Progressive Ideology

[Peter Brown]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ ... g-province

I always thought those Disney people were such good little FLP folks. They even give "special thanks" to the chicoms at the end of the film. Way to go Disney, good job folks.

It's the same hypocrisy of the NBA who tell people that black lives matter, but apparently not Uighurs.

Of course you are completely off base, no matter how many times you say it. BLM does not devalue other lives. BLM suggests that not all lives are equally at risk in the course of everyday activities, and that black lives appear to be at considerably more risk when doing relatively ordinary legal things, like jogging in the evening. It is so simple to understand this, that a misunderstanding and assertion that BLM is intended to devalue other lives has to be deliberate, and part of an agenda.

We could talk about BLM in the long and difficult context of this country's history, or in closer perspective, in connection with black lives' interactions with law enforcement. But this notion -- that BLM elevates one set of lives over all others, even Uighurs -- just makes the discussion sad, stupid, and maybe even something more repulsive.

America is such a racist country that, checks notes, the black immigrant population has increased 5-fold since 1980!

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... n-the-u-s/

You lefties should tell the blacks what is real here; obviously their eyes are lying and they'd be better off anywhere else.

[seacoaster]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ ... g-province

I always thought those Disney people were such good little FLP folks. They even give "special thanks" to the chicoms at the end of the film. Way to go Disney, good job folks.

It's the same hypocrisy of the NBA who tell people that black lives matter, but apparently not Uighurs.

Of course you are completely off base, no matter how many times you say it. BLM does not devalue other lives. BLM suggests that not all lives are equally at risk in the course of everyday activities, and that black lives appear to be at considerably more risk when doing relatively ordinary legal things, like jogging in the evening. It is so simple to understand this, that a misunderstanding and assertion that BLM is intended to devalue other lives has to be deliberate, and part of an agenda.

We could talk about BLM in the long and difficult context of this country's history, or in closer perspective, in connection with black lives' interactions with law enforcement. But this notion -- that BLM elevates one set of lives over all others, even Uighurs -- just makes the discussion sad, stupid, and maybe even something more repulsive.

America is such a racist country that, checks notes, the black immigrant population has increased 5-fold since 1980!

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... n-the-u-s/

You lefties should tell the blacks what is real here; obviously their eyes are lying and they'd be better off anywhere else.

This is a good example of why folks here deride you for trollish behavior. BLM is worthy of discussion, and no one is expected to agree with everything those acting under its banner do and are doing. But the basic underlying issue -- that people of color cannot function the same way I do and you do in the society -- is pretty clear to most people. But to you, "black immigrant population" increases are enough to slather over the wound. I'll put you back on the "foe' list, because you really do, for all of the words and posts and cutesy photos, have nearly nothing to say worth reading.

[Peter Brown]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ ... g-province

I always thought those Disney people were such good little FLP folks. They even give "special thanks" to the chicoms at the end of the film. Way to go Disney, good job folks.

It's the same hypocrisy of the NBA who tell people that black lives matter, but apparently not Uighurs.

Of course you are completely off base, no matter how many times you say it. BLM does not devalue other lives. BLM suggests that not all lives are equally at risk in the course of everyday activities, and that black lives appear to be at considerably more risk when doing relatively ordinary legal things, like jogging in the evening. It is so simple to understand this, that a misunderstanding and assertion that BLM is intended to devalue other lives has to be deliberate, and part of an agenda.

We could talk about BLM in the long and difficult context of this country's history, or in closer perspective, in connection with black lives' interactions with law enforcement. But this notion -- that BLM elevates one set of lives over all others, even Uighurs -- just makes the discussion sad, stupid, and maybe even something more repulsive.

America is such a racist country that, checks notes, the black immigrant population has increased 5-fold since 1980!

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... n-the-u-s/

You lefties should tell the blacks what is real here; obviously their eyes are lying and they'd be better off anywhere else.

This is a good example of why folks here deride you for trollish behavior. BLM is worthy of discussion, and no one is expected to agree with everything those acting under its banner do and are doing. But the basic underlying issue -- that people of color cannot function the same way I do and you do in the society -- is pretty clear to most people. But to you, "black immigrant population" increases are enough to slather over the wound. I'll put you back on the "foe' list, because you really do, for all of the words and posts and cutesy photos, you have nearly nothing to say worth reading.

Other than stone-cold facts that callously mock your liberal narrative, sure.

[6ftstick]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ ... g-province

I always thought those Disney people were such good little FLP folks. They even give "special thanks" to the chicoms at the end of the film. Way to go Disney, good job folks.

