Re: The Mueller Report and Impeachment
Posted: Thu May 30, 2019 6:59 pm
I play catch with Alfie Jacques with sticks made from hickory trees, strung by hands that carry the spirit of the Creator.....so there.
Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
I am good but thanks for the offer.LandM wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 6:56 pm TLD
Totally agree on the bfd. Everyone puts their pants, cleats, turf shoes on the same way.
I could have been a kid in a candy store. It was an unbelievable 1 hour conversation. When we got to the PTSD part I finally got up and walked out for some air.
I have all the info if you want me to walk it through with you.
That sure was a long BOD report! I do pity you needing to slog through something that long. Hope they got it to you well in advance! Pretty unusual, unless maybe for an Audit Committee. Red flag that they don't know how to distill the important from the chaff? Or worse, they're burying the BOD in paper? But great, you'd dug in to do your fiduciary duty. Unfortunately a lot of BOD members, whether corporate or charitable don't do so...LandM wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 2:06 pm MD:
I take my fiduciary responsibilities to heart. I do what is in the best interest of all shareholders. No the report I read was the BOD report not the Mueller report.
The 10 obstruction items are a normal business person/owner reaction, not a politician. Unfortunately for many of you a non politician won the election.
Yesterday I saw capitalism and socialism at its best. Had fun at a BOD meeting. Then went because my wife has been carping on me for the last 10 years as my neighbor gets free stuff from the VA to a counselor meeting I qualify for 70% VA diasability, a joke. Good news is I will take my sweet time. Unfortunately I have to listen to 10 more years of my liberal wife carping on me for not getting the free benefits
72 chug on me. Not sure whether I am a meatball or deplorable. Unfortunately your horse is going to buck you off.
Smart. When you're the one checking under the hood, you aren't the one who needs an NDA. So, good thinking. I can tell you've been around the block. A firm handshake is all you need if you're a true captain of industry.LandM wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2019 7:16 amAs to business circles. I have met great people and my fair share of interesting people. I do not need an NDA, Confidentialy Agreement, Inventions Agreement before I check under the hood. I will shake your hand, look you in the eyes, and make my own determination.
I remember getting into a huge argument with my DI's on Parris Island when they tried to force me to attend Sunday services. By the time we were done with bootcamp, half of the platoon stayed in the barracks instead of wasting time listening to the good men preaching lies. Refused to get injected with "mystery" drugs.....was threatened with a "office hours" or court martial if I didn't take the needle. Navy Doc tried the disobey superiors order tactic too. He relinquished when he admitted he had NO idea what drug/s were in the needle, in private.LandM wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2019 7:16 am MD,
I will try and keep up with you. I have a headache as I chose deplorable too many times
The reason I say my wife and Mueller are politicians is not because they are elected. They grinded, went through the beaucracy, took the tests and passed, did not rock the boat, said the right things, had a champion in their corner, looked and acted good, and were professional in manner and decorum. I am NOT one of those people. I like to rock boats, I like to think outside the box, i hate being told what to do (yep even in the military), I like to adapt and have fun hence the path I chose.
As to my BOD meeting - yep young guys first one so we are toning down on the dead trees
As to business circles. I have met great people and my fair share of interesting people. I do not need an NDA, Confidentialy Agreement, Inventions Agreement before I check under the hood. I will shake your hand, look you in the eyes, and make my own determination.
You too? All were supposed to get the swine flu shot (think it was that one, can't remember for sure), I didn't see guinea pig on my name tag so I thought, nope, aint happenin'. Ended up having to go front and center with the CO of the ship. All was well when we were done and I never went to get the shot.rrr wrote
Refused to get injected with "mystery" drugs.....was threatened with a "office hours" or court martial if I didn't take the needle.
AG Barr breaks with Trump, says he does not think Obama-era officials committed treason
RubieG wants a cage match in the house with Meadows, JJ, Gaetz. Gowdy and Co tried to wear HRC down over her 10 hour interview...I'm betting on Mueller. You can rest assured, if he goes in either chamber, he will piss of everyone in some fashion. Sounds about right.Trump's lawyer and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani has also called on Mueller to testify following the conclusion of his investigation and to explain how and when he came to the determination that there was not adequate evidence to prove that President Trump and his administration colluded with Russian forces.
Ok, so they were successful within an organization, thus 'politician', while you don't like taking orders, don't like trying to please your boss, etc. Got it.LandM wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2019 7:16 am MD,
I will try and keep up with you. I have a headache as I chose deplorable too many times
The reason I say my wife and Mueller are politicians is not because they are elected. They grinded, went through the beaucracy, took the tests and passed, did not rock the boat, said the right things, had a champion in their corner, looked and acted good, and were professional in manner and decorum. I am NOT one of those people. I like to rock boats, I like to think outside the box, i hate being told what to do (yep even in the military), I like to adapt and have fun hence the path I chose.
