media matters

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23867
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: media matters

Post by Farfromgeneva »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:38 pm Graham Nash joins Spotify boycott.
Does that include The Hollies or just his CSNY stuff?

I like how David Crosby is utilizing this moment to “slide into Taylor Swift’s DMs”. Her reputation does precede her-o think it’s an excellent one personally. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.billbo ... 29542/amp/
Harvard University, out
University of Utah, in

I am going to get a 4.0 in damage.

(Afan jealous he didn’t do this first)
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 15985
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: media matters

Post by youthathletics »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:18 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
... explain this slippery slope. :lol:
It is inherently bullying, essentially seeking power but against their own best personal interests. Do as I say, I have power of you, which is the very thing most argue as to why they are fighting...which is to release the pain of others not in the fight; a power trip. They are removing chance for discourse in the name of you must see things my way. In essence...they are like the "karens" of the world. And in the end.....they ruin it for those around them.
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy


“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn’t true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.” -Soren Kierkegaard
runrussellrun
Posts: 7583
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: media matters

Post by runrussellrun »

a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:10 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:02 pm Does there always HAVE to be, US.....vs .....THEM....scenario ?
Do you ALWAYS have to pick a fight where there isn't one?

Let me help you with what the word us means in this context= every human in America except Joe Rogan. Me. You. Elon Musk..... Us.
aren't we supposed to "fight" on these threads ? Being serious .....

. questions are fighting? Look at the context of my question, based on a reply you had made. Wrong of me to assume your intentions in your reply. Hard to do, when they are peppered with "your side" and "your team"....lil r....lil d. Kind of like how you mostly , only, pick on the public U's when talking about socialism. Privates get substantially MORE tax dollars than public U's, why aren't they socialist ? Some have special treatment from the govt. (anti trust protection )....bla blah blah.....

Oh well, this place is updated as much as the UMBC lockerroom (not all all )....when was this forum software written, 1988 ?
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
a fan
Posts: 19731
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: media matters

Post by a fan »

Peter Brown wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:08 pm I think the assumption is that many Democrats would certainly try to suppress speech if given the chance.
Yes, that's the FoxNews sales pitch.

And American conservatives....our current Republican party...would never do such a thing. Is that it?

Did you just move to America five minutes ago, Pete, and only read the brochure?
jhu72
Posts: 14485
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: media matters

Post by jhu72 »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:11 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:38 pm Graham Nash joins Spotify boycott.
Does that include The Hollies or just his CSNY stuff?

I like how David Crosby is utilizing this moment to “slide into Taylor Swift’s DMs”. Her reputation does precede her-o think it’s an excellent one personally. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.billbo ... 29542/amp/
... don't know. Apparently there is some other artist I have never heard of also joining the boycott.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
a fan
Posts: 19731
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: media matters

Post by a fan »

runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:21 pm
a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:10 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:02 pm Does there always HAVE to be, US.....vs .....THEM....scenario ?
Do you ALWAYS have to pick a fight where there isn't one?

Let me help you with what the word us means in this context= every human in America except Joe Rogan. Me. You. Elon Musk..... Us.
aren't we supposed to "fight" on these threads ? Being serious .....
Well, yes...but come on....flipping out over the word "us"?
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:21 pm
Kind of like how you mostly , only, pick on the public U's when talking about socialism. Privates get substantially MORE tax dollars than public U's, why aren't they socialist ? Some have special treatment from the govt. (anti trust protection )....bla blah blah.....
That's me and giving Pete well earned grief about UFlorida....getting educated by government workers.

I agree with you on the private subsidy nonsense...and you know that, my man.
runrussellrun
Posts: 7583
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: media matters

Post by runrussellrun »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 15595
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: media matters

Post by cradleandshoot »

runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
Didn't Neil Young silence himself of his own choice. I thought censorship is when some one else does that?
We don't make mistakes, we have happy accidents.
Bob Ross:
jhu72
Posts: 14485
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: media matters

Post by jhu72 »

youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:16 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:18 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
... explain this slippery slope. :lol:
It is inherently bullying, essentially seeking power but against their own best personal interests. Do as I say, I have power of you, which is the very thing most argue as to why they are fighting...which is to release the pain of others not in the fight; a power trip. They are removing chance for discourse in the name of you must see things my way. In essence...they are like the "karens" of the world. And in the end.....they ruin it for those around them.
... it is just a commercial boycott! It is a feature of the free market system everyone around here pays lip service to and swears by. The discourse took place. Spotify was given a choice. They chose. How does this ruin it for anyone else in the future? These have been around since forever. Some people today have a lot more freedom because they chose to hold boycotts. What is your solution -- outlaw boycotts (a form of freedom of speech)??
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
runrussellrun
Posts: 7583
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: media matters

Post by runrussellrun »

a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:24 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:21 pm
a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:10 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:02 pm Does there always HAVE to be, US.....vs .....THEM....scenario ?
Do you ALWAYS have to pick a fight where there isn't one?

