Re: 2024
Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:35 pm
This is a joke, right? If he doesn’t see him getting confirmed he’s installed as acting for four years. You keep pretending this country isn’t going to be unlike anything we’ve ever seen with Trump as president with immunity to whatever level he wants.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:27 pmThis is a joke, right ? Senate confirmation for SecDef would be impossible.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:25 pm It isn’t a long stretch to see where Trump would nominate LTG Michael Flynn, RET for SecDef and his younger brother GEN Charles Flynn for CJCS, placing the older Flynn in the chain of command directly under Trump and above all military branches, and the younger Flynn his top military adviser.
Example 1,236 you don't pay any attention to anyone but yourself here.
You mean more Tax cuts that help the Coastal Liberal Elite? Trump has already told us those are coming. I don't need to say a thing...Trump did it for me.
Ten seconds ago, you bragged about being a Republican who likes less regulation.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 6:09 pmApples & Oranges. Hugely different markets. How many local family business Genomics companies exist ?a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 4:57 pm
So yes, the FTC is FINALLY trying to keep the very monopolies that your family face every freaking day, from getting bigger. Past FTC's have waved these monopolies through, because the US Senate is on the take, as is our POTUS, as is the FTC itself.
She's trying to change that. Something that you already admitted that you support, complaining about monopolies hurting your family's biz....just not here, because you own stock.
M&A at this level? NEVER means good things for anyone but stockholders. Fewer jobs. Less competition. Higher prices.
It's too late for the FTC to help the little guys like us. I showed you the 10 chains that already monopolize retail grocery.
The small Independent grocers don't stand a chance unless they have a niche & a long standing, loyal customer base.
The big chains have won. That's what coined the term "food deserts". How many small family independent grocers can you find ?
...so many times we're sick of hearing it. You need to find a socialist or communist country to live in, which better suits you.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm
Hey fellow Forumites: how many times have you heard me tell you that these economic policies help the Coastal Liberal Elite?
And how many times have I explained that the economic policies that Old Salt is championing here royally F's TrumpNation, and working class Americans.....triply so in flyover States?
He's already been President for 4 years. We survived just fine. He hasn't even been elected yet.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:23 pmThis is a joke, right? If he doesn’t see him getting confirmed he’s installed as acting for four years. You keep pretending this country isn’t going to be unlike anything we’ve ever seen with Trump as president with immunity to whatever level he wants.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:27 pmThis is a joke, right ? Senate confirmation for SecDef would be impossible.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:25 pm It isn’t a long stretch to see where Trump would nominate LTG Michael Flynn, RET for SecDef and his younger brother GEN Charles Flynn for CJCS, placing the older Flynn in the chain of command directly under Trump and above all military branches, and the younger Flynn his top military adviser.
Prez can’t be tried while in office. Even if a D House brings impeachment, not enough Senators that aren’t MAGA to convict and throw the effer out.
I did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm These postings make clear to everyone here: you're a boilerplate 2024 Republican: you don't have an opinion on more or less regulation. All you care about is outcome that favors you and your family.
Which is why on one hand, you complain about monopolies when it hurt your family grocery, and want MORE regulation of monopolies on one hand...while on the other, you want NO regulation for this specific company, because you think the FTC cost you millions.
I don't understand how you don't get how transparent you're being with your motivations.
What you want is a Selfish-Ocracy....you don't care how you get it---more regulation, less regulation----makes no difference to you, you just want more money. And your stunned that no one here wants what you want.
Relax. LMFAO. “We survived just fine” my a$$. The last time this country was so divided was two centuries ago.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:21 amHe's already been President for 4 years. We survived just fine. He hasn't even been elected yet.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:23 pmThis is a joke, right? If he doesn’t see him getting confirmed he’s installed as acting for four years. You keep pretending this country isn’t going to be unlike anything we’ve ever seen with Trump as president with immunity to whatever level he wants.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:27 pmThis is a joke, right ? Senate confirmation for SecDef would be impossible.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:25 pm It isn’t a long stretch to see where Trump would nominate LTG Michael Flynn, RET for SecDef and his younger brother GEN Charles Flynn for CJCS, placing the older Flynn in the chain of command directly under Trump and above all military branches, and the younger Flynn his top military adviser.
