Page 228 of 294
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:59 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:55 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:12 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:02 pm
Wonder what happened a long time before that, and what happened after that...
I just scrolled down a few of those posts..... that stuff pollutes the mind. People actually spend time reading and participating in that stuff?
Was asking more about the actual timeline. Who encouraged them to go to the capitol and attack it in the first place? And whether they followed shaman's instructions to go home, or if they kept attacking the capitol, shaman included?
Guess we'll never know until Tucker releases all the remaining footage...
Yep….I was also just making a random comment. Someone forced that Shaman to plead guilty. He was probably tricked.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 12:29 am
by Farfromgeneva
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:59 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:55 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:12 pm
NattyBohChamps04 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:02 pm
Wonder what happened a long time before that, and what happened after that...
I just scrolled down a few of those posts..... that stuff pollutes the mind. People actually spend time reading and participating in that stuff?
Was asking more about the actual timeline. Who encouraged them to go to the capitol and attack it in the first place? And whether they followed shaman's instructions to go home, or if they kept attacking the capitol, shaman included?
Guess we'll never know until Tucker releases all the remaining footage...
Yep….I was also just making a random comment. Someone forced that Shaman to plead guilty. He was probably tricked.
The native Americans who want their style back from fraudsters.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:28 am
by youthathletics
NAOMI WOLF: Dear conservatives, I'm sorry I believed so many media lies:
https://humanevents.com/2023/03/10/naom ... aign=64483
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:52 am
by Seacoaster(1)
Boy, history will treat this little missive badly.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:55 am
by Typical Lax Dad
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:52 am
Boy, history will treat this little missive badly.
https://newrepublic.com/article/162702/ ... antivaxxer
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
by Seacoaster(1)
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
by MDlaxfan76
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
by youthathletics
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
by MDlaxfan76
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
by youthathletics
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:14 pm
by MDlaxfan76
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Who, Naomi???
I don't see whatever "fat shaming" you're referring to...
Naomi's a full-on whack job...but perhaps you didn't get that?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:35 am
by Farfromgeneva
The part about the 80s and individualism. Where’s Tech and the others to whine about the carnage boomers wrought on society with their excessive focus on individualism? When I jumped over here a few years into FL well after using LP since the mid 2000s for lacrosse only I dropped some of my now obvious hyperbolic bombs and he and few others took so much offense to it. Consistent at least (those cats and their selfishness and need for ego boosts).
Need to try and spend more time on empirical skepticism and less on the world revolving around the people who revolutionized society in the 80s and 90s.
https://www.shortform.com/blog/empirica ... hilosophy/
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
by Farfromgeneva
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:38 am
by Farfromgeneva
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:14 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Who, Naomi???
I don't see whatever "fat shaming" you're referring to...
Naomi's a full-on whack job...but perhaps you didn't get that?
Feels like a reply reliant on others not reading the piece and believing the analysis as is common if a wildly problematic tactic in social media such as Twitter, Instagram etc.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
by MDlaxfan76
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Just to be clear, it's worse than "lack of command".
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:04 am
by Farfromgeneva
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Just to be clear, it's worse than "lack of command".
Yes well it’s Sunday and while my family is at church I’m trying to not be my normal self for a few hours and be a little kinder. But happy to go back to ruthless and short tempered FFG if the demand is there!
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:31 am
by ggait
No idea who Naomi Wolf is. But her piece is lame.
We’ve all seen footage of the J6ers wandering around aimlessly like a bunch of dimwits. Like the idiots rifling through the congressional chamber desks as if they’re gonna find the secrets to the election steal or the nuclear codes. I wasn’t lied to at all.
No one should think that every J6er came with an Ouzi and a flame thrower and committed mass murder. No surprise that there were security screw ups.
But we didn’t have this sad awful violent garbage when any other electoral college count happened. Never. Only one set of people made that disgrace happen.
And if you want to focus on media lies, maybe wolf might want to look at the role that right wing media had promoting the big lie. That wolf is whining about lefty media lies as dominion is laying out fox’s awfulness on a daily basis is really
.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:00 pm
by SCLaxAttack
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....
I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Just to be clear, it's worse than "lack of command".
Perhaps Youth only got to the second sentence of the first paragraph - "The weighty feminist classics that had shaken the world from the midcentury through the 1970s—Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch, Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will—had been read by millions" - saw "weighty", and immediately assumed Featherstone was going to attack Wolf for a few extra pounds.
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:59 pm
by Typical Lax Dad
SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:00 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....
I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Just to be clear, it's worse than "lack of command".
Perhaps Youth only got to the second sentence of the first paragraph - "The weighty feminist classics that had shaken the world from the midcentury through the 1970s—Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch, Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will—had been read by millions" - saw "weighty", and immediately assumed Featherstone was going to attack Wolf for a few extra pounds.
Maybe this was YA issue with “fat” shaming: “Here was a feminist disquisition of old-school proportions: a
big fat analysis of how profit and patriarchy conspire to make women feel bad about ourselves”
Re: January 6, 2021: Insurrection or “normal tourist” visitation?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 3:08 pm
by Farfromgeneva
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:59 pm
SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 2:00 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: ↑Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:37 am
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:25 pm
youthathletics wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 5:13 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 2:41 pm
Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:53 am
Struggling to remain "relevant" is hard.
Youth,
have you had a chance to read that full article about Naomi Wolf?
which one? The one TLD posted was disgusting with all the references to being overweight.
Seriously?
That's what you learned from it?
Read it to the end.
Yes, seriously....
I suppose you have no issues with fat shaming.
Oh I read it.....she is disgustingly hateful, nothing more than a hit piece, right up there with the things Fox does.
Certainly an interesting take. You don’t have issues with her historical incorrect use of information and lack of command of facts and data?
Just to be clear, it's worse than "lack of command".
Perhaps Youth only got to the second sentence of the first paragraph - "The weighty feminist classics that had shaken the world from the midcentury through the 1970s—Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, Germaine Greer’s The Female Eunuch, Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will—had been read by millions" - saw "weighty", and immediately assumed Featherstone was going to attack Wolf for a few extra pounds.
Maybe this was YA issue with “fat” shaming: “Here was a feminist disquisition of old-school proportions: a
big fat analysis of how profit and patriarchy conspire to make women feel bad about ourselves”
Is it fat shaming when DMac lights up a fatty?
.