Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 8:58 am
Are you sure about this?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am
What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. :
Are you sure about this?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am
What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. :
That is not what Justice Rehnquist stated in his original dissent in 1973. I'm not a legal eagle like yourself but he was. He was directly referring to the 14th amendment.
I'm sure somebody leaked it, which is unprecedented in the history of the SCOTUS until today. The question would be valid to say... WHY???AOD wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:58 amAre you sure about this?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am
What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. :
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am https://college.cengage.com/polisci/edu ... ssent.html
Justice Rehnquist was correct in his dissent 50 years ago. In his opinion there was NO constitutional right to an abortion. What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. is that abortion rights are state rights. The same effing thing Justice Rehnquist said in his dissent 50 years ago. Right on cue the FLP hatemongers have stepped forward to spew their venom. Here in NYS you folks don't have to worry. The right to an abortion has been guaranteed as should have been done in the first place... IT IS A STATE RIGHT!!!! Let the states and the people of the states decide
"There apparently was no question concerning the validity of this provision or of any of the other state statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter"
cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:06 amI'm sure somebody leaked it, which is unprecedented in the history of the SCOTUS until today. The question would be valid to say... WHY???AOD wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:58 amAre you sure about this?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am
What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. :
... more KellyAnne bullsh*t; a person who would standby while her party marches gays into the ovens. Of course the anti-life republiCONs' have no desire to ban abortion in all states. Sure sounds reasonable to any dumbass.Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:10 amcradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am https://college.cengage.com/polisci/edu ... ssent.html
Justice Rehnquist was correct in his dissent 50 years ago. In his opinion there was NO constitutional right to an abortion. What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. is that abortion rights are state rights. The same effing thing Justice Rehnquist said in his dissent 50 years ago. Right on cue the FLP hatemongers have stepped forward to spew their venom. Here in NYS you folks don't have to worry. The right to an abortion has been guaranteed as should have been done in the first place... IT IS A STATE RIGHT!!!! Let the states and the people of the states decide
"There apparently was no question concerning the validity of this provision or of any of the other state statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter"
The cognoscenti are pointing at one of Sotomajor’s lunatic clerk FLP’ers as the culprit. He’s been a vocal (aren’t they all?) leftist screaming about Kavanaugh, even though that was bunk, and he’s known the author of the piece and has collaborated with the author in the past. Further, as anyone knows, Sotomajor doesn’t get along with any other judge and nor is she particularly keen on tradition.
Anyway…
Abortion is such a revealing topic on the mind of a FLP. (And you need to assume of course that this is a majority opinion which won’t change until any decision is made public: neither sumo Tim are gimme’s).
Their reactions have been characteristically hysterical and overly emotional…same as it ever was.
Abortion will still be legal in every state where they dominate, and illegal only in states they don’t. Meanwhile, libs are positively ecstatic that a clerk violated protocol, because of course recall this is the ‘party of norms’, much like it’s the ‘party of science’ as they can’t define woman…except in this case.
What you’ll never hear any FLP lament is either the life of the aborted baby (as if…) nor the emotional trauma most women feel for being responsible taking another humans life. Imagine never acknowledging those two facts. Completely devoid of humanity…
jhu72 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:24 am... more KellyAnne bullsh*t; a person who would standby while her party marches gays into the ovens. Of course the anti-life republiCONs' have no desire to ban abortion in all states. Sure sounds reasonable to any dumbass.Peter Brown wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:10 amcradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am https://college.cengage.com/polisci/edu ... ssent.html
Justice Rehnquist was correct in his dissent 50 years ago. In his opinion there was NO constitutional right to an abortion. What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. is that abortion rights are state rights. The same effing thing Justice Rehnquist said in his dissent 50 years ago. Right on cue the FLP hatemongers have stepped forward to spew their venom. Here in NYS you folks don't have to worry. The right to an abortion has been guaranteed as should have been done in the first place... IT IS A STATE RIGHT!!!! Let the states and the people of the states decide
"There apparently was no question concerning the validity of this provision or of any of the other state statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter"
The cognoscenti are pointing at one of Sotomajor’s lunatic clerk FLP’ers as the culprit. He’s been a vocal (aren’t they all?) leftist screaming about Kavanaugh, even though that was bunk, and he’s known the author of the piece and has collaborated with the author in the past. Further, as anyone knows, Sotomajor doesn’t get along with any other judge and nor is she particularly keen on tradition.
Anyway…
Abortion is such a revealing topic on the mind of a FLP. (And you need to assume of course that this is a majority opinion which won’t change until any decision is made public: neither sumo Tim are gimme’s).
Their reactions have been characteristically hysterical and overly emotional…same as it ever was.
Abortion will still be legal in every state where they dominate, and illegal only in states they don’t. Meanwhile, libs are positively ecstatic that a clerk violated protocol, because of course recall this is the ‘party of norms’, much like it’s the ‘party of science’ as they can’t define woman…except in this case.
What you’ll never hear any FLP lament is either the life of the aborted baby (as if…) nor the emotional trauma most women feel for being responsible taking another humans life. Imagine never acknowledging those two facts. Completely devoid of humanity…
Thank you for your input ggait. The problem with what Alito is doing shoots the concept of stare decisi all to hell. Some of us may disagree with the original Roe v Wade decision. The case was decided and if we open the can of worms of overturning cases already decided in the SCOTUS.. neither party will like the outcome of that.
... yes!cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:41 amThank you for your input ggait. The problem with what Alito is doing shoots the concept of stare decisi all to hell. Some of us may disagree with the original Roe v Wade decision. The case was decided and if we open the can of worms of overturning cases already decided in the SCOTUS.. neither party will like the outcome of that.
little CYA hey.CU88 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am Sen Susan Collins: “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office..”
Sucker born every minute...
At a certain point, you just have to laugh to survive. She really is a chucklehead.CU88 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am Sen Susan Collins: “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office..”
Sucker born every minute...
Well, yes, of course it was leaked. But you ascribed the leak to some . . . .cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 9:06 amI'm sure somebody leaked it, which is unprecedented in the history of the SCOTUS until today. The question would be valid to say... WHY???AOD wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:58 amAre you sure about this?cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 8:44 am
What Justice Alito has said in the leaked decision by some SCUMBAG FLP.. :
That's politics. Frankly, I don't believe she's surprised in the least. She simply says what's needed to be said to give her political cover.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:54 amAt a certain point, you just have to laugh to survive. She really is a chucklehead.CU88 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am Sen Susan Collins: “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office..”
Sucker born every minute...
+1AOD wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 11:08 amThat's politics. Frankly, I don't believe she's surprised in the least. She simply says what's needed to be said to give her political cover.Seacoaster(1) wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:54 amAt a certain point, you just have to laugh to survive. She really is a chucklehead.CU88 wrote: ↑Tue May 03, 2022 10:45 am Sen Susan Collins: “If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office..”
Sucker born every minute...