kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2024 1:07 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:41 pm
kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2024 12:27 pm
The spin has already begun. Less than 12 hrs later.
The tributes to Biden were heartfelt. Of course. All those "We Heart Joe!" signs surely make up for how they showed him the door. It was doubly nice of Nancy Pelosi to lead those cheers.
Kamela is the future for democracy, as long as we ignore that we didn't get a chance to elect her in a true primary as our party's nominee.
Kamela will fix all our problems, as long as we ignore that
she has overseen those issues and has held office and the ability to act and fix those issues, for the past 3.5 years.
If I'm looking for a positive from last night- I guess it was nice of Ashley to give her father's eulogy and let her know how she feels about him, while he's still with us. Seems like she is over all those issues she mentioned in her diary.
Don’t recall you mentioning what Mike Pence oversaw as Veep.
So was Kamala involved the past 3 years- Does she have any executive branch experience?
Or was she not involved, and had no part in the current problems?
Was she Immigration Czar or not?
I appreciate that you decided to spell her name correctly this time.
The snide garbage above isn't a good look for you, so why stoop to it?
It's not really who you are deep down, so why stoop?
The Dems are clearly super pleased to have accomplished this coming together in unity with a fresh look and energy. There's no real rancor among them and credit to Joe and his team for driving that from their angle and Harris and her team from theirs. Also credit to the progressives, like AOC, for recognizing the advantages of a re-boot, the fresh energy, as well as credit to all those governors and others who were serious contenders had Harris not been the obvious choice to rally around.
If we knew nothing else about Harris it's that she's running an incredibly impressive campaign operation, with no running start; absolutely crushing it on messaging clarity, unity, fundraising, volunteer sign-ups and excitement etc and she has the opposition totally flabbergasted. Impressive. Way different than 2019 when she was largely lost among a sea of contenders but managed to distinguish herself just a bit as the sole person to lay a glove on Biden...earning his respect, apparently. And apparently having earned his trust and even genuine affection over the ensuing 4 years.
As to her record as VP, other Dick Cheney I'm not sure we can say any VP in our recollections actually had any authority...and how did that work out? Probably the most impressive VP to my mind was HW, but he too didn't have any authority under Reagan and was very much in the background throughout. The VP's job is largely ceremonial and at most advisory, but it's also to quietly prepare for needing to take over. That means paying attention to the details, listening and learning, especially in areas new to them, probably most importantly for most in foreign affairs. It's never getting out in front of the President, making the POTUS look bad. Apparently that's what she did, quietly and competently...or at least let's hope that's what she did.
There's certainly no doubt that she's vastly better prepared for service as POTUS than Trump was in 2016 and he's since disqualified himself IMO from ever having such authority again...so, let's hope she paid close attention and learned a ton as VP.
As to immigration, you know the answer, so why troll with "Czar"? She had a limited assignment, apparently accomplished it well, but it certainly was insufficient on its own. That said, Biden's approach, like he did with so many topics, was to try to achieve a bipartisan legislative answer. And they darn near accomplished it only to have it blown up by a me-first, 'only I can do it' ego more interested in helping himself stay out of jail than helping the country move forward in any sort of unified, bi-partisan way..
Personally, I think they mishandled the politics of the problem, no matter how sincere they were about wanting a legislative answer...but that's a lesson, not a character flaw.