Prez can’t be tried while in office. Even if a D House brings impeachment, not enough Senators that aren’t MAGA to convict and throw the effer out.
Did you even bother to read the ruling on immunity ? It's not an unlimited immunity. It only covers official acts. It will prevent future Presidents from weaponizing the DoJ like Biden has.
Relax. If Trump is elected, Pompeo will be SecDef & Trump will appoint whoever Pompeo recommends to be SecDef.
Just like Pompeo recommended his classmate Esper to succeed Mattis as Sec Def.
Trump will accept whoever Pompeo recommeds as CJCS.
O'Brien will return as National Security Advisor or maybe Sec of State, if that does not go to Rubio.
Ratliffe will be AG. He was confirmed last time as DNI.
Earned?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 amI did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm These postings make clear to everyone here: you're a boilerplate 2024 Republican: you don't have an opinion on more or less regulation. All you care about is outcome that favors you and your family.
Which is why on one hand, you complain about monopolies when it hurt your family grocery, and want MORE regulation of monopolies on one hand...while on the other, you want NO regulation for this specific company, because you think the FTC cost you millions.
I don't understand how you don't get how transparent you're being with your motivations.
What you want is a Selfish-Ocracy....you don't care how you get it---more regulation, less regulation----makes no difference to you, you just want more money. And your stunned that no one here wants what you want.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
I also pointed out how ridiculous it is to compare an industry leading Genomics company with an independent family grocery store.
My Motivations ? Selfish-Ocracy ? I don't seek or need more money. I just don't want to get screwed out of what we have earned, cautiously invested & saved. I told you we hope to never have to sell the ILMN stock, or our other stocks. We selected them to buy & hold, long term. We hope to bequeath them to a foundation we plan to establish, to continue our charitable work after we're gone. We maintain a modest, frugal, but comfortable lifestyle & live happily, well within our means...without drawing on our savings or investments.
Yes. Our W-2's & 1099's said "earnings"...much of which we then invested.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:28 amEarned?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 amI did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm These postings make clear to everyone here: you're a boilerplate 2024 Republican: you don't have an opinion on more or less regulation. All you care about is outcome that favors you and your family.
Which is why on one hand, you complain about monopolies when it hurt your family grocery, and want MORE regulation of monopolies on one hand...while on the other, you want NO regulation for this specific company, because you think the FTC cost you millions.
I don't understand how you don't get how transparent you're being with your motivations.
What you want is a Selfish-Ocracy....you don't care how you get it---more regulation, less regulation----makes no difference to you, you just want more money. And your stunned that no one here wants what you want.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
I also pointed out how ridiculous it is to compare an industry leading Genomics company with an independent family grocery store.
My Motivations ? Selfish-Ocracy ? I don't seek or need more money. I just don't want to get screwed out of what we have earned, cautiously invested & saved. I told you we hope to never have to sell the ILMN stock, or our other stocks. We selected them to buy & hold, long term. We hope to bequeath them to a foundation we plan to establish, to continue our charitable work after we're gone. We maintain a modest, frugal, but comfortable lifestyle & live happily, well within our means...without drawing on our savings or investments.
Have faith in your fellow citizens & our institutional safeguards.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 7:27 amRelax. LMFAO. “We survived just fine” my a$$. The last time this country was so divided was two centuries ago.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:21 amHe's already been President for 4 years. We survived just fine. He hasn't even been elected yet.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:23 pmThis is a joke, right? If he doesn’t see him getting confirmed he’s installed as acting for four years. You keep pretending this country isn’t going to be unlike anything we’ve ever seen with Trump as president with immunity to whatever level he wants.old salt wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 8:27 pmThis is a joke, right ? Senate confirmation for SecDef would be impossible.SCLaxAttack wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:25 pm It isn’t a long stretch to see where Trump would nominate LTG Michael Flynn, RET for SecDef and his younger brother GEN Charles Flynn for CJCS, placing the older Flynn in the chain of command directly under Trump and above all military branches, and the younger Flynn his top military adviser.
