Nope; he made an early discovery, but he then went quite dormant in the particular effort re mRNA until re-emerging recently to claim primary credit and become a darling of conspiracy theorists as he argued against taking the vaccine.youthathletics wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 11:23 amWhy didn't Robert Malone receive it.....he pioneered mRNA?a fan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 10:52 amI was going to correct you, and tell you that we're talking about the Nobel Prize for Medicine, and that that award has been given out multiple times within a couple of years for things like the invention of insulin.tech37 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 8:24 amOh right, forgot about Obama.a fan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 03, 2023 8:22 amMore thoughts from "some guy on substack".MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2023 11:09 amwhat "jury" is "still out"???
The evidence of safety/effectiveness is overwhelming.
Would folks like it to be perfectly safe in all cases and perfectly effective in all cases? sure.
But overwhelmingly effective in reducing hospitalizations and deaths.
The "jury" is fully in.
And it would take tech all of two seconds to look at just a few Nobel Medical winners to find out that it's not at all unusual to get the award a year or two after said breakthrough. But why let pesky details get in the way of a substack conspiracy..........
But then I remembered who i was talking to....what was I thinking? A man who gets his medical advice from Rock critics probably DOES think that like you, Obama has a "Google MD in all things medicine'. (He does...Obama's speciality is substack dental advice)
On an unrelated note....when you head to the local used CD & Vinyl store to get advice and treatment for your arthritis, can you pick up a vinyl copy of Earth Wind & Fire's Greatest Hits? Also....favor for TLD and me-----ask the clerk if it's true that the fake moon landing was a cash grab to fund Fauci's medical education all those years ago.
Thanks!
Seems the goal in everything is to minimize the value of an award, by awarding it to those who benefited on the backs of others.
Hundreds of scientists advanced the work subsequently over many, many years. Science is all about advancing on the "backs of others", challenging/improving on earlier work.
He does deserve recognition, but was his work truly the most important?
Was it the most impactful in saving millions of lives from Covid?
Huge, huge chip on shoulder, he's prone to falsehoods and conspiracy theories.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... ic/619734/