LaxPower Back-Up Stick

stop with the lies......millions of USA residents got covid, with the same results. Mild symptoms and survived.. MILLIONS of us.

You lied about saying tRumps fake vaccine would PREVENT getting covid , at all, that the jabbed would NOT transmit covid (huh ? )...and on and on.

Now, the lie that POTUSA Obama got symptoms and tested POSTITIVE, for covid.....and telling us that tRumps fake shot, umm...works ?

The discussion of the 1200 + "side effects of interest" that pfizer reported to the FDA......has been very educational on this thread.

The federal judge, forcing pfizer to release documents, completely by the end of this year, instead of taking almost a century to complete........another document dump on April 1st.

Cant' wait for the nonsense replies in the future, "well, my Dr. made the right decision, based on the information available at the tyme "

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:47 am

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:16 am IVERMECTIN DECREASES COVID MORTALITY

I’m ahead of the cdc in science once again!!!

https://conservativeplaylist.com/2022/0 ... mortality/

Regarding health related national security threats ..I’m just destroying the cdc in the competence area!!

1) ahead of cdc in noticing the leader of the free world is dangerously suffering from semi advanced dementia

2) I was the only one who noticed hordes of unvaccinated people flooding the border and spreading into the country
Not only Covid but also unvaccinated for TB, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Tetanus and the rest. A huge health danger for citizens of the USA.

3) Ivermectin saves lives

4) the Amish did absolutely nothing recommended by the cdc and had no excess Covid Death.

5) Millenials had 85% increase in excess death rate in 2021 after vaccine mandates.

I am a science major that has great ability to see the big picture.

Pure troll: WSJ, Marketwatch, all over credible news sources say exactly the opposite of this piece of trash...spewed out as disinformation along with a whole bunch of other offensive BS...only purpose is trolling

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/iverm ... 1647602256

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ivermectin ... 1647601200

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/03 ... ients.html

https://endpts.com/covid-19-roundup-ast ... rge-trial/

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html

https://theweek.com/news/1011498/new-tr ... g-covid-19

Mr. I am a science major, did you even read the study?

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamain ... le/2789362

Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.

So, don't request that YOUR doctor prescribe it, when you get covid. Test positive.

oh,,,,,and your links are junk. more "story about the story", instead of ,the actual "story".

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:47 am

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:16 am IVERMECTIN DECREASES COVID MORTALITY

I’m ahead of the cdc in science once again!!!

https://conservativeplaylist.com/2022/0 ... mortality/

Regarding health related national security threats ..I’m just destroying the cdc in the competence area!!

1) ahead of cdc in noticing the leader of the free world is dangerously suffering from semi advanced dementia

2) I was the only one who noticed hordes of unvaccinated people flooding the border and spreading into the country
Not only Covid but also unvaccinated for TB, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Tetanus and the rest. A huge health danger for citizens of the USA.

3) Ivermectin saves lives

4) the Amish did absolutely nothing recommended by the cdc and had no excess Covid Death.

5) Millenials had 85% increase in excess death rate in 2021 after vaccine mandates.

I am a science major that has great ability to see the big picture.

Pure troll: WSJ, Marketwatch, all over credible news sources say exactly the opposite of this piece of trash...spewed out as disinformation along with a whole bunch of other offensive BS...only purpose is trolling

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/iverm ... 1647602256

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ivermectin ... 1647601200

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/03 ... ients.html

https://endpts.com/covid-19-roundup-ast ... rge-trial/

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html

https://theweek.com/news/1011498/new-tr ... g-covid-19

Mr. I am a science major, did you even read the study?

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamain ... le/2789362

Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.

All of those sources reported for 3 years there was Russian Collusion when there wasn’t. None of those sources notice that Biden has Dementia. It’s important to be a big picture guy and see the overall scientific truth.

MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:47 am

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:16 am IVERMECTIN DECREASES COVID MORTALITY

I’m ahead of the cdc in science once again!!!

https://conservativeplaylist.com/2022/0 ... mortality/

Regarding health related national security threats ..I’m just destroying the cdc in the competence area!!

1) ahead of cdc in noticing the leader of the free world is dangerously suffering from semi advanced dementia

2) I was the only one who noticed hordes of unvaccinated people flooding the border and spreading into the country
Not only Covid but also unvaccinated for TB, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Tetanus and the rest. A huge health danger for citizens of the USA.

3) Ivermectin saves lives

4) the Amish did absolutely nothing recommended by the cdc and had no excess Covid Death.

5) Millenials had 85% increase in excess death rate in 2021 after vaccine mandates.

I am a science major that has great ability to see the big picture.

Pure troll: WSJ, Marketwatch, all over credible news sources say exactly the opposite of this piece of trash...spewed out as disinformation along with a whole bunch of other offensive BS...only purpose is trolling

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/iverm ... 1647602256

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ivermectin ... 1647601200

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/03 ... ients.html

https://endpts.com/covid-19-roundup-ast ... rge-trial/

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html

https://theweek.com/news/1011498/new-tr ... g-covid-19

Mr. I am a science major, did you even read the study?

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamain ... le/2789362

Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.

Nope. Those sources reported inaccuracies for 4 years on Russian Collusion and were totally inaccurate. They also are ignorant of the President having advanced dementia.

