Re: All things CoronaVirus
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:33 pm
I call spades spades.
I call spades spades.
a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 2:07 pmRight. Every other poster here understands and agrees with every point I'm making to you...and you can't refute ANY of them, so you instead call it "spin" and run to mommy, ducking any actual dialog. Dialog that you have ZERO interest in, naturally. Oh no! I can't handle someone who refutes my points easily!tech37 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 1:18 pmSuit yourself a fan including all your spin, distraction, projection, and mischaracterization.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 10:21 amFFS, Tech. Because it would be global news. You are STILL speculating, and making plans for when you "prove" where Covid came from.
It kinda is global news.
I admit that I can't read or refute this sh(t. Why are you unable to do the same?
If that's the case, how can you dismiss with such certainty new ideas or anyone who continues to ask questions or speculate? Logic.
Logic. You NEVER post anything here that shows your theory is wrong, or has massive holes in it. All you post are things that affirm your beliefs that you "arrived at" four years ago.
My "theory"? What theory? And I certainly don't need to post anything to prove anything "wrong" when we have you and "every other poster here" (all 3 of them) to dispute/denigrate/kill any new ideas. Logic.
Strawman. No one said that it didn't come from a freaking Chinese lab. What folks said was------WAY THE F BACK IN 2020------is that you're an idiot if you think you're SURE it came from a Chinese lab way back in 2020. And that, my man, is 100% accurate.
The annoying part, and the part that TLD and others understand perfectly well....is that if Fauci had come out and said that Covid came from a Chinese lab back in 2020? You and your buds would take to the internet, and tell the world that "Fauci is hiding something! He can't possibly know that Covid came from a Chinese lab! We demand to see his evidence!"
THAT is what everyone is mocking here, Tech. You don't get that, and there's obviously nothing I can do to get you to have five seconds of self awareness to understand the game you're playing, where no matter what they do, 'mainstream medicine" is lying/tricking/covering-up/trying-to-kill-you.
The fact that you call it "mainstream medicine" or "the establishment" says it all. As if every 1st world country's top doctors get together in Dr. Evil's "underground lair" every week, to conspire as to how they're going to lie to Tech and his buds this week.
Really? "every other poster here" (all 3 of them)... so what? I'm not refuting anything. Now try thinking beyond your bluster a fan, this started because I posted a current, comprehensive podcast, that IMO raises very interesting, logical questions. I suppose that's Dunning-Kruger in your mind
Oh no! Not more ACTUAL scientists trying to move the field forward!?! Trying to keep Americans and Coloradan's and my family healthy and well!! Those BASTARDS!
Please explain "actual." You're ridiculous.
Well...obviously you and TeamTinFoil need to put a stop to this, what with your DEEP understanding of how science and public health is.
Here's some recent background news on what is going on in your state, it's all "TeamTinFoil" of course:
Colorado State University faces backlash over plans for new NIH-funded bat research lab
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-06-30- ... earch.html
Other background:
U.S. halts funding for new risky virus studies, calls for voluntary moratorium (2014 Obama Admin decision)
https://www.science.org/content/article ... moratorium
Gain-of-function on the hot seat (more recent deliberation)
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/fu ... t-00115575
And I'm surprised that they didn't offer you a tenured post, what with all your brilliant insights into how we should deal with viruses. What was your recent advice? Oh, right: use AI to "speed up approval of vaccines" on the one hand....and lose your mind because (checks notes) the FDA had the gall to "speed up the approval of vaccines". BRILLIANT work, Dr. Tech.
Huh. You ask me "what would you do" and I optimistically suggest AI might be helpful in the future. Then you yell Dunning-Kruger! or call me Dr.Tech and other names. And if I don't answer your direct questions you yell "you're running home to mommy." What a good-faith, honest broker you are a fan.
Bullying tactics on your part as well.
"Current" means it was recently publlshed.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 7:20 am >>I posted a current, comprehensive podcast, that IMO raises very interesting, logical questions. I suppose that's Dunning-Kruger in your mind <<
What is current about speculation that the Chinese virus was engineered in a lab? You had that take in 2020. The established scientific community has not seen any evidence to support that claim. What was new was the release of information based on the FOIA that detailed how Fauci and his crew considered it, investigated it and found nothing and moved on. That is what “vindicated” the lab leak theory which was further expanded into it was proven to be “engineered”.