It's the same hypocrisy of the NBA who tell people that black lives matter, but apparently not Uighurs.

Of course you are completely off base, no matter how many times you say it. BLM does not devalue other lives. BLM suggests that not all lives are equally at risk in the course of everyday activities, and that black lives appear to be at considerably more risk when doing relatively ordinary legal things, like jogging in the evening. It is so simple to understand this, that a misunderstanding and assertion that BLM is intended to devalue other lives has to be deliberate, and part of an agenda.

We could talk about BLM in the long and difficult context of this country's history, or in closer perspective, in connection with black lives' interactions with law enforcement. But this notion -- that BLM elevates one set of lives over all others, even Uighurs -- just makes the discussion sad, stupid, and maybe even something more repulsive.

America is such a racist country that, checks notes, the black immigrant population has increased 5-fold since 1980!

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... n-the-u-s/

You lefties should tell the blacks what is real here; obviously their eyes are lying and they'd be better off anywhere else.

This is a good example of why folks here deride you for trollish behavior. BLM is worthy of discussion, and no one is expected to agree with everything those acting under its banner do and are doing. But the basic underlying issue -- that people of color cannot function the same way I do and you do in the society -- is pretty clear to most people. But to you, "black immigrant population" increases are enough to slather over the wound. I'll put you back on the "foe' list, because you really do, for all of the words and posts and cutesy photos, have nearly nothing to say worth reading.

Hey captain enabler who in this video is wearing the yellow star and who's the brownshirts?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... ystem.html

How bout this one?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... _turd.html

[6ftstick]

This is where the liberal progressives have brought us.

More cultural destruction.

IT has many defenders in the MSM and I'm certain will have its defenders here.

https://www.mediaite.com/entertainment/ ... oes-viral/

[6ftstick]

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ ... g-province

I always thought those Disney people were such good little FLP folks. They even give "special thanks" to the chicoms at the end of the film. Way to go Disney, good job folks.

It's the same hypocrisy of the NBA who tell people that black lives matter, but apparently not Uighurs.

Of course you are completely off base, no matter how many times you say it. BLM does not devalue other lives. BLM suggests that not all lives are equally at risk in the course of everyday activities, and that black lives appear to be at considerably more risk when doing relatively ordinary legal things, like jogging in the evening. It is so simple to understand this, that a misunderstanding and assertion that BLM is intended to devalue other lives has to be deliberate, and part of an agenda.

We could talk about BLM in the long and difficult context of this country's history, or in closer perspective, in connection with black lives' interactions with law enforcement. But this notion -- that BLM elevates one set of lives over all others, even Uighurs -- just makes the discussion sad, stupid, and maybe even something more repulsive.

America is such a racist country that, checks notes, the black immigrant population has increased 5-fold since 1980!

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2 ... n-the-u-s/

You lefties should tell the blacks what is real here; obviously their eyes are lying and they'd be better off anywhere else.

This is a good example of why folks here deride you for trollish behavior. BLM is worthy of discussion, and no one is expected to agree with everything those acting under its banner do and are doing. But the basic underlying issue -- that people of color cannot function the same way I do and you do in the society -- is pretty clear to most people. But to you, "black immigrant population" increases are enough to slather over the wound. I'll put you back on the "foe' list, because you really do, for all of the words and posts and cutesy photos, have nearly nothing to say worth reading.

Hey captain enabler who in this video is wearing the yellow star and who's the brownshirts?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... /heck.html

How bout this one?

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... _turd.html

Can't get an answer?

[Peter Brown]

This is where the liberal progressives have brought us.

More cultural destruction.

IT has many defenders in the MSM and I'm certain will have its defenders here.

https://www.mediaite.com/entertainment/ ... oes-viral/

I say that Democrats are openly encouraging the disfigurement of American culture, but what I should say is they are openly encouraging the disfigurement of humanity. Reed Hastings is the CEO of Netflix and a massive Democratic Party donor. People like Nancy Pelosi, she one of the few sane democrats left, would never dare to call Reed out for such a disgusting movie like this.

Very few Dems will.

Watch the trailer and see. It is pathetic that so few Dems have the stones to call this stuff out any longer.

[MDlaxfan76]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

[kramerica.inc]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

[MDlaxfan76]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

[Peter Brown]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties that Hollywood produces.

Hi Woody Allen and Harvey Weinstein!

TDS burns so deep it's indescribable.

[a fan]

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties they produce.

And Trump came from Hollywood, Pete. Just like Reagan. That's how his base got to know him....and is why they vote for him....Hollywood.