They are all disqualified information sources.

My advice to liberals is to stock up on ivermectin but don’t admit it.

Boycott Dumb.

seacoaster wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 11:24 am Boycott Dumb.

boycott Dumber

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 11:15 am My advice to liberals is to stock up on ivermectin but don’t admit it.

kind of like using a golf cart.....or playing golf at all......what a carbon footprint disaster golf is.

golf courses should be banned.

b/c....when it affects OUR lives........it IS not real.

runrussellrun wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 11:26 am

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 11:15 am My advice to liberals is to stock up on ivermectin but don’t admit it.

kind of like using a golf cart.....or playing golf at all......what a carbon footprint disaster golf is.

golf courses should be banned.

b/c....when it affects OUR lives........it IS not real.

Global Warming !!!

Remember this one? “The greatest threat to mankind!!!!”

Meanwhile I was saying “Uhh. Nuclear explosions and biological disasters are the greatest threat to mankind”

See how much smarter I am?

Listen to me people… I can help all of you see the world as it actually is … and you can use that information as you please!

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:42 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

Here is the full quote. I highlighted the part you purposely omitted. Stop spreading falsehoods. People that do that are part of the problem.

A Note On Myocarditis
Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination. The increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis remained among people who were not vaccinated and was evident regardless of vaccination status.

What is a statistically valid sample size when controlling for mRNA vaccinations?

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:52 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:42 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

Here is the full quote. I highlighted the part you purposely omitted. Stop spreading falsehoods. People that do that are part of the problem.

A Note On Myocarditis
Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination. The increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis remained among people who were not vaccinated and was evident regardless of vaccination status.

What is a statistically valid sample size when controlling for mRNA vaccinations?

I did not purposely omit it, I merely took it as it was cited. The 2nd sentence "in red", was their explanation for the first sentence, and without providing any numbers extracted from their study, made me a bit skeptical of such a broad statement; whereas everywhere else they were liberal in providing data.

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:27 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:52 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:42 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

Here is the full quote. I highlighted the part you purposely omitted. Stop spreading falsehoods. People that do that are part of the problem.

A Note On Myocarditis
Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination. The increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis remained among people who were not vaccinated and was evident regardless of vaccination status.

What is a statistically valid sample size when controlling for mRNA vaccinations?

I did not purposely omit it, I merely took it as it was cited. The 2nd sentence "in red", was their explanation for the first sentence, and without providing any numbers extracted from their study, made me a bit skeptical of such a broad statement; whereas everywhere else they were liberal in providing data.

You know better than the scientist. Great deception.

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:33 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:27 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:52 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:42 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

Here is the full quote. I highlighted the part you purposely omitted. Stop spreading falsehoods. People that do that are part of the problem.

A Note On Myocarditis
Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination. The increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis remained among people who were not vaccinated and was evident regardless of vaccination status.

What is a statistically valid sample size when controlling for mRNA vaccinations?

I did not purposely omit it, I merely took it as it was cited. The 2nd sentence "in red", was their explanation for the first sentence, and without providing any numbers extracted from their study, made me a bit skeptical of such a broad statement; whereas everywhere else they were liberal in providing data.

You know better than the scientist. Great deception.

You are not a good listener. I never said I knew better, I even said "made me a bit skeptical" how they presented it. TTYL

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:43 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:33 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 9:27 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:52 am

youthathletics wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:42 am

Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 8:08 am https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/f ... le/2789793

Interesting take from the link....

Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination.

When 2/3rds of our population have mRNA vaxx flowing through them, it sure seems like a tough challenge at this point to solve and separate the non-mRNA vaaxxed that had covid & mRNA vaxxed w/out covid, vs. no vaxx with covid. The latter would seem to be a quite small sample size, with the symptoms related to the study.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... ditis.html

Here is the full quote. I highlighted the part you purposely omitted. Stop spreading falsehoods. People that do that are part of the problem.

A Note On Myocarditis
Because some COVID-19 vaccines may be associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, the authors conducted analyses to remove the effect of vaccination. The increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis remained among people who were not vaccinated and was evident regardless of vaccination status.

What is a statistically valid sample size when controlling for mRNA vaccinations?

I did not purposely omit it, I merely took it as it was cited. The 2nd sentence "in red", was their explanation for the first sentence, and without providing any numbers extracted from their study, made me a bit skeptical of such a broad statement; whereas everywhere else they were liberal in providing data.

You know better than the scientist. Great deception.

You are not a good listener. I never said I knew better, I even said "made me a bit skeptical" how they presented it. TTYL

Yeah. Enjoy your Sunday. Nice weather.

The Mills - McMaster University ivermectin study published their results. Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID is TOTAL BULLSH*T, as are the losers living in the shallow end of the gene pool, claiming otherwise.

Deaths:
997,933

Essexfenwick wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 10:16 am IVERMECTIN DECREASES COVID MORTALITY... I am a science major that has great ability to see the big picture.

Trolling. Hit the shower... viewtopic.php?p=346263#p346263

jhu72 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 7:15 pm The Mills - McMaster University ivermectin study published their results. Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID is TOTAL BULLSH*T, as are the losers living in the shallow end of the gene pool, claiming otherwise.

It’s still approved as a substitute for butter on popcorn.