Scientists you don’t agree with…. Gilligan’s Island was on yesterday…. It was a current broadcast.tech37 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 7:26 am"Current" means it was recently publlshed.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 7:20 am >>I posted a current, comprehensive podcast, that IMO raises very interesting, logical questions. I suppose that's Dunning-Kruger in your mind <<
What is current about speculation that the Chinese virus was engineered in a lab? You had that take in 2020. The established scientific community has not seen any evidence to support that claim. What was new was the release of information based on the FOIA that detailed how Fauci and his crew considered it, investigated it and found nothing and moved on. That is what “vindicated” the lab leak theory which was further expanded into it was proven to be “engineered”.
Define "established scientific community."
That’s just an I Dream Of Genie re-boot….tech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
http://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Are there parameters as to the slant of their eyes that qualifies them to being" oriental" enough for government work? Does this comment violate the protocol for political correctness?? I'm only asking for a friend.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:38 amhttp://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Post a link with some Oriental scientists when you get a chance.
Just calling a spade a spade.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:13 amAre there parameters as to the slant of their eyes that qualifies them to being" oriental" enough for government work? Does this comment violate the protocol for political correctness?? I'm only asking for a friend.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:38 amhttp://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Post a link with some Oriental scientists when you get a chance.
In some circles that is a racist phrase. Archie Bunker used it back in the day. All in the Family would NEVER be allowed on TV today. You should be ashamed of yourself TLD.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:16 amJust calling a spade a spade.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:13 amAre there parameters as to the slant of their eyes that qualifies them to being" oriental" enough for government work? Does this comment violate the protocol for political correctness?? I'm only asking for a friend.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:38 amhttp://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Post a link with some Oriental scientists when you get a chance.
I hear it all the time……Just because it’s not PC it doesn’t mean its racist.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:26 amIn some circles that is a racist phrase. Archie Bunker used it back in the day. All in the Family would NEVER be allowed on TV today. You should be ashamed of yourself TLD.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:16 amJust calling a spade a spade.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:13 amAre there parameters as to the slant of their eyes that qualifies them to being" oriental" enough for government work? Does this comment violate the protocol for political correctness?? I'm only asking for a friend.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:38 amhttp://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Post a link with some Oriental scientists when you get a chance.
Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 8:37 am
A sharper take and a better choice of words for me should have been “scientific consensus”. The Princeton guy is in fact part of the established scientific community.
BTW, the Stanford guy is too.
Scientific consensus is the generally held judgment, position, and opinion of the majority or the supermajority of scientists in a particular field of study at any particular time.
So you agree "consensus" is a moving target?
How can you tell, especially with the current politically charged Covid science environment, if many people in scientific fields aren't afraid to give their honest opinions? Couldn't those people be cancelled and/or lose funding if they veer outside of the narrative (consensus) the people in power have established and demand and with the support of mainstream corp media?
How can you be so certain your idea of "consensus" is accurate?
We get “science” wrong. But proving science wrong comes with new evidence that gets validated with consensus. The Princeton guy agreed with the Hopkins guy that he could be wrong. The consensus is that he is wrong.
How on earth did you arrive at that?
I’ve got a niece (“in law”?) who’s is going to be perpetually diminutive. I described her as a dwarf once and got hacked up for purportedly using a pejorative term. It’s not it’s a very clinical term.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 12:01 pmI hear it all the time……Just because it’s not PC it doesn’t mean its racist.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:26 amIn some circles that is a racist phrase. Archie Bunker used it back in the day. All in the Family would NEVER be allowed on TV today. You should be ashamed of yourself TLD.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:16 amJust calling a spade a spade.cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 11:13 amAre there parameters as to the slant of their eyes that qualifies them to being" oriental" enough for government work? Does this comment violate the protocol for political correctness?? I'm only asking for a friend.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 10:38 amhttp://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgx ... 445198.htmtech37 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:16 am Case closed? Those racist SOBs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyRhkcQKo9U
Post a link with some Oriental scientists when you get a chance.