As to my BOD meeting - yep young guys first one so we are toning down on the dead trees
As to business circles. I have met great people and my fair share of interesting people. I do not need an NDA, Confidentialy Agreement, Inventions Agreement before I check under the hood. I will shake your hand, look you in the eyes, and make my own determination.
And to be further clear, Trump’s an enormous failure as an an entrepreneur or business man. Rather he’s a con man, a cheat. Daddy ‘s money, and tax fraud. When that ran out along with OPM, Russians, mob money etc. But a good ‘marketer’ yes, always appealing to the basest of desires, greed, jealousy, sexual excess.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:48 am I’m with you on the last bit, as long as the china being broken is neither the law nor ethics. Plenty of entrepreneurial types achieve success without cutting legal and ethical corners.
Yes, bureaucrat would probably be a more appropriate word than politician to describe your point. Or maybe ‘institutionalist’.
But in Mueller ‘s case, you’d need to also call him a leader and a highly effective prosecutor. Lots of ‘bureaucrats ‘ just push paper, never achieve much. That’s not Mueller.
I'll take being a 4 BILLION DOLLAR failure.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:57 amAnd to be further clear, Trump’s an enormous failure as an an entrepreneur or business man. Rather he’s a con man, a cheat. Daddy ‘s money, and tax fraud. When that ran out along with OPM, Russians, mob money etc. But a good ‘marketer’ yes, always appealing to the basest of desires, greed, jealousy, sexual excess.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:48 am I’m with you on the last bit, as long as the china being broken is neither the law nor ethics. Plenty of entrepreneurial types achieve success without cutting legal and ethical corners.
Yes, bureaucrat would probably be a more appropriate word than politician to describe your point. Or maybe ‘institutionalist’.
But in Mueller ‘s case, you’d need to also call him a leader and a highly effective prosecutor. Lots of ‘bureaucrats ‘ just push paper, never achieve much. That’s not Mueller.
It ain’t $4B. That’s what HE says.....His Daddy left him $400-$500MM and he turned it into $400-$500MM.6ftstick wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:57 pmI'll take being a 4 BILLION DOLLAR failure.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:57 amAnd to be further clear, Trump’s an enormous failure as an an entrepreneur or business man. Rather he’s a con man, a cheat. Daddy ‘s money, and tax fraud. When that ran out along with OPM, Russians, mob money etc. But a good ‘marketer’ yes, always appealing to the basest of desires, greed, jealousy, sexual excess.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:48 am I’m with you on the last bit, as long as the china being broken is neither the law nor ethics. Plenty of entrepreneurial types achieve success without cutting legal and ethical corners.
Yes, bureaucrat would probably be a more appropriate word than politician to describe your point. Or maybe ‘institutionalist’.
But in Mueller ‘s case, you’d need to also call him a leader and a highly effective prosecutor. Lots of ‘bureaucrats ‘ just push paper, never achieve much. That’s not Mueller.
You people are way gone.
In the real world it’s called Daddy’s money.... and it ain’t $4B.LandM wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 6:34 pm MD,
It is not my place to lecture or teach people on what are their ethics, morals, integrity, honesty and sexual preferences are. It is my place to make a decision as to whether I want to interact with them. Hence a non-vote.
TLD,
In the start-up world it is called "friends and family money". If he kept the capital account the same but paid $20MM in a dividend a year, I would take that bet bet all day long........I know people who do thatand no it is not unethical nor illegal.....the smart people we elect make those rules.......
You don't buy Miralago, Doral, Trump Tower, and dozens of courses and other properties around the world if you're a fn failure.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 5:16 pmIt ain’t $4B. That’s what HE says.....His Daddy left him $400-$500MM and he turned it into $400-$500MM.6ftstick wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:57 pmI'll take being a 4 BILLION DOLLAR failure.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:57 amAnd to be further clear, Trump’s an enormous failure as an an entrepreneur or business man. Rather he’s a con man, a cheat. Daddy ‘s money, and tax fraud. When that ran out along with OPM, Russians, mob money etc. But a good ‘marketer’ yes, always appealing to the basest of desires, greed, jealousy, sexual excess.MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:48 am I’m with you on the last bit, as long as the china being broken is neither the law nor ethics. Plenty of entrepreneurial types achieve success without cutting legal and ethical corners.
Yes, bureaucrat would probably be a more appropriate word than politician to describe your point. Or maybe ‘institutionalist’.
But in Mueller ‘s case, you’d need to also call him a leader and a highly effective prosecutor. Lots of ‘bureaucrats ‘ just push paper, never achieve much. That’s not Mueller.
You people are way gone.