWinds S.E.C. filings, the malware was on the software from March to June. The number of organizations that downloaded the corrupted update could be as many as 18,000, which includes most federal government unclassified networks and more than 425 Fortune 500 companies.

The magnitude of this ongoing attack is hard to overstate.

The Russians have had access to a considerable number of important and sensitive networks for six to nine months. The Russian S.V.R. will surely have used its access to further exploit and gain administrative control over the networks it considered priority targets. For those targets, the hackers will have long ago moved past their entry point, covered their tracks and gained what experts call “persistent access,” meaning the ability to infiltrate and control networks in a way that is hard to detect or remove.

While the Russians did not have the time to gain complete control over every network they hacked, they most certainly did gain it over hundreds of them. It will take years to know for certain which networks the Russians control and which ones they just occupy.

The logical conclusion is that we must act as if the Russian government has control of all the networks it has penetrated. But it is unclear what the Russians intend to do next. The access the Russians now enjoy could be used for far more than simply spying.

The actual and perceived control of so many important networks could easily be used to undermine public and consumer trust in data, written communications and services. In the networks that the Russians control, they have the power to destroy or alter data, and impersonate legitimate people. Domestic and geopolitical tensions could escalate quite easily if they use their access for malign influence and misinformation — both hallmarks of Russian behavior.


What should be done?

On Dec. 13, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a division of the Department of Homeland Security — itself a victim — issued an emergency directive ordering federal civilian agencies to remove SolarWinds software from their networks.

The removal is aimed at stopping the bleeding. Unfortunately, the move is sadly insufficient and woefully too late. The damage is already done and the computer networks are already compromised.

It also is impractical. In 2017, the federal government was ordered to remove from its networks software from a Russian company, Kaspersky Lab, that was deemed too risky. It took over a year to get it off the networks. Even if we double that pace with SolarWinds software, and even if it wasn’t already too late, the situation would remain dire for a long time.

The remediation effort alone will be staggering. It will require the segregated replacement of entire enclaves of computers, network hardware and servers across vast federal and corporate networks. Somehow, the nation’s sensitive networks have to remain operational despite unknown levels of Russian access and control. A “do over” is mandatory and entire new networks need to be built — and isolated from compromised networks.

Cyber threat hunters that are stealthier than the Russians must be unleashed on these networks to look for the hidden, persistent access controls. These information security professionals actively search for, isolate and remove advanced, malicious code that evades automated safeguards. This will be difficult work as the Russians will be watching every move on the inside.

The National Defense Authorization Act, which each year provides the Defense Department and other agencies the authority to perform its work, is caught up in partisan wrangling. Among other important provisions, the act would authorize the Department of Homeland Security to perform network hunting in federal networks. If it wasn’t already, it is now a must-sign piece of legislation, and it will not be the last congressional action needed before this is resolved.

Network operators also must take immediate steps to more carefully inspect their internet traffic to detect and neutralize unexplained anomalies and obvious remote commands from hackers before the traffic enters or leaves their network.

The response must be broader than patching networks. While all indicators point to the Russian government, the United States, and ideally its allies, must publicly and formally attribute responsibility for these hacks. If it is Russia, President Trump must make it clear to Vladimir Putin that these actions are unacceptable. The U.S. military and intelligence community must be placed on increased alert; all elements of national power must be placed on the table.

While we must reserve our right to unilateral self-defense, allies must be rallied to the cause. The importance of coalitions will be especially important to punishing Russia and navigating this crisis without uncontrolled escalation.

President Trump is on the verge of leaving behind a federal government, and perhaps a large number of major industries, compromised by the Russian government. He must use whatever leverage he can muster to protect the United States and severely punish the Russians.

President-elect Joe Biden must begin his planning to take charge of this crisis. He has to assume that communications about this matter are being read by Russia, and assume that any government data or email could be falsified.

At this moment, the two teams must find a way to cooperate.

President Trump must get past his grievances about the election and govern for the remainder of his term. This moment requires unity, purpose and discipline. An intrusion so brazen and of this size and scope cannot be tolerated by any sovereign nation.