Prez can’t be tried while in office. Even if a D House brings impeachment, not enough Senators that aren’t MAGA to convict and throw the effer out.
Did you even bother to read the ruling on immunity ? It's not an unlimited immunity. It only covers official acts. It will prevent future Presidents from weaponizing the DoJ like Biden has.
Relax. If Trump is elected, Pompeo will be SecDef & Trump will appoint whoever Pompeo recommends to be SecDef.
Just like Pompeo recommended his classmate Esper to succeed Mattis as Sec Def.
Trump will accept whoever Pompeo recommeds as CJCS.
O'Brien will return as National Security Advisor or maybe Sec of State, if that does not go to Rubio.
Ratliffe will be AG. He was confirmed last time as DNI.
In your constant blame of Jan 6 on ineffective security you’ve continued to ignore the root cause of the incident. One guy - ONE GUY! - who did his Constitutional duty got in the way to save the Republic.
Trump has no internal guardrails and had few external ones in his first term. In a second he’ll have no and fewer if any.
More gaslighting.....you recognize how much harder things were made by the monopolies, and pointed it out, and told me the FTC did nothing.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 am I did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
Don't care. That's your OPINION, masquerading as fact. You're convinced that because you say something, it's a fact...which is why you ignore anything anyone here posts, and trundle ahead. No thought. No pause. Not an ounce of hubris.
Right. Yet you've now posted dozens of times showing you're clearly outraged to the point where you called the clearly qualified FTC Chair a "DEI hire". Either you are REALLY mad, or you're a racist. Pick one.
Again, you're a Federal contractor, Kram. If you believe this? Stop selling stuff to the .govkramerica.inc wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:40 am You're not allowed to earn anything. It all must flow through govt first. And then you can have the leftover.
That's what the Defund the Police crew says. You're on board with that, Kram?kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:40 am People in this country don't understand that the #1 goal of law enforcement is NOT to protect or serve, but to simply enter people into the judicial system.
Kram.....you're a Federal Contractor. Why do you keep posting this stuff?kramerica.inc wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:40 am Just like they don't understand that the #1 goal of gov't officials/politicians is not to provide basic services or protections, but to take your money to grow the government.
Bzzzt. Wrong. STILL pretending to not pay attention.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:10 am...so many times we're sick of hearing it. You need to find a socialist or communist country to live in, which better suits you.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm
Hey fellow Forumites: how many times have you heard me tell you that these economic policies help the Coastal Liberal Elite?
And how many times have I explained that the economic policies that Old Salt is championing here royally F's TrumpNation, and working class Americans.....triply so in flyover States?
I assumed your earnings was a reference to the Illumina stock.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:20 amYes. Our W-2's & 1099's said "earnings"...much of which we then invested.Typical Lax Dad wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 9:28 amEarned?old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 amI did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.a fan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:42 pm These postings make clear to everyone here: you're a boilerplate 2024 Republican: you don't have an opinion on more or less regulation. All you care about is outcome that favors you and your family.
Which is why on one hand, you complain about monopolies when it hurt your family grocery, and want MORE regulation of monopolies on one hand...while on the other, you want NO regulation for this specific company, because you think the FTC cost you millions.
I don't understand how you don't get how transparent you're being with your motivations.
What you want is a Selfish-Ocracy....you don't care how you get it---more regulation, less regulation----makes no difference to you, you just want more money. And your stunned that no one here wants what you want.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
I also pointed out how ridiculous it is to compare an industry leading Genomics company with an independent family grocery store.
My Motivations ? Selfish-Ocracy ? I don't seek or need more money. I just don't want to get screwed out of what we have earned, cautiously invested & saved. I told you we hope to never have to sell the ILMN stock, or our other stocks. We selected them to buy & hold, long term. We hope to bequeath them to a foundation we plan to establish, to continue our charitable work after we're gone. We maintain a modest, frugal, but comfortable lifestyle & live happily, well within our means...without drawing on our savings or investments.
