LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pm**

molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!

michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:03 pm**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pm
molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.

PSU had family (looked like more than just parents but also siblings) and allowed the visiting team to have a single parent, if I'm not mistaken.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pm
molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.

My understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.

Posted: **Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:42 pm**

flalax22 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pm
molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.
My understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.

smart move. time for baltimore and Hopkins to follow suit.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am**

Why one ticket instead of two?

It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am**

WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?

It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.

https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:05 am**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+.

Skipping this one too?

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:01 pm**

jhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 11:05 am
jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+.
Skipping this one too?

I'm already a big ten subscriber, so yes I'll throw $ rosemont for this one. Looked at the 2019 box score from our last visit there and realized epstein will be our only starter aside from narewski from that game in the same spot in the lineup although williams and connor are still around. Epstein and Grimes might be the only guys the next time we player there in the same spot in the lineup.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:13 pm**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:01 pm
I'm already a big ten subscriber, so yes I'll throw $ rosemont for this one.

Good. I look forward to hearing from you during the game. This thread was too quiet this Saturday.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:15 pm**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:01 pm Epstein and Grimes might be the only guys the next time we player there in the same spot in the lineup.

How are you arriving at this conclusion? If we play there next year then Williams is the only player on the roster who can't come back. Pretty sure even Lyne can come back. DeSimone, Baskin, Keogh, Prouty, Reinson—they can all come back. Even if we don't play there again until 2023 then guys like Angelus, Degnon, Szuluk, Deans could all still be around and very well be in similar roles. Not everyone is going to take the extra year of eligibility from Covid but some probably will.

They only touched on the Michigan game briefly on this week's IL podcast but Quint seemed positive (for him, at least). Said he thinks the offense is talented and will be able to score with top Big Ten teams, but still has questions about the defense, which is certainly fair.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pm**

jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?

It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.

QK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pm**

jhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:13 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:01 pm
I'm already a big ten subscriber, so yes I'll throw $ rosemont for this one.
Good. I look forward to hearing from you during the game. This thread was too quiet this Saturday.

I tried . . . .

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:33 pm**

nyjay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?

It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
QK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.

He doesn’t think Georgetown
is any good.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:36 pm**

nyjay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pm
jhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:13 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:01 pm
I'm already a big ten subscriber, so yes I'll throw $ rosemont for this one.
Good. I look forward to hearing from you during the game. This thread was too quiet this Saturday.
I tried . . . .

Haha no slight against you. I’m ribbing 06 for what I deem to be “questionable logic” when it comes to spending money.

It seemed like there were only like 3 of us actually watching live last week.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:42 pm**

10stone5 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:33 pm
nyjay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 12:32 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 9:41 am
WOMBAT, Mod Emeritus wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 4:59 am Why one ticket instead of two?

It generally takes two to create a lacrosse player.
https://www.insidelacrosse.com/article/ ... arch/57382
quint shows bobby benson a lot of love that some of you don't seem to share and in case there was any doubt, game this weekend is on btn+. In a normal year our schedule based on this weeks rankings w/spots varying 2-3 to include ivy participants we'd be at 1,3,4,6,7,10,11,14 w/navy umbc receiving votes and obviously towson and princeton are strong rivals. "One of the toughest schedules in the nation", was always something I looked forward in the game notes, a credit to the quality of our rivals, and meant we were getting to see great games and some of the best players every week.
QK continues with the performance art in this week's rankings. Richmond? UMBC? UMass at 12? Georgetown at 9? You gotta give it to him though, the guy definitely has his opinions. Based on this week's rankings, he may have just as much against Georgetown as he does against Hop.
He doesn’t think Georgetown
is any good.

No, he does not. And they've allowed 2 goals in 2 games. Dude definitely has the courage of his convictions.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:12 pm**

flalax22 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 10:16 pm
jhu06 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:41 pm
molo wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 9:06 pm In light of all the complaints about poor fan attendance, it may be possible to open the stadium to the public and still maintain social distancing. Much to the chagrin of the governor, I'll be getting a vaccine Wednesday. Here's hoping to see some live games this year!
michigan had parents on saturday it sounded like. time to open sesame.
My understanding is that Michigan allowed each Hopkins player one ticket for family.

I’m willing to act as a surrogate parent to attend a Jays game this season.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm**

Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.

Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.

For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:41 pm**

HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.

Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.

For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.

Didn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?

I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:48 pm**

jhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:41 pm
HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.

Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.

For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
Didn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?

I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)

Yes, but that's because the Maryland governor had already issued an order allowing for fans at sporting events, which I didn't realize: https://governor.maryland.gov/wp-conten ... .28.21.pdf

"Fans or no fans" is a state-level issue, but after that it's up to localities to decide if they brings fans back under the state guidelines. Didn't see that the state had made its decision already. NJ just announced it was allowing fans last week.

Posted: **Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:50 pm**

jhu08 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:41 pm
HopFan16 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:21 pm Rutgers will apparently allow limited fans at its home games. When we play there (likely in April?) that might be an opportunity to see the Jays.

Attendance at sporting events is decided on a state level. I suspect when Maryland allows, Homewood will have fans again, even if it's just family to start. The staff and admin have been saying all along that they'd like to have fans back in the stands when they're able to do so but right now it's not up to them.

For those still following PLL, Atlas traded Rabil to the Cannons for draft picks. They protected Durkin, Crawley, Tinney, and Brown to prevent the Cannons from taking them in the expansion draft. Redwoods protected Harrison and Chrome protected Ranagan. Foley, Rapine, Hubler all went unprotected for their respective teams. If they are smart some PLL coach will draft Cody Radz, who's been a very solid player in the MLL.
Didn’t Navy have fans in their first home games? If so, is it really a state-level decision?

I don’t really have a strong opinion on whether Hopkins/the Big Ten should or shouldn’t. So no one bite my head off please. (As in, whatever they decide is fine with me - I’m more worried about other things.)

Fan attendance is based on state and county. AA county has reduced it to parents only for Navy. But Navy is now shut down for the next 10 days

LaxPower Back-Up Stick

Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021

Re: Johns Hopkins 2021