Re: AOC
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:30 am
Forgot it would be nice to have AOC pay her back business taxes for a failed business. Geez cannot believe she failed in a business adventure. Wonder how many vendors she screwe$?
seacoaster wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:08 amI confess I had the same thought about a bunch of these threads. But they do tend, with this President and his constant blather to remain in the news feeds, to bleed into the same thing.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:25 am Congratulations, folks. I only took the effort to look back two complete pages on this thread. Excluding the mention here, AOC got one sentence. Another thread hijacked into all Trump hate, all the time. I think that means we’re up to at least six or seven of them now. Geez it’s boring, and redundant, on the fanlax political pages.
AOC thread -- Trump makes racist attack on AOC and other Congresswomen of color. Trump relevant.
Progressive Ideology thread -- Trump calls Democrats "socialists" and stuff, without knowing what he is talking about. Trump relevant (and this thread is special for its silliness anyway).
GOP, Past Present and Future -- The GOP of the past is, umm, moribund because of fidelity to Orange Duce, and its future is bound to and governed by the bootlicking toadyism of the GOP to Trump. Trump relevant.
Orange Duce thread -- Trump is the issue, in all of his childish, incurious, uninformed counter-glory.
The Mueller Report and Impeachment -- well, seems like Trump is relevant here too. Just going out on a limb.
National Security, Iran, the Census threads? The Security and Iran threads are tied up in the Gordian knot of "Obama bad deal/apologist/identity politician" vs. "Trump No Deals/Lotta Blather/racist/divisive electoral strategy. The Census thread actually directly deals with Trump/Wilbur/GOP efforts to gerrymander the national count of people. Not true. Census thread ONLY topic is WHY? Why have the census at all, if not going to increase number of Reps, per the US Constitution. Funds? How can someone (AFAN ) claim that funds are distributed to US Congressional districts based on Census data, and out of the other side of the mouth utters, "flyover/RED states get MORE funds than......."
I wish it wasn't so, but the threads do tend to merge into a focus on one stupid person.
No, I'm pretty darn moderate in my views and perspective. I lean conservative fiscally and in national defense, but libertarian on social issues.LandM wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:15 am MD,
You have the Congresswoman from MI hollering impeach the MF and being escorted out by the Secret Service for being “bold” in a Trump presentation. Are you not a little concerned about that?
You have the Congresswoman from MN - to anyone that I know she is outright scary. Listen to what she says.
You have AOC winning with 27,000 votes yet has 4 million twitter followers using that platform for free everything. If the green new deal was that great at least explain in 12 slides.
The last Congresswoman seems to just tag along for the publicity.
I do not see any outrage over their actions, their communications or their twitter usage. If your gonna critic be fair about it.
Create a thread if that's what you want to talk about RR.runrussellrun wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:40 amseacoaster wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 10:08 amI confess I had the same thought about a bunch of these threads. But they do tend, with this President and his constant blather to remain in the news feeds, to bleed into the same thing.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:25 am Congratulations, folks. I only took the effort to look back two complete pages on this thread. Excluding the mention here, AOC got one sentence. Another thread hijacked into all Trump hate, all the time. I think that means we’re up to at least six or seven of them now. Geez it’s boring, and redundant, on the fanlax political pages.
AOC thread -- Trump makes racist attack on AOC and other Congresswomen of color. Trump relevant.
Progressive Ideology thread -- Trump calls Democrats "socialists" and stuff, without knowing what he is talking about. Trump relevant (and this thread is special for its silliness anyway).
GOP, Past Present and Future -- The GOP of the past is, umm, moribund because of fidelity to Orange Duce, and its future is bound to and governed by the bootlicking toadyism of the GOP to Trump. Trump relevant.
Orange Duce thread -- Trump is the issue, in all of his childish, incurious, uninformed counter-glory.
The Mueller Report and Impeachment -- well, seems like Trump is relevant here too. Just going out on a limb.
National Security, Iran, the Census threads? The Security and Iran threads are tied up in the Gordian knot of "Obama bad deal/apologist/identity politician" vs. "Trump No Deals/Lotta Blather/racist/divisive electoral strategy. The Census thread actually directly deals with Trump/Wilbur/GOP efforts to gerrymander the national count of people. Not true. Census thread ONLY topic is WHY? Why have the census at all, if not going to increase number of Reps, per the US Constitution. Funds? How can someone (AFAN ) claim that funds are distributed to US Congressional districts based on Census data, and out of the other side of the mouth utters, "flyover/RED states get MORE funds than......."
I wish it wasn't so, but the threads do tend to merge into a focus on one stupid person.
For shame. Her failed business venture owes NY State less than $2,000...not for income taxes, as in on actual profits, but simply her 'business taxes' for having a registered business. Sounds like the business never made a profit, but does owe various fees.
Not sure why you thought the first para was necessary to say to me.LandM wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:44 am MD,
If you have not guessed by now I do not take people’s advice, can think for myself. Not intimidated by anything either. No, not Billy Bad, just the facts.
The integrity of a person should be on display by not coughing the $2,000. NY is the one of the worst places to set up a business. She knew the rules and by not paying she showed her integrity. That means allot more then the $ amount.
so what you can't see is what is happening below the bottom frame... Let's just say his hands are busy.......
The establishment has already gotten to AOC. Some of Her recent votes ensure that she will run un-opposed .
yep - I just find the extent to which the attention has dissipated interesting.holmes435 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 11:51 am How quiet AOC is, or how quiet the media reporting and how quiet those attacking her are?
I don't follow her on any social media but a quick look at her twitter feed shows tons of activity.
The more Trump and people focus on her, the more of a platform she has to get her beliefs out there. The same thing happened with Trump - we gave him a platform to step on.
On this, I wouldn't be surprised if this was one of the things that Pelosi and AOC spoke about in their meeting recently. Chakrabarti had indeed been an inflammatory influence in the AOC office, impolitic. And Pelosi undoubtedly emphasized the need to build influence by making allies, not foes, within the Dem Party, and AOC listened and acted. Makes sense.youthathletics wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 7:08 pm Breaking: Chief of staff and communications director for Ocasio-Cortez abruptly resign.
Saikat Chakrabarti resigned as the chief of staff for Ocasio-Cortez after a series of controversies over his comments that led to a recriminations from the Democratic establishment and the progressive upstarts in the party.....
....In another misstep, Chakrabarti admitted in an interview that the Green New Deal was crafted in order to seize the economy, not to fix the climate.
Quite interesting.