We are sick, distracted, and now under cyberattack. Leadership is essential
."

Thomas P. Bossert, who was the homeland security adviser to President Trump and deputy homeland security adviser to President George W. Bush, is the president of Trinity Cyber, a firm that provides network security services to governments and private companies.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:17 am
by ABV 8.3%
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
Please, all this killing machine industry lover did was hand out combat ribbons to the drone pilots. What IS the name of the private drone company based in California.........only difference between Obama and tRump is Barrack will give you a reach around, every once in a while. To make you feel loved. both are porking you in the you know what..

Stephen Corbett makes me sick......and his puppy dog look, feeling oh so bad that Obama had to struggle with the decision to KILL innocent people, or poor, poor, killing choices......

You don't even realize how pathetic it is. You , being the pretend liberals, like Stephen C.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:35 am
by Typical Lax Dad
ABV 8.3% wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:17 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
Please, all this killing machine industry lover did was hand out combat ribbons to the drone pilots. What IS the name of the private drone company based in California.........only difference between Obama and tRump is Barrack will give you a reach around, every once in a while. To make you feel loved. both are porking you in the you know what..

Stephen Corbett makes me sick......and his puppy dog look, feeling oh so bad that Obama had to struggle with the decision to KILL innocent people, or poor, poor, killing choices......

You don't even realize how pathetic it is. You , being the pretend liberals, like Stephen C.
Something trigger you? Put the bowl down.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:00 am
by ABV 8.3%
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:35 am
ABV 8.3% wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:17 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
Please, all this killing machine industry lover did was hand out combat ribbons to the drone pilots. What IS the name of the private drone company based in California.........only difference between Obama and tRump is Barrack will give you a reach around, every once in a while. To make you feel loved. both are porking you in the you know what..

Stephen Corbett makes me sick......and his puppy dog look, feeling oh so bad that Obama had to struggle with the decision to KILL innocent people, or poor, poor, killing choices......

You don't even realize how pathetic it is. You , being the pretend liberals, like Stephen C.
Something trigger you? Put the bowl down.
maybe you should pick it up? Did you watch the video? Is stephen C. not adoring him, with those sad puppy dog eyes of understanding and compassion.

"You killed people with deep thought, and anguish. Trump is such a cad, and said F em. No class. you, sir, Obama, killed with class. "

maybe if my folks were in power, we wouldn't be counting cards.......just saying. You wave your pom pomms to the killing industry machine like a good pretend liberal.

Re: The Politics of National Security

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:07 am
by Typical Lax Dad
ABV 8.3% wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 11:00 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:35 am
ABV 8.3% wrote: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:17 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:00 pm
Matnum PI wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pm obama and drone strikes. https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872
Thanks for posting that. It’s amazing listening to someone sane compared to what we have heard over the past 4 years. There are no easy answers.
Please, all this killing machine industry lover did was hand out combat ribbons to the drone pilots. What IS the name of the private drone company based in California.........only difference between Obama and tRump is Barrack will give you a reach around, every once in a while. To make you feel loved. both are porking you in the you know what..

Stephen Corbett makes me sick......and his puppy dog look, feeling oh so bad that Obama had to struggle with the decision to KILL innocent people, or poor, poor, killing choices......

You don't even realize how pathetic it is. You , being the pretend liberals, like Stephen C.
Something trigger you? Put the bowl down.
maybe you should pick it up? Did you watch the video? Is stephen C. not adoring him, with those sad puppy dog eyes of understanding and compassion.

"You killed people with deep thought, and anguish. Trump is such a cad, and said F em. No class. you, sir, Obama, killed with class. "

maybe if my folks were in power, we wouldn't be counting cards.......just saying. You wave your pom pomms to the killing industry machine like a good pretend liberal.
Engine, engine number 9......

This

https://twitter.com/Ibrahimpols/status/ ... 6054479872

Or That



Which is more coherent? You can’t help yourself......🥲