Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:55 pm
I'm hearing some interesting "positive" news regarding RU...keep an eye out
Page 18 of 22
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:56 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:57 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:58 pm
Is Toby Burgdorf allowed to untransfer? Poor kid got hoodwinked bad
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:13 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:18 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:21 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:24 pm
he shoulda been on fanlax. anyone who wasn't in the room doesn't know exactly what conversations were had, if this plays out.
maybe you had 2nd or 3rd that was convincing.
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:25 pm
What is Kirst back in goal?Laxfan#1969 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 5:56 pmI'm hearing some interesting "positive" news regarding RU...keep an eye out
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:30 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:32 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:42 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:48 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:48 pm
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pm
Yes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:00 pm
Dawg you gotta offload that chip on your shoulder. Not everyone is out to get you or Rutgers.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pmYes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Neither Hopkins nor me personally had interest in Burgdorf. Hop announced in April they were bringing in a goalie transfer. Burgdorf didn't even enter the portal until June. They weren't "outrecruited," but your presumption is amazing
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:08 pm
HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:00 pmDawg you gotta offload that chip on your shoulder. Not everyone is out to get you or Rutgers.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pmYes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Neither Hopkins nor me personally had interest in Burgdorf. Hop announced in April they were bringing in a goalie transfer. Burgdorf didn't even enter the portal until June. They weren't "outrecruited," but your presumption is amazing
So you didn't try to get a starting D1 goalie and decided to just go with your D3 guy. Ok.
You seem triggered. Good luck dealing with that.
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:13 pm
Projection1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:08 pmHopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:00 pmDawg you gotta offload that chip on your shoulder. Not everyone is out to get you or Rutgers.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pmYes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Neither Hopkins nor me personally had interest in Burgdorf. Hop announced in April they were bringing in a goalie transfer. Burgdorf didn't even enter the portal until June. They weren't "outrecruited," but your presumption is amazing
So you didn't try to get a starting D1 goalie and decided to just go with your D3 guy. Ok.
You seem triggered. Good luck dealing with that.
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:19 pm
Projection of winning. Rutgers has two better goalies than Hopkins.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:13 pmProjection1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:08 pmHopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:00 pmDawg you gotta offload that chip on your shoulder. Not everyone is out to get you or Rutgers.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pmYes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Neither Hopkins nor me personally had interest in Burgdorf. Hop announced in April they were bringing in a goalie transfer. Burgdorf didn't even enter the portal until June. They weren't "outrecruited," but your presumption is amazing
So you didn't try to get a starting D1 goalie and decided to just go with your D3 guy. Ok.
You seem triggered. Good luck dealing with that.
Re: Rutgers 2021
Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2021 9:45 pm
Funny thing is he didn’t even look at Hopkins. It was between Rutgers and Penn State.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:19 pmProjection of winning. Rutgers has two better goalies than Hopkins.HopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:13 pmProjection1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:08 pmHopFan16 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:00 pmDawg you gotta offload that chip on your shoulder. Not everyone is out to get you or Rutgers.1766 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 17, 2021 6:50 pmYes you are. Rutgers outrecruited Hopkins for his services providing the opportunity to compete. Which he will have. Everyone knows the score. Much of this information is on a public message board lol. There was no backroom dealing.
You lost this one. No reason to be bitter.
Neither Hopkins nor me personally had interest in Burgdorf. Hop announced in April they were bringing in a goalie transfer. Burgdorf didn't even enter the portal until June. They weren't "outrecruited," but your presumption is amazing
So you didn't try to get a starting D1 goalie and decided to just go with your D3 guy. Ok.
You seem triggered. Good luck dealing with that.