With each passing day, you get worse at this trolling act of yours. No one is this stupid Pete, and no one is buying your ridiculous act....

[Peter Brown]

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties they produce.

And Trump came from Hollywood, Pete. Just like Reagan. That's how his base got to know him....and is why they vote for him....Hollywood.

With each passing day, you get worse at this trolling act of yours. No one is this stupid Pete, and no one is buying your ridiculous act....

Whu....?!?!!? I thought he was a bum from Queens!!!

[MDlaxfan76]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties that Hollywood produces.

Hi Woody Allen and Harvey Weinstein!

TDS burns so deep it's indescribable.

It's a French film Petey but go ahead on another clueless rant.

We get it, you prefer Toddlers in Tiaras and Dance Moms...all disgusting in my book, but hey, your "real Americans" like this garbage...American capitalism, yes haw!

[Peter Brown]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties that Hollywood produces.

Hi Woody Allen and Harvey Weinstein!

TDS burns so deep it's indescribable.

It's a French film Petey but go ahead on another clueless rant.

We get it, you prefer Toddlers in Tiaras and Dance Moms...all disgusting in my book, but hey, your "real Americans" like this garbage...American capitalism, yes haw!

is the distributor Netflix also a French company? is Sundance Film Festival, where the film received an award, a French entity?

stick with your original premise: Hollywood isn't responsible for Hollywood. It suits your TDS.

[MDlaxfan76]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

MD doesn't see the connection between Hollywood, which is 99.99% Democratic and partisan, and the anti-humanity garbage like Cuties that Hollywood produces.

Hi Woody Allen and Harvey Weinstein!

TDS burns so deep it's indescribable.

It's a French film Petey but go ahead on another clueless rant.

We get it, you prefer Toddlers in Tiaras and Dance Moms...all disgusting in my book, but hey, your "real Americans" like this garbage...American capitalism, yes haw!

is the distributor Netflix also a French company? is Sundance Film Festival, where the film received an award, a French entity?

stick with your original premise: Hollywood isn't responsible for Hollywood. It suits your TDS.

nah, you 'real Americans' prefer Toddlers in Tiaras...

Seriously, all of this sexualization of children is gross, I just don't see it as somehow connected to D's or R's...a lot of perversion out there, doesn't really care about politics.

[6ftstick]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

Did they run or not. Is the poster not a still from a scene in the movie. Isn't the movie made.

Jeezus.

[MDlaxfan76]

sure appears to be gross.
I know nothing about the movie, but is that (hopefully) the point???

What's this have to do with Democrats or progressive ideology?

The sexual objectification of females is certainly not associated with feminism (mostly a Dem and progressive view), whether with adult women or young girls.

I'm not seeing the connection to this thread.

EDIT: https://www.bustle.com/entertainment/ne ... -explained

Susan Rice is on the board for Netflix. And Michelle and Barack are major players there as well.

Still not seeing the connection to this thread. Do some homework on this movie and it's point being made.

The poster and the trailer (which are gross) apparently did result in some apologies at Netflix, and (I dunno if related) Hastings just fired the 18 year veteran at the head of all movie production etc.

Do you seriously think those you mention wouldn't be upset by that trailer and poster too? Seriously?

Did they run or not. Is the poster not a still from a scene in the movie. Isn't the movie made.

Jeezus.

Boy, that's difficult to parse.

Did who (they?) run or not?

The poster is indeed from the movie, it was the choice of that picture and the way the movie was being positioned that made it very much seem like they were trying to attract viewers on a salacious basis...and whoever did so should be embarrassed and likely fired (IMO).

The movie, on the other hand, apparently has a quite different message. However, as I haven't seen it, I'm not qualified to judge other than to note that there are those who are saying it's quite the opposite of salacious. I linked the first article I saw.

Isn't the movie made...??? what's that mean?
are you asking if it exists? Obviously.
Are you asking who made it? look at the credits.

[Peter Brown]

The ghoulish looking LA County Health Director Barbara Ferrer was caught on mic telling some school union nurses that schools wouldn’t open “until after the election”.

KFIAM640 obtained an audio recording of LA County Public Health Director Dr. Ferrer repeatedly saying in a conference call that she doesn't expect K-12 schools to reopen until "we are done with the election" in November.

Democrats lie about Covid. It’s all about power. She should be jailed.

https://twitter.com/billfoxla/status/13 ... 37216?s=21

Why does anyone listen to this Party? Despicable.

[kramerica.inc]

A look back to an article from a few years ago. Almost prophetic. But certainly explains a lot.

https://www.ft.com/content/095c7a8e-96a ... GZxKnQfR5Q