Same Party, Different House
https://fanlax.com/forum/
Any surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Oh, boy, here we go ... ; ) !tothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
tothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
So are you suprisedLarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:28 pmtothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
I always thought Liz had great talent, but she tries to be flashy and does NOT make the routine saves enough. She had one season at Syracuse where she was outstanding, but mediocre the other three.
Not much of a Waters fan. Talented, but inconsistent. In many eyes she had a successful collegiate career, but I never thought the HS hype(Best HS Goalie in the country) was matched in college.
My opinion and I know nothing...right?
Honestly, and not to sound dismissive, I really have very little interest in the Women's US team. I lost my taste and interest a long time ago. There are reasons behind those feelings of disinterest, but they are not worth discussing on the Forum.Laxfan500 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:34 pmSo are you suprisedLarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:28 pmtothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
I always thought Liz had great talent, but she tries to be flashy and does NOT make the routine saves enough. She had one season at Syracuse where she was outstanding, but mediocre the other three.
Not much of a Waters fan. Talented, but inconsistent. In many eyes she had a successful collegiate career, but I never thought the HS hype(Best HS Goalie in the country) was matched in college.
My opinion and I know nothing...right?
No Moreno …or do you think the fact UNC has 6 players On team a deterant to add more?
Nice to hear from you Larry. I actually share your feelings about having less interest in the women's national team, although I don't think the reasons are the same. My lack of interest is more to do with USA's lack of competition. I was at the game in Annapolis in 2005 when they lost to Australia 14-7, but they haven't seen a lot of serious competition in the past decade.LarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:41 pmHonestly, and not to sound dismissive, I really have very little interest in the Women's US team. I lost my taste and interest a long time ago. There are reasons behind those feelings of disinterest, but they are not worth discussing on the Forum.Laxfan500 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:34 pmSo are you suprisedLarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:28 pmtothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
I always thought Liz had great talent, but she tries to be flashy and does NOT make the routine saves enough. She had one season at Syracuse where she was outstanding, but mediocre the other three.
Not much of a Waters fan. Talented, but inconsistent. In many eyes she had a successful collegiate career, but I never thought the HS hype(Best HS Goalie in the country) was matched in college.
My opinion and I know nothing...right?
No Moreno …or do you think the fact UNC has 6 players On team a deterant to add more?
I must confess I was also waiting for this (in the end anticlimactic) announcement to put paid once and for all the Charlotte North debate. JB was/is very knowledgeable about women’s lacrosse, particularly in the high school ranks by his own admission; but no one’s right about everything. As ol’ Elston Gunnn once affirmed:
Def a little politics involved . I don’t see a lot of chemistry on attacking unit to be honest . Having watched most of the training team games seems like each player on attack (with the exception of Appuzzo) doing highlight reels . Ohlmiller didn’t seem to contribute much IMO . But that’s what USA wants flashy plus And goals. They are going to crush each team where running clock will be the norm. It’s a shame even Canada can’t give them competition .wlaxphan20 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 3:42 pmNice to hear from you Larry. I actually share your feelings about having less interest in the women's national team, although I don't think the reasons are the same. My lack of interest is more to do with USA's lack of competition. I was at the game in Annapolis in 2005 when they lost to Australia 14-7, but they haven't seen a lot of serious competition in the past decade.LarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:41 pmHonestly, and not to sound dismissive, I really have very little interest in the Women's US team. I lost my taste and interest a long time ago. There are reasons behind those feelings of disinterest, but they are not worth discussing on the Forum.Laxfan500 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:34 pmSo are you suprisedLarryGamLax wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 1:28 pmtothedraw wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 9:11 amAny surprise absences ?DMac wrote: ↑Thu Feb 24, 2022 8:02 am Not Team USA but a couple of collegiates who will be playing against their coach.
https://cuse.com/news/2022/2/23/womens- ... nship.aspx
Happy for Liz Hogan to get her shot in goal, I don't believe she'a ever made the final cut- correct me if wrong.
LarryGamLax what do you think of Watters and Hogan's technique skill ? Genuine question.
I always thought Liz had great talent, but she tries to be flashy and does NOT make the routine saves enough. She had one season at Syracuse where she was outstanding, but mediocre the other three.
Not much of a Waters fan. Talented, but inconsistent. In many eyes she had a successful collegiate career, but I never thought the HS hype(Best HS Goalie in the country) was matched in college.
My opinion and I know nothing...right?
No Moreno …or do you think the fact UNC has 6 players On team a deterant to add more?
Cletus, Nowhere Man, whatever you are calling yourself these days, let's take this to Hamsterdam. You too Can Opener.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:53 amI must confess I was also waiting for this (in the end anticlimactic) announcement to put paid once and for all the Charlotte North debate. JB was/is very knowledgeable about women’s lacrosse, particularly in the high school ranks by his own admission; but no one’s right about everything. As ol’ Elston Gunnn once affirmed:
“Half the people can be part right all of the time;
And some of the people can be all right part of the time;
But all the people can’t be all right all of the time.
I think Abraham Lincoln said that.”
You’re serious with that post? C’mon. Like it or not, and you obviously don’t like it, CN is the face of women’s lacrosse right now. There was no way she wasn’t going to be on the team.njbill wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:39 amCletus, Nowhere Man, whatever you are calling yourself these days, let's take this to Hamsterdam. You too Can Opener.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:53 amI must confess I was also waiting for this (in the end anticlimactic) announcement to put paid once and for all the Charlotte North debate. JB was/is very knowledgeable about women’s lacrosse, particularly in the high school ranks by his own admission; but no one’s right about everything. As ol’ Elston Gunnn once affirmed:
“Half the people can be part right all of the time;
And some of the people can be all right part of the time;
But all the people can’t be all right all of the time.
I think Abraham Lincoln said that.”
Welcome Back, njbill! Wow! Very nice surprise on this snowy Friday in Beantown.njbill wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 9:39 amCletus, Nowhere Man, whatever you are calling yourself these days, let's take this to Hamsterdam. You too Can Opener.OuttaNowhereWregget wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 6:53 amI must confess I was also waiting for this (in the end anticlimactic) announcement to put paid once and for all the Charlotte North debate. JB was/is very knowledgeable about women’s lacrosse, particularly in the high school ranks by his own admission; but no one’s right about everything. As ol’ Elston Gunnn once affirmed:
“Half the people can be part right all of the time;
And some of the people can be all right part of the time;
But all the people can’t be all right all of the time.
I think Abraham Lincoln said that.”