You're right -- I'm REALLY mad. ...not at the lost money but losing the amount of good things we could have done with it.a fan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:42 amMore gaslighting.....you recognize how much harder things were made by the monopolies, and pointed it out, and told me the FTC did nothing.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 am I did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
You understand just fine. "Force us to go union". Nothing like just making stuff up to try and virtue signal.
Don't care. That's your OPINION, masquerading as fact. You're convinced that because you say something, it's a fact...which is why you ignore anything anyone here posts, and trundle ahead. No thought. No pause. Not an ounce of hubris.
Right. Yet you've now posted dozens of times showing you're clearly outraged to the point where you called the clearly qualified FTC Chair a "DEI hire". Either you are REALLY mad, or you're a racist. Pick one.
And we both know you're not a racist. This is transparently about money. If the value of the stock had remained unchanged? You wouldn't have so much as noticed what the FTC did. Trying to sell the forum on any other motivation is a waste of time. You want more money. Period.
And again.....that's fine. This is America. I wish you and your family all the success in the world.
RISK FACTORSold salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 11:08 amYou're right -- I'm REALLY mad. ...not at the lost money but losing the amount of good things we could have done with it.a fan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:42 amMore gaslighting.....you recognize how much harder things were made by the monopolies, and pointed it out, and told me the FTC did nothing.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 am I did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
You understand just fine. "Force us to go union". Nothing like just making stuff up to try and virtue signal.
Don't care. That's your OPINION, masquerading as fact. You're convinced that because you say something, it's a fact...which is why you ignore anything anyone here posts, and trundle ahead. No thought. No pause. Not an ounce of hubris.
Right. Yet you've now posted dozens of times showing you're clearly outraged to the point where you called the clearly qualified FTC Chair a "DEI hire". Either you are REALLY mad, or you're a racist. Pick one.
And we both know you're not a racist. This is transparently about money. If the value of the stock had remained unchanged? You wouldn't have so much as noticed what the FTC did. Trying to sell the forum on any other motivation is a waste of time. You want more money. Period.
And again.....that's fine. This is America. I wish you and your family all the success in the world.
I'm aware that you should never invest money in stocks that you can't afford to lose. We factored that in when we bought & retained ILMN.
By all metrics, it was a rock solid long term play. No risk factors. No way to anticipate Khan's overreach. It was unprecedented in many ways.
Her hiring & trustbusting is part of a DEI agenda.
"No risk factors". OS, FFS, you're just off the rails on this one. There's no such thing as no risk factors, and you know it. Don't want to tangle with the FTC? Don't invest in businesses than anyone with a pulse can see is, to put it euphemistically, a likely monopoly.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 11:08 amYou're right -- I'm REALLY mad. ...not at the lost money but losing the amount of good things we could have done with it.a fan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 10:42 amMore gaslighting.....you recognize how much harder things were made by the monopolies, and pointed it out, and told me the FTC did nothing.old salt wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2024 6:42 am I did not complain about grocery monolipies. You did on my behalf. I told you how my family copes with it. I didn't complain about it - you did.
The FTC did not protect us & we don't need them to. They'd force us to go union, against the wishes of our employees.
You understand just fine. "Force us to go union". Nothing like just making stuff up to try and virtue signal.
Don't care. That's your OPINION, masquerading as fact. You're convinced that because you say something, it's a fact...which is why you ignore anything anyone here posts, and trundle ahead. No thought. No pause. Not an ounce of hubris.
Right. Yet you've now posted dozens of times showing you're clearly outraged to the point where you called the clearly qualified FTC Chair a "DEI hire". Either you are REALLY mad, or you're a racist. Pick one.
And we both know you're not a racist. This is transparently about money. If the value of the stock had remained unchanged? You wouldn't have so much as noticed what the FTC did. Trying to sell the forum on any other motivation is a waste of time. You want more money. Period.
And again.....that's fine. This is America. I wish you and your family all the success in the world.
I'm aware that you should never invest money in stocks that you can't afford to lose. We factored that in when we bought & retained ILMN.
By all metrics, it was a rock solid long term play. No risk factors. No way to anticipate Khan's overreach. It was unprecedented in many ways.
Her hiring & trustbusting is part of a DEI agenda.