Let me help you with what the word us means in this context= every human in America except Joe Rogan. Me. You. Elon Musk..... Us.
aren't we supposed to "fight" on these threads ? Being serious .....
Well, yes...but come on....flipping out over the word "us"?
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:21 pm
Kind of like how you mostly , only, pick on the public U's when talking about socialism. Privates get substantially MORE tax dollars than public U's, why aren't they socialist ? Some have special treatment from the govt. (anti trust protection )....bla blah blah.....
That's me and giving Pete well earned grief about UFlorida....getting educated by government workers.

I agree with you on the private subsidy nonsense...and you know that, my man.
Do I
Just stop.......SUNY.......any state school for that matter, is fodder for the AFAN "let me tell you" messaging.

Just take the observation and perhaps, when bashing, say UMass or Maryland , mention the privates, located near them, that get billions, instead of millions. If presenting the entire, true story. Just a suggestion. If even, every once in a while.
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
jhu72
Posts: 14485
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: media matters

Post by jhu72 »

runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
NO, it is a choice.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23867
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: media matters

Post by Farfromgeneva »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:24 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:11 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:38 pm Graham Nash joins Spotify boycott.
Does that include The Hollies or just his CSNY stuff?

I like how David Crosby is utilizing this moment to “slide into Taylor Swift’s DMs”. Her reputation does precede her-o think it’s an excellent one personally. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.billbo ... 29542/amp/
... don't know. Apparently there is some other artist I have never heard of also joining the boycott.
Not a fan but she’s more relevant to their bottom line than he is at this point.
Harvard University, out
University of Utah, in

I am going to get a 4.0 in damage.

(Afan jealous he didn’t do this first)
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23867
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: media matters

Post by Farfromgeneva »

runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:21 pm
a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:10 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:02 pm Does there always HAVE to be, US.....vs .....THEM....scenario ?
Do you ALWAYS have to pick a fight where there isn't one?

Let me help you with what the word us means in this context= every human in America except Joe Rogan. Me. You. Elon Musk..... Us.
aren't we supposed to "fight" on these threads ? Being serious .....

. questions are fighting? Look at the context of my question, based on a reply you had made. Wrong of me to assume your intentions in your reply. Hard to do, when they are peppered with "your side" and "your team"....lil r....lil d. Kind of like how you mostly , only, pick on the public U's when talking about socialism. Privates get substantially MORE tax dollars than public U's, why aren't they socialist ? Some have special treatment from the govt. (anti trust protection )....bla blah blah.....

Oh well, this place is updated as much as the UMBC lockerroom (not all all )....when was this forum software written, 1988 ?
Create your own and move on.

I can be a massive dick when I want to and wouldn’t even imagine acting like this. May as well take a dump on the floor as a houseguest too.
Harvard University, out
University of Utah, in

I am going to get a 4.0 in damage.

(Afan jealous he didn’t do this first)
runrussellrun
Posts: 7583
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: media matters

Post by runrussellrun »

cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:30 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
Didn't Neil Young silence himself of his own choice. I thought censorship is when some one else does that?
IF.......means a hypothetical "IF Gray (unc ) gets the ball, we're going to yell his number and triple team him " .

Read , out loud, what I wrote. IF......Joe wanted Neil Young gone....and it happened.......would JHU think it would be cool ?

Typical......no one cares about the monopolistic bizness moves amazingON music, along with BLACKstone...........etc.

Easy to be the best when you are a monopoly. That mindset gave us Bud beer for decades......
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23867
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: media matters

Post by Farfromgeneva »

cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:30 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
Didn't Neil Young silence himself of his own choice. I thought censorship is when some one else does that?
Correct. But you have people who believe that if they don’t get what they want it’s unfair and toss around words they literally don’t understand the meaning of and can’t Google a definition to save their lives.
Harvard University, out
University of Utah, in

I am going to get a 4.0 in damage.

(Afan jealous he didn’t do this first)
jhu72
Posts: 14485
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: media matters

Post by jhu72 »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:36 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:24 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:11 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 3:38 pm Graham Nash joins Spotify boycott.
Does that include The Hollies or just his CSNY stuff?

I like how David Crosby is utilizing this moment to “slide into Taylor Swift’s DMs”. Her reputation does precede her-o think it’s an excellent one personally. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.billbo ... 29542/amp/
... don't know. Apparently there is some other artist I have never heard of also joining the boycott.
Not a fan but she’s more relevant to their bottom line than he is at this point.
... could be, I am not a subscriber, never have been.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 23867
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: media matters

Post by Farfromgeneva »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:16 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:18 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
... explain this slippery slope. :lol:
It is inherently bullying, essentially seeking power but against their own best personal interests. Do as I say, I have power of you, which is the very thing most argue as to why they are fighting...which is to release the pain of others not in the fight; a power trip. They are removing chance for discourse in the name of you must see things my way. In essence...they are like the "karens" of the world. And in the end.....they ruin it for those around them.
... it is just a commercial boycott! It is a feature of the free market system everyone around here pays lip service to and swears by. The discourse took place. Spotify was given a choice. They chose. How does this ruin it for anyone else in the future? These have been around since forever. Some people today have a lot more freedom because they chose to hold boycotts. What is your solution -- outlaw boycotts (a form of freedom of speech)??
But boycotting Facebook to go to Parler is totally different (and I hate Facebook but point remains)
Harvard University, out
University of Utah, in

I am going to get a 4.0 in damage.

(Afan jealous he didn’t do this first)
Peter Brown
Posts: 12878
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:19 am

Re: media matters

Post by Peter Brown »

a fan wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:22 pm
Peter Brown wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:08 pm I think the assumption is that many Democrats would certainly try to suppress speech if given the chance.
Yes, that's the FoxNews sales pitch.

And American conservatives....our current Republican party...would never do such a thing. Is that it?

Did you just move to America five minutes ago, Pete, and only read the brochure?


I have no doubt there exist some Republicans who would pull the plug on MSNBC if given the chance. But to compare a few of those with entire Democratic movements dedicated to shutting down Fox (or Rogan, or Newsmax, etc) is apples and watermelons. I can name significantly funded Democratic entities whose sole purpose is to shut down speech. Media Matters is one such example.
runrussellrun
Posts: 7583
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: media matters

Post by runrussellrun »

jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:36 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
NO, it is a choice.
What is?

If mdlaxfan said, it's either me.......or Pete Brown.......who makes that choice.

Your not being sincere. Glad you didn't get covid symptoms that bad. Did you puke, or was that only what covid ORIGINAL doled out to the infected ?

Same outcomes, I and you. both got covid and survived.

vaxx cards are so easy to fake.........
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
jhu72
Posts: 14485
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: media matters

Post by jhu72 »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:41 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:30 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:26 pm
jhu72 wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:57 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:33 pm
youthathletics wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 4:16 pm The crazy part....those that agree with this current JR censure issue, can not see what is happening in front of their very eyes. They are essentially killing themselves by a thousand cuts, strangling their own future freedom(s), to which they truly must have no concern. Part of me wonders what makes these type of people tick....to only live in the immediate, to tear others down and be happy and smile about it....my guess is that they really must be miserable inside.
Isn't this a new fangled variation of how the angry, hate filled FLP liberal Democrats spent 30 years trying to shut up Rush Limbaugh? You know who are. Your all the same people who lecture us about diversity, tolerance and respecting the opinion of others. Your the people who SHOULD be advocating for the people you disagree with. That is not what angry, hate filled FLP liberals actually want. You all want to shut off any perspective or discussion that disagrees with your dogma. You want an example, woe to anybody who disagrees with the dogma of the environmental extremists. No discussion or counter point of view is allowed. The science is settled. Settled by who???
... more meaningless vomit, trying to insult other posters. :roll:

So what is so special about Joe Rogan. A fan has it exactly right!

No one is banning or silencing Joe Rogan or even trying to. Those boycotting Rogan are exercising their first amendment rights, which you apparently don't think they have. Grow up!
Young is gone from spotify. Gone, as no longer around. Silenced. Isn't that a form of "censorship" Like the pathetic "ignore" funtion.

If JRogan had made the request, "me or him"......and the same result ,happened, Young being gone. interested if you would consider that censorship ? Thoughts?
Didn't Neil Young silence himself of his own choice. I thought censorship is when some one else does that?
Correct. But you have people who believe that if they don’t get what they want it’s unfair and toss around words they literally don’t understand the meaning of and can’t Google a definition to save their lives.
... don't think Neil Young feels or felt silenced for even a second. He spoke loudly and profoundly.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”